Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators

Fluidic oscillators are interesting actuators for flow control purposes as they produce unsteady jets without any moving part. Flow separation control in a large scale, for instance on a wing, needs an array of such actuators, whose efficiency can be improved if the pulsed jets are synchronized. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sensors and actuators. A. Physical. 2024-04, Vol.369, p.115165, Article 115165
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Shiqi, Batikh, Ahmad, Baldas, Lucien, Kourta, Azeddine, Mazellier, Nicolas, Colin, Stéphane, Orieux, Stéphane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115165
container_title Sensors and actuators. A. Physical.
container_volume 369
creator Wang, Shiqi
Batikh, Ahmad
Baldas, Lucien
Kourta, Azeddine
Mazellier, Nicolas
Colin, Stéphane
Orieux, Stéphane
description Fluidic oscillators are interesting actuators for flow control purposes as they produce unsteady jets without any moving part. Flow separation control in a large scale, for instance on a wing, needs an array of such actuators, whose efficiency can be improved if the pulsed jets are synchronized. In this paper, two synchronization configurations based on interconnections of the feedback loops have been applied successfully to two bi-stable fluidic oscillators. The first configuration permits to obtain jets pulsating at a similar frequency as the jets produced by the oscillators working separately. The second configuration, which differs by the interconnection pattern, leads to a much lower frequency. Two different phase lags between the jets produced by the two oscillators have also been identified, depending on the interconnection pattern. These experimental results have been completed by a numerical study of the internal flow patterns of the two oscillators for an in-depth analysis of the physical mechanisms controlling the oscillation dynamics. In the first synchronization configuration, the oscillation is shown to be mainly controlled by the back and forth propagation of pressure waves in the oscillators' branches and feedback loops and its frequency can be estimated by the same simple relation as the one used for single oscillators. In the second synchronization configuration, the jet switching time is no more negligible compared to the pressure waves propagation time, leading to more complex oscillation dynamics. [Display omitted] •Two bistable fluidic oscillators synced via two different feedback loop interconnections.•Frequency of synced oscillators and phase lag of produced jets defined by interconnection patterns.•First configuration exhibits internal dynamics of a single oscillator, resulting in similar frequencies.•Second configuration leads to a non-negligible jet switching time and more complex oscillation dynamic.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.sna.2024.115165
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04450402v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0924424724001584</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0924424724001584</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-9ad548da7acb46b45ec63cacce930528226c4f392aa143126faafba4781abd133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAey8ZZHgV15iVVVAkSqxgbU1cZzWUWpHtlsoX09KEEtWI82cO9I9CN1SklJC8_suDRZSRphIKc1onp2hGS0LnnCSV-doRiomEsFEcYmuQugIIZwXxQztlm437CNE4yz0GGyD9eegvdlpG8dFiPvmiF2L41bjcLRq6501Xz_8ePQQ9cbo8EN8ODzs-2DsBnc64rbfm8Yo7IIyfQ_R-XCNLlrog775nXP0_vT4tlwl69fnl-VinSjO8phU0GSibKAAVYu8FplWOVeglK44yVjJWK5EyysGQAWnLG8B2hpEUVKoG8r5HN1Nf7fQy2EsA_4oHRi5WqzlaUeEyIgg7EBHlk6s8i4Er9u_ACXy5FZ2cnQrT27l5HbMPEwZPZY4GO3l2FFbpRvjtYqyceaf9DcEL4SI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Wang, Shiqi ; Batikh, Ahmad ; Baldas, Lucien ; Kourta, Azeddine ; Mazellier, Nicolas ; Colin, Stéphane ; Orieux, Stéphane</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shiqi ; Batikh, Ahmad ; Baldas, Lucien ; Kourta, Azeddine ; Mazellier, Nicolas ; Colin, Stéphane ; Orieux, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><description>Fluidic oscillators are interesting actuators for flow control purposes as they produce unsteady jets without any moving part. Flow separation control in a large scale, for instance on a wing, needs an array of such actuators, whose efficiency can be improved if the pulsed jets are synchronized. In this paper, two synchronization configurations based on interconnections of the feedback loops have been applied successfully to two bi-stable fluidic oscillators. The first configuration permits to obtain jets pulsating at a similar frequency as the jets produced by the oscillators working separately. The second configuration, which differs by the interconnection pattern, leads to a much lower frequency. Two different phase lags between the jets produced by the two oscillators have also been identified, depending on the interconnection pattern. These experimental results have been completed by a numerical study of the internal flow patterns of the two oscillators for an in-depth analysis of the physical mechanisms controlling the oscillation dynamics. In the first synchronization configuration, the oscillation is shown to be mainly controlled by the back and forth propagation of pressure waves in the oscillators' branches and feedback loops and its frequency can be estimated by the same simple relation as the one used for single oscillators. In the second synchronization configuration, the jet switching time is no more negligible compared to the pressure waves propagation time, leading to more complex oscillation dynamics. [Display omitted] •Two bistable fluidic oscillators synced via two different feedback loop interconnections.