Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties
Trophic interactions are often deduced from body size differences, assuming that predators prefer prey smaller than themselves because larger prey are more difficult to subdue. This has mainly been confirmed in aquatic ecosystems, but rarely in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in arthropods. Our g...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of animal ecology 2023-04, Vol.92 (4), p.913-924 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 924 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 913 |
container_title | The Journal of animal ecology |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Van De Walle, Ruben Logghe, Garben Haas, Nina Massol, François Vandegehuchte, Martijn L. Bonte, Dries |
description | Trophic interactions are often deduced from body size differences, assuming that predators prefer prey smaller than themselves because larger prey are more difficult to subdue. This has mainly been confirmed in aquatic ecosystems, but rarely in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in arthropods.
Our goal was to validate whether body size ratios can predict trophic interactions in a terrestrial, plant‐associated arthropod community and whether predator hunting strategy and prey taxonomy could explain additional variation.
We conducted feeding trials with arthropods from marram grass in coastal dunes to test whether two individuals, of the same or different species, would predate each other. From the trial results, we constructed one of the most complete, empirically derived food webs for terrestrial arthropods associated with a single plant species. We contrasted this empirical food web with a theoretical web based on body size ratios, activity period, microhabitat, and expert knowledge.
In our feeding trials, predator–prey interactions were indeed largely size‐based. Moreover, the theoretical and empirically based food webs converged well for both predator and prey species. However, predator hunting strategy, and especially prey taxonomy improved predictions of predation. Well‐defended taxa, such as hard‐bodied beetles, were less frequently consumed than expected based on their body size. For instance, a beetle of average size (measuring 4 mm) is 38% less vulnerable than another average arthropod with the same length.
Body size ratios predict trophic interactions among plant‐associated arthropods fairly well. However, traits such as hunting strategy and anti‐predator defences can explain why certain trophic interactions do not adhere to size‐based rules. Feeding trials can generate insights into multiple traits underlying real‐life trophic interactions among arthropods.
This study is one of the first to investigate trophic interactions in a natural aboveground arthropod community. An accurate depiction of natural food web structure and ecosystem functioning is especially vital to predict the future destabilizing effects of the rapid decline in arthropod numbers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2656.13905 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04273895v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2778976583</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4475-be9ec8f09016f0251876f06b583c5c31c84c900565a929c28eb070f3c4f82a833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCmRuKxAUOacdx_HVcVYWCVu0FzlbiTKhLEgc7u1X463Gasgcu9cGjef7N01iPkHcUzmk6F5QJnheCi3PKNPAXZHNUXpINQEFzJTWcktcx3gOALIC9IqdMKEiy2JBf2zDdBT_6Jmt9uh6wjtkYsHF2wqQF32e1b-Ysuj-YhWpyPmZVwMz1Y_CHhNRz5gbrw-iX1-HnMj1nDbY4RHfA1PoRw-QwviEnbdVFfPtUz8iPz1ffL6_z3e2Xr5fbXW7LUvK8Ro1WtaCBihYKTpVMVdRcMcsto1aVVgNwwStdaFsorEFCy2zZqqJSjJ2RT6vvXdWZMbi-CrPxlTPX251ZNCgLyZTmB5rYjyub1vy9xziZ3kWLXVcN6PfRFFIqLQV_tP3wH3rv92FIP0mUTmsK0CJRFytlg48xYHvcgIJZMjNLQmZJyDxmlibeP_nu6x6bI_8vpASIFXhwHc7P-Zlv25ur1fkviZygDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2795186096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Van De Walle, Ruben ; Logghe, Garben ; Haas, Nina ; Massol, François ; Vandegehuchte, Martijn L. ; Bonte, Dries</creator><creatorcontrib>Van De Walle, Ruben ; Logghe, Garben ; Haas, Nina ; Massol, François ; Vandegehuchte, Martijn L. ; Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><description>Trophic interactions are often deduced from body size differences, assuming that predators prefer prey smaller than themselves because larger prey are more difficult to subdue. This has mainly been confirmed in aquatic ecosystems, but rarely in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in arthropods.
Our goal was to validate whether body size ratios can predict trophic interactions in a terrestrial, plant‐associated arthropod community and whether predator hunting strategy and prey taxonomy could explain additional variation.
We conducted feeding trials with arthropods from marram grass in coastal dunes to test whether two individuals, of the same or different species, would predate each other. From the trial results, we constructed one of the most complete, empirically derived food webs for terrestrial arthropods associated with a single plant species. We contrasted this empirical food web with a theoretical web based on body size ratios, activity period, microhabitat, and expert knowledge.
