Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products
In this work, a comparative study between two processes was performed—biodegradation and photocatalysis, as an advanced oxidation process—to discover which one is more efficient to degrade Rhodamine B, a synthetic dye widely used in the textile and food industries. The advantage of this study is tha...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Processes 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2671 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2671 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Chadelaud, Thomas Zeghioud, Hicham Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso Fuerte, Omar Benítez-Rico, Adriana Revel, Messika Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E. Djelal, Hayet |
description | In this work, a comparative study between two processes was performed—biodegradation and photocatalysis, as an advanced oxidation process—to discover which one is more efficient to degrade Rhodamine B, a synthetic dye widely used in the textile and food industries. The advantage of this study is that it correlates treatment efficiency with the ecotoxicity of the by-products resulting from the treatments. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been difficult to use activated sludge because of the risk factor of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, biodegradation tests were conducted with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in this study. For the photocatalysis assays, TiO2 doped with 5 per cent Cerium was used as a catalyst under UV light irradiation. S. cerevisiae cannot reduce RhB by biodegradation. However, a 13 per cent biosorption was observed with an uptake capacity of 4.2 mg g−1 dry matter of S. cerevisiae cultivated in the presence of 5 mg L−1 of RhB after 150 min. At a 5 mg L−1 of RhB concentration, the 6 h photocatalysis treatment led to 55% color removal and 8.6% COT reduction. The biodegradability of the photocatalyzed solution increased since the BOD5/COD ratio raised from 0.10 to 0.42. In the presence of glucose as a source of carbon, yeast can grow on the by-products generated by photocatalysis. The phytotoxicity of RhB in solution was measured using the germination index (GI) of watercress seeds. The GI decreases by 75% for an RhB solution of 100 mg L−1 compared to the control sample. The by-products of the photocatalytic treatment, using crustaceans Daphnia magna and conducted with solutions of Rhodamine B, induced a decrease of 24% in the GI. Lethality test. After 3 or 6 h of treatment, no increase in immobilization or mortality of D. magna was observed compared to the negative control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr11092671 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04213725v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771812081</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771812081</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bc57fa051fe61791aebec513fead6ee76c0d9f9822c334597caeb06e36fd0c6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkU1LAzEQhhdRULQXf0HAk8LWfHSTjbe21A8oKFrPIWYnGuluapIW--_NWlFnDjPM-8zLwBTFKcFDxiS-XAVCsKRckL3iiFIqSimI2P_XHxaDGN9xDklYXfGjYjn17UoHndwG0FNaN1vkLXp8841uXQdoghYBdGqhS1doHCPE6LrXnplZ64yDzmzRQ_AGeg3prkEz45P_zFr69ppsy6w3a5PiSXFg9TLC4KceF8_Xs8X0tpzf39xNx_PSMF6n8sVUwmpcEQucCEk0vICpCLOgGw4guMGNtLKm1DA2qqQwmcAcGLcNNrkeF-c73ze9VKvgWh22ymunbsdz1c_wiBImaLUhmT3bsavgP9YQk3r369Dl8xStuawqLEc0U8Md9aqXoFxnfQra5GygdcZ3YF2ej4UgNaG47m0vdgsm-BgD2N87CFb9t9Tft9gXzUWHFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869550942</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Chadelaud, Thomas ; Zeghioud, Hicham ; Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso ; Fuerte, Omar ; Benítez-Rico, Adriana ; Revel, Messika ; Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E. ; Djelal, Hayet</creator><creatorcontrib>Chadelaud, Thomas ; Zeghioud, Hicham ; Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso ; Fuerte, Omar ; Benítez-Rico, Adriana ; Revel, Messika ; Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E. ; Djelal, Hayet</creatorcontrib><description>In this work, a comparative study between two processes was performed—biodegradation and photocatalysis, as an advanced oxidation process—to discover which one is more efficient to degrade Rhodamine B, a synthetic dye widely used in the textile and food industries. The advantage of this study is that it correlates treatment efficiency with the ecotoxicity of the by-products resulting from the treatments. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been difficult to use activated sludge because of the risk factor of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, biodegradation tests were conducted with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in this study. For the photocatalysis assays, TiO2 doped with 5 per cent Cerium was used as a catalyst under UV light irradiation. S. cerevisiae cannot reduce RhB by biodegradation. However, a 13 per cent biosorption was observed with an uptake capacity of 4.2 mg g−1 dry matter of S. cerevisiae cultivated in the presence of 5 mg L−1 of RhB after 150 min. At a 5 mg L−1 of RhB concentration, the 6 h photocatalysis treatment led to 55% color removal and 8.6% COT reduction. The biodegradability of the photocatalyzed solution increased since the BOD5/COD ratio raised from 0.10 to 0.42. In the presence of glucose as a source of carbon, yeast can grow on the by-products generated by photocatalysis. The phytotoxicity of RhB in solution was measured using the germination index (GI) of watercress seeds. The GI decreases by 75% for an RhB solution of 100 mg L−1 compared