Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts
Many animals respond to and use social cues emitted by other species (e.g., head direction). In the context of human-animal communication, these capacities have been attributed to regular and longstanding exposure to humans. We presented wild brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) with t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) 2023-08, Vol.137 (3), p.167-177 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 177 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Journal of comparative psychology (1983) |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Danel, Samara Rebout, Nancy Pinto, Laura Carette, Pierre Bonadonna, Francesco Biro, Dora |
description | Many animals respond to and use social cues emitted by other species (e.g., head direction). In the context of human-animal communication, these capacities have been attributed to regular and longstanding exposure to humans. We presented wild brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) with two versions of an object-choice paradigm. In the cooperative version (Experiment 1), one human experimenter provided a simple and salient cue indicating which of two containers covered a food reward. The cues administered consisted of touching, looking at, pointing at, or pointing and looking at the container hiding food. In Experiment 1, skuas could thus cooperate with an experimenter by using the cues provided to locate the rewarded container. In the competitive version (Experiment 2), two human experimenters presented a platform with a visible food reward. In six experimental conditions, we varied experimenters' body orientation, head orientation, eye-gaze direction, face occlusion, and mouth occlusion, as well as the platform's location, ensuring that in each case only one experimenter had visual access to the rewarded platform. Here, birds could compete with the experimenters by robbing the human who does not see the food. Skuas failed to use human-given cues spontaneously in Experiment 1, and took the reward regardless of whether the experimenters could see in Experiment 2. Our results contrast with those obtained on other wild birds with pre-experience with humans. Hopefully, our findings will stimulate further research in order to illuminate the potential role of such experience in the capacity to respond to and use human-given cues. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/com0000345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04248599v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2857935593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-f0ad94cd09850ca66ab93c7ce340892040f0d66fbf586a16aebe35a307e42d883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhkOp0O3qTX9BoDe1OJpMJl-XslhXWBDcFi_D2Uymxs5OpklGFP-8WbfYO8_N4bw85xuhL5ScUsLkmQ1bUow1_AOaUc10VRMlP6IZkYxXkjDxCX1O6b4wgjZyhp5vXBrDkFzCocO3vm_x-s8ECX9bQL6DCDYDhiFDtNlbwCmNp7gPw7Bx8bc_xjng5bSFAS-mUsIXH8LoImT_4EpeW-Lt6LJ_jdfBeuiLNGT3mNMhOuigT-7on5-jXz8ufi6W1er68mpxvqqAKZGrjkCrG9sSrTixIARsNLPSOtYQpWvSkI60QnSbjisBVIDbOMaBEemaulWKzdHxvu4d9GaMfgvxyQTwZnm-MjuNNHWjuNYPtLBf9-wYw9-yUjb3YYpDGc_USlCleF3z9ykuNeNcs0J931M2hpSi696aU2J27zL_31Xgkz0MI5gxPVmI5eC9S3aK0Q15xxpacpihQrIX-CiWrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857935593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Danel, Samara ; Rebout, Nancy ; Pinto, Laura ; Carette, Pierre ; Bonadonna, Francesco ; Biro, Dora</creator><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M ; Beran, Michael</contributor><creatorcontrib>Danel, Samara ; Rebout, Nancy ; Pinto, Laura ; Carette, Pierre ; Bonadonna, Francesco ; Biro, Dora ; Fragaszy, Dorothy M ; Beran, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Many animals respond to and use social cues emitted by other species (e.g., head direction). In the context of human-animal communication, these capacities have been attributed to regular and longstanding exposure to humans. We presented wild brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) with two versions of an object-choice paradigm. In the cooperative version (Experiment 1), one human experimenter provided a simple and salient cue indicating which of two containers covered a food reward. The cues administered consisted of touching, looking at, pointing at, or pointing and looking at the container hiding food. In Experiment 1, skuas could thus cooperate with an experimenter by using the cues provided to locate the rewarded container. In the competitive version (Experiment 2), two human experimenters presented a platform with a visible food reward. In six experimental conditions, we varied experimenters' body orientation, head orientation, eye-gaze direction, face occlusion, and mouth occlusion, as well as the platform's location, ensuring that in each case only one experimenter had visual access to the rewarded platform. Here, birds could compete with the experimenters by robbing the human who does not see the food. Skuas failed to use human-given cues spontaneously in Experiment 1, and took the reward regardless of whether the experimenters could see in Experiment 2. Our results contrast with those obtained on other wild birds with pre-experience with humans. Hopefully, our findings will stimulate further research in order to illuminate the potential role of such experience in the capacity to respond to and use human-given cues.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-7036</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/com0000345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Animal ; Animal behavior ; Animal biology ; Animal Communication ; Birds ; Cognitive science ; Cues ; Ecology, environment ; Experimenters ; Female ; Food ; Human ; Interspecies Interaction ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Symbiosis ; Task ; Vertebrate Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2023-08, Vol.137 (3), p.167-177</ispartof><rights>2023 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Aug 2023</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-2702-5801</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04248599$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</contributor><contributor>Beran, Michael</contributor><creatorcontrib>Danel, Samara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebout, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carette, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonadonna, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Dora</creatorcontrib><title>Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts</title><title>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</title><description>Many animals respond to and use social cues emitted by other species (e.g., head direction). In the context of human-animal communication, these capacities have been attributed to regular and longstanding exposure to humans. We presented wild brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) with two versions of an object-choice paradigm. In the cooperative version (Experiment 1), one human experimenter provided a simple and salient