Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches
Aim The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). Methods The charts of all patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit for NLUTD between January 2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2022-02, Vol.41 (2), p.601-608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 608 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 601 |
container_title | Neurourology and urodynamics |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Haudebert, Camille Hascoet, Juliette Freton, Lucas Khene, Zine‐eddine Dosin, Gilles Voiry, Caroline Samson, Emmanuelle Richard, Claire Neau, Anne‐Cécile Drouet, Anais Mathieu, Romain Bensalah, Karim Verhoest, Grégory Manunta, Andréa Peyronnet, Benoit |
description | Aim
The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).
Methods
The charts of all patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit for NLUTD between January 2004 and November 2020 in an academic center were retrospectively reviewed. The approach was either open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted depending on the period (i.e., three consecutive era). For the robotic approach, the diversion was done either intracorporeally or extracorporeally. We compared the perioperative and late postoperative outcomes between the three groups.
Results
After exclusion of 10 patients with non‐neurogenic benign conditions, 126 patients were included over the study period. The most frequent neurological conditions were multiple sclerosis (36.5%) and spinal cord injury (25.4%). The approach was open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted in 31 (24.6%), 26 (20.6%) and 69 (54.7%) cases respectively. Seventy‐two patients experienced a 90‐day postoperative complication (57.1%) of which 22 had a major complication (Clavien 3 or higher, 17.5%) including one death (0.8%). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly lower in the robotic group (23% vs. 23% vs. 10%; p = 0.049) while the rate of overall complications was comparable across the three groups (58.1% vs. 53.9% vs. 60.6%; p = 0.84). After a median follow‐up of 23 months, 22 patients presented a late complication (17.6%), mainly incisional hernia (5; 4%) and uretero‐ileal stricture (9; 7.2%). The rate of late complications did not differ significantly between the three approaches.
Conclusion
Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder is associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity. The robot‐assisted approach may decrease the risk of major postoperative complications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nau.24855 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03713436v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2615110055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-6c146c25da28f2e0e75d75e8d3c75489518a0c0030c64350a7d3a581ebcfab143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhoO06Gp74R8ogd5U6Gi-M3q3LFqFRW_qdcgkZ9yRmWSazLTsv2-2ay0UvEnC4eHNOedB6JSSc0oIuwh2PmeilvIALahkpFJa63doQTTnFRNKH6HjnJ8JITUXl4foqJyKKckXaFxt8wRuisMW2-Bx14PtsYvBz92E25hwgDnFJwidw01vvYd0hVdxGG3qcgw4tnjaAI4jhK-4t6Ucs4tjoXdxKTZx2r3HMUXrNpA_oPet7TN8fLlP0OPN9ffVbbV--Ha3Wq4rx2stK-WoUI5Jb1ndMiCgpdcSas-dlqK-lLS2xBHCiVOCS2K151bWFBrX2oYKfoLO9rkb25sxdYNNWxNtZ26Xa7OrEa4pF1z9pIX9smdLkz9myJMZuuyg722AOGfDFJW0bFrKgn7-D32OcwplkkJxoTnhgv773JVt5ATtaweUmJ0yU5SZP8oK--klcW4G8K_kX0cFuNgDv4qc7dtJ5n75uI_8DZx_nyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2634730341</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Haudebert, Camille ; Hascoet, Juliette ; Freton, Lucas ; Khene, Zine‐eddine ; Dosin, Gilles ; Voiry, Caroline ; Samson, Emmanuelle ; Richard, Claire ; Neau, Anne‐Cécile ; Drouet, Anais ; Mathieu, Romain ; Bensalah, Karim ; Verhoest, Grégory ; Manunta, Andréa ; Peyronnet, Benoit</creator><creatorcontrib>Haudebert, Camille ; Hascoet, Juliette ; Freton, Lucas ; Khene, Zine‐eddine ; Dosin, Gilles ; Voiry, Caroline ; Samson, Emmanuelle ; Richard, Claire ; Neau, Anne‐Cécile ; Drouet, Anais ; Mathieu, Romain ; Bensalah, Karim ; Verhoest, Grégory ; Manunta, Andréa ; Peyronnet, Benoit</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).
Methods
The charts of all patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit for NLUTD between January 2004 and November 2020 in an academic center were retrospectively reviewed. The approach was either open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted depending on the period (i.e., three consecutive era). For the robotic approach, the diversion was done either intracorporeally or extracorporeally. We compared the perioperative and late postoperative outcomes between the three groups.