to the control sample. The by-products of the photocatalytic treatment, using crustaceans Daphnia magna and conducted with solutions of Rhodamine B, induced a decrease of 24% in the GI. Lethality test. After 3 or 6 h of treatment, no increase in immobilization or mortality of D. magna was observed compared to the negative control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr11092671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Adsorption ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Biosorption ; By products ; Byproducts ; Carcinogens ; Catalysts ; Cerium ; Chemical Sciences ; Color removal ; Comparative studies ; COVID-19 ; Crustaceans ; Dry matter ; Dyes ; Efficiency ; Experiments ; Food industry ; Germination ; Glucose ; Immobilization ; Lethality ; Light irradiation ; Oxidation ; Photocatalysis ; Photosynthesis ; Phytotoxicity ; Pollutants ; Radiation ; Rhodamine ; Risk factors ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Seeds ; Titanium dioxide ; Toxicity ; Ultraviolet radiation ; Watercress ; Yeast</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2671</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bc57fa051fe61791aebec513fead6ee76c0d9f9822c334597caeb06e36fd0c6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bc57fa051fe61791aebec513fead6ee76c0d9f9822c334597caeb06e36fd0c6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1718-3080 ; 0000-0002-3089-2594 ; 0000-0002-3113-041X ; 0000-0002-5619-2633 ; 0000-0002-8000-8170</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04213725$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chadelaud, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeghioud, Hicham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuerte, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez-Rico, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revel, Messika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djelal, Hayet</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products</title><title>Processes</title><description>In this work, a comparative study between two processes was performed—biodegradation and photocatalysis, as an advanced oxidation process—to discover which one is more efficient to degrade Rhodamine B, a synthetic dye widely used in the textile and food industries. The advantage of this study is that it correlates treatment efficiency with the ecotoxicity of the by-products resulting from the treatments. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been difficult to use activated sludge because of the risk factor of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, biodegradation tests were conducted with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in this study. For the photocatalysis assays, TiO2 doped with 5 per cent Cerium was used as a catalyst under UV light irradiation. S. cerevisiae cannot reduce RhB by biodegradation. However, a 13 per cent biosorption was observed with an uptake capacity of 4.2 mg g−1 dry matter of S. cerevisiae cultivated in the presence of 5 mg L−1 of RhB after 150 min. At a 5 mg L−1 of RhB concentration, the 6 h photocatalysis treatment led to 55% color removal and 8.6% COT reduction. The biodegradability of the photocatalyzed solution increased since the BOD5/COD ratio raised from 0.10 to 0.42. In the presence of glucose as a source of carbon, yeast can grow on the by-products generated by photocatalysis. The phytotoxicity of RhB in solution was measured using the germination index (GI) of watercress seeds. The GI decreases by 75% for an RhB solution of 100 mg L−1 compared to the control sample. The by-products of the photocatalytic treatment, using crustaceans Daphnia magna and conducted with solutions of Rhodamine B, induced a decrease of 24% in the GI. Lethality test. After 3 or 6 h of treatment, no increase in immobilization or mortality of D. magna was observed compared to the negative control.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biosorption</subject><subject>By products</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Cerium</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>Color removal</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Germination</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Immobilization</subject><subject>Lethality</subject><subject>Light irradiation</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Photocatalysis</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Phytotoxicity</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Rhodamine</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Titanium dioxide</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><subject>Watercress</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkU1LAzEQhhdRULQXf0HAk8LWfHSTjbe21A8oKFrPIWYnGuluapIW--_NWlFnDjPM-8zLwBTFKcFDxiS-XAVCsKRckL3iiFIqSimI2P_XHxaDGN9xDklYXfGjYjn17UoHndwG0FNaN1vkLXp8841uXQdoghYBdGqhS1doHCPE6LrXnplZ64yDzmzRQ_AGeg3prkEz45P_zFr69ppsy6w3a5PiSXFg9TLC4KceF8_Xs8X0tpzf39xNx_PSMF6n8sVUwmpcEQucCEk0vICpCLOgGw4guMGNtLKm1DA2qqQwmcAcGLcNNrkeF-c73ze9VKvgWh22ymunbsdz1c_wiBImaLUhmT3bsavgP9YQk3r369Dl8xStuawqLEc0U8Md9aqXoFxnfQra5GygdcZ3YF2ej4UgNaG47m0vdgsm-BgD2N87CFb9t9Tft9gXzUWHFA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Chadelaud, Thomas</creator><creator>Zeghioud, Hicham</creator><creator>Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso</creator><creator>Fuerte, Omar</creator><creator>Benítez-Rico, Adriana</creator><creator>Revel, Messika</creator><creator>Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E.