Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?

Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of art...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2021-01, Vol.753, p.141987-141987, Article 141987
Hauptverfasser: Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel, Ilg, Christiane, Demierre, Eliane, Bonnet, Nelly, Wezel, Alexander, Robin, Joël, Vallod, Dominique, Calvo, José Francisco, Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José, Oertli, Beat
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141987
container_issue
container_start_page 141987
container_title The Science of the total environment
container_volume 753
creator Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel
Ilg, Christiane
Demierre, Eliane
Bonnet, Nelly
Wezel, Alexander
Robin, Joël
Vallod, Dominique
Calvo, José Francisco
Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José
Oertli, Beat
description Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of artificial ponds to regional biodiversity of five different regions, studying amphibians, water beetles and freshwater snails. This biodiversity is also compared with that observed in natural ponds from three of the investigated regions. Our results indicate that artificial ponds host, on average, about 50% of the regional pool of lentic species. When compared to natural ponds, the artificial ponds always supported a substantially lower alpha richness (54% of the natural pond richness). The invertebrate communities presented high values of beta diversity and were represented by a restricted set of widely distributed species, and by numerous rare species. There were discrepancies among the taxonomic groups: overall, amphibians benefited most from the presence of artificial ponds, since 65% of the regional lentic species pools for this group was found in artificial ponds, whereas 43% and 42% was observed in the case of beetles and snails, respectively. However, each invertebrate group was promptly the most benefited animal group in a single pond type. Therefore, artificial pond types were complementary among them in terms of contribution to regional diversity of the three animal groups. Based on these results, we forecast that future human-dominated landscapes in which most ponds are artificial will be particularly impoverished in terms of freshwater biodiversity, underlining the need to conserve existing natural ponds and to create new “near-natural” ponds. However, if properly designed and managed, artificial ponds could make a substantial contribution to support freshwater biodiversity at a regional scale. Furthermore, the number and diversity of artificial ponds must be high in each considered landscape. [Display omitted] •Artificial ponds will replace natural ponds in our future human-dominated landscapes.•We assess the relative contribution of different types of artificial and natural ponds to regional biodiversity.•Artificial ponds hosted on average about 50% of the regional species pool, then making a moderate contribution.•Natural ponds supported higher alpha richness than artificial ones, especially in the case of freshwater snails.•Conservation strategies
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03712752v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969720355169</els_id><sourcerecordid>2441607136</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7d915a174242a7b0967c1510e30266438c00d622c9ff1ed173e6fa8bdff15c063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMFu2zAMFYoVaNb2G6rjdnAmyo5k7zIEwdoUCLDLCvQmyDLVKXCsTJJT5O8nw0Ou5YV8xOMj-Qh5ALYEBuLbfhmNSz7hcFpyxnO3gqaWV2QBtWwKYFx8IgvGqrpoRCNvyOcY9yyHrGFBXjd-SMG1Y3J-oN5SHZKzzjjd03edMLS-cxhp8rR1uTxhiC6dv9M1fet1jPSP7i3FwzGdqQ8zsmPf_7gj11b3Ee__51vy8vjz92Zb7H49PW_Wu8JUJaRCdg2sNMiKV1zLljVCGlgBwzLfLaqyNox1gnPTWAvYgSxRWF23XYYrw0R5S77Ounm1OgZ30OGsvHZqu96pqcdKCVyu-Aky98vMPQb_d8SY1MFFg32vB_RjVLyqQDAJ5SQrZ6oJPsaA9qINTE2-q726-K4m39Xse55cz5OYvz45DBMPB4OdC2iS6rz7UOMfXbKPfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441607136</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel ; Ilg, Christiane ; Demierre, Eliane ; Bonnet, Nelly ; Wezel, Alexander ; Robin, Joël ; Vallod, Dominique ; Calvo, José Francisco ; Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José ; Oertli, Beat</creator><creatorcontrib>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel ; Ilg, Christiane ; Demierre, Eliane ; Bonnet, Nelly ; Wezel, Alexander ; Robin, Joël ; Vallod, Dominique ; Calvo, José Francisco ; Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José ; Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><description>Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of artificial ponds to regional biodiversity of five different regions, studying amphibians, water beetles and freshwater snails. This biodiversity is also compared with that observed in natural ponds from three of the investigated regions. Our results indicate that artificial ponds host, on average, about 50% of the regional pool of lentic species. When compared to natural ponds, the artificial ponds always supported a substantially lower alpha richness (54% of the natural pond richness). The invertebrate communities presented high values of beta diversity and were represented by a restricted set of widely distributed species, and by numerous rare species. There were discrepancies among the taxonomic groups: overall, amphibians benefited most from the presence of artificial ponds, since 65% of the regional lentic species pools for this group