Results
After exclusion of 10 patients with non‐neurogenic benign conditions, 126 patients were included over the study period. The most frequent neurological conditions were multiple sclerosis (36.5%) and spinal cord injury (25.4%). The approach was open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted in 31 (24.6%), 26 (20.6%) and 69 (54.7%) cases respectively. Seventy‐two patients experienced a 90‐day postoperative complication (57.1%) of which 22 had a major complication (Clavien 3 or higher, 17.5%) including one death (0.8%). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly lower in the robotic group (23% vs. 23% vs. 10%; p = 0.049) while the rate of overall complications was comparable across the three groups (58.1% vs. 53.9% vs. 60.6%; p = 0.84). After a median follow‐up of 23 months, 22 patients presented a late complication (17.6%), mainly incisional hernia (5; 4%) and uretero‐ileal stricture (9; 7.2%). The rate of late complications did not differ significantly between the three approaches.
Conclusion
Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder is associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity. The robot‐assisted approach may decrease the risk of major postoperative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.24855</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34962653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Complications ; cystectomy ; Cystectomy - adverse effects ; Hernia ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Life Sciences ; Morbidity ; Multiple sclerosis ; neurogenic ; Postoperative ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotics ; Robots ; Spinal cord injuries ; Treatment Outcome ; urinary bladder ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery ; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - etiology ; urinary diversion ; Urinary Diversion - adverse effects ; Urinary tract</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022-02, Vol.41 (2), p.601-608</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-6c146c25da28f2e0e75d75e8d3c75489518a0c0030c64350a7d3a581ebcfab143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-6c146c25da28f2e0e75d75e8d3c75489518a0c0030c64350a7d3a581ebcfab143</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8157-2825</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.24855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.24855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34962653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03713436$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haudebert, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hascoet, Juliette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freton, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khene, Zine‐eddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dosin, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voiry, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neau, Anne‐Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drouet, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensalah, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Grégory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manunta, Andréa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyronnet, Benoit</creatorcontrib><title>Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aim
The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).
Methods
The charts of all patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit for NLUTD between January 2004 and November 2020 in an academic center were retrospectively reviewed. The approach was either open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted depending on the period (i.e., three consecutive era). For the robotic approach, the diversion was done either intracorporeally or extracorporeally. We compared the perioperative and late postoperative outcomes between the three groups.
Results
After exclusion of 10 patients with non‐neurogenic benign conditions, 126 patients were included over the study period. The most frequent neurological conditions were multiple sclerosis (36.5%) and spinal cord injury (25.4%). The approach was open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted in 31 (24.6%), 26 (20.6%) and 69 (54.7%) cases respectively. Seventy‐two patients experienced a 90‐day postoperative complication (57.1%) of which 22 had a major complication (Clavien 3 or higher, 17.5%) including one death (0.8%). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly lower in the robotic group (23% vs. 23% vs. 10%; p = 0.049) while the rate of overall complications was comparable across the three groups (58.1% vs. 53.9% vs. 60.6%; p = 0.84). After a median follow‐up of 23 months, 22 patients presented a late complication (17.6%), mainly incisional hernia (5; 4%) and uretero‐ileal stricture (9; 7.2%). The rate of late complications did not differ significantly between the three approaches.
Conclusion
Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder is associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity. The robot‐assisted approach may decrease the risk of major postoperative complications.</description><subject>Complications</subject><subject>cystectomy</subject><subject>Cystectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>neurogenic</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - etiology</subject><subject>urinary diversion</subject><subject>Urinary Diversion - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urinary tract</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1LHDEUhoO06Gp74R8ogd5U6Gi-M3q3LFqFRW_qdcgkZ9yRmWSazLTsv2-2ay0UvEnC4eHNOedB6JSSc0oIuwh2PmeilvIALahkpFJa63doQTTnFRNKH6HjnJ8JITUXl4foqJyKKckXaFxt8wRuisMW2-Bx14PtsYvBz92E25hwgDnFJwidw01vvYd0hVdxGG3qcgw4tnjaAI4jhK-4t6Ucs4tjoXdxKTZx2r3HMUXrNpA_oPet7TN8fLlP0OPN9ffVbbV--Ha3Wq4rx2stK-WoUI5Jb1ndMiCgpdcSas-dlqK-lLS2xBHCiVOCS2K151bWFBrX2oYKfoLO9rkb25sxdYNNWxNtZ26Xa7OrEa4pF1z9pIX9smdLkz9myJMZuuyg722AOGfDFJW0bFrKgn7-D32OcwplkkJxoTnhgv773JVt5ATtaweUmJ0yU5SZP8oK--klcW4G8K_kX0cFuNgDv4qc7dtJ5n75uI_8DZx_nyo</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Haudebert, Camille</creator><creator>Hascoet, Juliette</creator><creator>Freton, Lucas</creator><creator>Khene, Zine‐eddine</creator><creator>Dosin, Gilles</creator><creator>Voiry, Caroline</creator><creator>Samson, Emmanuelle</creator><creator>Richard, Claire</creator><creator>Neau, Anne‐Cécile</creator><creator>Drouet, Anais</creator><creator>Mathieu, Romain</creator><creator>Bensalah, Karim</creator><creator>Verhoest, Grégory</creator><creator>Manunta, Andréa</creator><creator>Peyronnet, Benoit</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-2825</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches</title><author>Haudebert, Camille ; Hascoet, Juliette ; Freton, Lucas ; Khene, Zine‐eddine ; Dosin, Gilles ; Voiry, Caroline ; Samson, Emmanuelle ; Richard, Claire ; Neau, Anne‐Cécile ; Drouet, Anais ; Mathieu, Romain ; Bensalah, Karim ; Verhoest, Grégory ; Manunta, Andréa ; Peyronnet, Benoit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3875-6c146c25da28f2e0e75d75e8d3c75489518a0c0030c64350a7d3a581ebcfab143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Complications</topic><topic>cystectomy</topic><topic>Cystectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>neurogenic</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - etiology</topic><topic>urinary diversion</topic><topic>Urinary Diversion - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urinary tract</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haudebert, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hascoet, Juliette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freton, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khene, Zine‐eddine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dosin, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voiry, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samson, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richard, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neau, Anne‐Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drouet, Anais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathieu, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bensalah, Karim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoest, Grégory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manunta, Andréa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyronnet, Benoit</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haudebert, Camille</au><au>Hascoet, Juliette</au><au>Freton, Lucas</au><au>Khene, Zine‐eddine</au><au>Dosin, Gilles</au><au>Voiry, Caroline</au><au>Samson, Emmanuelle</au><au>Richard, Claire</au><au>Neau, Anne‐Cécile</au><au>Drouet, Anais</au><au>Mathieu, Romain</au><au>Bensalah, Karim</au><au>Verhoest, Grégory</au><au>Manunta, Andréa</au><au>Peyronnet, Benoit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>601</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>601-608</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aim
The objective of the present study was to compare the outcomes of open versus laparoscopic versus robotic cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD).
Methods
The charts of all patients who underwent cystectomy and ileal conduit for NLUTD between January 2004 and November 2020 in an academic center were retrospectively reviewed. The approach was either open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted depending on the period (i.e., three consecutive era). For the robotic approach, the diversion was done either intracorporeally or extracorporeally. We compared the perioperative and late postoperative outcomes between the three groups.
Results
After exclusion of 10 patients with non‐neurogenic benign conditions, 126 patients were included over the study period. The most frequent neurological conditions were multiple sclerosis (36.5%) and spinal cord injury (25.4%). The approach was open, laparoscopic or robot‐assisted in 31 (24.6%), 26 (20.6%) and 69 (54.7%) cases respectively. Seventy‐two patients experienced a 90‐day postoperative complication (57.1%) of which 22 had a major complication (Clavien 3 or higher, 17.5%) including one death (0.8%). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly lower in the robotic group (23% vs. 23% vs. 10%; p = 0.049) while the rate of overall complications was comparable across the three groups (58.1% vs. 53.9% vs. 60.6%; p = 0.84). After a median follow‐up of 23 months, 22 patients presented a late complication (17.6%), mainly incisional hernia (5; 4%) and uretero‐ileal stricture (9; 7.2%). The rate of late complications did not differ significantly between the three approaches.
Conclusion
Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder is associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity. The robot‐assisted approach may decrease the risk of major postoperative complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34962653</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.24855</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8157-2825</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-2467 |
ispartof | Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022-02, Vol.41 (2), p.601-608 |
issn | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03713436v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Complications cystectomy Cystectomy - adverse effects Hernia Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Life Sciences Morbidity Multiple sclerosis neurogenic Postoperative Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Robotics Robots Spinal cord injuries Treatment Outcome urinary bladder Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - surgery Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic - etiology urinary diversion Urinary Diversion - adverse effects Urinary tract |
title | Cystectomy and ileal conduit for neurogenic bladder: Comparison of the open, laparoscopic and robotic approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T05%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cystectomy%20and%20ileal%20conduit%20for%20neurogenic%20bladder:%20Comparison%20of%20the%20open,%20laparoscopic%20and%20robotic%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Haudebert,%20Camille&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=601&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=601-608&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.24855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2615110055%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2634730341&rft_id=info:pmid/34962653&rfr_iscdi=true |