Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse

•No significant agreement between clinical and sonographic evaluation for the anterior compartment in FPOP.•Due to the large number of sonographic missing data for medium and posterior compartment, evaluation of the clinical-ultrasound correlation was not possible.•No significant agreement between c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction 2023-11, Vol.52 (9), p.102650-102650, Article 102650
Hauptverfasser: Maheut, Célia, Vernet, Thibaud, Le Boité, Hugo, Fernandez, Hervé, Capmas, Perrine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102650
container_issue 9
container_start_page 102650
container_title Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
container_volume 52
creator Maheut, Célia
Vernet, Thibaud
Le Boité, Hugo
Fernandez, Hervé
Capmas, Perrine
description •No significant agreement between clinical and sonographic evaluation for the anterior compartment in FPOP.•Due to the large number of sonographic missing data for medium and posterior compartment, evaluation of the clinical-ultrasound correlation was not possible.•No significant agreement between clinical evaluation and perineal hiatus area or posterior perineal angle.•No significant agreement between clinical examination and functional scores.•Significant improvement of almost every functional score in postoperative period. Lifetime risk of surgery for female pelvic organ prolapse (FPOP) is estimated at 10 to 20%. Prolapse assessment is mostly done by clinical examination. Perineal ultrasound is easily available and performed to evaluate and stage FPOP. This study's aim is to evaluate the agreement between clinical examination by POP-Q and perineal sonography in women presenting pelvic organ prolapse. We carried out a prospective study from December 2015 to March 2018 in the gynecologic department of a teaching hospital. Consecutive woman requiring a surgery for pelvic organ prolapse were included. All women underwent clinical examination by POP-Q, perineal ultrasound with measurements of each compartment descent, levator hiatus area and posterior perineal angle. They also answered several functional questionnaires (PFDI 20, PFIQ7, EQ-5D and PISQ12) before and after surgery. Data for clinical and sonographic assessments were compared with Spearman's test and correlation with functional questionnaires was tested. 82 women were included. We found no significant agreement between POP-Q and sonographic measures of bladder prolapse, surface of the perineal hiatus or perineal posterior angle. There was a significant improvement of most of the functional scores after surgery. Our study does not suggest correlation between clinical POP-Q and sonographic assessment of bladder prolapse, hiatus surface or perineal posterior angle. Ultrasound datasets were limited by an important number of missing data resulting in a lack of power.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102650
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04229539v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2468784723001174</els_id><sourcerecordid>2857840789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-350250f7e5a5d485549ecd477a4e118466aa6a6dc6f779646b50dd2c9d0122503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhq2qVUE0v6CXPdJDgu31x-6hBxSVDykSF3q2JvYsODh2am8C_HucblVx4jSjd95nNPZLyHdGF4wydbFZbNJDelxwytuqcCXpJ3LKhermuhP687v-hMxK2VBKWceVatVXctJqxXrN6Cl5WqacMcDoU2zWOD4jxsYGH72F0OALbH2chhBds8PsI9bBPowZStpXzcfmOW0rNWaEEV0zpFyN4eBtk_IDxGaXU4BdwW_kywCh4OxfPSO_r37dL2_mq7vr2-Xlam4Fk-O8lZRLOmiUIJ3opBQ9Wie0BoGMdUIpAAXKWTVo3Suh1pI6x23vKOOVbM_Ij2nvIwSzy34L-dUk8ObmcmWOGhWc97LtD6x6zydvPfLPHstotr5YDAEipn0xvJP1D6nu-mptJ6vNqZSMw__djJpjKGZj_oZijqGYKZRK_ZworC8-eMymWI_RovMZ7Whc8h_yb9g3lIM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2857840789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Maheut, Célia ; Vernet, Thibaud ; Le Boité, Hugo ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Capmas, Perrine</creator><creatorcontrib>Maheut, Célia ; Vernet, Thibaud ; Le Boité, Hugo ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Capmas, Perrine</creatorcontrib><description>•No significant agreement between clinical and sonographic evaluation for the anterior compartment in FPOP.•Due to the large number of sonographic missing data for medium and posterior compartment, evaluation of the clinical-ultrasound correlation was not possible.•No significant agreement between clinical evaluation and perineal hiatus area or posterior perineal angle.•No significant agreement between clinical examination and functional scores.•Significant improvement of almost every functional score in postoperative period. Lifetime risk of surgery for female pelvic organ prolapse (FPOP) is estimated at 10 to 20%. Prolapse assessment is mostly done by clinical examination. Perineal ultrasound is easily available and performed to evaluate and stage FPOP. This study's aim is to evaluate the agreement between clinical examination by POP-Q and perineal sonography in women presenting pelvic organ prolapse. We carried out a prospective study from December 2015 to March 2018 in the gynecologic department of a teaching hospital. Consecutive woman requiring a surgery for pelvic organ prolapse were included. All women underwent clinical examination by POP-Q, perineal ultrasound with measurements of each compartment descent, levator hiatus area and posterior perineal angle. They also answered several functional questionnaires (PFDI 20, PFIQ7, EQ-5D and PISQ12) before and after surgery. Data for clinical and sonographic assessments were compared with Spearman's test and correlation with functional questionnaires was tested. 82 women were included. We found no significant agreement between POP-Q and sonographic measures of bladder prolapse, surface of the perineal hiatus or perineal posterior angle. There was a significant improvement of most of the functional scores after surgery. Our study does not suggest correlation between clinical POP-Q and sonographic assessment of bladder prolapse, hiatus surface or perineal posterior angle. Ultrasound datasets were limited by an important number of missing data resulting in a lack of power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2468-8495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102650</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37619710</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Agreement ; Life Sciences ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Perineal ultrasonography ; POP-Q</subject><ispartof>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-11, Vol.52 (9), p.102650-102650, Article 102650</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-350250f7e5a5d485549ecd477a4e118466aa6a6dc6f779646b50dd2c9d0122503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-350250f7e5a5d485549ecd477a4e118466aa6a6dc6f779646b50dd2c9d0122503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4232-5140 ; 0000-0002-6463-1018</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04229539$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maheut, Célia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernet, Thibaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Boité, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capmas, Perrine</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse</title><title>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</title><description>•No significant agreement between clinical and sonographic evaluation for the anterior compartment in FPOP.•Due to the large number of sonographic missing data for medium and posterior compartment, evaluation of the clinical-ultrasound correlation was not possible.•No significant agreement between clinical evaluation and perineal hiatus area or posterior perineal angle.•No significant agreement between clinical examination and functional scores.•Significant improvement of almost every functional score in postoperative period. Lifetime risk of surgery for female pelvic organ prolapse (FPOP) is estimated at 10 to 20%. Prolapse assessment is mostly done by clinical examination. Perineal ultrasound is easily available and performed to evaluate and stage FPOP. This study's aim is to evaluate the agreement between clinical examination by POP-Q and perineal sonography in women presenting pelvic organ prolapse. We carried out a prospective study from December 2015 to March 2018 in the gynecologic department of a teaching hospital. Consecutive woman requiring a surgery for pelvic organ prolapse were included. All women underwent clinical examination by POP-Q, perineal ultrasound with measurements of each compartment descent, levator hiatus area and posterior perineal angle. They also answered several functional questionnaires (PFDI 20, PFIQ7, EQ-5D and PISQ12) before and after surgery. Data for clinical and sonographic assessments were compared with Spearman's test and correlation with functional questionnaires was tested. 82 women were included. We found no significant agreement between POP-Q and sonographic measures of bladder prolapse, surface of the perineal hiatus or perineal posterior angle. There was a significant improvement of most of the functional scores after surgery. Our study does not suggest correlation between clinical POP-Q and sonographic assessment of bladder prolapse, hiatus surface or perineal posterior angle. Ultrasound datasets were limited by an important number of missing data resulting in a lack of power.