Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate

We know little about the determinants and demographic consequences of the marked seasonal mass changes exhibited by many northern and alpine mammals. We analysed 43 years of data on individual winter mass loss (the difference between mass in early June and mass in mid-September the previous year) an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 2018-03, Vol.99 (3), p.724-734
Hauptverfasser: Douhard, Mathieu, Guillemette, Simon, Festa-Bianchet, Marco, Pelletier, Fanie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 734
container_issue 3
container_start_page 724
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 99
creator Douhard, Mathieu
Guillemette, Simon
Festa-Bianchet, Marco
Pelletier, Fanie
description We know little about the determinants and demographic consequences of the marked seasonal mass changes exhibited by many northern and alpine mammals. We analysed 43 years of data on individual winter mass loss (the difference between mass in early June and mass in mid-September the previous year) and summer mass gain (the difference between mass in mid-September and in early June of the same year) in adult bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). We calculated relative seasonal mass change as a proportion of individual body mass at the start of each season. We first examined the effects of weather and population density on relative changes in body mass. We then assessed the consequences of relative seasonal mass changes on reproduction. Mean April–May temperature was the main driver of relative seasonal mass changes: warm springs reduced both relative winter mass loss and summer mass gain of both sexes, likely partially due to a trade-off between growth rate of plants and duration of access to high-quality forage. Because these effects cancelled each other, spring temperature did not influence mass in mid-September. Mothers that lost relatively more mass during the winter had lambs that gained less mass during summer, likely because these females allocated fewer resources to lactation. Winter survival of lambs increased with their summer mass gain. In males, relative mass loss during winter, which includes the rut, did not influence the probability of siring at least one lamb, possibly indicating that greater mating effort did not necessarily translate into greater reproductive success. Our findings improve our understanding of how weather influences recruitment and underline the importance of cryptic mechanisms behind the effects of climate change on demographic traits.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ecy.2141
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04298175v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26624188</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26624188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-1e52fb9d2887307a21fecf2ec07912871da9be9fc9b9062192e29fd61e3ecd863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUGLEzEUx4Mobl0Fv4AS2IseZs1LppO841JXVyh4UA-eQpp5006ZSWrSWem3N6V1FwTfJfDyy4_8-TP2GsQ1CCE_kD9cS6jhCZsBKqwQtHjKZkKArLCZmwv2IuetKAO1ec4uJCrV1LqZsW8fU39PKXMXWt7SGNfJ7Ta95z6GTL8mCp4yjx3P5HIMbuCjy5n7jQvrctGH8pC7YdcH4lNYT4Pb00v2rHNDplfn85L9-HT7fXFXLb9-_rK4WVa-VggV0Fx2K2ylMVoJ7SR05DtJXmgEaTS0DleEnccVikYCSpLYtQ2QIt-aRl2y9yfvxg12l_rRpYONrrd3N0t73IlaogE9v4fCvjuxuxRLqry3Y589DYMLFKdsAQ3OtQFx1F79g27jlEr0bKUQKJVGIx6FPsWcE3UPPwBhj6XYUoo9llLQt2fhtBqpfQD_tlCA6gT87gc6_Fdkbxc_z8I3J36b9zE9-ppG1mCM-gNmj510</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2009237980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Douhard, Mathieu ; Guillemette, Simon ; Festa-Bianchet, Marco ; Pelletier, Fanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Douhard, Mathieu ; Guillemette, Simon ; Festa-Bianchet, Marco ; Pelletier, Fanie</creatorcontrib><description>We know little about the determinants and demographic consequences of the marked seasonal mass changes exhibited by many northern and alpine mammals. We analysed 43 years of data on individual winter mass loss (the difference between mass in early June and mass in mid-September the previous year) and summer mass gain (the difference between mass in mid-September and in early June of the same year) in adult bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). We calculated relative seasonal mass change as a proportion of individual body mass at the start of each season. We first examined the effects of weather and population density on relative changes in body mass. We then assessed the consequences of relative seasonal mass changes on reproduction. Mean April–May temperature was the main driver of relative seasonal mass changes: warm springs reduced both relative winter mass loss and summer mass gain of both sexes, likely partially due to a trade-off between growth rate of plants and duration of access to high-quality forage. Because these effects cancelled each other, spring temperature did not influence mass in mid-September. Mothers that lost relatively more mass during the winter had lambs that gained less mass during