Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing

A general aversion to new ideas, psychological factors, and foremost, institutional conditions shape the challenging position of heterodox economics. This institutional framework is coined by a strong orientation towards publication metrics and influences young scholars to conformity. We propose two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of philosophical economics 2023-01, Vol.XVI (Symposium: Is there a future...), p.243-253
Hauptverfasser: Frey, Bruno, Briviba, Andre
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue Symposium: Is there a future...
container_start_page 243
container_title The journal of philosophical economics
container_volume XVI
creator Frey, Bruno
Briviba, Andre
description A general aversion to new ideas, psychological factors, and foremost, institutional conditions shape the challenging position of heterodox economics. This institutional framework is coined by a strong orientation towards publication metrics and influences young scholars to conformity. We propose two ideas to improve the conditions for heterodox research. First, to introduce competition between journals for the scientific papers they want to have the most. Second, to establish a qualified random selection of papers to equalize the chances of publishing.
doi_str_mv 10.46298/jpe.10889
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03914421v2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918788244</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-73b7a303745e9b078ec82e9c9b0eb97ba94af72d9d05980f3627b59809b6da473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZu_AUFQVDoPPlok1zOoXZQ9EavQ9qm2lqbmmTi_r3dKuLVeTk8vLw8CJ1jWLKUSHHTDmaJQQh5hGZYMBYLAuL4Xz5FC-9bAMDACU7SGbrMTDDOVvZ7Fz0aU_lo0_vQhG1obK-76FaX703_eoZOat15s_i9c_Ryf_e8zuL86WGzXuVxSVMIMacF1xQoZ4mRBXBhSkGMLMdsCskLLZmuOalkBYkUUNOU8GKfZJFWmnE6R1dT75vu1OCaD-12yupGZatc7X9AJWaM4C8yshcTOzj7uTU-qNZu3TjaKyKx4EIQxkbqeqJKZ713pv6rxaAO2tSoTR200R_0f1zy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918788244</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Frey, Bruno ; Briviba, Andre</creator><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno ; Briviba, Andre</creatorcontrib><description>A general aversion to new ideas, psychological factors, and foremost, institutional conditions shape the challenging position of heterodox economics. This institutional framework is coined by a strong orientation towards publication metrics and influences young scholars to conformity. We propose two ideas to improve the conditions for heterodox research. First, to introduce competition between journals for the scientific papers they want to have the most. Second, to establish a qualified random selection of papers to equalize the chances of publishing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-8208</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1843-2298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46298/jpe.10889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Journal of Philosophical Economics</publisher><subject>Academic careers ; Conformity ; Economics ; Editing ; Graduate students ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Nobel prizes ; Psychological aspects ; Publishing ; Scholarly publishing</subject><ispartof>The journal of philosophical economics, 2023-01, Vol.XVI (Symposium: Is there a future...), p.243-253</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under http://www.jpe.ro/?id=revista&amp;p=494&amp;cuprins=ascuns (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-5380-6655 ; 0000-0002-7113-5733</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03914421$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briviba, Andre</creatorcontrib><title>Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing</title><title>The journal of philosophical economics</title><description>A general aversion to new ideas, psychological factors, and foremost, institutional conditions shape the challenging position of heterodox economics. This institutional framework is coined by a strong orientation towards publication metrics and influences young scholars to conformity. We propose two ideas to improve the conditions for heterodox research. First, to introduce competition between journals for the scientific papers they want to have the most. Second, to establish a qualified random selection of papers to equalize the chances of publishing.</description><subject>Academic careers</subject><subject>Conformity</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Editing</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Nobel prizes</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Publishing</subject><subject>Scholarly publishing</subject><issn>1844-8208</issn><issn>1843-2298</issn><issn>1844-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOOZu_AUFQVDoPPlok1zOoXZQ9EavQ9qm2lqbmmTi_r3dKuLVeTk8vLw8CJ1jWLKUSHHTDmaJQQh5hGZYMBYLAuL4Xz5FC-9bAMDACU7SGbrMTDDOVvZ7Fz0aU_lo0_vQhG1obK-76FaX703_eoZOat15s_i9c_Ryf_e8zuL86WGzXuVxSVMIMacF1xQoZ4mRBXBhSkGMLMdsCskLLZmuOalkBYkUUNOU8GKfZJFWmnE6R1dT75vu1OCaD-12yupGZatc7X9AJWaM4C8yshcTOzj7uTU-qNZu3TjaKyKx4EIQxkbqeqJKZ713pv6rxaAO2tSoTR200R_0f1zy</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Frey, Bruno</creator><creator>Briviba, Andre</creator><general>Journal of Philosophical Economics</general><general>Rosetti Educational</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-6655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-5733</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing</title><author>Frey, Bruno ; Briviba, Andre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-73b7a303745e9b078ec82e9c9b0eb97ba94af72d9d05980f3627b59809b6da473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic careers</topic><topic>Conformity</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Editing</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Nobel prizes</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Publishing</topic><topic>Scholarly publishing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frey, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briviba, Andre</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The journal of philosophical economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frey, Bruno</au><au>Briviba, Andre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing</atitle><jtitle>The journal of philosophical economics</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>XVI</volume><issue>Symposium: Is there a future...</issue><spage>243</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>243-253</pages><issn>1844-8208</issn><issn>1843-2298</issn><eissn>1844-8208</eissn><abstract>A general aversion to new ideas, psychological factors, and foremost, institutional conditions shape the challenging position of heterodox economics. This institutional framework is coined by a strong orientation towards publication metrics and influences young scholars to conformity. We propose two ideas to improve the conditions for heterodox research. First, to introduce competition between journals for the scientific papers they want to have the most. Second, to establish a qualified random selection of papers to equalize the chances of publishing.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Journal of Philosophical Economics</pub><doi>10.46298/jpe.10889</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5380-6655</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7113-5733</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1844-8208
ispartof The journal of philosophical economics, 2023-01, Vol.XVI (Symposium: Is there a future...), p.243-253
issn 1844-8208
1843-2298
1844-8208
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03914421v2
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Academic careers
Conformity
Economics
Editing
Graduate students
Humanities and Social Sciences
Nobel prizes
Psychological aspects
Publishing
Scholarly publishing
title Heterodoxy Needs Institutional Backing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T17%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterodoxy%20Needs%20Institutional%20Backing&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20philosophical%20economics&rft.au=Frey,%20Bruno&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=XVI&rft.issue=Symposium:%20Is%20there%20a%20future...&rft.spage=243&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=243-253&rft.issn=1844-8208&rft.eissn=1844-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.46298/jpe.10889&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2918788244%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918788244&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true