cue indicating which of two containers covered a food reward. The cues administered consisted of touching, looking at, pointing at, or pointing and looking at the container hiding food. In Experiment 1, skuas could thus cooperate with an experimenter by using the cues provided to locate the rewarded container. In the competitive version (Experiment 2), two human experimenters presented a platform with a visible food reward. In six experimental conditions, we varied experimenters' body orientation, head orientation, eye-gaze direction, face occlusion, and mouth occlusion, as well as the platform's location, ensuring that in each case only one experimenter had visual access to the rewarded platform. Here, birds could compete with the experimenters by robbing the human who does not see the food. Skuas failed to use human-given cues spontaneously in Experiment 1, and took the reward regardless of whether the experimenters could see in Experiment 2. Our results contrast with those obtained on other wild birds with pre-experience with humans. Hopefully, our findings will stimulate further research in order to illuminate the potential role of such experience in the capacity to respond to and use human-given cues.</description><subject>Animal</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal biology</subject><subject>Animal Communication</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Ecology, environment</subject><subject>Experimenters</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Interspecies Interaction</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Symbiosis</subject><subject>Task</subject><subject>Vertebrate Zoology</subject><issn>0735-7036</issn><issn>1939-2087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kV1LHDEUhkOp0O3qTX9BoDe1OJpMJl-XslhXWBDcFi_D2Uymxs5OpklGFP-8WbfYO8_N4bw85xuhL5ScUsLkmQ1bUow1_AOaUc10VRMlP6IZkYxXkjDxCX1O6b4wgjZyhp5vXBrDkFzCocO3vm_x-s8ECX9bQL6DCDYDhiFDtNlbwCmNp7gPw7Bx8bc_xjng5bSFAS-mUsIXH8LoImT_4EpeW-Lt6LJ_jdfBeuiLNGT3mNMhOuigT-7on5-jXz8ufi6W1er68mpxvqqAKZGrjkCrG9sSrTixIARsNLPSOtYQpWvSkI60QnSbjisBVIDbOMaBEemaulWKzdHxvu4d9GaMfgvxyQTwZnm-MjuNNHWjuNYPtLBf9-wYw9-yUjb3YYpDGc_USlCleF3z9ykuNeNcs0J931M2hpSi696aU2J27zL_31Xgkz0MI5gxPVmI5eC9S3aK0Q15xxpacpihQrIX-CiWrA</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Danel, Samara</creator><creator>Rebout, Nancy</creator><creator>Pinto, Laura</creator><creator>Carette, Pierre</creator><creator>Bonadonna, Francesco</creator><creator>Biro, Dora</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-5801</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts</title><author>Danel, Samara ; Rebout, Nancy ; Pinto, Laura ; Carette, Pierre ; Bonadonna, Francesco ; Biro, Dora</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-f0ad94cd09850ca66ab93c7ce340892040f0d66fbf586a16aebe35a307e42d883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal biology</topic><topic>Animal Communication</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Ecology, environment</topic><topic>Experimenters</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Interspecies Interaction</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Symbiosis</topic><topic>Task</topic><topic>Vertebrate Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Danel, Samara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rebout, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carette, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonadonna, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biro, Dora</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Danel, Samara</au><au>Rebout, Nancy</au><au>Pinto, Laura</au><au>Carette, Pierre</au><au>Bonadonna, Francesco</au><au>Biro, Dora</au><au>Fragaszy, Dorothy M</au><au>Beran, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of comparative psychology (1983)</jtitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>167-177</pages><issn>0735-7036</issn><eissn>1939-2087</eissn><abstract>Many animals respond to and use social cues emitted by other species (e.g., head direction). In the context of human-animal communication, these capacities have been attributed to regular and longstanding exposure to humans. We presented wild brown skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) with two versions of an object-choice paradigm. In the cooperative version (Experiment 1), one human experimenter provided a simple and salient cue indicating which of two containers covered a food reward. The cues administered consisted of touching, looking at, pointing at, or pointing and looking at the container hiding food. In Experiment 1, skuas could thus cooperate with an experimenter by using the cues provided to locate the rewarded container. In the competitive version (Experiment 2), two human experimenters presented a platform with a visible food reward. In six experimental conditions, we varied experimenters' body orientation, head orientation, eye-gaze direction, face occlusion, and mouth occlusion, as well as the platform's location, ensuring that in each case only one experimenter had visual access to the rewarded platform. Here, birds could compete with the experimenters by robbing the human who does not see the food. Skuas failed to use human-given cues spontaneously in Experiment 1, and took the reward regardless of whether the experimenters could see in Experiment 2. Our results contrast with those obtained on other wild birds with pre-experience with humans. Hopefully, our findings will stimulate further research in order to illuminate the potential role of such experience in the capacity to respond to and use human-given cues.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><doi>10.1037/com0000345</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2702-5801</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-7036 |
ispartof | Journal of comparative psychology (1983), 2023-08, Vol.137 (3), p.167-177 |
issn | 0735-7036 1939-2087 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04248599v1 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Animal Animal behavior Animal biology Animal Communication Birds Cognitive science Cues Ecology, environment Experimenters Female Food Human Interspecies Interaction Life Sciences Male Symbiosis Task Vertebrate Zoology |
title | Responses of Wild Skuas (Catharacta antarctica ssp. lonnbergi) to Human Cues in Cooperative and Competitive Social Contexts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T23%3A42%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Responses%20of%20Wild%20Skuas%20(Catharacta%20antarctica%20ssp.%20lonnbergi)%20to%20Human%20Cues%20in%20Cooperative%20and%20Competitive%20Social%20Contexts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20comparative%20psychology%20(1983)&rft.au=Danel,%20Samara&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=167-177&rft.issn=0735-7036&rft.eissn=1939-2087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/com0000345&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2857935593%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857935593&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |