Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods

This study investigates the effect of text structure and “hands-on” methods in the acquisition of the concepts of moon phases and seasons for pre-service elementary teachers. The goal is to evaluate the most appropriate method for facilitating conceptual change. The presentation of two main misconce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in space research 2008-12, Vol.42 (11), p.1819-1830
1. Verfasser: Frede, V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1830
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1819
container_title Advances in space research
container_volume 42
creator Frede, V
description This study investigates the effect of text structure and “hands-on” methods in the acquisition of the concepts of moon phases and seasons for pre-service elementary teachers. The goal is to evaluate the most appropriate method for facilitating conceptual change. The presentation of two main misconceptions associated with each concept (moon phases and seasons) is tested. Sixty pre-service elementary teachers are divided into three same size experimental groups after a pre-test on their knowledge about astronomy: one group read a simple expository text that presents factual information about seasons and moon phases, another group read a refutation text that moreover presents explicitly two main and usual misconceptions about each concept and arguments to refute them; the last group participates to a refutation modelling activity by testing, for each concept, three hypothesis: the scientific explanation and the two common misconceptions. The hands-on method is used as a way to refute the pre-conceptions thanks to a collaborative activity in small groups. We observe that teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity and who read the refutation text outperformed the ones who read simple expository text both for an immediate post-test (1 day later) and for a delayed one (1 month later). The teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity outperformed the others and the conceptual change induced by this activity seemed more robust in time (1 month later) than the one induced by the other modalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03742199v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273117707011489</els_id><sourcerecordid>19329539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dbfdd079b8e60573263861bd8fcb8ceb300b7b3e65e12e8b16f2a1cde56696df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtOgoddM4lNNnoqxS8o9KLnkE1mbcrupiZrof_eLRWPngaG532ZeQi5BlYCA3m3KW1OJWdMlcBLxuCETKBSugB9X52SCeNKFABKnZOLnDcjwJViE7J6R-vWof-kNg8p9rHb0yYmuk1YZEy74JBiix32g017OhxoTPmBzqmL3damkGNPY0M7HNbR50ty1tg249XvnJKP56f3xWuxXL28LebLwgnJh8LXjfdM6bpCyWZKcCkqCbWvGldXDmvBWK1qgXKGwLGqQTbcgvM4k1JL34gpuT32rm1rtil043Um2mBe50tz2DGh7jlovYORvTmy2xS_vjEPpgvZYdvaHuN3NqAF1zOhRxCOoEsx54TNXzMwc9BsNmbUbA6aDXAzWhwzj8cMjt_uAiaTXcDeoQ8J3WB8DP-kfwD6EoXW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19329539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Frede, V</creator><creatorcontrib>Frede, V</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigates the effect of text structure and “hands-on” methods in the acquisition of the concepts of moon phases and seasons for pre-service elementary teachers. The goal is to evaluate the most appropriate method for facilitating conceptual change. The presentation of two main misconceptions associated with each concept (moon phases and seasons) is tested. Sixty pre-service elementary teachers are divided into three same size experimental groups after a pre-test on their knowledge about astronomy: one group read a simple expository text that presents factual information about seasons and moon phases, another group read a refutation text that moreover presents explicitly two main and usual misconceptions about each concept and arguments to refute them; the last group participates to a refutation modelling activity by testing, for each concept, three hypothesis: the scientific explanation and the two common misconceptions. The hands-on method is used as a way to refute the pre-conceptions thanks to a collaborative activity in small groups. We observe that teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity and who read the refutation text outperformed the ones who read simple expository text both for an immediate post-test (1 day later) and for a delayed one (1 month later). The teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity outperformed the others and the conceptual change induced by this activity seemed more robust in time (1 month later) than the one induced by the other modalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1948</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Astrophysics ; Moon phases ; Physics ; Pre-service elementary teachers ; Refutation activities ; Seasons</subject><ispartof>Advances in space research, 2008-12, Vol.42 (11), p.1819-1830</ispartof><rights>2007 COSPAR</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dbfdd079b8e60573263861bd8fcb8ceb300b7b3e65e12e8b16f2a1cde56696df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dbfdd079b8e60573263861bd8fcb8ceb300b7b3e65e12e8b16f2a1cde56696df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03742199$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frede, V</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods</title><title>Advances in space research</title><description>This study investigates the effect of text structure and “hands-on” methods in the acquisition of the concepts of moon phases and seasons for