High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462
Hauptverfasser: Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio, Jaber, Samir, Grieco, Domenico Luca, Mancebo, Jordi, Zakynthinos, Spyros, Demoule, Alexandre, Ricard, Jean-Damien, Navalesi, Paolo, Vaschetto, Rosanna, Hraiech, Sami, Klouche, Kada, Frat, Jean-Pierre, Lemiale, Virginie, Fanelli, Vito, Chanques, Gerald, Natalini, Daniele, Ischaki, Eleni, Reuter, Danielle, Morán, Indalecio, La Combe, Béatrice, Longhini, Federico, de Gaetano, Andrea, Ranieri, V. Marco, Brochard, Laurent, Antonelli, Massimo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1462
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1452
container_title American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
container_volume 106
creator Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio
Jaber, Samir
Grieco, Domenico Luca
Mancebo, Jordi
Zakynthinos, Spyros
Demoule, Alexandre
Ricard, Jean-Damien
Navalesi, Paolo
Vaschetto, Rosanna
Hraiech, Sami
Klouche, Kada
Frat, Jean-Pierre
Lemiale, Virginie
Fanelli, Vito
Chanques, Gerald
Natalini, Daniele
Ischaki, Eleni
Reuter, Danielle
Morán, Indalecio
La Combe, Béatrice
Longhini, Federico
de Gaetano, Andrea
Ranieri, V. Marco
Brochard, Laurent
Antonelli, Massimo
description Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).
doi_str_mv 10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVyt1KwzAcBfAgipsfL-DV_1YwMx_t2nlXxkYFx8Yo4l2JXbZG07Qk7Wx9D9_XCPoAXp3DOT-EbiiZUDoN7m1RVBNGGCMUEzIN1_MTNKYhD3Ewi8ip7yTiOAhmLyN04dwbIZTFlJyjEQ9jT-JojL5SdSjxUtcf8Cyt65wP03ZWrYR7h3U_HKSBrJRWNAO0NWysPHoAW4kfvXsVraoNKAPp0NS9rFQBG7954iDZt9LCov9jD5DAqtOtKvwt7R1shdnVlfqUO5hrZVQhNGRWCX2FzvZCO3n9m5fodrnI5ikuhc4bqyphh7wWKk-Tp_xnIzxiEePsSPl_7Df7Y2VO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</creator><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-449X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-4970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35849787</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Thoracic Society</publisher><subject>Airway Extubation ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Life Sciences ; Noninvasive Ventilation ; Oxygen ; Oxygen Inhalation Therapy ; Pulmonology and respiratory tract ; Respiratory Insufficiency</subject><ispartof>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462</ispartof><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7851-8609 ; 0000-0002-9176-7797 ; 0000-0002-4557-6308 ; 0000-0003-1633-7700 ; 0000-0002-1828-9143 ; 0000-0002-7257-8069 ; 0000-0002-9176-7797 ; 0000-0002-1828-9143 ; 0000-0001-7851-8609 ; 0000-0002-7257-8069 ; 0000-0003-1633-7700 ; 0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03727232$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demoule, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraiech, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klouche, Kada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiale, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanques, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ischaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morán, Indalecio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Combe, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longhini, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gaetano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranieri, V. Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><title>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</title><description>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</description><subject>Airway Extubation</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Noninvasive Ventilation</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</subject><subject>Pulmonology and respiratory tract</subject><subject>Respiratory Insufficiency</subject><issn>1073-449X</issn><issn>1535-4970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVyt1KwzAcBfAgipsfL-DV_1YwMx_t2nlXxkYFx8Yo4l2JXbZG07Qk7Wx9D9_XCPoAXp3DOT-EbiiZUDoN7m1RVBNGGCMUEzIN1_MTNKYhD3Ewi8ip7yTiOAhmLyN04dwbIZTFlJyjEQ9jT-JojL5SdSjxUtcf8Cyt65wP03ZWrYR7h3U_HKSBrJRWNAO0NWysPHoAW4kfvXsVraoNKAPp0NS9rFQBG7954iDZt9LCov9jD5DAqtOtKvwt7R1shdnVlfqUO5hrZVQhNGRWCX2FzvZCO3n9m5fodrnI5ikuhc4bqyphh7wWKk-Tp_xnIzxiEePsSPl_7Df7Y2VO</recordid><startdate>20221215</startdate><enddate>20221215</enddate><creator>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creator><creator>Jaber, Samir</creator><creator>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creator><creator>Mancebo, Jordi</creator><creator>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creator><creator>Demoule, Alexandre</creator><creator>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creator><creator>Navalesi, Paolo</creator><creator>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creator><creator>Hraiech, Sami</creator><creator>Klouche, Kada</creator><creator>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Lemiale, Virginie</creator><creator>Fanelli, Vito</creator><creator>Chanques, Gerald</creator><creator>Natalini, Daniele</creator><creator>Ischaki, Eleni</creator><creator>Reuter, Danielle</creator><creator>Morán, Indalecio</creator><creator>La Combe, Béatrice</creator><creator>Longhini, Federico</creator><creator>de Gaetano, Andrea</creator><creator>Ranieri, V. Marco</creator><creator>Brochard, Laurent</creator><creator>Antonelli, Massimo</creator><general>American Thoracic Society</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221215</creationdate><title>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio ; Jaber, Samir ; Grieco, Domenico Luca ; Mancebo, Jordi ; Zakynthinos, Spyros ; Demoule, Alexandre ; Ricard, Jean-Damien ; Navalesi, Paolo ; Vaschetto, Rosanna ; Hraiech, Sami ; Klouche, Kada ; Frat, Jean-Pierre ; Lemiale, Virginie ; Fanelli, Vito ; Chanques, Gerald ; Natalini, Daniele ; Ischaki, Eleni ; Reuter, Danielle ; Morán, Indalecio ; La Combe, Béatrice ; Longhini, Federico ; de Gaetano, Andrea ; Ranieri, V. Marco ; Brochard, Laurent ; Antonelli, Massimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Airway Extubation</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Noninvasive Ventilation</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Oxygen Inhalation Therapy</topic><topic>Pulmonology and respiratory tract</topic><topic>Respiratory Insufficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaber, Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieco, Domenico Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mancebo, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakynthinos, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demoule, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricard, Jean-Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navalesi, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaschetto, Rosanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hraiech, Sami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klouche, Kada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frat, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemiale, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanelli, Vito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chanques, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natalini, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ischaki, Eleni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reuter, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morán, Indalecio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Combe, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Longhini, Federico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Gaetano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranieri, V. Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brochard, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antonelli, Massimo</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maggiore, Salvatore Maurizio</au><au>Jaber, Samir</au><au>Grieco, Domenico Luca</au><au>Mancebo, Jordi</au><au>Zakynthinos, Spyros</au><au>Demoule, Alexandre</au><au>Ricard, Jean-Damien</au><au>Navalesi, Paolo</au><au>Vaschetto, Rosanna</au><au>Hraiech, Sami</au><au>Klouche, Kada</au><au>Frat, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Lemiale, Virginie</au><au>Fanelli, Vito</au><au>Chanques, Gerald</au><au>Natalini, Daniele</au><au>Ischaki, Eleni</au><au>Reuter, Danielle</au><au>Morán, Indalecio</au><au>La Combe, Béatrice</au><au>Longhini, Federico</au><au>de Gaetano, Andrea</au><au>Ranieri, V. Marco</au><au>Brochard, Laurent</au><au>Antonelli, Massimo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine</jtitle><date>2022-12-15</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1452</spage><epage>1462</epage><pages>1452-1462</pages><issn>1073-449X</issn><eissn>1535-4970</eissn><abstract>Rationale: When compared with VenturiMask after extubation, high-flow nasal oxygen provides physiological advantages. Objectives: To establish whether high-flow oxygen prevents endotracheal reintubation in hypoxemic patients after extubation, compared with VenturiMask. Methods: In this multicenter randomized trial, 494 patients exhibiting PaO2:FiO2 ratio ⩽ 300 mm Hg after extubation were randomly assigned to receive high-flow or VenturiMask oxygen, with the possibility to apply rescue noninvasive ventilation before reintubation. High-flow use in the VenturiMask group was not permitted. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was the rate of reintubation within 72 hours according to predefined criteria, which were validated a posteriori by an independent adjudication committee. Main secondary outcomes included reintubation rate at 28 days and the need for rescue noninvasive ventilation according to predefined criteria. After intubation criteria validation (n = 492 patients), 32 patients (13%) in the high-flow group and 27 patients (11%) in the VenturiMask group required reintubation at 72 hours (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70-2.26]; P = 0.49). At 28 days, the rate of reintubation was 21% in the high-flow group and 23% in the VenturiMask group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.60-1.31]; P = 0.55). The need for rescue noninvasive ventilation was significantly lower in the high-flow group than in the VenturiMask group: at 72 hours, 8% versus 17% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P = 0.002) and at 28 days, 12% versus 21% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.32-0.83]; P = 0.007). Conclusions: Reintubation rate did not significantly differ between patients treated with VenturiMask or high-flow oxygen after extubation. High-flow oxygen yielded less frequent use of rescue noninvasive ventilation. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02107183).</abstract><pub>American Thoracic Society</pub><pmid>35849787</pmid><doi>10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9176-7797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1828-9143</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-8609</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-8069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1633-7700</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-6308</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-449X
ispartof American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2022-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1452-1462
issn 1073-449X
1535-4970
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03727232v1
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; American Thoracic Society (ATS) Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Airway Extubation
Human health and pathology
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal
Life Sciences
Noninvasive Ventilation
Oxygen
Oxygen Inhalation Therapy
Pulmonology and respiratory tract
Respiratory Insufficiency
title High-Flow Versus VenturiMask Oxygen Therapy to Prevent Re-Intubation in Hypoxemic Patients After Extubation: A Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T18%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High-Flow%20Versus%20VenturiMask%20Oxygen%20Therapy%20to%20Prevent%20Re-Intubation%20in%20Hypoxemic%20Patients%20After%20Extubation:%20A%20Multicenter,%20Randomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20respiratory%20and%20critical%20care%20medicine&rft.au=Maggiore,%20Salvatore%20Maurizio&rft.date=2022-12-15&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1452&rft.epage=1462&rft.pages=1452-1462&rft.issn=1073-449X&rft.eissn=1535-4970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1164/rccm.202201-0065OC&rft_dat=%3Chal%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03727232v1%3C/hal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/35849787&rfr_iscdi=true