Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial

Aim The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) assisted by home health care (HHC) services in people with type 2 diabetes unable to manage multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at home on their own. Patients and Methods This was an open l...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-02, Vol.26 (2), p.622-630
Hauptverfasser: Reznik, Yves, Carvalho, Martin, Fendri, Salha, Prevost, Gaetan, Chaillous, Lucy, Riveline, Jean Pierre, Hanaire, Hélène, Dubois, Séverine, Houéto, Patrick, Pasche, Hélène, Mianowska, Beata, Renard, Eric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 630
container_issue 2
container_start_page 622
container_title Diabetes, obesity & metabolism
container_volume 26
creator Reznik, Yves
Carvalho, Martin
Fendri, Salha
Prevost, Gaetan
Chaillous, Lucy
Riveline, Jean Pierre
Hanaire, Hélène
Dubois, Séverine
Houéto, Patrick
Pasche, Hélène
Mianowska, Beata
Renard, Eric
description Aim The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) assisted by home health care (HHC) services in people with type 2 diabetes unable to manage multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at home on their own. Patients and Methods This was an open label, multicentre, randomized, parallel group trial. In total, 30 adults with type 2 diabetes using MDI and requiring nursing support were randomly allocated to AID or kept their usual therapy over a 12‐week period. Both treatments were managed with the support of HHC services. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target glucose range of 70‐180 mg/dl (TIR). Secondary outcomes included other continuous glucose monitoring metrics, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, daily insulin doses, body weight, and of quality of life scores, fear of hypoglycaemia and satisfaction questionnaires. Results Age (69.7 vs. 69.3 years) and HbA1c (9.25 vs. 9.0) did not differ in MDI and AID at baseline. Compared with MDI, AID resulted in a significant increase in TIR by 27.4% [95% CI (15.0‐39.8); p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/dom.15351
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04284019v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2911033252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-2041f0019b9a5b82c1da2ee570222662f2d248e9b7ee8bf5c20353acd22c13b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4AWQJS4gtK09TrLJqVothSItWqSWs-XYs4pXThxshyqceAQeiKfhSfA2pUhI-DK_rG_-8fjPsueMnrJ0zrTrTlnBC_YgO2Z5yReMQ_nwVsOiqikcZU9C2FNKc14tH2dHfFkDoxU_zn5etW60mgzoBovkxsSWxGlAAkQb2WDEQKJHGVGTZiLdaKM5gFoaOxHTh9GaPtU9qmhcH2aH1nVIWpQ2aSU9kjAOg_ORNEkmQrXJLjrSTo03mijrAupf339Y54Zzct0iWW-2Vxdk9ekN8bJP-5lvqUO5Pnpn7aHZG2mfZo920gZ8dldPss_vLq7Xl4vN9v2H9WqzUJwCWwDN2Y5SVje1LJoKFNMSEIslBYCyhB1oyCusmyVi1ewKBZQXXCoNCeVNyU-y17NvK60YvOmkn4STRlyuNuJwR3Oo8jTgK0vsq5kdvPsyYoiiM0GhtbJHNwYBVVWmdHIoEvryH3TvRt-nTQTUjFHOoYC_w5V3IXjc3b-AUXGIX6TvEbfxJ_bFnePYdKjvyT95J-BsBm6Mxen_TuLt9uNs-RtO9Ls1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2911033252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Reznik, Yves ; Carvalho, Martin ; Fendri, Salha ; Prevost, Gaetan ; Chaillous, Lucy ; Riveline, Jean Pierre ; Hanaire, Hélène ; Dubois, Séverine ; Houéto, Patrick ; Pasche, Hélène ; Mianowska, Beata ; Renard, Eric</creator><creatorcontrib>Reznik, Yves ; Carvalho, Martin ; Fendri, Salha ; Prevost, Gaetan ; Chaillous, Lucy ; Riveline, Jean Pierre ; Hanaire, Hélène ; Dubois, Séverine ; Houéto, Patrick ; Pasche, Hélène ; Mianowska, Beata ; Renard, Eric</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) assisted by home health care (HHC) services in people with type 2 diabetes unable to manage multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at home on their own. Patients and Methods This was an open label, multicentre, randomized, parallel group trial. In total, 30 adults with type 2 diabetes using MDI and requiring nursing support were randomly allocated to AID or kept their usual therapy over a 12‐week period. Both treatments were managed with the support of HHC services. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target glucose range of 70‐180 mg/dl (TIR). Secondary outcomes included other continuous glucose monitoring metrics, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, daily insulin doses, body weight, and of quality of life scores, fear of hypoglycaemia and satisfaction questionnaires. Results Age (69.7 vs. 69.3 years) and HbA1c (9.25 vs. 9.0) did not differ in MDI and AID at baseline. Compared with MDI, AID resulted in a significant increase in TIR by 27.4% [95% CI (15.0‐39.8); p &lt; .001], a decrease in time above range by 27.7% and an unchanged time below range of &lt;1%. A between‐group difference in HbA1c was 1.3% favouring AID. Neither severe hypoglycaemia nor ketoacidosis occurred in either group. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with AID was high. Conclusions AID combined with tailored HHC services significantly improved glycaemic control with no safety issues in people with type 2 diabetes previously under an MDI regimen with HHC. AID should be considered a safe option in these people when lacking acceptable glucose control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8902</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/dom.15351</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37921083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: DBlackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>automated insulin delivery ; Body weight ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Endocrinology and metabolism ; Glucose ; Glucose monitoring ; Health care ; Hemoglobin ; Home health care ; Human health and pathology ; hybrid closed loop ; Hypoglycemia ; Insulin ; Ketoacidosis ; Life Sciences ; Quality of life ; type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>Diabetes, obesity &amp; metabolism, 2024-02, Vol.26 (2), p.622-630</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-2041f0019b9a5b82c1da2ee570222662f2d248e9b7ee8bf5c20353acd22c13b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-2041f0019b9a5b82c1da2ee570222662f2d248e9b7ee8bf5c20353acd22c13b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6267-8058 ; 0000-0002-1862-0430 ; 0000-0002-3407-7263 ; 0000-0002-8794-8990</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fdom.15351$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fdom.15351$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37921083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04284019$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reznik, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendri, Salha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Gaetan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaillous, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riveline, Jean Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanaire, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Séverine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houéto, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasche, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mianowska, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renard, Eric</creatorcontrib><title>Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial</title><title>Diabetes, obesity &amp; metabolism</title><addtitle>Diabetes Obes Metab</addtitle><description>Aim The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) assisted by home health care (HHC) services in people with type 2 diabetes unable to manage multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at home on their own. Patients and Methods This was an open label, multicentre, randomized, parallel group trial. In total, 30 adults with type 2 diabetes using MDI and requiring nursing support were randomly allocated to AID or kept their usual therapy over a 12‐week period. Both treatments were managed with the support of HHC services. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target glucose range of 70‐180 mg/dl (TIR). Secondary outcomes included other continuous glucose monitoring metrics, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, daily insulin doses, body weight, and of quality of life scores, fear of hypoglycaemia and satisfaction questionnaires. Results Age (69.7 vs. 69.3 years) and HbA1c (9.25 vs. 9.0) did not differ in MDI and AID at baseline. Compared with MDI, AID resulted in a significant increase in TIR by 27.4% [95% CI (15.0‐39.8); p &lt; .001], a decrease in time above range by 27.7% and an unchanged time below range of &lt;1%. A between‐group difference in HbA1c was 1.3% favouring AID. Neither severe hypoglycaemia nor ketoacidosis occurred in either group. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with AID was high. Conclusions AID combined with tailored HHC services significantly improved glycaemic control with no safety issues in people with type 2 diabetes previously under an MDI regimen with HHC. AID should be considered a safe option in these people when lacking acceptable glucose control.</description><subject>automated insulin delivery</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Endocrinology and metabolism</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Glucose monitoring</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Home health care</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>hybrid closed loop</subject><subject>Hypoglycemia</subject><subject>Insulin</subject><subject>Ketoacidosis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>1462-8902</issn><issn>1463-1326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4AWQJS4gtK09TrLJqVothSItWqSWs-XYs4pXThxshyqceAQeiKfhSfA2pUhI-DK_rG_-8fjPsueMnrJ0zrTrTlnBC_YgO2Z5yReMQ_nwVsOiqikcZU9C2FNKc14tH2dHfFkDoxU_zn5etW60mgzoBovkxsSWxGlAAkQb2WDEQKJHGVGTZiLdaKM5gFoaOxHTh9GaPtU9qmhcH2aH1nVIWpQ2aSU9kjAOg_ORNEkmQrXJLjrSTo03mijrAupf339Y54Zzct0iWW-2Vxdk9ekN8bJP-5lvqUO5Pnpn7aHZG2mfZo920gZ8dldPss_vLq7Xl4vN9v2H9WqzUJwCWwDN2Y5SVje1LJoKFNMSEIslBYCyhB1oyCusmyVi1ewKBZQXXCoNCeVNyU-y17NvK60YvOmkn4STRlyuNuJwR3Oo8jTgK0vsq5kdvPsyYoiiM0GhtbJHNwYBVVWmdHIoEvryH3TvRt-nTQTUjFHOoYC_w5V3IXjc3b-AUXGIX6TvEbfxJ_bFnePYdKjvyT95J-BsBm6Mxen_TuLt9uNs-RtO9Ls1</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Reznik, Yves</creator><creator>Carvalho, Martin</creator><creator>Fendri, Salha</creator><creator>Prevost, Gaetan</creator><creator>Chaillous, Lucy</creator><creator>Riveline, Jean Pierre</creator><creator>Hanaire, Hélène</creator><creator>Dubois, Séverine</creator><creator>Houéto, Patrick</creator><creator>Pasche, Hélène</creator><creator>Mianowska, Beata</creator><creator>Renard, Eric</creator><general>DBlackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-8058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-0430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-7263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-8990</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial</title><author>Reznik, Yves ; Carvalho, Martin ; Fendri, Salha ; Prevost, Gaetan ; Chaillous, Lucy ; Riveline, Jean Pierre ; Hanaire, Hélène ; Dubois, Séverine ; Houéto, Patrick ; Pasche, Hélène ; Mianowska, Beata ; Renard, Eric</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3021-2041f0019b9a5b82c1da2ee570222662f2d248e9b7ee8bf5c20353acd22c13b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>automated insulin delivery</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Endocrinology and metabolism</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Glucose monitoring</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Home health care</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>hybrid closed loop</topic><topic>Hypoglycemia</topic><topic>Insulin</topic><topic>Ketoacidosis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reznik, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fendri, Salha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prevost, Gaetan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaillous, Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riveline, Jean Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanaire, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, Séverine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houéto, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasche, Hélène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mianowska, Beata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renard, Eric</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Diabetes, obesity &amp; metabolism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reznik, Yves</au><au>Carvalho, Martin</au><au>Fendri, Salha</au><au>Prevost, Gaetan</au><au>Chaillous, Lucy</au><au>Riveline, Jean Pierre</au><au>Hanaire, Hélène</au><au>Dubois, Séverine</au><au>Houéto, Patrick</au><au>Pasche, Hélène</au><au>Mianowska, Beata</au><au>Renard, Eric</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes, obesity &amp; metabolism</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Obes Metab</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>622</spage><epage>630</epage><pages>622-630</pages><issn>1462-8902</issn><eissn>1463-1326</eissn><abstract>Aim The study aim was to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of automated insulin delivery (AID) assisted by home health care (HHC) services in people with type 2 diabetes unable to manage multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) at home on their own. Patients and Methods This was an open label, multicentre, randomized, parallel group trial. In total, 30 adults with type 2 diabetes using MDI and requiring nursing support were randomly allocated to AID or kept their usual therapy over a 12‐week period. Both treatments were managed with the support of HHC services. The primary outcome was the percentage time in the target glucose range of 70‐180 mg/dl (TIR). Secondary outcomes included other continuous glucose monitoring metrics, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, daily insulin doses, body weight, and of quality of life scores, fear of hypoglycaemia and satisfaction questionnaires. Results Age (69.7 vs. 69.3 years) and HbA1c (9.25 vs. 9.0) did not differ in MDI and AID at baseline. Compared with MDI, AID resulted in a significant increase in TIR by 27.4% [95% CI (15.0‐39.8); p &lt; .001], a decrease in time above range by 27.7% and an unchanged time below range of &lt;1%. A between‐group difference in HbA1c was 1.3% favouring AID. Neither severe hypoglycaemia nor ketoacidosis occurred in either group. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with AID was high. Conclusions AID combined with tailored HHC services significantly improved glycaemic control with no safety issues in people with type 2 diabetes previously under an MDI regimen with HHC. AID should be considered a safe option in these people when lacking acceptable glucose control.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>DBlackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37921083</pmid><doi>10.1111/dom.15351</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-8058</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1862-0430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3407-7263</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-8990</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-8902
ispartof Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2024-02, Vol.26 (2), p.622-630
issn 1462-8902
1463-1326
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04284019v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects automated insulin delivery
Body weight
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Endocrinology and metabolism
Glucose
Glucose monitoring
Health care
Hemoglobin
Home health care
Human health and pathology
hybrid closed loop
Hypoglycemia
Insulin
Ketoacidosis
Life Sciences
Quality of life
type 2 diabetes
title Should people with type 2 diabetes treated by multiple daily insulin injections with home health care support be switched to hybrid closed‐loop? The CLOSE AP+ randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T01%3A26%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Should%20people%20with%20type%202%20diabetes%20treated%20by%20multiple%20daily%20insulin%20injections%20with%20home%20health%20care%20support%20be%20switched%20to%20hybrid%20closed%E2%80%90loop?%20The%20CLOSE%20AP+%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Diabetes,%20obesity%20&%20metabolism&rft.au=Reznik,%20Yves&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=622&rft.epage=630&rft.pages=622-630&rft.issn=1462-8902&rft.eissn=1463-1326&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/dom.15351&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2911033252%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2911033252&rft_id=info:pmid/37921083&rfr_iscdi=true