Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas
The aim of this study was to contribute to the development of tilapia aquaculture in Côte d’Ivoire by increasing the productivity of Oreochromis niloticus fry in fish hatcheries. Thus, the production of Oreochromis niloticus larvae was compared between two tilapia breeding systems, earthen ponds and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture research 2022-12, Vol.53 (17), p.6049-6055 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6055 |
---|---|
container_issue | 17 |
container_start_page | 6049 |
container_title | Aquaculture research |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan Quenum, Crespin Luc Koua, Daniel N’ Zi Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou Clota, Frédéric Bégout, Marie‐Laure Yao, Kouakou |
description | The aim of this study was to contribute to the development of tilapia aquaculture in Côte d’Ivoire by increasing the productivity of Oreochromis niloticus fry in fish hatcheries. Thus, the production of Oreochromis niloticus larvae was compared between two tilapia breeding systems, earthen ponds and hapas in ponds. Over 98 days, 900 broodstock fish were allowed to reproduce in two ponds of 500 m2 and 900 others in 20 hapas of 50 m2, each installed in two ponds of 1200 m2. The sex ratio was one male for two females at a density of 0.9 breeders/m2 at a density of 450 breeders per pond and 45 breeders per hapa. After breeding broodstock in both systems, larvae were harvested and counted every 14 days. The survival rate and growth of the broodstock, as well as the reproductive performance of the females, were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the survival rates of the broodstock in the two breeding systems (98.1 ± 0.4% in ponds and 97.4 ± 0.5% in hapas). Broodstock, however, showed significantly higher growth in ponds than in hapas. The quantity of larvae produced by females in ponds was significantly higher than that of females bred in hapas (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/are.16075 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03817264v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2731036076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-e2b8a4579baf1f37219f2e5d089d9fed9baeb3dbf0ffb6968afe154d7163c1c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9KHDEUh4dSoVZ70Tc44E0FV5PJZv5crotVYVEQC70LZyYnbHQ2GZOZlX2KPofP4YuZdUt7ZW4SDl8-kt8vy75zdsrTOsNAp7xgpfyU7XNRyEnOWf15e5ZyImX5-0v2NcYHxviUCb6f_Zn7VY8BB7smiMOoN-ANdBjWSNAHr8d2sN5Bs4FhSXBjO4LBdthbhB-3gXy7DH5lIzjb-cG2YzyBhXXu9eUEeCmrYzj3Iz6-viR5QJtENDwTOSAMSeig905HQKdhiT3Gw2zPYBfp29_9IPv18-J-fjVZ3F5ez2eLSSuK9CvKmwqnsqwbNNyIMue1yUlqVtW6NqTTnBqhG8OMaYq6qNAQl1Nd8kK0vK3EQXa88y6xU32wKwwb5dGqq9lCbWdMVLzMi-maJ_Zox6Y8nkaKg3rwY3DpeSovBWci5V38N7bBxxjI_NNyprbdqNSNeu8msWc79jnlufkYVLO7i92NNxM4kpQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2731036076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan ; Quenum, Crespin Luc ; Koua, Daniel N’ Zi ; Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou ; Clota, Frédéric ; Bégout, Marie‐Laure ; Yao, Kouakou</creator><creatorcontrib>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan ; Quenum, Crespin Luc ; Koua, Daniel N’ Zi ; Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou ; Clota, Frédéric ; Bégout, Marie‐Laure ; Yao, Kouakou</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study was to contribute to the development of tilapia aquaculture in Côte d’Ivoire by increasing the productivity of Oreochromis niloticus fry in fish hatcheries. Thus, the production of Oreochromis niloticus larvae was compared between two tilapia breeding systems, earthen ponds and hapas in ponds. Over 98 days, 900 broodstock fish were allowed to reproduce in two ponds of 500 m2 and 900 others in 20 hapas of 50 m2, each installed in two ponds of 1200 m2. The sex ratio was one male for two females at a density of 0.9 breeders/m2 at a density of 450 breeders per pond and 45 breeders per hapa. After breeding broodstock in both systems, larvae were harvested and counted every 14 days. The survival rate and growth of the broodstock, as well as the reproductive performance of the females, were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the survival rates of the broodstock in the two breeding systems (98.1 ± 0.4% in ponds and 97.4 ± 0.5% in hapas). Broodstock, however, showed significantly higher growth in ponds than in hapas. The quantity of larvae produced by females in ponds was significantly higher than that of females bred in hapas (p < 0.05). Hence, the best reproductive performance was recorded in broodstock stocked in ponds (absolute productivity: 93.1 larvae per female, relative productivity: 0.3 larvae per g of female, system productivity: 3.9 ± 0.2 larvae·m−2·day−1).