Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes

During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cycloph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revue neurologique 2020-06, Vol.176 (6), p.497-499
Hauptverfasser: de Seze, J., Bigaut, K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 6
container_start_page 497
container_title Revue neurologique
container_volume 176
creator de Seze, J.
Bigaut, K.
description During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3–5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03791045v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0035378720304938</els_id><sourcerecordid>2387649690</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-736dde447555f06fede2b13bad2da41ee23e06d2382499d349673c651467e5ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxX0A0VL4Bgj52B4S_C9xcwFVXWiRFnGBAyfLa092vUri4ElWKp--jtL2yMUeWb83bzyPkA-clZzx-tOxHGBOsSsFE6xksmRMviLn-awKqa_1GXmLeGRMcM3kG3ImhagrpsU5-beJ1AcEi1D00Yf2IQx76tO8R3q5-bG5ogd7AmrpGDFMIZehH62baBzodAAanZtTgsHlsqUILg7epgc6prhPgLgo-rmbwtgBRddByn3wC_0D-I68bm2H8P7pviC_v339dXtfbH_efb-92RZOKTEVWtbeg1K6qqqW1S14EDsud9YLbxUHEBJY7YW8FqppvFRNraWrK65qDVXbygtytfY92M6MKfR5PhNtMPc3W7O8MakbzlR14pm9XNk8_98ZcDJ9QAddZweIM5rsouvs0LCMqhV1-UuYoH3pzZlZUjFHs6ZillSyi8l5ZNnHJ4d514N_ET1HkoHPKwB5J6cAyaALy4J9SOAm42P4v8MjZgmiNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2387649690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Seze, J. ; Bigaut, K.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Seze, J. ; Bigaut, K.</creatorcontrib><description>During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3–5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-3787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2020.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32265072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cohort Studies ; Disease Progression ; Evolution ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Immunosuppressive Agents - classification ; Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy ; Multiple Sclerosis - epidemiology ; Multiple Sclerosis - pathology ; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - epidemiology ; Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - prevention &amp; control ; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - epidemiology ; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - prevention &amp; control ; Neurons and Cognition ; Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification ; Progression ; Recurrence ; Secondary progressive ; Treatment</subject><ispartof>Revue neurologique, 2020-06, Vol.176 (6), p.497-499</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-736dde447555f06fede2b13bad2da41ee23e06d2382499d349673c651467e5ff3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-736dde447555f06fede2b13bad2da41ee23e06d2382499d349673c651467e5ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7197-7578</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0035378720304938$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32265072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03791045$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Seze, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigaut, K.</creatorcontrib><title>Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes</title><title>Revue neurologique</title><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><description>During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3–5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>History, 21st Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - classification</subject><subject>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - epidemiology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - epidemiology</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Neurons and Cognition</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</subject><subject>Progression</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Secondary progressive</subject><subject>Treatment</subject><issn>0035-3787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9v1DAQxX0A0VL4Bgj52B4S_C9xcwFVXWiRFnGBAyfLa092vUri4ElWKp--jtL2yMUeWb83bzyPkA-clZzx-tOxHGBOsSsFE6xksmRMviLn-awKqa_1GXmLeGRMcM3kG3ImhagrpsU5-beJ1AcEi1D00Yf2IQx76tO8R3q5-bG5ogd7AmrpGDFMIZehH62baBzodAAanZtTgsHlsqUILg7epgc6prhPgLgo-rmbwtgBRddByn3wC_0D-I68bm2H8P7pviC_v339dXtfbH_efb-92RZOKTEVWtbeg1K6qqqW1S14EDsud9YLbxUHEBJY7YW8FqppvFRNraWrK65qDVXbygtytfY92M6MKfR5PhNtMPc3W7O8MakbzlR14pm9XNk8_98ZcDJ9QAddZweIM5rsouvs0LCMqhV1-UuYoH3pzZlZUjFHs6ZillSyi8l5ZNnHJ4d514N_ET1HkoHPKwB5J6cAyaALy4J9SOAm42P4v8MjZgmiNA</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>de Seze, J.</creator><creator>Bigaut, K.</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><general>Elsevier Masson</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-7578</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes</title><author>de Seze, J. ; Bigaut, K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-736dde447555f06fede2b13bad2da41ee23e06d2382499d349673c651467e5ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>History, 21st Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - classification</topic><topic>Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - pathology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - epidemiology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - epidemiology</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Neurons and Cognition</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification</topic><topic>Progression</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Secondary progressive</topic><topic>Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Seze, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bigaut, K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Seze, J.</au><au>Bigaut, K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes</atitle><jtitle>Revue neurologique</jtitle><addtitle>Rev Neurol (Paris)</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>176</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>497</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>497-499</pages><issn>0035-3787</issn><abstract>During the 20 past years, the management of multiple sclerosis (MS) has largely changed especially concerning therapeutical approach. Before 1996, treatments were restricted to corticosteroids for relapses, several symptomatic treatments and unselective immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate) with a low evidence of any efficacy. In the present review, we analyze the principal real-life cohorts of MS during several periods (before therapeutical modern area, first-generation treatment area and most recent period). Despite many methodological problems, we observe globally a delay of around 3–5 years between untreated cohorts and first-generation treatments for going to EDSS 6 which is probably the most robust score. This delay is clearly increase to at least 15 years with the most recent cohort treated first and second-line treatments confirming that early and more intensive treatment are necessary to have a long-term efficacy on disability progression and especially on severe disability represent by EDSS 6. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these tendencies and OFSEP observatory or MS base will probably provide us the possibility to conclude in a couple of years.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>32265072</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neurol.2020.03.003</doi><tpages>3</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-7578</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-3787
ispartof Revue neurologique, 2020-06, Vol.176 (6), p.497-499
issn 0035-3787
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03791045v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Cohort Studies
Disease Progression
Evolution
Female
Follow-Up Studies
History, 20th Century
History, 21st Century
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - classification
Immunosuppressive Agents - therapeutic use
Life Sciences
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - drug therapy
Multiple Sclerosis - epidemiology
Multiple Sclerosis - pathology
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - epidemiology
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive - prevention & control
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - epidemiology
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting - prevention & control
Neurons and Cognition
Pharmaceutical Preparations - classification
Progression
Recurrence
Secondary progressive
Treatment
title Do disease-modifying drugs (DMD) have a positive impact on the occurrence of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis? Yes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T13%3A13%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20disease-modifying%20drugs%20(DMD)%20have%20a%20positive%20impact%20on%20the%20occurrence%20of%20secondary%20progressive%20multiple%20sclerosis?%20Yes&rft.jtitle=Revue%20neurologique&rft.au=de%20Seze,%20J.&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=176&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=497&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=497-499&rft.issn=0035-3787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neurol.2020.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2387649690%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2387649690&rft_id=info:pmid/32265072&rft_els_id=S0035378720304938&rfr_iscdi=true