High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1462 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1452 |
container_title | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio Jaber, Samir Grieco, Domenico Luca Mancebo, Jordi Zakynthinos, Spyros Demoule, Alexandre Ricard, Jean-Damien Navalesi, Paolo Vaschetto, Rosanna Hraiech, Sami Klouche, Kada Frat, Jean-Pierre Lemiale, Virginie Fanelli, Vito Chanques, Gerald Natalini, Daniele Ischaki, Eleni Reuter, Danielle Morán, Indalecio La Combe, Béatrice Longhini, Federico de Gaetano, Andrea Ranieri, V. Marco Brochard, Laurent Antonelli, Massimo |
description | Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyt1KwzAcBfAgipsfL-DV_1YwMx_t2nlXxkYFx8Yo4l2JXbZG07Qk7Wx9D9_XCPoAXp3DOT-EbiiZUDoN7m1RVBNGGCMUEzIN1_MTNKYhD3Ewi8ip7yTiOAhmLyN04dwbIZTFlJyjEQ9jT-JojL5SdSjxUtcf8Cyt65wP03ZWrYR7h3U_HKSBrJRWNAO0NWysPHoAW4kfvXsVraoNKAPp0NS9rFQBG7954iDZt9LCov9jD5DAqtOtKvwt7R1shdnVlfqUO5hrZVQhNGRWCX2FzvZCO3n9m5fodrnI5ikuhc4bqyphh7wWKk-Tp_xnIzxiEePsSPl_7Df7Y2VO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-4970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35849787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Airway Extubation ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Life Sciences ; Noninvasive Ventilation ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy ; Pulmonology and respiratory tract ; Respiratory Insufficiency</subject><ispartof>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462</ispartof><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7851-8609 ; 0000-0002-9176-7797 ; 0000-0002-4557-6308 ; 0000-0003-1633-7700 ; 0000-0002-1828-9143 ; 0000-0002-7257-8069 ; 0000-0002-9176-7797 ; 0000-0002-1828-9143 ; 0000-0001-7851-8609 ; 0000-0002-7257-8069 ; 0000-0003-1633-7700 ; 0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03727232$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demoule, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraiech, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klouche, Kada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiale, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanques, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ischaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morán, Indalecio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Combe, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longhini, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gaetano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranieri, V. Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</title><description>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</description><subject>Airway Extubation</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Noninvasive Ventilation</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</subject><subject>Pulmonology and respiratory tract</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency</subject><issn>1073-449X</issn><issn>1535-4970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyt1KwzAcBfAgipsfL-DV_1YwMx_t2nlXxkYFx8Yo4l2JXbZG07Qk7Wx9D9_XCPoAXp3DOT-EbiiZUDoN7m1RVBNGGCMUEzIN1_MTNKYhD3Ewi8ip7yTiOAhmLyN04dwbIZTFlJyjEQ9jT-JojL5SdSjxUtcf8Cyt65wP03ZWrYR7h3U_HKSBrJRWNAO0NWysPHoAW4kfvXsVraoNKAPp0NS9rFQBG7954iDZt9LCov9jD5DAqtOtKvwt7R1shdnVlfqUO5hrZVQhNGRWCX2FzvZCO3n9m5fodrnI5ikuhc4bqyphh7wWKk-Tp_xnIzxiEePsSPl_7Df7Y2VO</recordid><startdate>20221215</startdate><enddate>20221215</enddate><creator>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creator><creator>Jaber, Samir</creator><creator>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creator><creator>Mancebo, Jordi</creator><creator>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creator><creator>Demoule, Alexandre</creator><creator>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creator><creator>Navalesi, Paolo</creator><creator>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creator><creator>Hraiech, Sami</creator><creator>Klouche, Kada</creator><creator>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Lemiale, Virginie</creator><creator>Fanelli, Vito</creator><creator>Chanques, Gerald</creator><creator>Natalini, Daniele</creator><creator>Ischaki, Eleni</creator><creator>Reuter, Danielle</creator><creator>Morán, Indalecio</creator><creator>La Combe, Béatrice</creator><creator>Longhini, Federico</creator><creator>de Gaetano, Andrea</creator><creator>Ranieri, V. Marco</creator><creator>Brochard, Laurent</creator><creator>Antonelli, Massimo</creator><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221215</creationdate><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Airway Extubation</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Noninvasive Ventilation</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</topic><topic>Pulmonology and respiratory tract</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demoule, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraiech, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klouche, Kada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiale, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanques, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ischaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morán, Indalecio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Combe, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longhini, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gaetano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranieri, V. Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</au><au>Jaber, Samir</au><au>Grieco, Domenico Luca</au><au>Mancebo, Jordi</au><au>Zakynthinos, Spyros</au><au>Demoule, Alexandre</au><au>Ricard, Jean-Damien</au><au>Navalesi, Paolo</au><au>Vaschetto, Rosanna</au><au>Hraiech, Sami</au><au>Klouche, Kada</au><au>Frat, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Lemiale, Virginie</au><au>Fanelli, Vito</au><au>Chanques, Gerald</au><au>Natalini, Daniele</au><au>Ischaki, Eleni</au><au>Reuter, Danielle</au><au>Morán, Indalecio</au><au>La Combe, Béatrice</au><au>Longhini, Federico</au><au>de Gaetano, Andrea</au><au>Ranieri, V. Marco</au><au>Brochard, Laurent</au><au>Antonelli, Massimo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle><date>2022-12-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1452</spage><epage>1462</epage><pages>1452-1462</pages><issn>1073-449X</issn><eissn>1535-4970</eissn><abstract>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</abstract><pub>American Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>35849787</pmid><doi>10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1073-449X |
ispartof | American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462 |
issn | 1073-449X 1535-4970 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Airway Extubation Human health and pathology Humans Intubation, Intratracheal Life Sciences Noninvasive Ventilation Oxygen Oxygen Inhalation Therapy Pulmonology and respiratory tract Respiratory Insufficiency |
title | High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-Flow%20Versus%20VenturiMask%20Oxygen%20Therapy%20to%20Prevent%20Re-Intubation%20in%20Hypoxemic%20Patients%20After%20Extubation:%20A%20Multicenter,%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20respiratory%20and%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Maggiore,%20Salvatore%20Maurizio&rft.date=2022-12-15&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1452&rft.epage=1462&rft.pages=1452-1462&rft.issn=1073-449X&rft.eissn=1535-4970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC&rft_dat=%3Chal%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03727232v1%3C/hal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35849787&rfr_iscdi=true |