Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland
While Germany is often conceived as the “ideal type” militant democracy, until the emergence of the AfD in 2013, the absence of a successful right-wing populist party made it an exceptional case in Europe. Unlike most former targets of militant democracy, the AfD accepts rules of the liberal democra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) Basingstoke, England), 2023-12, Vol.21 (6), p.761-778 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 761 |
container_title | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Laumond, Bénédicte |
description | While Germany is often conceived as the “ideal type” militant democracy, until the emergence of the AfD in 2013, the absence of a successful right-wing populist party made it an exceptional case in Europe. Unlike most former targets of militant democracy, the AfD accepts rules of the liberal democracy. This raises the central question addressed in the article: How does the emergence of a populist right-wing party affect practices of German militant democracy? I argue that AfD opponents have developed an adapted militancy towards the right-wing populist party. Data on initiatives opposing the AfD between 2013 and 2021 show that AfD opponents use a full range of initiatives spanning both tolerant and intolerant modes of engagement. If the proportion of tolerant initiatives is somewhat unexpected, intolerant responses were progressively introduced. With the help of semi-structured interviews conducted with the authors of initiatives opposing the AfD, I argue that four factors help explain the developments of initiatives against the right-wing populist party: the radicalization of the AfD; the militant democratic legacy in Germany; the distribution of power among AfD opponents; and learning dynamics affecting political actors, public authorities, and civil society groups differently. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04320255v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892163536</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-806e20bceea70239685dae1146096f07d16cbdbc36446b45210f00cf66d8b97d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0BVwFXLqonl6btSgZvMzDgRsFdSNNTp9JJxyQz4M4H0Tdx55v4JGas6M5VwuH7P87hT5JDCicUsvzUC8rKLAXGUwDOZSo3kh2aC0h5Udxvxr_IWSryEraTXe8fARiDDHaS1cQah9q39oGEvkOnQ9tb0vSOhBmS1g5DG87I58vrqNaLgDWZt10btDXPny9vRNuaXKOba0sc-kVvPfroIqMuoLPRt0LSfLw7coHL4M2si4H9ZKvRnceDn3cvubu6vD0fp9Ob68n5aJoanvGQFiCRQWUQdR5vK2WR1RopFRJK2UBeU2mqujJcCiErkTEKDYBppKyLqsxrvpccD96Z7tTCtXPtnlWvWzUeTdV6BoIzYFm2opE9GtiF65-W6IN67JfxgM4rVpSMyriSjBQbKON67x02v1oKat2FGrpQcV_13YVah_gQ8hG2D-j-1P-kvgCfOo-U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892163536</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Laumond, Bénédicte</creator><creatorcontrib>Laumond, Bénédicte</creatorcontrib><description>While Germany is often conceived as the “ideal type” militant democracy, until the emergence of the AfD in 2013, the absence of a successful right-wing populist party made it an exceptional case in Europe. Unlike most former targets of militant democracy, the AfD accepts rules of the liberal democracy. This raises the central question addressed in the article: How does the emergence of a populist right-wing party affect practices of German militant democracy? I argue that AfD opponents have developed an adapted militancy towards the right-wing populist party. Data on initiatives opposing the AfD between 2013 and 2021 show that AfD opponents use a full range of initiatives spanning both tolerant and intolerant modes of engagement. If the proportion of tolerant initiatives is somewhat unexpected, intolerant responses were progressively introduced. With the help of semi-structured interviews conducted with the authors of initiatives opposing the AfD, I argue that four factors help explain the developments of initiatives against the right-wing populist party: the radicalization of the AfD; the militant democratic legacy in Germany; the distribution of power among AfD opponents; and learning dynamics affecting political actors, public authorities, and civil society groups differently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-4790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-388X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Civil society ; Comparative Politics ; Democracy ; European Politics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; International Relations ; Liberal democracy ; Militancy ; Original Article ; Political power ; Political Science ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Populism ; Public Finance ; Radicalism ; Responses ; Right wing politics ; Rules</subject><ispartof>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2023-12, Vol.21 (6), p.761-778</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-806e20bceea70239685dae1146096f07d16cbdbc36446b45210f00cf66d8b97d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-806e20bceea70239685dae1146096f07d16cbdbc36446b45210f00cf66d8b97d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1489-1695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,12824,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04320255$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laumond, Bénédicte</creatorcontrib><title>Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland</title><title>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</title><addtitle>Comp Eur Polit</addtitle><description>While Germany is often conceived as the “ideal type” militant democracy, until the emergence of the AfD in 2013, the absence of a successful right-wing populist party made it an exceptional case in Europe. Unlike most former targets of militant democracy, the AfD accepts rules of the liberal democracy. This raises the central question addressed in the article: How does the emergence of a populist right-wing party affect practices of German militant democracy? I argue that AfD opponents have developed an adapted militancy towards the right-wing populist party. Data on initiatives opposing the AfD between 2013 and 2021 show that AfD opponents use a full range of initiatives spanning both tolerant and intolerant modes of engagement. If the proportion of tolerant initiatives is somewhat unexpected, intolerant responses were progressively introduced. With the help of semi-structured interviews conducted with the authors of initiatives opposing the AfD, I argue that four factors help explain the developments of initiatives against the right-wing populist party: the radicalization of the AfD; the militant democratic legacy in Germany; the distribution of power among AfD opponents; and learning dynamics affecting political actors, public authorities, and civil society groups differently.