Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes
Introduction and hypothesis Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathological condition that may require surgical management. Several surgical treatment options are possible, and practice varies from one center to another. The objective of the present study was to describe the surgical management...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International Urogynecology Journal 2021-04, Vol.32 (4), p.961-966 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 966 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 961 |
container_title | International Urogynecology Journal |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Hendriks, Mathilde Bartolo, Stéphanie Giraudet, Géraldine Cosson, Michel Chazard, Emmanuel |
description | Introduction and hypothesis
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathological condition that may require surgical management. Several surgical treatment options are possible, and practice varies from one center to another. The objective of the present study was to describe the surgical management and outcomes of POP in France from 2008 to 2014.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients operated on for POP from 2008 to 2014, according to the French national hospital discharge summary database. Patient characteristics, surgical approaches, concomitant hysterectomy and/or incontinence surgery, the length of stay, the proportion of day-case operations, and patient outcomes were analyzed.
Results
We analyzed 310,938 hospital stays with POP surgery between 2008 and 2014; 130,908 (42%) of the operations took place in hospitals performing more than 100 prolapse surgical procedures per year. The proportion of day-case operations was low, but rose significantly from 1.2% to 4.6% during the study period. More than half of the operations featured a vaginal approach. The proportions of operations with concomitant hysterectomy or urinary incontinence surgery fell from 41.0% to 36.1% and from 33.0% to 25.8% respectively. The proportions of laparoscopic procedures increased. The mortality rate was stable (0.07% for all years).
Conclusions
The number of patients undergoing POP surgery remained stable from 2008 to 2014. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased (in parallel with the rising proportion of day-case operations) and the proportion of procedures with concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence treatment decreased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04357900v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506944476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-2cd47a61037fcf7de4f6b75ec3848bb1b1586031540d3380ae708aec23932ee73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCC7BAltiAROD6J3HSXTVqaaWRuoG15Tg3M6kSO9jJIB6Ft61DSiux6Ma2jr9zfK1DyDsGXxiA-hoBWMUz4JCBlBXL-AuyYVKITAAXL8kGKqEyIQt-Sl7HeAcAEnJ4RU4FLyuZlg35sz0Yt0fqjxjo1A1IO0enA9I4h31nTU8H48weB3QT9S0dsT92lvqwN46OwfdmjEhrnH4hOsoBSmpckw5MLklXwTiL53Q0U7ckJEfb9Rg_P-WbMYnGHhZxsfp5sn7A-IactKaP-PZhPyM_ri6_b6-z3e23m-3FLrMSqinjtpHKFAyEam2rGpRtUascrShlWdesZnlZgGC5hEaIEgwqKA1aLirBEZU4I5_W3IPp9Ri6wYTf2ptOX1_s9KKBFLmqAI4ssR9XNo38c8Y46aGLFvveOPRz1FxKKArBxBL74T_0zs_BpZ9onkNRSSlVkSi-Ujb4GAO2jxMw0EvJei1Zp5L135I1T6b3D9FzPWDzaPnXagLECsR0ldoNT28_E3sPrv-wZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2506944476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Hendriks, Mathilde ; Bartolo, Stéphanie ; Giraudet, Géraldine ; Cosson, Michel ; Chazard, Emmanuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Mathilde ; Bartolo, Stéphanie ; Giraudet, Géraldine ; Cosson, Michel ; Chazard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and hypothesis
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathological condition that may require surgical management. Several surgical treatment options are possible, and practice varies from one center to another. The objective of the present study was to describe the surgical management and outcomes of POP in France from 2008 to 2014.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients operated on for POP from 2008 to 2014, according to the French national hospital discharge summary database. Patient characteristics, surgical approaches, concomitant hysterectomy and/or incontinence surgery, the length of stay, the proportion of day-case operations, and patient outcomes were analyzed.
Results
We analyzed 310,938 hospital stays with POP surgery between 2008 and 2014; 130,908 (42%) of the operations took place in hospitals performing more than 100 prolapse surgical procedures per year. The proportion of day-case operations was low, but rose significantly from 1.2% to 4.6% during the study period. More than half of the operations featured a vaginal approach. The proportions of operations with concomitant hysterectomy or urinary incontinence surgery fell from 41.0% to 36.1% and from 33.0% to 25.8% respectively. The proportions of laparoscopic procedures increased. The mortality rate was stable (0.07% for all years).
Conclusions
The number of patients undergoing POP surgery remained stable from 2008 to 2014. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased (in parallel with the rising proportion of day-case operations) and the proportion of procedures with concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence treatment decreased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-3462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3023</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32894328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Gynecology ; Hysterectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Life Sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Original Article ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>International Urogynecology Journal, 2021-04, Vol.32 (4), p.961-966</ispartof><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2020</rights><rights>The International Urogynecological Association 2020.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-2cd47a61037fcf7de4f6b75ec3848bb1b1586031540d3380ae708aec23932ee73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-2cd47a61037fcf7de4f6b75ec3848bb1b1586031540d3380ae708aec23932ee73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6186-576X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32894328$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04357900$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartolo, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraudet, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><title>Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes</title><title>International Urogynecology Journal</title><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><description>Introduction and hypothesis
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathological condition that may require surgical management. Several surgical treatment options are possible, and practice varies from one center to another. The objective of the present study was to describe the surgical management and outcomes of POP in France from 2008 to 2014.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients operated on for POP from 2008 to 2014, according to the French national hospital discharge summary database. Patient characteristics, surgical approaches, concomitant hysterectomy and/or incontinence surgery, the length of stay, the proportion of day-case operations, and patient outcomes were analyzed.
Results
We analyzed 310,938 hospital stays with POP surgery between 2008 and 2014; 130,908 (42%) of the operations took place in hospitals performing more than 100 prolapse surgical procedures per year. The proportion of day-case operations was low, but rose significantly from 1.2% to 4.6% during the study period. More than half of the operations featured a vaginal approach. The proportions of operations with concomitant hysterectomy or urinary incontinence surgery fell from 41.0% to 36.1% and from 33.0% to 25.8% respectively. The proportions of laparoscopic procedures increased. The mortality rate was stable (0.07% for all years).
Conclusions
The number of patients undergoing POP surgery remained stable from 2008 to 2014. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased (in parallel with the rising proportion of day-case operations) and the proportion of procedures with concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence treatment decreased.</description><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0937-3462</issn><issn>1433-3023</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS1ERYfCC7BAltiAROD6J3HSXTVqaaWRuoG15Tg3M6kSO9jJIB6Ft61DSiux6Ma2jr9zfK1DyDsGXxiA-hoBWMUz4JCBlBXL-AuyYVKITAAXL8kGKqEyIQt-Sl7HeAcAEnJ4RU4FLyuZlg35sz0Yt0fqjxjo1A1IO0enA9I4h31nTU8H48weB3QT9S0dsT92lvqwN46OwfdmjEhrnH4hOsoBSmpckw5MLklXwTiL53Q0U7ckJEfb9Rg_P-WbMYnGHhZxsfp5sn7A-IactKaP-PZhPyM_ri6_b6-z3e23m-3FLrMSqinjtpHKFAyEam2rGpRtUascrShlWdesZnlZgGC5hEaIEgwqKA1aLirBEZU4I5_W3IPp9Ri6wYTf2ptOX1_s9KKBFLmqAI4ssR9XNo38c8Y46aGLFvveOPRz1FxKKArBxBL74T_0zs_BpZ9onkNRSSlVkSi-Ujb4GAO2jxMw0EvJei1Zp5L135I1T6b3D9FzPWDzaPnXagLECsR0ldoNT28_E3sPrv-wZA</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Hendriks, Mathilde</creator><creator>Bartolo, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Giraudet, Géraldine</creator><creator>Cosson, Michel</creator><creator>Chazard, Emmanuel</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-576X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes</title><author>Hendriks, Mathilde ; Bartolo, Stéphanie ; Giraudet, Géraldine ; Cosson, Michel ; Chazard, Emmanuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-2cd47a61037fcf7de4f6b75ec3848bb1b1586031540d3380ae708aec23932ee73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendriks, Mathilde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartolo, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giraudet, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chazard, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendriks, Mathilde</au><au>Bartolo, Stéphanie</au><au>Giraudet, Géraldine</au><au>Cosson, Michel</au><au>Chazard, Emmanuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes</atitle><jtitle>International Urogynecology Journal</jtitle><stitle>Int Urogynecol J</stitle><addtitle>Int Urogynecol J</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>961</spage><epage>966</epage><pages>961-966</pages><issn>0937-3462</issn><eissn>1433-3023</eissn><abstract>Introduction and hypothesis
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common pathological condition that may require surgical management. Several surgical treatment options are possible, and practice varies from one center to another. The objective of the present study was to describe the surgical management and outcomes of POP in France from 2008 to 2014.
Methods
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all patients operated on for POP from 2008 to 2014, according to the French national hospital discharge summary database. Patient characteristics, surgical approaches, concomitant hysterectomy and/or incontinence surgery, the length of stay, the proportion of day-case operations, and patient outcomes were analyzed.
Results
We analyzed 310,938 hospital stays with POP surgery between 2008 and 2014; 130,908 (42%) of the operations took place in hospitals performing more than 100 prolapse surgical procedures per year. The proportion of day-case operations was low, but rose significantly from 1.2% to 4.6% during the study period. More than half of the operations featured a vaginal approach. The proportions of operations with concomitant hysterectomy or urinary incontinence surgery fell from 41.0% to 36.1% and from 33.0% to 25.8% respectively. The proportions of laparoscopic procedures increased. The mortality rate was stable (0.07% for all years).
Conclusions
The number of patients undergoing POP surgery remained stable from 2008 to 2014. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures increased (in parallel with the rising proportion of day-case operations) and the proportion of procedures with concomitant hysterectomy or incontinence treatment decreased.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>32894328</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-576X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0937-3462 |
ispartof | International Urogynecology Journal, 2021-04, Vol.32 (4), p.961-966 |
issn | 0937-3462 1433-3023 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04357900v1 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Gynecology Hysterectomy Laparoscopy Life Sciences Medicine Medicine & Public Health Original Article Pelvic organ prolapse Surgery Urology |
title | Change over time in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse between 2008 and 2014 in France: patient profiles, surgical approaches, and outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A24%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Change%20over%20time%20in%20the%20surgical%20management%20of%20pelvic%20organ%20prolapse%20between%202008%20and%202014%20in%20France:%20patient%20profiles,%20surgical%20approaches,%20and%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=International%20Urogynecology%20Journal&rft.au=Hendriks,%20Mathilde&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=961&rft.epage=966&rft.pages=961-966&rft.issn=0937-3462&rft.eissn=1433-3023&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00192-020-04491-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2506944476%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506944476&rft_id=info:pmid/32894328&rfr_iscdi=true |