summer, likely because these females allocated fewer resources to lactation. Winter survival of lambs increased with their summer mass gain. In males, relative mass loss during winter, which includes the rut, did not influence the probability of siring at least one lamb, possibly indicating that greater mating effort did not necessarily translate into greater reproductive success. Our findings improve our understanding of how weather influences recruitment and underline the importance of cryptic mechanisms behind the effects of climate change on demographic traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2141</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29336476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alpine environments ; Animals ; bighorn sheep ; Body mass ; Breeding success ; capital breeder ; Climate Change ; Climate effects ; Demographics ; Female ; Females ; Growth rate ; Lactation ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Males ; nutrition ; Ovis canadensis ; Population Density ; primary production ; Reproduction ; reproductive allocation ; Seasons ; Sheep ; Summer ; Weather ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2018-03, Vol.99 (3), p.724-734</ispartof><rights>2018 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2018 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2018 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-1e52fb9d2887307a21fecf2ec07912871da9be9fc9b9062192e29fd61e3ecd863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-1e52fb9d2887307a21fecf2ec07912871da9be9fc9b9062192e29fd61e3ecd863</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9422-7270 ; 0000-0002-2352-3379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26624188$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26624188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,803,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29336476$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04298175$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Douhard, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillemette, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa-Bianchet, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Fanie</creatorcontrib><title>Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>We know little about the determinants and demographic consequences of the marked seasonal mass changes exhibited by many northern and alpine mammals. We analysed 43 years of data on individual winter mass loss (the difference between mass in early June and mass in mid-September the previous year) and summer mass gain (the difference between mass in mid-September and in early June of the same year) in adult bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). We calculated relative seasonal mass change as a proportion of individual body mass at the start of each season. We first examined the effects of weather and population density on relative changes in body mass. We then assessed the consequences of relative seasonal mass changes on reproduction. Mean April–May temperature was the main driver of relative seasonal mass changes: warm springs reduced both relative winter mass loss and summer mass gain of both sexes, likely partially due to a trade-off between growth rate of plants and duration of access to high-quality forage. Because these effects cancelled each other, spring temperature did not influence mass in mid-September. Mothers that lost relatively more mass during the winter had lambs that gained less mass during summer, likely because these females allocated fewer resources to lactation. Winter survival of lambs increased with their summer mass gain. In males, relative mass loss during winter, which includes the rut, did not influence the probability of siring at least one lamb, possibly indicating that greater mating effort did not necessarily translate into greater reproductive success. Our findings improve our understanding of how weather influences recruitment and underline the importance of cryptic mechanisms behind the effects of climate change on demographic traits.</description><subject>Alpine environments</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>bighorn sheep</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>capital breeder</subject><subject>Climate Change</subject><subject>Climate effects</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Lactation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>nutrition</subject><subject>Ovis canadensis</subject><subject>Population Density</subject><subject>primary production</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>reproductive