</description><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Comparative Politics</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>European Politics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Liberal democracy</subject><subject>Militancy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Political power</subject><subject>Political Science</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Public Finance</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Right wing politics</subject><subject>Rules</subject><issn>1472-4790</issn><issn>1740-388X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhosoeH0BVwFXLqonl6btSgZvMzDgRsFdSNNTp9JJxyQz4M4H0Tdx55v4JGas6M5VwuH7P87hT5JDCicUsvzUC8rKLAXGUwDOZSo3kh2aC0h5Udxvxr_IWSryEraTXe8fARiDDHaS1cQah9q39oGEvkOnQ9tb0vSOhBmS1g5DG87I58vrqNaLgDWZt10btDXPny9vRNuaXKOba0sc-kVvPfroIqMuoLPRt0LSfLw7coHL4M2si4H9ZKvRnceDn3cvubu6vD0fp9Ob68n5aJoanvGQFiCRQWUQdR5vK2WR1RopFRJK2UBeU2mqujJcCiErkTEKDYBppKyLqsxrvpccD96Z7tTCtXPtnlWvWzUeTdV6BoIzYFm2opE9GtiF65-W6IN67JfxgM4rVpSMyriSjBQbKON67x02v1oKat2FGrpQcV_13YVah_gQ8hG2D-j-1P-kvgCfOo-U</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Laumond, Bénédicte</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-1695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland</title><author>Laumond, Bénédicte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-806e20bceea70239685dae1146096f07d16cbdbc36446b45210f00cf66d8b97d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Comparative Politics</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>European Politics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Liberal democracy</topic><topic>Militancy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Political power</topic><topic>Political Science</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Public Finance</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Right wing politics</topic><topic>Rules</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laumond, Bénédicte</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laumond, Bénédicte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland</atitle><jtitle>Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)</jtitle><stitle>Comp Eur Polit</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>761-778</pages><issn>1472-4790</issn><eissn>1740-388X</eissn><abstract>While Germany is often conceived as the “ideal type” militant democracy, until the emergence of the AfD in 2013, the absence of a successful right-wing populist party made it an exceptional case in Europe. Unlike most former targets of militant democracy, the AfD accepts rules of the liberal democracy. This raises the central question addressed in the article: How does the emergence of a populist right-wing party affect practices of German militant democracy? I argue that AfD opponents have developed an adapted militancy towards the right-wing populist party. Data on initiatives opposing the AfD between 2013 and 2021 show that AfD opponents use a full range of initiatives spanning both tolerant and intolerant modes of engagement. If the proportion of tolerant initiatives is somewhat unexpected, intolerant responses were progressively introduced. With the help of semi-structured interviews conducted with the authors of initiatives opposing the AfD, I argue that four factors help explain the developments of initiatives against the right-wing populist party: the radicalization of the AfD; the militant democratic legacy in Germany; the distribution of power among AfD opponents; and learning dynamics affecting political actors, public authorities, and civil society groups differently.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1489-1695</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-4790 |
ispartof | Comparative European politics (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2023-12, Vol.21 (6), p.761-778 |
issn | 1472-4790 1740-388X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04320255v1 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Civil society Comparative Politics Democracy European Politics Humanities and Social Sciences International Relations Liberal democracy Militancy Original Article Political power Political Science Political Science and International Relations Political Science and International Studies Populism Public Finance Radicalism Responses Right wing politics Rules |
title | Increasing toleration for the intolerant? “Adapted militancy” and German responses to Alternative für Deutschland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A53%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Increasing%20toleration%20for%20the%20intolerant?%20%E2%80%9CAdapted%20militancy%E2%80%9D%20and%20German%20responses%20to%20Alternative%20f%C3%BCr%20Deutschland&rft.jtitle=Comparative%20European%20politics%20(Houndmills,%20Basingstoke,%20England)&rft.au=Laumond,%20B%C3%A9n%C3%A9dicte&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=761-778&rft.issn=1472-4790&rft.eissn=1740-388X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41295-023-00336-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2892163536%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892163536&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |