Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks
The use of force platforms limits the study of human movement in the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments minimise a cost function, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, to distribute the overall force over the contact surfaces. The detecti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomechanical engineering 2024-01, Vol.146 (1), p.1-9 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Journal of biomechanical engineering |
| container_volume | 146 |
| creator | Morin, Pauline Muller, Antoine Dumont, Georges Pontonnier, Charles |
| description | The use of force platforms limits the study of human movement in the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments minimise a cost function, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, to distribute the overall force over the contact surfaces. The detection of the contact surfaces is dependent on parameter settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate two contact surface detection methods: one based on foot kinematics and the other based on pressure insoles data. Optimal parameters were identified for both methods on sidestep cuts, runs and walks. Contact can be detected on the basis of a position threshold or of a velocity threshold. Using pressure insoles data to detect contact gives a better estimate of the position of the centre of pressure. The two contact detection methods demonstrated comparable accuracy in terms of estimating the external forces. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.4064034 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04256186v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2888035065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-a67139a2fa65e601d3295f092c9375ac349a39fe9a8d751d062fd868db5586a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgTtCPlKJFE_8EftYpZ_SVpVKEUdrmjg0JYkX2wFx5J_jbZb2ZGneZx6N_BLyDtgRAMjPcCSYEoyLF2QFstSFNhJekhUDoQtWcdgj-zE-MAagBXtN9nhlBAcmVuRv7ccNhj76ifqO3v72tPZTwibRE5dck_ocXLl079tIOx_oefDz1NIbh0t25kPjIsU8u_KjmxI9jakf8TE8mUM_fadf-tbF5Da0nlP8RG_maVn4hsOP-Ia86nCI7u3uPSBfz05v64tifX1-WR-vC-RcpgJVBdxg2aGSTjFoeWlkx0zZGF5JbLgwyE3nDOq2ktAyVXatVrq9k1IrVPyAHC7eexzsJuQTwx_rsbcXx2u7nTFRSgVa_YLMflzYTfA_53y7HfvYuGHAyfk52lJrzbhkSj5rm-BjDK57cgOz23Ys2F07mf2w0853o2ufyP91ZOD9AmAcnX3wc5jyl2RNxbb7_wDy5ZGW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888035065</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Morin, Pauline ; Muller, Antoine ; Dumont, Georges ; Pontonnier, Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Morin, Pauline ; Muller, Antoine ; Dumont, Georges ; Pontonnier, Charles</creatorcontrib><description>The use of force platforms limits the study of human movement in the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments minimise a cost function, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, to distribute the overall force over the contact surfaces. The detection of the contact surfaces is dependent on parameter settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate two contact surface detection methods: one based on foot kinematics and the other based on pressure insoles data. Optimal parameters were identified for both methods on sidestep cuts, runs and walks. Contact can be detected on the basis of a position threshold or of a velocity threshold. Using pressure insoles data to detect contact gives a better estimate of the position of the centre of pressure. The two contact detection methods demonstrated comparable accuracy in terms of estimating the external forces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8951</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.4064034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37943104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Mechanical Engineers</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Biomechanics ; Engineering Sciences ; Foot ; Gait ; Humans ; Mechanical Phenomena ; Mechanics ; Running ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024-01, Vol.146 (1), p.1-9</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by ASME.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-a67139a2fa65e601d3295f092c9375ac349a39fe9a8d751d062fd868db5586a63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1140-3772 ; 0000-0002-0709-0921 ; 0000-0003-2606-1429</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,38520</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37943104$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://inria.hal.science/hal-04256186$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morin, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontonnier, Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks</title><title>Journal of biomechanical engineering</title><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><description>The use of force platforms limits the study of human movement in the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments minimise a cost function, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, to distribute the overall force over the contact surfaces. The detection of the contact surfaces is dependent on parameter settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate two contact surface detection methods: one based on foot kinematics and the other based on pressure insoles data. Optimal parameters were identified for both methods on sidestep cuts, runs and walks. Contact can be detected on the basis of a position threshold or of a velocity threshold. Using pressure insoles data to detect contact gives a better estimate of the position of the centre of pressure. The two contact detection methods demonstrated comparable accuracy in terms of estimating the external forces.