Near-source magnitude scaling of spectral accelerations: analysis and update of Kotha et al. (2020) model
Ground-motion models (GMMs) are often used to predict the random distribution of Spectral accelerations ( SAs ) at a site due to a nearby earthquake. In probabilistic seismic hazard and risk assessment, large earthquakes occurring close to a site are considered as critical scenarios. GMMs are expect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2022-02, Vol.20 (3), p.1343-1370 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Ground-motion models (GMMs) are often used to predict the random distribution of Spectral accelerations (
SAs
) at a site due to a nearby earthquake. In probabilistic seismic hazard and risk assessment, large earthquakes occurring close to a site are considered as critical scenarios. GMMs are expected to predict realistic
SAs
with low within-model uncertainty (
σ
μ
) for such rare scenarios. However, the datasets used to regress GMMs are usually deficient of data from critical scenarios. The (Kotha et al., A Regionally Adaptable Ground-Motion Model for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes in Europe Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18:4091–4125, 2020) GMM developed from the Engineering strong motion (ESM) dataset was found to predict decreasing short-period
SAs
with increasing
M
W
≥
M
h
=
6.2
, and with large
σ
μ
at near-source distances
≤
30
km
. In this study, we updated the parametrisation of the GMM based on analyses of ESM and the Near source strong motion (NESS) datasets. With
M
h
=
5.7
, we could rectify the
M
W
scaling issue, while also reducing
σ
μ
at
M
W
≥
M
h
. We then evaluated the GMM against NESS data, and found that the
SAs
from a few large, thrust-faulting events in California, New Zealand, Japan, and Mexico are significantly higher than GMM median predictions. However, recordings from these events were mostly made on soft-soil geology, and contain anisotropic pulse-like effects. A more thorough non-ergodic treatment of NESS was not possible because most sites sampled unique events in very diverse tectonic environments. We provide an updated set of GMM coefficients,
σ
μ
, and heteroscedastic variance models; while also cautioning against its application for
M
W
≤
4
in low-moderate seismicity regions without evaluating the homogeneity of
M
W
estimates between pan-European ESM and regional datasets. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10518-021-01308-5 |