Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions

Most targeted biopsy–negative prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolve over time. Lesion persistence could indicate the presence of undetected significant cancer and MRI follow-up could identify candidates for repeat biopsy. The optimal radiological follow-up of prostate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology focus 2023-09, Vol.9 (5), p.781-787
Hauptverfasser: Stavrinides, Vasilis, Eksi, Ece, Finn, Ron, Texeira-Mendes, Larissa, Rana, Sarina, Trahearn, Nick, Grey, Alistair, Giganti, Francesco, Huet, Eric, Fiard, Gaelle, Freeman, Alex, Haider, Aiman, Allen, Clare, Kirkham, Alex, Cole, Alexander P., Collins, Tom, Pendse, Douglas, Dickinson, Louise, Punwani, Shonit, Pashayan, Nora, Emberton, Mark, Moore, Caroline M., Orczyk, Clement
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 787
container_issue 5
container_start_page 781
container_title European urology focus
container_volume 9
creator Stavrinides, Vasilis
Eksi, Ece
Finn, Ron
Texeira-Mendes, Larissa
Rana, Sarina
Trahearn, Nick
Grey, Alistair
Giganti, Francesco
Huet, Eric
Fiard, Gaelle
Freeman, Alex
Haider, Aiman
Allen, Clare
Kirkham, Alex
Cole, Alexander P.
Collins, Tom
Pendse, Douglas
Dickinson, Louise
Punwani, Shonit
Pashayan, Nora
Emberton, Mark
Moore, Caroline M.
Orczyk, Clement
description Most targeted biopsy–negative prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolve over time. Lesion persistence could indicate the presence of undetected significant cancer and MRI follow-up could identify candidates for repeat biopsy. The optimal radiological follow-up of prostate lesions negative on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is yet to be optimised. To present medium-term radiological and clinical follow-up of biopsy-negative lesions. The records for men who underwent multiparametric MRI at the UCLH one-stop clinic for suspected prostate cancer between September 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed (n = 1199). Patients with Likert 4 or 5 lesions were considered (n = 495), and those with a subsequent negative MRI-TB comprised the final study population (n = 91). Baseline and follow-up MRI and biopsy data (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, radiological scores, and presence of any noncancerous pathology) were extracted from reports. The last follow-up date was the date of the last test or review in clinic. Median follow-up was 1.8 yr (656 d, interquartile range [IQR] 359–1008). At baseline, the median age was 65.4 yr (IQR 60.7–70.0), median PSA was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 4.7–10.0), median prostate volume was 54 ml (IQR 39.5–75.0), and median PSA density (PSAD) was 0.13 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.09–0.18). Eighty-six men (95%) had Likert 4 lesions, while the remaining five (5%) had Likert 5 lesions. Only 21 men (23%) had a single lesion; most had at least two. Atrophy was the most prevalent pathology on MRI-TB, present in 64 men (74%), and followed by acute inflammation in 42 (46%), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 33 (36%), chronic inflammation in 18 (20%), atypia in 13 (14%), and granulomatous inflammation in three (3%). Fifty-eight men had a second MRI study (median 376 d, IQR 361–412). At the second MRI, median PSAD decreased to 0.11 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.08–0.18). A Likert 4 or 5 score persisted only in five men (9%); 40 men (69%) were scored Likert 3, while the remaining 13 (22%) were scored Likert 2 (no lesion). Of 45 men with a Likert ≥3 score, most only had one lesion at the second MRI (28 men; 62%). Of six men with repeat MRI-TB during the study period, two were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer and both had persistent Likert 4 scores (at baseline and at least one follow-up MRI). Most biopsy-negative MRI lesions in the prostate resolve over time, but any persistent lesions should be closely
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04068235v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2405456923000779</els_id><sourcerecordid>2798713430</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-fde737b990fc884c6a38a0c58cf70cfe8ab5ea3793e572f62daddef5000cfc8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRVLQP4EVy1EPqbDbJJnjSYm2homg9L9vNbNySZms2qXjzHXxDn8QtreJJGJhh-eZn5yPkhEKfAk0v5n3sdD-CiPXBF6U75DCKIQnjJM13_8wHpOfcHABoEnOWsX1ywDgwCnl6SJ7uZFlja1TwiM7WslYYjBeyNHUZDG1V2bewWwZWB1PZlNhiEVwbu3TvXx-fNZayNSsMHhrrWtliMEFnbO2OyZ6WlcPeth-R5-HNdDAKJ_e348HVJFQxgzbUBXLGZ3kOWmVZrFLJMgkqyZTmoDRmcpagZDxnmPBIp1EhiwJ14i9RfkOzI3K-yX2RlVg2ZiGbd2GlEaOriVi_QQxpFrFkRT17tmGXjX3t0LViYZzCqpI12s6JiOcZp8x_zKN0gyp_l2tQ_2ZTEGv1Yi68erFWL8AXXcefbuO72QKL340f0R643ADohawMNsIpg952YRpUrSis-Sf-GyHulO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2798713430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stavrinides, Vasilis ; Eksi, Ece ; Finn, Ron ; Texeira-Mendes, Larissa ; Rana, Sarina ; Trahearn, Nick ; Grey, Alistair ; Giganti, Francesco ; Huet, Eric ; Fiard, Gaelle ; Freeman, Alex ; Haider, Aiman ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex ; Cole, Alexander P. ; Collins, Tom ; Pendse, Douglas ; Dickinson, Louise ; Punwani, Shonit ; Pashayan, Nora ; Emberton, Mark ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Orczyk, Clement</creator><creatorcontrib>Stavrinides, Vasilis ; Eksi, Ece ; Finn, Ron ; Texeira-Mendes, Larissa ; Rana, Sarina ; Trahearn, Nick ; Grey, Alistair ; Giganti, Francesco ; Huet, Eric ; Fiard, Gaelle ; Freeman, Alex ; Haider, Aiman ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex ; Cole, Alexander P. ; Collins, Tom ; Pendse, Douglas ; Dickinson, Louise ; Punwani, Shonit ; Pashayan, Nora ; Emberton, Mark ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Orczyk, Clement</creatorcontrib><description>Most targeted biopsy–negative prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolve over time. Lesion persistence could indicate the presence of undetected significant cancer and MRI follow-up could identify candidates for repeat biopsy. The optimal radiological follow-up of prostate lesions negative on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is yet to be optimised. To present medium-term radiological and clinical follow-up of biopsy-negative lesions. The records for men who underwent multiparametric MRI at the UCLH one-stop clinic for suspected prostate cancer between September 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed (n = 1199). Patients with Likert 4 or 5 lesions were considered (n = 495), and those with a subsequent negative MRI-TB comprised the final study population (n = 91). Baseline and follow-up MRI and biopsy data (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, radiological scores, and presence of any noncancerous pathology) were extracted from reports. The last follow-up date was the date of the last test or review in clinic. Median follow-up was 1.8 yr (656 d, interquartile range [IQR] 359–1008). At baseline, the median age was 65.4 yr (IQR 60.7–70.0), median PSA was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 4.7–10.0), median prostate volume was 54 ml (IQR 39.5–75.0), and median PSA density (PSAD) was 0.13 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.09–0.18). Eighty-six men (95%) had Likert 4 lesions, while the remaining five (5%) had Likert 5 lesions. Only 21 men (23%) had a single lesion; most had at least two. Atrophy was the most prevalent pathology on MRI-TB, present in 64 men (74%), and followed by acute inflammation in 42 (46%), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 33 (36%), chronic inflammation in 18 (20%), atypia in 13 (14%), and granulomatous inflammation in three (3%). Fifty-eight men had a second MRI study (median 376 d, IQR 361–412). At the second MRI, median PSAD decreased to 0.11 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.08–0.18). A Likert 4 or 5 score persisted only in five men (9%); 40 men (69%) were scored Likert 3, while the remaining 13 (22%) were scored Likert 2 (no lesion). Of 45 men with a Likert ≥3 score, most only had one lesion at the second MRI (28 men; 62%). Of six men with repeat MRI-TB during the study period, two were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer and both had persistent Likert 4 scores (at baseline and at least one follow-up MRI). Most biopsy-negative MRI lesions in the prostate resolve over time, but any persistent lesions should be closely monitored. Lesions in the prostate detected via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that are negative for cancer on biopsy usually resolve. Repeat MRI can indicate persistent lesions that might need a second biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2405-4569</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37031096</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy - methods ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Life Sciences ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Prostate ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate-Specific Antigen ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Targeted biopsy</subject><ispartof>European urology focus, 2023-09, Vol.9 (5), p.781-787</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-fde737b990fc884c6a38a0c58cf70cfe8ab5ea3793e572f62daddef5000cfc8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-fde737b990fc884c6a38a0c58cf70cfe8ab5ea3793e572f62daddef5000cfc8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37031096$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.u-pec.fr/hal-04068235$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stavrinides, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eksi, Ece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finn, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texeira-Mendes, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rana, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trahearn, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiard, Gaelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendse, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punwani, Shonit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pashayan, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orczyk, Clement</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions</title><title>European urology focus</title><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><description>Most targeted biopsy–negative prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolve over time. Lesion persistence could indicate the presence of undetected significant cancer and MRI follow-up could identify