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biomechanics</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Foot</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0148-0731</issn><issn>1528-8951</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCgTtCPlKJFE_8EftYpZ_SVpVKEUdrmjg0JYkX2wFx5J_jbZb2ZGneZx6N_BLyDtgRAMjPcCSYEoyLF2QFstSFNhJekhUDoQtWcdgj-zE-MAagBXtN9nhlBAcmVuRv7ccNhj76ifqO3v72tPZTwibRE5dck_ocXLl079tIOx_oefDz1NIbh0t25kPjIsU8u_KjmxI9jakf8TE8mUM_fadf-tbF5Da0nlP8RG_maVn4hsOP-Ia86nCI7u3uPSBfz05v64tifX1-WR-vC-RcpgJVBdxg2aGSTjFoeWlkx0zZGF5JbLgwyE3nDOq2ktAyVXatVrq9k1IrVPyAHC7eexzsJuQTwx_rsbcXx2u7nTFRSgVa_YLMflzYTfA_53y7HfvYuGHAyfk52lJrzbhkSj5rm-BjDK57cgOz23Ys2F07mf2w0853o2ufyP91ZOD9AmAcnX3wc5jyl2RNxbb7_wDy5ZGW</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Morin, Pauline</creator><creator>Muller, Antoine</creator><creator>Dumont, Georges</creator><creator>Pontonnier, Charles</creator><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-3772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-0921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-1429</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks</title><author>Morin, Pauline ; Muller, Antoine ; Dumont, Georges ; Pontonnier, Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a335t-a67139a2fa65e601d3295f092c9375ac349a39fe9a8d751d062fd868db5586a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biomechanics</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Foot</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morin, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Georges</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pontonnier, Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morin, Pauline</au><au>Muller, Antoine</au><au>Dumont, Georges</au><au>Pontonnier, Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomechanical engineering</jtitle><stitle>J Biomech Eng</stitle><addtitle>J Biomech Eng</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>1-9</pages><issn>0148-0731</issn><eissn>1528-8951</eissn><abstract>The use of force platforms limits the study of human movement in the laboratory. Promising methods for estimating ground reaction forces and moments minimise a cost function, constrained by the subject's dynamic equilibrium, to distribute the overall force over the contact surfaces. The detection of the contact surfaces is dependent on parameter settings. The aim of this study was to evaluate two contact surface detection methods: one based on foot kinematics and the other based on pressure insoles data. Optimal parameters were identified for both methods on sidestep cuts, runs and walks. Contact can be detected on the basis of a position threshold or of a velocity threshold. Using pressure insoles data to detect contact gives a better estimate of the position of the centre of pressure. The two contact detection methods demonstrated comparable accuracy in terms of estimating the external forces.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</pub><pmid>37943104</pmid><doi>10.1115/1.4064034</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1140-3772</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0709-0921</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2606-1429</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0148-0731 |
| ispartof | Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024-01, Vol.146 (1), p.1-9 |
| issn | 0148-0731 1528-8951 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04256186v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; ASME Transactions Journals (Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Biomechanics Engineering Sciences Foot Gait Humans Mechanical Phenomena Mechanics Running Walking |
| title | Comparison of Two Contact Detection Methods for Ground Reaction Forces and Moment Estimation During Sidestep Cuts, Runs and Walks |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A06%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Contact%20Detection%20Methods%20for%20Ground%20Reaction%20Forces%20and%20Moment%20Estimation%20During%20Sidestep%20Cuts,%20Runs%20and%20Walks&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomechanical%20engineering&rft.au=Morin,%20Pauline&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=1-9&rft.issn=0148-0731&rft.eissn=1528-8951&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.4064034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2888035065%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888035065&rft_id=info:pmid/37943104&rfr_iscdi=true |