The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review

Purpose The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE. Methods Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2021-10, Vol.35 (5), p.959-966
Hauptverfasser: Recher, Morgan, Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh, Jeanne, Mathieu, Storme, Laurent, Leteurtre, Stéphane, Sabourdin, Nada, De jonckheere, Julien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 966
container_issue 5
container_start_page 959
container_title Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
container_volume 35
creator Recher, Morgan
Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh
Jeanne, Mathieu
Storme, Laurent
Leteurtre, Stéphane
Sabourdin, Nada
De jonckheere, Julien
description Purpose The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE. Methods Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator. Results The NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients’ gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates’ comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous. Conclusion The results regarding NIPE’s performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04191352v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2490130569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc127b95b7d41ee16d6eef5498528fc6172b0948d0f977792212247609d2cc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv3CAUhVHVqnm0fyCLyFI3ycLtBYyB7qIoj0ojdTN7hO3rDJHHuIAnmn8fpk4TKYuuQJfvHDgcQs4ofKcA8kekoKQsgdESoJZQqg_kmArJS1bT6mPecyVLykEekZMYHwFAK04_kyPOhYaKqmNi1hssRnxqfBgLN_Z2TMVkg4377WTTBpNrC9zZYbbJ-QNRTNg5m0Ke27HLUj_a5Af_sP9Z2GJwCYNNc8Ai4M7h0xfyqbdDxK8v6ylZ396sr-_L1e-7X9dXq7KtQKeyaSmTjRaN7CqKSOuuRuxFpZVgqm9rKlkDulId9FpKqRmjjFWyBt2xtgV-Si4X240dzBTc1oa98daZ-6uVOcxyWk25YDua2YuFnYL_M2NMZutii8Ngc5g5GlZpyJ8map3Rb-_QRz-HMQcxTEitZGZEpthCtcHHGLB_fQEFc2jKLE2Z3JT525RRWXT-Yj03W-xeJf-qyQBfgJiPxgcMb3f_x_YZC46dNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579876935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Recher, Morgan ; Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh ; Jeanne, Mathieu ; Storme, Laurent ; Leteurtre, Stéphane ; Sabourdin, Nada ; De jonckheere, Julien</creator><creatorcontrib>Recher, Morgan ; Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh ; Jeanne, Mathieu ; Storme, Laurent ; Leteurtre, Stéphane ; Sabourdin, Nada ; De jonckheere, Julien</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE. Methods Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator. Results The NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients’ gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates’ comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous. Conclusion The results regarding NIPE’s performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33590418</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesiology ; Comfort ; Critical Care Medicine ; Echocardiography ; Evaluation ; General anesthesia ; Health Sciences ; Heart rate ; Infants ; Intensive ; Life Sciences ; Literature reviews ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Newborn babies ; Pain ; Review Paper ; Statistics for Life Sciences ; Technology assessment</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021-10, Vol.35 (5), p.959-966</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc127b95b7d41ee16d6eef5498528fc6172b0948d0f977792212247609d2cc03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc127b95b7d41ee16d6eef5498528fc6172b0948d0f977792212247609d2cc03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6513-5083</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590418$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.univ-lille.fr/hal-04191352$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Recher, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanne, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storme, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leteurtre, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabourdin, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De jonckheere, Julien</creatorcontrib><title>The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>Purpose The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE. Methods Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator. Results The NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients’ gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates’ comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous. Conclusion The results regarding NIPE’s performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Comfort</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Health Sciences</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Statistics for Life Sciences</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtv3CAUhVHVqnm0fyCLyFI3ycLtBYyB7qIoj0ojdTN7hO3rDJHHuIAnmn8fpk4TKYuuQJfvHDgcQs4ofKcA8kekoKQsgdESoJZQqg_kmArJS1bT6mPecyVLykEekZMYHwFAK04_kyPOhYaKqmNi1hssRnxqfBgLN_Z2TMVkg4377WTTBpNrC9zZYbbJ-QNRTNg5m0Ke27HLUj_a5Af_sP9Z2GJwCYNNc8Ai4M7h0xfyqbdDxK8v6ylZ396sr-_L1e-7X9dXq7KtQKeyaSmTjRaN7CqKSOuuRuxFpZVgqm9rKlkDulId9FpKqRmjjFWyBt2xtgV-Si4X240dzBTc1oa98daZ-6uVOcxyWk25YDua2YuFnYL_M2NMZutii8Ngc5g5GlZpyJ8map3Rb-_QRz-HMQcxTEitZGZEpthCtcHHGLB_fQEFc2jKLE2Z3JT525RRWXT-Yj03W-xeJf-qyQBfgJiPxgcMb3f_x_YZC46dNA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Recher, Morgan</creator><creator>Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh</creator><creator>Jeanne, Mathieu</creator><creator>Storme, Laurent</creator><creator>Leteurtre, Stéphane</creator><creator>Sabourdin, Nada</creator><creator>De