candidates for repeat biopsy. The optimal radiological follow-up of prostate lesions negative on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is yet to be optimised. To present medium-term radiological and clinical follow-up of biopsy-negative lesions. The records for men who underwent multiparametric MRI at the UCLH one-stop clinic for suspected prostate cancer between September 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed (n = 1199). Patients with Likert 4 or 5 lesions were considered (n = 495), and those with a subsequent negative MRI-TB comprised the final study population (n = 91). Baseline and follow-up MRI and biopsy data (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, radiological scores, and presence of any noncancerous pathology) were extracted from reports. The last follow-up date was the date of the last test or review in clinic. Median follow-up was 1.8 yr (656 d, interquartile range [IQR] 359–1008). At baseline, the median age was 65.4 yr (IQR 60.7–70.0), median PSA was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 4.7–10.0), median prostate volume was 54 ml (IQR 39.5–75.0), and median PSA density (PSAD) was 0.13 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.09–0.18). Eighty-six men (95%) had Likert 4 lesions, while the remaining five (5%) had Likert 5 lesions. Only 21 men (23%) had a single lesion; most had at least two. Atrophy was the most prevalent pathology on MRI-TB, present in 64 men (74%), and followed by acute inflammation in 42 (46%), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 33 (36%), chronic inflammation in 18 (20%), atypia in 13 (14%), and granulomatous inflammation in three (3%). Fifty-eight men had a second MRI study (median 376 d, IQR 361–412). At the second MRI, median PSAD decreased to 0.11 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.08–0.18). A Likert 4 or 5 score persisted only in five men (9%); 40 men (69%) were scored Likert 3, while the remaining 13 (22%) were scored Likert 2 (no lesion). Of 45 men with a Likert ≥3 score, most only had one lesion at the second MRI (28 men; 62%). Of six men with repeat MRI-TB during the study period, two were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer and both had persistent Likert 4 scores (at baseline and at least one follow-up MRI). Most biopsy-negative MRI lesions in the prostate resolve over time, but any persistent lesions should be closely monitored. Lesions in the prostate detected via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that are negative for cancer on biopsy usually resolve. Repeat MRI can indicate persistent lesions that might need a second biopsy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Targeted biopsy</subject><issn>2405-4569</issn><issn>2405-4569</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRVLQP4EVy1EPqbDbJJnjSYm2homg9L9vNbNySZms2qXjzHXxDn8QtreJJGJhh-eZn5yPkhEKfAk0v5n3sdD-CiPXBF6U75DCKIQnjJM13_8wHpOfcHABoEnOWsX1ywDgwCnl6SJ7uZFlja1TwiM7WslYYjBeyNHUZDG1V2bewWwZWB1PZlNhiEVwbu3TvXx-fNZayNSsMHhrrWtliMEFnbO2OyZ6WlcPeth-R5-HNdDAKJ_e348HVJFQxgzbUBXLGZ3kOWmVZrFLJMgkqyZTmoDRmcpagZDxnmPBIp1EhiwJ14i9RfkOzI3K-yX2RlVg2ZiGbd2GlEaOriVi_QQxpFrFkRT17tmGXjX3t0LViYZzCqpI12s6JiOcZp8x_zKN0gyp_l2tQ_2ZTEGv1Yi68erFWL8AXXcefbuO72QKL340f0R643ADohawMNsIpg952YRpUrSis-Sf-GyHulO0</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Stavrinides, Vasilis</creator><creator>Eksi, Ece</creator><creator>Finn, Ron</creator><creator>Texeira-Mendes, Larissa</creator><creator>Rana, Sarina</creator><creator>Trahearn, Nick</creator><creator>Grey, Alistair</creator><creator>Giganti, Francesco</creator><creator>Huet, Eric</creator><creator>Fiard, Gaelle</creator><creator>Freeman, Alex</creator><creator>Haider, Aiman</creator><creator>Allen, Clare</creator><creator>Kirkham, Alex</creator><creator>Cole, Alexander P.</creator><creator>Collins, Tom</creator><creator>Pendse, Douglas</creator><creator>Dickinson, Louise</creator><creator>Punwani, Shonit</creator><creator>Pashayan, Nora</creator><creator>Emberton, Mark</creator><creator>Moore, Caroline M.</creator><creator>Orczyk, Clement</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions</title><author>Stavrinides, Vasilis ; Eksi, Ece ; Finn, Ron ; Texeira-Mendes, Larissa ; Rana, Sarina ; Trahearn, Nick ; Grey, Alistair ; Giganti, Francesco ; Huet, Eric ; Fiard, Gaelle ; Freeman, Alex ; Haider, Aiman ; Allen, Clare ; Kirkham, Alex ; Cole, Alexander P. ; Collins, Tom ; Pendse, Douglas ; Dickinson, Louise ; Punwani, Shonit ; Pashayan, Nora ; Emberton, Mark ; Moore, Caroline M. ; Orczyk, Clement</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-fde737b990fc884c6a38a0c58cf70cfe8ab5ea3793e572f62daddef5000cfc8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Targeted biopsy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stavrinides, Vasilis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eksi, Ece</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finn, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texeira-Mendes, Larissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rana, Sarina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trahearn, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiard, Gaelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Alexander P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendse, Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punwani, Shonit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pashayan, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orczyk, Clement</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stavrinides, Vasilis</au><au>Eksi, Ece</au><au>Finn, Ron</au><au>Texeira-Mendes, Larissa</au><au>Rana, Sarina</au><au>Trahearn, Nick</au><au>Grey, Alistair</au><au>Giganti, Francesco</au><au>Huet, Eric</au><au>Fiard, Gaelle</au><au>Freeman, Alex</au><au>Haider, Aiman</au><au>Allen, Clare</au><au>Kirkham, Alex</au><au>Cole, Alexander P.</au><au>Collins, Tom</au><au>Pendse, Douglas</au><au>Dickinson, Louise</au><au>Punwani, Shonit</au><au>Pashayan, Nora</au><au>Emberton, Mark</au><au>Moore, Caroline M.</au><au>Orczyk, Clement</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions</atitle><jtitle>European urology focus</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol Focus</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>781</spage><epage>787</epage><pages>781-787</pages><issn>2405-4569</issn><eissn>2405-4569</eissn><abstract>Most targeted biopsy–negative prostate lesions visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) resolve over time. Lesion persistence could indicate the presence of undetected significant cancer and MRI follow-up could identify candidates for repeat biopsy. The optimal radiological follow-up of prostate lesions negative on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsy (MRI-TB) is yet to be optimised. To present medium-term radiological and clinical follow-up of biopsy-negative lesions. The records for men who underwent multiparametric MRI at the UCLH one-stop clinic for suspected prostate cancer between September 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed (n = 1199). Patients with Likert 4 or 5 lesions were considered (n = 495), and those with a subsequent negative MRI-TB comprised the final study population (n = 91). Baseline and follow-up MRI and biopsy data (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA], prostate volume, radiological scores, and presence of any noncancerous pathology) were extracted from reports. The last follow-up date was the date of the last test or review in clinic. Median follow-up was 1.8 yr (656 d, interquartile range [IQR] 359–1008). At baseline, the median age was 65.4 yr (IQR 60.7–70.0), median PSA was 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 4.7–10.0), median prostate volume was 54 ml (IQR 39.5–75.0), and median PSA density (PSAD) was 0.13 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.09–0.18). Eighty-six men (95%) had Likert 4 lesions, while the remaining five (5%) had Likert 5 lesions. Only 21 men (23%) had a single lesion; most had at least two. Atrophy was the most prevalent pathology on MRI-TB, present in 64 men (74%), and followed by acute inflammation in 42 (46%), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in 33 (36%), chronic inflammation in 18 (20%), atypia in 13 (14%), and granulomatous inflammation in three (3%). Fifty-eight men had a second MRI study (median 376 d, IQR 361–412). At the second MRI, median PSAD decreased to 0.11 ng/ml2 (IQR 0.08–0.18). A Likert 4 or 5 score persisted only in five men (9%); 40 men (69%) were scored Likert 3, while the remaining 13 (22%) were scored Likert 2 (no lesion). Of 45 men with a Likert ≥3 score, most only had one lesion at the second MRI (28 men; 62%). Of six men with repeat MRI-TB during the study period, two were subsequently diagnosed with prostate cancer and both had persistent Likert 4 scores (at baseline and at least one follow-up MRI). Most biopsy-negative MRI lesions in the prostate resolve over time, but any persistent lesions should be closely monitored. Lesions in the prostate detected via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans that are negative for cancer on biopsy usually resolve. Repeat MRI can indicate persistent lesions that might need a second biopsy.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37031096</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.011</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2405-4569
ispartof European urology focus, 2023-09, Vol.9 (5), p.781-787
issn 2405-4569
2405-4569
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04068235v1
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Biopsy - methods
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Inflammation
Life Sciences
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Prostate
Prostate - diagnostic imaging
Prostate - pathology
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Targeted biopsy
title Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up of Targeted Biopsy–negative Prostate Lesions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T01%3A37%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20Follow-up%20of%20Targeted%20Biopsy%E2%80%93negative%20Prostate%20Lesions&rft.jtitle=European%20urology%20focus&rft.au=Stavrinides,%20Vasilis&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=781&rft.epage=787&rft.pages=781-787&rft.issn=2405-4569&rft.eissn=2405-4569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.euf.2023.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2798713430%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2798713430&rft_id=info:pmid/37031096&rft_els_id=S2405456923000779&rfr_iscdi=true