Inherent and probabilistic naturalness

Standard accounts hold that regularities of behavior must be arbitrary to constitute a convention. Yet, there is growing consensus that conventionality is a graded phenomenon, and that conventions can be more or less natural. I develop an account of natural conventions that distinguishes two basic d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical studies 2024-03, Vol.181 (2-3), p.369-385
1. Verfasser: Gasparri, Luca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 385
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 369
container_title Philosophical studies
container_volume 181
creator Gasparri, Luca
description Standard accounts hold that regularities of behavior must be arbitrary to constitute a convention. Yet, there is growing consensus that conventionality is a graded phenomenon, and that conventions can be more or less natural. I develop an account of natural conventions that distinguishes two basic dimensions of conventional naturalness: a probabilistic dimension and an inherent one. A convention is probabilistically natural if it is likely to emerge in a population of agents, and inherently natural if its content is a regularity that scores high on relevant measures for naturalness. I motivate the proposal on conceptual grounds and then showcase its descriptive benefits by discussing two case studies in language: the tendency towards word-length optimality and the prevalence of shape opacity in spoken language vocabularies.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04268871v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04268871v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-c212427a8c75682e1ee9b03b7062941a36ffae97c042e4cef0e28eb82702bfbe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK6-gKeeBA_VmaRN0uOyqLtQ8KLnkNSp26WmS9KV9e3NWvHoYWZI-L-B-Ri7RrhDAHUfEaHSOXCRChTkhxM2w1Klp9bilM0ABOYaUZ6zixi3ACCrspixm7XfUCA_Zta_ZbswOOu6votj12Tejvtge08xXrKz1vaRrn7nnL0-PrwsV3n9_LReLuq84UqOqSMvuLK6UaXUnJCociCcAsmrAq2QbWupUg0UnIqGWiCuyWmugLvWkZiz22nvxvZmF7oPG77MYDuzWtTm-JdAqbXCT0xZPmWbMMQYqP0DEMzRipmsmGTF_FgxhwSJCYop7N8pmO2wDz7d9B_1DVUMZHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inherent and probabilistic naturalness</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Gasparri, Luca</creator><creatorcontrib>Gasparri, Luca</creatorcontrib><description>Standard accounts hold that regularities of behavior must be arbitrary to constitute a convention. Yet, there is growing consensus that conventionality is a graded phenomenon, and that conventions can be more or less natural. I develop an account of natural conventions that distinguishes two basic dimensions of conventional naturalness: a probabilistic dimension and an inherent one. A convention is probabilistically natural if it is likely to emerge in a population of agents, and inherently natural if its content is a regularity that scores high on relevant measures for naturalness. I motivate the proposal on conceptual grounds and then showcase its descriptive benefits by discussing two case studies in language: the tendency towards word-length optimality and the prevalence of shape opacity in spoken language vocabularies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8116</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Epistemology ; Ethics ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Metaphysics ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Mind</subject><ispartof>Philosophical studies, 2024-03, Vol.181 (2-3), p.369-385</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-c212427a8c75682e1ee9b03b7062941a36ffae97c042e4cef0e28eb82702bfbe3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0270-9262</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04268871$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gasparri, Luca</creatorcontrib><title>Inherent and probabilistic naturalness</title><title>Philosophical studies</title><addtitle>Philos Stud</addtitle><description>Standard accounts hold that regularities of behavior must be arbitrary to constitute a convention. Yet, there is growing consensus that conventionality is a graded phenomenon, and that conventions can be more or less natural. I develop an account of natural conventions that distinguishes two basic dimensions of conventional naturalness: a probabilistic dimension and an inherent one. A convention is probabilistically natural if it is likely to emerge in a population of agents, and inherently natural if its content is a regularity that scores high on relevant measures for naturalness. I motivate the proposal on conceptual grounds and then showcase its descriptive benefits by discussing two case studies in language: the tendency towards word-length optimality and the prevalence of shape opacity in spoken language vocabularies.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Mind</subject><issn>0031-8116</issn><issn>1573-0883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKxDAQhoMouK6-gKeeBA_VmaRN0uOyqLtQ8KLnkNSp26WmS9KV9e3NWvHoYWZI-L-B-Ri7RrhDAHUfEaHSOXCRChTkhxM2w1Klp9bilM0ABOYaUZ6zixi3ACCrspixm7XfUCA_Zta_ZbswOOu6votj12Tejvtge08xXrKz1vaRrn7nnL0-PrwsV3n9_LReLuq84UqOqSMvuLK6UaXUnJCociCcAsmrAq2QbWupUg0UnIqGWiCuyWmugLvWkZiz22nvxvZmF7oPG77MYDuzWtTm-JdAqbXCT0xZPmWbMMQYqP0DEMzRipmsmGTF_FgxhwSJCYop7N8pmO2wDz7d9B_1DVUMZHc</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Gasparri, Luca</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-9262</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Inherent and probabilistic naturalness</title><author>Gasparri, Luca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-c212427a8c75682e1ee9b03b7062941a36ffae97c042e4cef0e28eb82702bfbe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Mind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gasparri, Luca</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gasparri, Luca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inherent and probabilistic naturalness</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical studies</jtitle><stitle>Philos Stud</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>369</spage><epage>385</epage><pages>369-385</pages><issn>0031-8116</issn><eissn>1573-0883</eissn><abstract>Standard accounts hold that regularities of behavior must be arbitrary to constitute a convention. Yet, there is growing consensus that conventionality is a graded phenomenon, and that conventions can be more or less natural. I develop an account of natural conventions that distinguishes two basic dimensions of conventional naturalness: a probabilistic dimension and an inherent one. A convention is probabilistically natural if it is likely to emerge in a population of agents, and inherently natural if its content is a regularity that scores high on relevant measures for naturalness. I motivate the proposal on conceptual grounds and then showcase its descriptive benefits by discussing two case studies in language: the tendency towards word-length optimality and the prevalence of shape opacity in spoken language vocabularies.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-9262</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8116
ispartof Philosophical studies, 2024-03, Vol.181 (2-3), p.369-385
issn 0031-8116
1573-0883
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04268871v1
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Education
Epistemology
Ethics
Humanities and Social Sciences
Metaphysics
Philosophy
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Mind
title Inherent and probabilistic naturalness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A46%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inherent%20and%20probabilistic%20naturalness&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20studies&rft.au=Gasparri,%20Luca&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=369&rft.epage=385&rft.pages=369-385&rft.issn=0031-8116&rft.eissn=1573-0883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11098-023-02070-x&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04268871v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true