</description><subject>Agreement</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Perineal ultrasonography</subject><subject>POP-Q</subject><issn>2468-7847</issn><issn>2468-8495</issn><issn>2468-7847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1PGzEQhq2qVUE0v6CXPdJDgu31x-6hBxSVDykSF3q2JvYsODh2am8C_HucblVx4jSjd95nNPZLyHdGF4wydbFZbNJDelxwytuqcCXpJ3LKhermuhP687v-hMxK2VBKWceVatVXctJqxXrN6Cl5WqacMcDoU2zWOD4jxsYGH72F0OALbH2chhBds8PsI9bBPowZStpXzcfmOW0rNWaEEV0zpFyN4eBtk_IDxGaXU4BdwW_kywCh4OxfPSO_r37dL2_mq7vr2-Xlam4Fk-O8lZRLOmiUIJ3opBQ9Wie0BoGMdUIpAAXKWTVo3Suh1pI6x23vKOOVbM_Ij2nvIwSzy34L-dUk8ObmcmWOGhWc97LtD6x6zydvPfLPHstotr5YDAEipn0xvJP1D6nu-mptJ6vNqZSMw__djJpjKGZj_oZijqGYKZRK_ZworC8-eMymWI_RovMZ7Whc8h_yb9g3lIM</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Maheut, Célia</creator><creator>Vernet, Thibaud</creator><creator>Le Boité, Hugo</creator><creator>Fernandez, Hervé</creator><creator>Capmas, Perrine</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-5140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-1018</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse</title><author>Maheut, Célia ; Vernet, Thibaud ; Le Boité, Hugo ; Fernandez, Hervé ; Capmas, Perrine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c415t-350250f7e5a5d485549ecd477a4e118466aa6a6dc6f779646b50dd2c9d0122503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agreement</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Perineal ultrasonography</topic><topic>POP-Q</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maheut, Célia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vernet, Thibaud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Boité, Hugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Hervé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capmas, Perrine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maheut, Célia</au><au>Vernet, Thibaud</au><au>Le Boité, Hugo</au><au>Fernandez, Hervé</au><au>Capmas, Perrine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>102650</spage><epage>102650</epage><pages>102650-102650</pages><artnum>102650</artnum><issn>2468-7847</issn><issn>2468-8495</issn><eissn>2468-7847</eissn><abstract>•No significant agreement between clinical and sonographic evaluation for the anterior compartment in FPOP.•Due to the large number of sonographic missing data for medium and posterior compartment, evaluation of the clinical-ultrasound correlation was not possible.•No significant agreement between clinical evaluation and perineal hiatus area or posterior perineal angle.•No significant agreement between clinical examination and functional scores.•Significant improvement of almost every functional score in postoperative period. Lifetime risk of surgery for female pelvic organ prolapse (FPOP) is estimated at 10 to 20%. Prolapse assessment is mostly done by clinical examination. Perineal ultrasound is easily available and performed to evaluate and stage FPOP. This study's aim is to evaluate the agreement between clinical examination by POP-Q and perineal sonography in women presenting pelvic organ prolapse. We carried out a prospective study from December 2015 to March 2018 in the gynecologic department of a teaching hospital. Consecutive woman requiring a surgery for pelvic organ prolapse were included. All women underwent clinical examination by POP-Q, perineal ultrasound with measurements of each compartment descent, levator hiatus area and posterior perineal angle. They also answered several functional questionnaires (PFDI 20, PFIQ7, EQ-5D and PISQ12) before and after surgery. Data for clinical and sonographic assessments were compared with Spearman's test and correlation with functional questionnaires was tested. 82 women were included. We found no significant agreement between POP-Q and sonographic measures of bladder prolapse, surface of the perineal hiatus or perineal posterior angle. There was a significant improvement of most of the functional scores after surgery. Our study does not suggest correlation between clinical POP-Q and sonographic assessment of bladder prolapse, hiatus surface or perineal posterior angle. Ultrasound datasets were limited by an important number of missing data resulting in a lack of power.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>37619710</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102650</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-5140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6463-1018</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2468-7847
ispartof Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-11, Vol.52 (9), p.102650-102650, Article 102650
issn 2468-7847
2468-8495
2468-7847
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04229539v1
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agreement
Life Sciences
Pelvic organ prolapse
Perineal ultrasonography
POP-Q
title Correlation between clinical examination and perineal ultrasound in women treated for pelvic organ prolapse
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A06%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20between%20clinical%20examination%20and%20perineal%20ultrasound%20in%20women%20treated%20for%20pelvic%20organ%20prolapse&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecology%20obstetrics%20and%20human%20reproduction&rft.au=Maheut,%20C%C3%A9lia&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=102650&rft.epage=102650&rft.pages=102650-102650&rft.artnum=102650&rft.issn=2468-7847&rft.eissn=2468-7847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102650&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2857840789%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2857840789&rft_id=info:pmid/37619710&rft_els_id=S2468784723001174&rfr_iscdi=true