In our feeding trials, predator–prey interactions were indeed largely size‐based. Moreover, the theoretical and empirically based food webs converged well for both predator and prey species. However, predator hunting strategy, and especially prey taxonomy improved predictions of predation. Well‐defended taxa, such as hard‐bodied beetles, were less frequently consumed than expected based on their body size. For instance, a beetle of average size (measuring 4 mm) is 38% less vulnerable than another average arthropod with the same length.
Body size ratios predict trophic interactions among plant‐associated arthropods fairly well. However, traits such as hunting strategy and anti‐predator defences can explain why certain trophic interactions do not adhere to size‐based rules. Feeding trials can generate insights into multiple traits underlying real‐life trophic interactions among arthropods.
This study is one of the first to investigate trophic interactions in a natural aboveground arthropod community. An accurate depiction of natural food web structure and ecosystem functioning is especially vital to predict the future destabilizing effects of the rapid decline in arthropod numbers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13905</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36807906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Aquatic ecosystems ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Beetles ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Body Size ; Coleoptera ; Dunes ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Sciences ; Feeding trials ; Food Chain ; Food chains ; Food conversion ; Food webs ; Hunting ; hunting strategy ; insects ; invertebrate community ; marram grass dunes ; Microenvironments ; Microhabitats ; Plant communities ; Plant species ; Predation ; Predator-prey interactions ; Predators ; Predatory Behavior ; Prey ; Taxonomy ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; trophic interactions ; Trophic relationships</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2023-04, Vol.92 (4), p.913-924</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4475-be9ec8f09016f0251876f06b583c5c31c84c900565a929c28eb070f3c4f82a833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4475-be9ec8f09016f0251876f06b583c5c31c84c900565a929c28eb070f3c4f82a833</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3320-7505 ; 0000-0003-2330-6734 ; 0000-0003-1283-4654 ; 0000-0001-5519-0153 ; 0000-0003-2000-7982 ; 0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13905$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13905$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04273895$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van De Walle, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logghe, Garben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandegehuchte, Martijn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><title>Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Trophic interactions are often deduced from body size differences, assuming that predators prefer prey smaller than themselves because larger prey are more difficult to subdue. This has mainly been confirmed in aquatic ecosystems, but rarely in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in arthropods.
Our goal was to validate whether body size ratios can predict trophic interactions in a terrestrial, plant‐associated arthropod community and whether predator hunting strategy and prey taxonomy could explain additional variation.
We conducted feeding trials with arthropods from marram grass in coastal dunes to test whether two individuals, of the same or different species, would predate each other. From the trial results, we constructed one of the most complete, empirically derived food webs for terrestrial arthropods associated with a single plant species. We contrasted this empirical food web with a theoretical web based on body size ratios, activity period, microhabitat, and expert knowledge.
In our feeding trials, predator–prey interactions were indeed largely size‐based. Moreover, the theoretical and empirically based food webs converged well for both predator and prey species. However, predator hunting strategy, and especially prey taxonomy improved predictions of predation. Well‐defended taxa, such as hard‐bodied beetles, were less frequently consumed than expected based on their body size. For instance, a beetle of average size (measuring 4 mm) is 38% less vulnerable than another average arthropod with the same length.
Body size ratios predict trophic interactions among plant‐associated arthropods fairly well. However, traits such as hunting strategy and anti‐predator defences can explain why certain trophic interactions do not adhere to size‐based rules. Feeding trials can generate insights into multiple traits underlying real‐life trophic interactions among arthropods.
This study is one of the first to investigate trophic interactions in a natural aboveground arthropod community. An accurate depiction of natural food web structure and ecosystem functioning is especially vital to predict the future destabilizing effects of the rapid decline in arthropod numbers.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aquatic ecosystems</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Body Size</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Dunes</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Feeding trials</subject><subject>Food Chain</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food conversion</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Hunting</subject><subject>hunting strategy</subject><subject>insects</subject><subject>invertebrate community</subject><subject>marram grass dunes</subject><subject>Microenvironments</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>Plant communities</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predator-prey interactions</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>trophic interactions</subject><subject>Trophic relationships</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS1ERZfCmRuKxAUOacdx_HVcVYWCVu0FzlbiTKhLEgc7u1X463Gasgcu9cGjef7N01iPkHcUzmk6F5QJnheCi3PKNPAXZHNUXpINQEFzJTWcktcx3gOALIC9IqdMKEiy2JBf2zDdBT_6Jmt9uh6wjtkYsHF2wqQF32e1b-Ysuj-YhWpyPmZVwMz1Y_CHhNRz5gbrw-iX1-HnMj1nDbY4RHfA1PoRw-QwviEnbdVFfPtUz8iPz1ffL6_z3e2Xr5fbXW7LUvK8Ro1WtaCBihYKTpVMVdRcMcsto1aVVgNwwStdaFsorEFCy2zZqqJSjJ2RT6vvXdWZMbi-CrPxlTPX251ZNCgLyZTmB5rYjyub1vy9xziZ3kWLXVcN6PfRFFIqLQV_tP3wH3rv92FIP0mUTmsK0CJRFytlg48xYHvcgIJZMjNLQmZJyDxmlibeP_nu6x6bI_8vpASIFXhwHc7P-Zlv25ur1fkviZygDQ</recordid><startdate>202304</startdate><enddate>202304</enddate><creator>Van De Walle, Ruben</creator><creator>Logghe, Garben</creator><creator>Haas, Nina</creator><creator>Massol, François</creator><creator>Vandegehuchte, Martijn L.