•Frequency of synced oscillators and phase lag of produced jets defined by interconnection patterns.•First configuration exhibits internal dynamics of a single oscillator, resulting in similar frequencies.•Second configuration leads to a non-negligible jet switching time and more complex oscillation dynamic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-4247</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2024.115165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Active flow control actuator ; Bi-stable fluidic oscillator ; CFD ; Engineering Sciences ; Oscillation dynamics ; Synchronization</subject><ispartof>Sensors and actuators. A. Physical., 2024-04, Vol.369, p.115165, Article 115165</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-9ad548da7acb46b45ec63cacce930528226c4f392aa143126faafba4781abd133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3434-3848 ; 0000-0001-7577-4463 ; 0000-0002-2751-2079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04450402$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batikh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldas, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kourta, Azeddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazellier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orieux, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><title>Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators</title><title>Sensors and actuators. A. Physical.</title><description>Fluidic oscillators are interesting actuators for flow control purposes as they produce unsteady jets without any moving part. Flow separation control in a large scale, for instance on a wing, needs an array of such actuators, whose efficiency can be improved if the pulsed jets are synchronized. In this paper, two synchronization configurations based on interconnections of the feedback loops have been applied successfully to two bi-stable fluidic oscillators. The first configuration permits to obtain jets pulsating at a similar frequency as the jets produced by the oscillators working separately. The second configuration, which differs by the interconnection pattern, leads to a much lower frequency. Two different phase lags between the jets produced by the two oscillators have also been identified, depending on the interconnection pattern. These experimental results have been completed by a numerical study of the internal flow patterns of the two oscillators for an in-depth analysis of the physical mechanisms controlling the oscillation dynamics. In the first synchronization configuration, the oscillation is shown to be mainly controlled by the back and forth propagation of pressure waves in the oscillators' branches and feedback loops and its frequency can be estimated by the same simple relation as the one used for single oscillators. In the second synchronization configuration, the jet switching time is no more negligible compared to the pressure waves propagation time, leading to more complex oscillation dynamics. [Display omitted] •Two bistable fluidic oscillators synced via two different feedback loop interconnections.•Frequency of synced oscillators and phase lag of produced jets defined by interconnection patterns.•First configuration exhibits internal dynamics of a single oscillator, resulting in similar frequencies.•Second configuration leads to a non-negligible jet switching time and more complex oscillation dynamic.</description><subject>Active flow control actuator</subject><subject>Bi-stable fluidic oscillator</subject><subject>CFD</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Oscillation dynamics</subject><subject>Synchronization</subject><issn>0924-4247</issn><issn>1873-3069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwAey8ZZHgV15iVVVAkSqxgbU1cZzWUWpHtlsoX09KEEtWI82cO9I9CN1SklJC8_suDRZSRphIKc1onp2hGS0LnnCSV-doRiomEsFEcYmuQugIIZwXxQztlm437CNE4yz0GGyD9eegvdlpG8dFiPvmiF2L41bjcLRq6501Xz_8ePQQ9cbo8EN8ODzs-2DsBnc64rbfm8Yo7IIyfQ_R-XCNLlrog775nXP0_vT4tlwl69fnl-VinSjO8phU0GSibKAAVYu8FplWOVeglK44yVjJWK5EyysGQAWnLG8B2hpEUVKoG8r5HN1Nf7fQy2EsA_4oHRi5WqzlaUeEyIgg7EBHlk6s8i4Er9u_ACXy5FZ2cnQrT27l5HbMPEwZPZY4GO3l2FFbpRvjtYqyceaf9DcEL4SI</recordid><startdate>20240416</startdate><enddate>20240416</enddate><creator>Wang, Shiqi</creator><creator>Batikh, Ahmad</creator><creator>Baldas, Lucien</creator><creator>Kourta, Azeddine</creator><creator>Mazellier, Nicolas</creator><creator>Colin, Stéphane</creator><creator>Orieux, Stéphane</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-3848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-4463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2751-2079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240416</creationdate><title>Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators</title><author>Wang, Shiqi ; Batikh, Ahmad ; Baldas, Lucien ; Kourta, Azeddine ; Mazellier, Nicolas ; Colin, Stéphane ; Orieux, Stéphane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-9ad548da7acb46b45ec63cacce930528226c4f392aa143126faafba4781abd133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Active flow control actuator</topic><topic>Bi-stable fluidic oscillator</topic><topic>CFD</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Oscillation dynamics</topic><topic>Synchronization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Shiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batikh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldas, Lucien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kourta, Azeddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazellier, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orieux, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Sensors and actuators. A. Physical.</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Shiqi</au><au>Batikh, Ahmad</au><au>Baldas, Lucien</au><au>Kourta, Azeddine</au><au>Mazellier, Nicolas</au><au>Colin, Stéphane</au><au>Orieux, Stéphane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators</atitle><jtitle>Sensors and actuators. A. Physical.</jtitle><date>2024-04-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>369</volume><spage>115165</spage><pages>115165-</pages><artnum>115165</artnum><issn>0924-4247</issn><eissn>1873-3069</eissn><abstract>Fluidic oscillators are interesting actuators for flow control purposes as they produce unsteady jets without any moving part. Flow separation control in a large scale, for instance on a wing, needs an array of such actuators, whose efficiency can be improved if the pulsed jets are synchronized. In this paper, two synchronization configurations based on interconnections of the feedback loops have been applied successfully to two bi-stable fluidic oscillators. The first configuration permits to obtain jets pulsating at a similar frequency as the jets produced by the oscillators working separately. The second configuration, which differs by the interconnection pattern, leads to a much lower frequency. Two different phase lags between the jets produced by the two oscillators have also been identified, depending on the interconnection pattern. These experimental results have been completed by a numerical study of the internal flow patterns of the two oscillators for an in-depth analysis of the physical mechanisms controlling the oscillation dynamics. In the first synchronization configuration, the oscillation is shown to be mainly controlled by the back and forth propagation of pressure waves in the oscillators' branches and feedback loops and its frequency can be estimated by the same simple relation as the one used for single oscillators. In the second synchronization configuration, the jet switching time is no more negligible compared to the pressure waves propagation time, leading to more complex oscillation dynamics. [Display omitted] •Two bistable fluidic oscillators synced via two different feedback loop interconnections.•Frequency of synced oscillators and phase lag of produced jets defined by interconnection patterns.•First configuration exhibits internal dynamics of a single oscillator, resulting in similar frequencies.•Second configuration leads to a non-negligible jet switching time and more complex oscillation dynamic.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.sna.2024.115165</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3434-3848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-4463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2751-2079</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0924-4247
ispartof Sensors and actuators. A. Physical., 2024-04, Vol.369, p.115165, Article 115165
issn 0924-4247
1873-3069
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04450402v1
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Active flow control actuator
Bi-stable fluidic oscillator
CFD
Engineering Sciences
Oscillation dynamics
Synchronization
title Computational and experimental study of the synchronization strategies of two pulsing jet fluidic oscillators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T22%3A35%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20and%20experimental%20study%20of%20the%20synchronization%20strategies%20of%20two%20pulsing%20jet%20fluidic%20oscillators&rft.jtitle=Sensors%20and%20actuators.%20A.%20Physical.&rft.au=Wang,%20Shiqi&rft.date=2024-04-16&rft.volume=369&rft.spage=115165&rft.pages=115165-&rft.artnum=115165&rft.issn=0924-4247&rft.eissn=1873-3069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.sna.2024.115165&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0924424724001584%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0924424724001584&rfr_iscdi=true