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.16075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Aquaculture ; Breeding ; Breeding stock ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Density ; Females ; Fish ; Fish culture ; Fish hatcheries ; Freshwater fishes ; hapa ; Hatcheries ; Larvae ; larvae production ; Life Sciences ; Marine fishes ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Polyculture (aquaculture) ; pond ; Ponds ; Productivity ; Reproduction ; reproductive behaviour ; Sex ratio ; Survival ; Tilapia ; Whitefish</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2022-12, Vol.53 (17), p.6049-6055</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-e2b8a4579baf1f37219f2e5d089d9fed9baeb3dbf0ffb6968afe154d7163c1c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-e2b8a4579baf1f37219f2e5d089d9fed9baeb3dbf0ffb6968afe154d7163c1c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6950-2357 ; 0000-0003-1416-3479</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.16075$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.16075$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,1418,27926,27927,45576,45577</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03817264$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenum, Crespin Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koua, Daniel N’ Zi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clota, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bégout, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Kouakou</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>The aim of this study was to contribute to the development of tilapia aquaculture in Côte d’Ivoire by increasing the productivity of Oreochromis niloticus fry in fish hatcheries. Thus, the production of Oreochromis niloticus larvae was compared between two tilapia breeding systems, earthen ponds and hapas in ponds. Over 98 days, 900 broodstock fish were allowed to reproduce in two ponds of 500 m2 and 900 others in 20 hapas of 50 m2, each installed in two ponds of 1200 m2. The sex ratio was one male for two females at a density of 0.9 breeders/m2 at a density of 450 breeders per pond and 45 breeders per hapa. After breeding broodstock in both systems, larvae were harvested and counted every 14 days. The survival rate and growth of the broodstock, as well as the reproductive performance of the females, were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the survival rates of the broodstock in the two breeding systems (98.1 ± 0.4% in ponds and 97.4 ± 0.5% in hapas). Broodstock, however, showed significantly higher growth in ponds than in hapas. The quantity of larvae produced by females in ponds was significantly higher than that of females bred in hapas (p < 0.05). Hence, the best reproductive performance was recorded in broodstock stocked in ponds (absolute productivity: 93.1 larvae per female, relative productivity: 0.3 larvae per g of female, system productivity: 3.9 ± 0.2 larvae·m−2·day−1).</description><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding stock</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish culture</subject><subject>Fish hatcheries</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>hapa</subject><subject>Hatcheries</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>larvae production</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Polyculture (aquaculture)</subject><subject>pond</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>reproductive behaviour</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><subject>Whitefish</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9KHDEUh4dSoVZ70Tc44E0FV5PJZv5crotVYVEQC70LZyYnbHQ2GZOZlX2KPofP4YuZdUt7ZW4SDl8-kt8vy75zdsrTOsNAp7xgpfyU7XNRyEnOWf15e5ZyImX5-0v2NcYHxviUCb6f_Zn7VY8BB7smiMOoN-ANdBjWSNAHr8d2sN5Bs4FhSXBjO4LBdthbhB-3gXy7DH5lIzjb-cG2YzyBhXXu9eUEeCmrYzj3Iz6-viR5QJtENDwTOSAMSeig905HQKdhiT3Gw2zPYBfp29_9IPv18-J-fjVZ3F5ez2eLSSuK9CvKmwqnsqwbNNyIMue1yUlqVtW6NqTTnBqhG8OMaYq6qNAQl1Nd8kK0vK3EQXa88y6xU32wKwwb5dGqq9lCbWdMVLzMi-maJ_Zox6Y8nkaKg3rwY3DpeSovBWci5V38N7bBxxjI_NNyprbdqNSNeu8msWc79jnlufkYVLO7i92NNxM4kpQ</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan</creator><creator>Quenum, Crespin Luc</creator><creator>Koua, Daniel N’ Zi</creator><creator>Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou</creator><creator>Clota, Frédéric</creator><creator>Bégout, Marie‐Laure</creator><creator>Yao, Kouakou</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-2357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-3479</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas</title><author>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan ; Quenum, Crespin Luc ; Koua, Daniel N’ Zi ; Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou ; Clota, Frédéric ; Bégout, Marie‐Laure ; Yao, Kouakou</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3665-e2b8a4579baf1f37219f2e5d089d9fed9baeb3dbf0ffb6968afe154d7163c1c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding stock</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish culture</topic><topic>Fish hatcheries</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>hapa</topic><topic>Hatcheries</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>larvae production</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Polyculture (aquaculture)</topic><topic>pond</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>reproductive behaviour</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><topic>Whitefish</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenum, Crespin Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koua, Daniel N’ Zi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clota, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bégout, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Kouakou</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akian, Dieudonné Djétouan</au><au>Quenum, Crespin Luc</au><au>Koua, Daniel N’ Zi</au><au>Houra, Joël Alain Kouakou</au><au>Clota, Frédéric</au><au>Bégout, Marie‐Laure</au><au>Yao, Kouakou</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>6049</spage><epage>6055</epage><pages>6049-6055</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study was to contribute to the development of tilapia aquaculture in Côte d’Ivoire by increasing the productivity of Oreochromis niloticus fry in fish hatcheries. Thus, the production of Oreochromis niloticus larvae was compared between two tilapia breeding systems, earthen ponds and hapas in ponds. Over 98 days, 900 broodstock fish were allowed to reproduce in two ponds of 500 m2 and 900 others in 20 hapas of 50 m2, each installed in two ponds of 1200 m2. The sex ratio was one male for two females at a density of 0.9 breeders/m2 at a density of 450 breeders per pond and 45 breeders per hapa. After breeding broodstock in both systems, larvae were harvested and counted every 14 days. The survival rate and growth of the broodstock, as well as the reproductive performance of the females, were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the survival rates of the broodstock in the two breeding systems (98.1 ± 0.4% in ponds and 97.4 ± 0.5% in hapas). Broodstock, however, showed significantly higher growth in ponds than in hapas. The quantity of larvae produced by females in ponds was significantly higher than that of females bred in hapas (p < 0.05). Hence, the best reproductive performance was recorded in broodstock stocked in ponds (absolute productivity: 93.1 larvae per female, relative productivity: 0.3 larvae per g of female, system productivity: 3.9 ± 0.2 larvae·m−2·day−1).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.16075</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6950-2357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-3479</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1355-557X |
ispartof | Aquaculture research, 2022-12, Vol.53 (17), p.6049-6055 |
issn | 1355-557X 1365-2109 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03817264v1 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Aquaculture Breeding Breeding stock Comparative analysis Comparative studies Density Females Fish Fish culture Fish hatcheries Freshwater fishes hapa Hatcheries Larvae larvae production Life Sciences Marine fishes Oreochromis niloticus Polyculture (aquaculture) pond Ponds Productivity Reproduction reproductive behaviour Sex ratio Survival Tilapia Whitefish |
title | Comparative study of larvae production by the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linné, 1758) Bouaké strain between earthen ponds and hapas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A04%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20larvae%20production%20by%20the%20Nile%20tilapia%20(Oreochromis%20niloticus,%20Linn%C3%A9,%201758)%20Bouak%C3%A9%20strain%20between%20earthen%20ponds%20and%20hapas&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Akian,%20Dieudonn%C3%A9%20Dj%C3%A9touan&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=6049&rft.epage=6055&rft.pages=6049-6055&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.16075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2731036076%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2731036076&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |