Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics

As soils store more carbon (C) than the Earth's atmosphere and terrestrial biomass together, the balance between soil C uptake in the form of soil organic matter (SOC) and release as CO2 upon its decomposition is a critical determinant in the global C cycle regulating our planet's climate....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of ecology 2022-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2911-2928
Hauptverfasser: Huys, Raoul, Poirier, Vincent, Bourget, Malo Y., Roumet, Catherine, Hättenschwiler, Stephan, Fromin, Nathalie, Munson, Alison D., Freschet, Grégoire T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2928
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2911
container_title The Journal of ecology
container_volume 110
creator Huys, Raoul
Poirier, Vincent
Bourget, Malo Y.
Roumet, Catherine
Hättenschwiler, Stephan
Fromin, Nathalie
Munson, Alison D.
Freschet, Grégoire T.
description As soils store more carbon (C) than the Earth's atmosphere and terrestrial biomass together, the balance between soil C uptake in the form of soil organic matter (SOC) and release as CO2 upon its decomposition is a critical determinant in the global C cycle regulating our planet's climate. Although plant litter is the predominant source of C fuelling both soil C build‐up and losses, the issue of how litter chemistry influences this balance remains unresolved. As a contribution to solving that issue, we traced the fate of C during near‐complete decomposition of 13C‐labelled leaf and root litters from 12 plant species in a coarse‐textured soil. We separated the soil organic carbon into mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) pools, and investigated how 14 litter chemical traits affected novel SOC formation and native SOC mineralization (i.e. the priming effect) in these soil fractions. We observed an overall net increase in SOC due to the addition of litter, which was stronger for root than for leaf litters. The presumed stable MAOM‐C pool underwent both substantial stabilization and mineralization, whereas the presumably less stable POM‐C pool showed substantial stabilization and reduced mineralization. Overall, the initial increase in soil C mineralization was fully counterbalanced by a later decrease in native soil C mineralization. POM‐C formation as well as MAOM‐C formation and mineralization were positively related to the initial litter lignin concentration and negatively to that of the nitrogen leachates, whereas the opposite was observed for POM‐C mineralization. Synthesis. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2745.13997
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03787888v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2748033987</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-292ee965dd0ca18fe93a696a9c1ceefbaa9672baf0fe45e6cb5671516195de873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws0ZiYkhrx7Udj1XVH1AlGGC2HOdGTZXGxXaBbDwCz8iTkDSoK3e5V0fnHF19CN0SPCLtjAnlLE7EhI0IlVKcocFJOUcDjJMkxhMhLtGV91uMMRcMD9DiudJ1iKoyBHCR2cCu9ME1kbF1cLby7aGdh5-v7wCf4eAgj7wtq8hol9k6ypta70rjr9FFoSsPN397iF4X85fZKl4_LR9m03VsqMQiTmQCIDnLc2w0SQuQVHPJtTTEABSZ1pKLJNMFLmDCgJuMcUEY4USyHFJBh-i-793oSu1dudOuUVaXajVdq07DVKQiTdN30nrveu_e2bcD-KC29uDq9j3VQkkxpfLYOO5dxlnvHRSnWoJVB1Z1GLsEU0ewbYL1iY-yguY_u3qcz_rcLx_4ezc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2748033987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Huys, Raoul ; Poirier, Vincent ; Bourget, Malo Y. ; Roumet, Catherine ; Hättenschwiler, Stephan ; Fromin, Nathalie ; Munson, Alison D. ; Freschet, Grégoire T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huys, Raoul ; Poirier, Vincent ; Bourget, Malo Y. ; Roumet, Catherine ; Hättenschwiler, Stephan ; Fromin, Nathalie ; Munson, Alison D. ; Freschet, Grégoire T.</creatorcontrib><description>As soils store more carbon (C) than the Earth's atmosphere and terrestrial biomass together, the balance between soil C uptake in the form of soil organic matter (SOC) and release as CO2 upon its decomposition is a critical determinant in the global C cycle regulating our planet's climate. Although plant litter is the predominant source of C fuelling both soil C build‐up and losses, the issue of how litter chemistry influences this balance remains unresolved. As a contribution to solving that issue, we traced the fate of C during near‐complete decomposition of 13C‐labelled leaf and root litters from 12 plant species in a coarse‐textured soil. We separated the soil organic carbon into mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) pools, and investigated how 14 litter chemical traits affected novel SOC formation and native SOC mineralization (i.e. the priming effect) in these soil fractions. We observed an overall net increase in SOC due to the addition of litter, which was stronger for root than for leaf litters. The presumed stable MAOM‐C pool underwent both substantial stabilization and mineralization, whereas the presumably less stable POM‐C pool showed substantial stabilization and reduced mineralization. Overall, the initial increase in soil C mineralization was fully counterbalanced by a later decrease in native soil C mineralization. POM‐C formation as well as MAOM‐C formation and mineralization were positively related to the initial litter lignin concentration and negatively to that of the nitrogen leachates, whereas the opposite was observed for POM‐C mineralization. Synthesis. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13997</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Carbon ; carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; carbon saturation ; Decomposition ; Destabilization ; Environmental Sciences ; Fluxes ; Fractions ; Leachates ; Leaves ; Litter ; Litters (births) ; Mineralization ; mineral‐associated organic matter ; Organic carbon ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Particulate organic matter ; plant litter traits ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Priming ; priming effect ; Saturation ; Soil ; Soil dynamics ; Soil management ; Soil organic matter ; Soil properties ; Soil stabilization ; Soil texture ; Soils ; Stabilization ; Texture ; Uptake</subject><ispartof>The Journal of ecology, 2022-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2911-2928</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. Journal of Ecology © 2022 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Ecology © 2022 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-292ee965dd0ca18fe93a696a9c1ceefbaa9672baf0fe45e6cb5671516195de873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-292ee965dd0ca18fe93a696a9c1ceefbaa9672baf0fe45e6cb5671516195de873</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3752-7503 ; 0000-0001-6013-7998 ; 0000-0002-7499-674X ; 0000-0003-1320-9770 ; 0000-0002-5182-4291 ; 0000-0002-8830-3860 ; 0000-0001-8148-960X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13997$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2745.13997$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03787888$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huys, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poirier, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourget, Malo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roumet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hättenschwiler, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromin, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Alison D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freschet, Grégoire T.</creatorcontrib><title>Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics</title><title>The Journal of ecology</title><description>As soils store more carbon (C) than the Earth's atmosphere and terrestrial biomass together, the balance between soil C uptake in the form of soil organic matter (SOC) and release as CO2 upon its decomposition is a critical determinant in the global C cycle regulating our planet's climate. Although plant litter is the predominant source of C fuelling both soil C build‐up and losses, the issue of how litter chemistry influences this balance remains unresolved. As a contribution to solving that issue, we traced the fate of C during near‐complete decomposition of 13C‐labelled leaf and root litters from 12 plant species in a coarse‐textured soil. We separated the soil organic carbon into mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) pools, and investigated how 14 litter chemical traits affected novel SOC formation and native SOC mineralization (i.e. the priming effect) in these soil fractions. We observed an overall net increase in SOC due to the addition of litter, which was stronger for root than for leaf litters. The presumed stable MAOM‐C pool underwent both substantial stabilization and mineralization, whereas the presumably less stable POM‐C pool showed substantial stabilization and reduced mineralization. Overall, the initial increase in soil C mineralization was fully counterbalanced by a later decrease in native soil C mineralization. POM‐C formation as well as MAOM‐C formation and mineralization were positively related to the initial litter lignin concentration and negatively to that of the nitrogen leachates, whereas the opposite was observed for POM‐C mineralization. Synthesis. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>carbon saturation</subject><subject>Decomposition</subject><subject>Destabilization</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Leachates</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Litter</subject><subject>Litters (births)</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>mineral‐associated organic matter</subject><subject>Organic carbon</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>plant litter traits</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>priming effect</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil dynamics</subject><subject>Soil management</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soil properties</subject><subject>Soil stabilization</subject><subject>Soil texture</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stabilization</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Uptake</subject><issn>0022-0477</issn><issn>1365-2745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkL1OwzAUhS0EEqUws0ZiYkhrx7Udj1XVH1AlGGC2HOdGTZXGxXaBbDwCz8iTkDSoK3e5V0fnHF19CN0SPCLtjAnlLE7EhI0IlVKcocFJOUcDjJMkxhMhLtGV91uMMRcMD9DiudJ1iKoyBHCR2cCu9ME1kbF1cLby7aGdh5-v7wCf4eAgj7wtq8hol9k6ypta70rjr9FFoSsPN397iF4X85fZKl4_LR9m03VsqMQiTmQCIDnLc2w0SQuQVHPJtTTEABSZ1pKLJNMFLmDCgJuMcUEY4USyHFJBh-i-793oSu1dudOuUVaXajVdq07DVKQiTdN30nrveu_e2bcD-KC29uDq9j3VQkkxpfLYOO5dxlnvHRSnWoJVB1Z1GLsEU0ewbYL1iY-yguY_u3qcz_rcLx_4ezc</recordid><startdate>202212</startdate><enddate>202212</enddate><creator>Huys, Raoul</creator><creator>Poirier, Vincent</creator><creator>Bourget, Malo Y.</creator><creator>Roumet, Catherine</creator><creator>Hättenschwiler, Stephan</creator><creator>Fromin, Nathalie</creator><creator>Munson, Alison D.</creator><creator>Freschet, Grégoire T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-7503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6013-7998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-674X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-4291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8830-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-960X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202212</creationdate><title>Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics</title><author>Huys, Raoul ; Poirier, Vincent ; Bourget, Malo Y. ; Roumet, Catherine ; Hättenschwiler, Stephan ; Fromin, Nathalie ; Munson, Alison D. ; Freschet, Grégoire T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3907-292ee965dd0ca18fe93a696a9c1ceefbaa9672baf0fe45e6cb5671516195de873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>carbon saturation</topic><topic>Decomposition</topic><topic>Destabilization</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Leachates</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Litter</topic><topic>Litters (births)</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>mineral‐associated organic matter</topic><topic>Organic carbon</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>plant litter traits</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>priming effect</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil dynamics</topic><topic>Soil management</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soil properties</topic><topic>Soil stabilization</topic><topic>Soil texture</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stabilization</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Uptake</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huys, Raoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poirier, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourget, Malo Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roumet, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hättenschwiler, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fromin, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munson, Alison D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freschet, Grégoire T.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huys, Raoul</au><au>Poirier, Vincent</au><au>Bourget, Malo Y.</au><au>Roumet, Catherine</au><au>Hättenschwiler, Stephan</au><au>Fromin, Nathalie</au><au>Munson, Alison D.</au><au>Freschet, Grégoire T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of ecology</jtitle><date>2022-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2911</spage><epage>2928</epage><pages>2911-2928</pages><issn>0022-0477</issn><eissn>1365-2745</eissn><abstract>As soils store more carbon (C) than the Earth's atmosphere and terrestrial biomass together, the balance between soil C uptake in the form of soil organic matter (SOC) and release as CO2 upon its decomposition is a critical determinant in the global C cycle regulating our planet's climate. Although plant litter is the predominant source of C fuelling both soil C build‐up and losses, the issue of how litter chemistry influences this balance remains unresolved. As a contribution to solving that issue, we traced the fate of C during near‐complete decomposition of 13C‐labelled leaf and root litters from 12 plant species in a coarse‐textured soil. We separated the soil organic carbon into mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) and particulate organic matter (POM) pools, and investigated how 14 litter chemical traits affected novel SOC formation and native SOC mineralization (i.e. the priming effect) in these soil fractions. We observed an overall net increase in SOC due to the addition of litter, which was stronger for root than for leaf litters. The presumed stable MAOM‐C pool underwent both substantial stabilization and mineralization, whereas the presumably less stable POM‐C pool showed substantial stabilization and reduced mineralization. Overall, the initial increase in soil C mineralization was fully counterbalanced by a later decrease in native soil C mineralization. POM‐C formation as well as MAOM‐C formation and mineralization were positively related to the initial litter lignin concentration and negatively to that of the nitrogen leachates, whereas the opposite was observed for POM‐C mineralization. Synthesis. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally. Our results highlight the importance of litter chemical traits for SOC formation, and stabilization, destabilization and mineralization. In our coarse‐textured soil, the amount of MAOM‐C did not change despite large C fluxes through this pool. The litter chemical traits that drove these processes differed from those frequently reported for fine‐textured soils far from mineral‐associated C saturation. To account for these discrepancies, we propose an integrative perspective in which litter quality and soil texture interactively control soil C fluxes by modulating several SOC stabilization and destabilization mechanisms. Irrespective, our results open new critical perspectives for managing soil C pools globally.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2745.13997</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-7503</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6013-7998</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-674X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1320-9770</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-4291</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8830-3860</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8148-960X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0477
ispartof The Journal of ecology, 2022-12, Vol.110 (12), p.2911-2928
issn 0022-0477
1365-2745
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03787888v1
source Wiley Free Content; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Carbon
carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide
carbon saturation
Decomposition
Destabilization
Environmental Sciences
Fluxes
Fractions
Leachates
Leaves
Litter
Litters (births)
Mineralization
mineral‐associated organic matter
Organic carbon
Organic matter
Organic soils
Particulate organic matter
plant litter traits
Plant species
Plants (botany)
Priming
priming effect
Saturation
Soil
Soil dynamics
Soil management
Soil organic matter
Soil properties
Soil stabilization
Soil texture
Soils
Stabilization
Texture
Uptake
title Plant litter chemistry controls coarse‐textured soil carbon dynamics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T19%3A43%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plant%20litter%20chemistry%20controls%20coarse%E2%80%90textured%20soil%20carbon%20dynamics&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20ecology&rft.au=Huys,%20Raoul&rft.date=2022-12&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2911&rft.epage=2928&rft.pages=2911-2928&rft.issn=0022-0477&rft.eissn=1365-2745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2745.13997&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2748033987%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2748033987&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true