</creator><creator>Bonte, Dries</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-7505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-6734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-4654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-0153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-7982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202304</creationdate><title>Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties</title><author>Van De Walle, Ruben ; Logghe, Garben ; Haas, Nina ; Massol, François ; Vandegehuchte, Martijn L. ; Bonte, Dries</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4475-be9ec8f09016f0251876f06b583c5c31c84c900565a929c28eb070f3c4f82a833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aquatic ecosystems</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Body Size</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Dunes</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Feeding trials</topic><topic>Food Chain</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food conversion</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Hunting</topic><topic>hunting strategy</topic><topic>insects</topic><topic>invertebrate community</topic><topic>marram grass dunes</topic><topic>Microenvironments</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>Plant communities</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predator-prey interactions</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>trophic interactions</topic><topic>Trophic relationships</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van De Walle, Ruben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logghe, Garben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vandegehuchte, Martijn L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van De Walle, Ruben</au><au>Logghe, Garben</au><au>Haas, Nina</au><au>Massol, François</au><au>Vandegehuchte, Martijn L.</au><au>Bonte, Dries</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2023-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>913</spage><epage>924</epage><pages>913-924</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><abstract>Trophic interactions are often deduced from body size differences, assuming that predators prefer prey smaller than themselves because larger prey are more difficult to subdue. This has mainly been confirmed in aquatic ecosystems, but rarely in terrestrial ecosystems, especially in arthropods.
Our goal was to validate whether body size ratios can predict trophic interactions in a terrestrial, plant‐associated arthropod community and whether predator hunting strategy and prey taxonomy could explain additional variation.
We conducted feeding trials with arthropods from marram grass in coastal dunes to test whether two individuals, of the same or different species, would predate each other. From the trial results, we constructed one of the most complete, empirically derived food webs for terrestrial arthropods associated with a single plant species. We contrasted this empirical food web with a theoretical web based on body size ratios, activity period, microhabitat, and expert knowledge.
In our feeding trials, predator–prey interactions were indeed largely size‐based. Moreover, the theoretical and empirically based food webs converged well for both predator and prey species. However, predator hunting strategy, and especially prey taxonomy improved predictions of predation. Well‐defended taxa, such as hard‐bodied beetles, were less frequently consumed than expected based on their body size. For instance, a beetle of average size (measuring 4 mm) is 38% less vulnerable than another average arthropod with the same length.
Body size ratios predict trophic interactions among plant‐associated arthropods fairly well. However, traits such as hunting strategy and anti‐predator defences can explain why certain trophic interactions do not adhere to size‐based rules. Feeding trials can generate insights into multiple traits underlying real‐life trophic interactions among arthropods.
This study is one of the first to investigate trophic interactions in a natural aboveground arthropod community. An accurate depiction of natural food web structure and ecosystem functioning is especially vital to predict the future destabilizing effects of the rapid decline in arthropod numbers.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>36807906</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.13905</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-7505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-6734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-4654</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5519-0153</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2000-7982</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8790 |
ispartof | The Journal of animal ecology, 2023-04, Vol.92 (4), p.913-924 |
issn | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04273895v1 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Aquatic ecosystems Arthropoda Arthropods Beetles Biodiversity and Ecology Body Size Coleoptera Dunes Ecosystem Ecosystems Environmental Sciences Feeding trials Food Chain Food chains Food conversion Food webs Hunting hunting strategy insects invertebrate community marram grass dunes Microenvironments Microhabitats Plant communities Plant species Predation Predator-prey interactions Predators Predatory Behavior Prey Taxonomy Terrestrial ecosystems trophic interactions Trophic relationships |
title | Arthropod food webs predicted from body size ratios are improved by incorporating prey defensive properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T00%3A06%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Arthropod%20food%20webs%20predicted%20from%20body%20size%20ratios%20are%20improved%20by%20incorporating%20prey%20defensive%20properties&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Van%C2%A0De%C2%A0Walle,%20Ruben&rft.date=2023-04&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=913&rft.epage=924&rft.pages=913-924&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13905&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2778976583%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2795186096&rft_id=info:pmid/36807906&rfr_iscdi=true |