jonckheere, Julien</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>Springer Verlag</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-5083</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review</title><author>Recher, Morgan ; Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh ; Jeanne, Mathieu ; Storme, Laurent ; Leteurtre, Stéphane ; Sabourdin, Nada ; De jonckheere, Julien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-bc127b95b7d41ee16d6eef5498528fc6172b0948d0f977792212247609d2cc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Comfort</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Health Sciences</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Statistics for Life Sciences</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Recher, Morgan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanne, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storme, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leteurtre, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabourdin, Nada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De jonckheere, Julien</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Recher, Morgan</au><au>Boukhris, Mohamed Riadh</au><au>Jeanne, Mathieu</au><au>Storme, Laurent</au><au>Leteurtre, Stéphane</au><au>Sabourdin, Nada</au><au>De jonckheere, Julien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Monit Comput</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>959</spage><epage>966</epage><pages>959-966</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><abstract>Purpose The Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) is a heart rate variability-based technology for assessing pain and comfort in neonates and infants under 2-years-old. This review aims to investigate the clinical utility of the NIPE. Methods Two investigators screened Pubmed/Medline and Google Scholar for relevant studies, independently. One investigator extracted data, which were reviewed by a second investigator. Results The NIPE was used during/after painful stimuli (6 studies), in the context of general anaesthesia (2 studies), and for comfort assessment (6 studies). A) Evaluation of procedural pain/distress: 2 studies reported that the mean-NIPE could be used for reliable monitoring of prolonged pain, and one study reported the association between instant-NIPE and pain after a stimulus but the instant-NIPE represents the NIPE average over 3 min. Two studies found no correlation between the NIPE and comfort behavior/pain scales, but they mainly differed in patients’ gestational age and evaluation methodology. B) There are only 2 studies for the evaluation of nociception during surgery under general anaesthesia with contradictory results. C) Studies assessing neonates’ comfort reported increased NIPE scores during skin-to-skin contact and during facilitated tucking associated with a human voice. No effect on NIPE scores of facilitated tucking during echocardiography was reported in preterm infants. One study reported significantly different NIPE scores with 2 surfactant therapy protocols. Overall, study populations were small and heterogeneous. Conclusion The results regarding NIPE’s performances differ between studies. Given the limited number of studies and the heterogeneous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm the NIPE usefulness in the different clinical settings.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>33590418</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6513-5083</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-1307
ispartof Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2021-10, Vol.35 (5), p.959-966
issn 1387-1307
1573-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04191352v1
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Comfort
Critical Care Medicine
Echocardiography
Evaluation
General anesthesia
Health Sciences
Heart rate
Infants
Intensive
Life Sciences
Literature reviews
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Newborn babies
Pain
Review Paper
Statistics for Life Sciences
Technology assessment
title The newborn infant parasympathetic evaluation in pediatric and neonatology: a literature review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A37%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20newborn%20infant%20parasympathetic%20evaluation%20in%20pediatric%20and%20neonatology:%20a%20literature%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=Recher,%20Morgan&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=959&rft.epage=966&rft.pages=959-966&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-021-00670-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2490130569%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579876935&rft_id=info:pmid/33590418&rfr_iscdi=true