</creator><creator>Djelal, Hayet</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1718-3080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-2594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3113-041X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8000-8170</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products</title><author>Chadelaud, Thomas ; Zeghioud, Hicham ; Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso ; Fuerte, Omar ; Benítez-Rico, Adriana ; Revel, Messika ; Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E. ; Djelal, Hayet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bc57fa051fe61791aebec513fead6ee76c0d9f9822c334597caeb06e36fd0c6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biosorption</topic><topic>By products</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Cerium</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>Color removal</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Germination</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Immobilization</topic><topic>Lethality</topic><topic>Light irradiation</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Photocatalysis</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Phytotoxicity</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Rhodamine</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Titanium dioxide</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><topic>Watercress</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chadelaud, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeghioud, Hicham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuerte, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benítez-Rico, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Revel, Messika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Djelal, Hayet</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chadelaud, Thomas</au><au>Zeghioud, Hicham</au><au>Reynoso de la Garza, Alonso</au><au>Fuerte, Omar</au><au>Benítez-Rico, Adriana</au><au>Revel, Messika</au><au>Chávez-Miyauchi, Tomás E.</au><au>Djelal, Hayet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2671</spage><pages>2671-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>In this work, a comparative study between two processes was performed—biodegradation and photocatalysis, as an advanced oxidation process—to discover which one is more efficient to degrade Rhodamine B, a synthetic dye widely used in the textile and food industries. The advantage of this study is that it correlates treatment efficiency with the ecotoxicity of the by-products resulting from the treatments. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it has been difficult to use activated sludge because of the risk factor of COVID-19 infection. Therefore, biodegradation tests were conducted with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in this study. For the photocatalysis assays, TiO2 doped with 5 per cent Cerium was used as a catalyst under UV light irradiation. S. cerevisiae cannot reduce RhB by biodegradation. However, a 13 per cent biosorption was observed with an uptake capacity of 4.2 mg g−1 dry matter of S. cerevisiae cultivated in the presence of 5 mg L−1 of RhB after 150 min. At a 5 mg L−1 of RhB concentration, the 6 h photocatalysis treatment led to 55% color removal and 8.6% COT reduction. The biodegradability of the photocatalyzed solution increased since the BOD5/COD ratio raised from 0.10 to 0.42. In the presence of glucose as a source of carbon, yeast can grow on the by-products generated by photocatalysis. The phytotoxicity of RhB in solution was measured using the germination index (GI) of watercress seeds. The GI decreases by 75% for an RhB solution of 100 mg L−1 compared to the control sample. The by-products of the photocatalytic treatment, using crustaceans Daphnia magna and conducted with solutions of Rhodamine B, induced a decrease of 24% in the GI. Lethality test. After 3 or 6 h of treatment, no increase in immobilization or mortality of D. magna was observed compared to the negative control.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr11092671</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1718-3080</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-2594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3113-041X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-2633</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8000-8170</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2671 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04213725v1 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Activated sludge Adsorption Biodegradability Biodegradation Biosorption By products Byproducts Carcinogens Catalysts Cerium Chemical Sciences Color removal Comparative studies COVID-19 Crustaceans Dry matter Dyes Efficiency Experiments Food industry Germination Glucose Immobilization Lethality Light irradiation Oxidation Photocatalysis Photosynthesis Phytotoxicity Pollutants Radiation Rhodamine Risk factors Saccharomyces cerevisiae Seeds Titanium dioxide Toxicity Ultraviolet radiation Watercress Yeast |
title | Comparative Study of Rhodamine B Treatment: Assessing of Efficiency Processes and Ecotoxicity of By-Products |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A00%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20Rhodamine%20B%20Treatment:%20Assessing%20of%20Efficiency%20Processes%20and%20Ecotoxicity%20of%20By-Products&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Chadelaud,%20Thomas&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2671&rft.pages=2671-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr11092671&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3EA771812081%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869550942&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771812081&rfr_iscdi=true |