pre-service elementary teachers. The goal is to evaluate the most appropriate method for facilitating conceptual change. The presentation of two main misconceptions associated with each concept (moon phases and seasons) is tested. Sixty pre-service elementary teachers are divided into three same size experimental groups after a pre-test on their knowledge about astronomy: one group read a simple expository text that presents factual information about seasons and moon phases, another group read a refutation text that moreover presents explicitly two main and usual misconceptions about each concept and arguments to refute them; the last group participates to a refutation modelling activity by testing, for each concept, three hypothesis: the scientific explanation and the two common misconceptions. The hands-on method is used as a way to refute the pre-conceptions thanks to a collaborative activity in small groups. We observe that teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity and who read the refutation text outperformed the ones who read simple expository text both for an immediate post-test (1 day later) and for a delayed one (1 month later). The teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity outperformed the others and the conceptual change induced by this activity seemed more robust in time (1 month later) than the one induced by the other modalities.</description><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Moon phases</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pre-service elementary teachers</subject><subject>Refutation activities</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><issn>0273-1177</issn><issn>1879-1948</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKs_wFtOgoddM4lNNnoqxS8o9KLnkE1mbcrupiZrof_eLRWPngaG532ZeQi5BlYCA3m3KW1OJWdMlcBLxuCETKBSugB9X52SCeNKFABKnZOLnDcjwJViE7J6R-vWof-kNg8p9rHb0yYmuk1YZEy74JBiix32g017OhxoTPmBzqmL3damkGNPY0M7HNbR50ty1tg249XvnJKP56f3xWuxXL28LebLwgnJh8LXjfdM6bpCyWZKcCkqCbWvGldXDmvBWK1qgXKGwLGqQTbcgvM4k1JL34gpuT32rm1rtil043Um2mBe50tz2DGh7jlovYORvTmy2xS_vjEPpgvZYdvaHuN3NqAF1zOhRxCOoEsx54TNXzMwc9BsNmbUbA6aDXAzWhwzj8cMjt_uAiaTXcDeoQ8J3WB8DP-kfwD6EoXW</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Frede, V</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods</title><author>Frede, V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-dbfdd079b8e60573263861bd8fcb8ceb300b7b3e65e12e8b16f2a1cde56696df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Moon phases</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pre-service elementary teachers</topic><topic>Refutation activities</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frede, V</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frede, V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods</atitle><jtitle>Advances in space research</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1819</spage><epage>1830</epage><pages>1819-1830</pages><issn>0273-1177</issn><eissn>1879-1948</eissn><abstract>This study investigates the effect of text structure and “hands-on” methods in the acquisition of the concepts of moon phases and seasons for pre-service elementary teachers. The goal is to evaluate the most appropriate method for facilitating conceptual change. The presentation of two main misconceptions associated with each concept (moon phases and seasons) is tested. Sixty pre-service elementary teachers are divided into three same size experimental groups after a pre-test on their knowledge about astronomy: one group read a simple expository text that presents factual information about seasons and moon phases, another group read a refutation text that moreover presents explicitly two main and usual misconceptions about each concept and arguments to refute them; the last group participates to a refutation modelling activity by testing, for each concept, three hypothesis: the scientific explanation and the two common misconceptions. The hands-on method is used as a way to refute the pre-conceptions thanks to a collaborative activity in small groups. We observe that teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity and who read the refutation text outperformed the ones who read simple expository text both for an immediate post-test (1 day later) and for a delayed one (1 month later). The teachers who participated to the refutation modelling activity outperformed the others and the conceptual change induced by this activity seemed more robust in time (1 month later) than the one induced by the other modalities.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1177
ispartof Advances in space research, 2008-12, Vol.42 (11), p.1819-1830
issn 0273-1177
1879-1948
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03742199v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings
subjects Astrophysics
Moon phases
Physics
Pre-service elementary teachers
Refutation activities
Seasons
title Teaching astronomy for pre-service elementary teachers: A comparison of methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20astronomy%20for%20pre-service%20elementary%20teachers:%20A%20comparison%20of%20methods&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20space%20research&rft.au=Frede,%20V&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1819&rft.epage=1830&rft.pages=1819-1830&rft.issn=0273-1177&rft.eissn=1879-1948&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.asr.2007.12.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E19329539%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19329539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0273117707011489&rfr_iscdi=true