allocation</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUGLEzEUx4Mobl0Fv4AS2IseZs1LppO841JXVyh4UA-eQpp5006ZSWrSWem3N6V1FwTfJfDyy4_8-TP2GsQ1CCE_kD9cS6jhCZsBKqwQtHjKZkKArLCZmwv2IuetKAO1ec4uJCrV1LqZsW8fU39PKXMXWt7SGNfJ7Ta95z6GTL8mCp4yjx3P5HIMbuCjy5n7jQvrctGH8pC7YdcH4lNYT4Pb00v2rHNDplfn85L9-HT7fXFXLb9-_rK4WVa-VggV0Fx2K2ylMVoJ7SR05DtJXmgEaTS0DleEnccVikYCSpLYtQ2QIt-aRl2y9yfvxg12l_rRpYONrrd3N0t73IlaogE9v4fCvjuxuxRLqry3Y589DYMLFKdsAQ3OtQFx1F79g27jlEr0bKUQKJVGIx6FPsWcE3UPPwBhj6XYUoo9llLQt2fhtBqpfQD_tlCA6gT87gc6_Fdkbxc_z8I3J36b9zE9-ppG1mCM-gNmj510</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Douhard, Mathieu</creator><creator>Guillemette, Simon</creator><creator>Festa-Bianchet, Marco</creator><creator>Pelletier, Fanie</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-7270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-3379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate</title><author>Douhard, Mathieu ; Guillemette, Simon ; Festa-Bianchet, Marco ; Pelletier, Fanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4391-1e52fb9d2887307a21fecf2ec07912871da9be9fc9b9062192e29fd61e3ecd863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alpine environments</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>bighorn sheep</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>capital breeder</topic><topic>Climate Change</topic><topic>Climate effects</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Lactation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>nutrition</topic><topic>Ovis canadensis</topic><topic>Population Density</topic><topic>primary production</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>reproductive allocation</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Douhard, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guillemette, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festa-Bianchet, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, Fanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Douhard, Mathieu</au><au>Guillemette, Simon</au><au>Festa-Bianchet, Marco</au><au>Pelletier, Fanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>724</spage><epage>734</epage><pages>724-734</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>We know little about the determinants and demographic consequences of the marked seasonal mass changes exhibited by many northern and alpine mammals. We analysed 43 years of data on individual winter mass loss (the difference between mass in early June and mass in mid-September the previous year) and summer mass gain (the difference between mass in mid-September and in early June of the same year) in adult bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). We calculated relative seasonal mass change as a proportion of individual body mass at the start of each season. We first examined the effects of weather and population density on relative changes in body mass. We then assessed the consequences of relative seasonal mass changes on reproduction. Mean April–May temperature was the main driver of relative seasonal mass changes: warm springs reduced both relative winter mass loss and summer mass gain of both sexes, likely partially due to a trade-off between growth rate of plants and duration of access to high-quality forage. Because these effects cancelled each other, spring temperature did not influence mass in mid-September. Mothers that lost relatively more mass during the winter had lambs that gained less mass during summer, likely because these females allocated fewer resources to lactation. Winter survival of lambs increased with their summer mass gain. In males, relative mass loss during winter, which includes the rut, did not influence the probability of siring at least one lamb, possibly indicating that greater mating effort did not necessarily translate into greater reproductive success. Our findings improve our understanding of how weather influences recruitment and underline the importance of cryptic mechanisms behind the effects of climate change on demographic traits.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>29336476</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.2141</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9422-7270</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2352-3379</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 2018-03, Vol.99 (3), p.724-734
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04298175v1
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Alpine environments
Animals
bighorn sheep
Body mass
Breeding success
capital breeder
Climate Change
Climate effects
Demographics
Female
Females
Growth rate
Lactation
Life Sciences
Male
Males
nutrition
Ovis canadensis
Population Density
primary production
Reproduction
reproductive allocation
Seasons
Sheep
Summer
Weather
Winter
title Drivers and demographic consequences of seasonal mass changes in an alpine ungulate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A33%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Drivers%20and%20demographic%20consequences%20of%20seasonal%20mass%20changes%20in%20an%20alpine%20ungulate&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Douhard,%20Mathieu&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=724&rft.epage=734&rft.pages=724-734&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.2141&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E26624188%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2009237980&rft_id=info:pmid/29336476&rft_jstor_id=26624188&rfr_iscdi=true