was found in artificial ponds, whereas 43% and 42% was observed in the case of beetles and snails, respectively. However, each invertebrate group was promptly the most benefited animal group in a single pond type. Therefore, artificial pond types were complementary among them in terms of contribution to regional diversity of the three animal groups. Based on these results, we forecast that future human-dominated landscapes in which most ponds are artificial will be particularly impoverished in terms of freshwater biodiversity, underlining the need to conserve existing natural ponds and to create new “near-natural” ponds. However, if properly designed and managed, artificial ponds could make a substantial contribution to support freshwater biodiversity at a regional scale. Furthermore, the number and diversity of artificial ponds must be high in each considered landscape. [Display omitted] •Artificial ponds will replace natural ponds in our future human-dominated landscapes.•We assess the relative contribution of different types of artificial and natural ponds to regional biodiversity.•Artificial ponds hosted on average about 50% of the regional species pool, then making a moderate contribution.•Natural ponds supported higher alpha richness than artificial ones, especially in the case of freshwater snails.•Conservation strategies should focus on conserving existing natural ponds and creating new “near-natural” ponds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Environmental Sciences ; Freshwater snails ; Natural ponds ; Pond management ; Regional species pools ; Species richness ; Water beetles</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2021-01, Vol.753, p.141987-141987, Article 141987</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7d915a174242a7b0967c1510e30266438c00d622c9ff1ed173e6fa8bdff15c063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7d915a174242a7b0967c1510e30266438c00d622c9ff1ed173e6fa8bdff15c063</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5088-5087 ; 0000-0003-2981-086X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://isara.hal.science/hal-03712752$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demierre, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Nelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wezel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallod, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, José Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><description>Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of artificial ponds to regional biodiversity of five different regions, studying amphibians, water beetles and freshwater snails. This biodiversity is also compared with that observed in natural ponds from three of the investigated regions. Our results indicate that artificial ponds host, on average, about 50% of the regional pool of lentic species. When compared to natural ponds, the artificial ponds always supported a substantially lower alpha richness (54% of the natural pond richness). The invertebrate communities presented high values of beta diversity and were represented by a restricted set of widely distributed species, and by numerous rare species. There were discrepancies among the taxonomic groups: overall, amphibians benefited most from the presence of artificial ponds, since 65% of the regional lentic species pools for this group was found in artificial ponds, whereas 43% and 42% was observed in the case of beetles and snails, respectively. However, each invertebrate group was promptly the most benefited animal group in a single pond type. Therefore, artificial pond types were complementary among them in terms of contribution to regional diversity of the three animal groups. Based on these results, we forecast that future human-dominated landscapes in which most ponds are artificial will be particularly impoverished in terms of freshwater biodiversity, underlining the need to conserve existing natural ponds and to create new “near-natural” ponds. However, if properly designed and managed, artificial ponds could make a substantial contribution to support freshwater biodiversity at a regional scale. Furthermore, the number and diversity of artificial ponds must be high in each considered landscape. [Display omitted] •Artificial ponds will replace natural ponds in our future human-dominated landscapes.•We assess the relative contribution of different types of artificial and natural ponds to regional biodiversity.•Artificial ponds hosted on average about 50% of the regional species pool, then making a moderate contribution.•Natural ponds supported higher alpha richness than artificial ones, especially in the case of freshwater snails.•Conservation strategies should focus on conserving existing natural ponds and creating new “near-natural” ponds.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Freshwater snails</subject><subject>Natural ponds</subject><subject>Pond management</subject><subject>Regional species pools</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Water beetles</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUMFu2zAMFYoVaNb2G6rjdnAmyo5k7zIEwdoUCLDLCvQmyDLVKXCsTJJT5O8nw0Ou5YV8xOMj-Qh5ALYEBuLbfhmNSz7hcFpyxnO3gqaWV2QBtWwKYFx8IgvGqrpoRCNvyOcY9yyHrGFBXjd-SMG1Y3J-oN5SHZKzzjjd03edMLS-cxhp8rR1uTxhiC6dv9M1fet1jPSP7i3FwzGdqQ8zsmPf_7gj11b3Ee__51vy8vjz92Zb7H49PW_Wu8JUJaRCdg2sNMiKV1zLljVCGlgBwzLfLaqyNox1gnPTWAvYgSxRWF23XYYrw0R5S77Ounm1OgZ30OGsvHZqu96pqcdKCVyu-Aky98vMPQb_d8SY1MFFg32vB_RjVLyqQDAJ5SQrZ6oJPsaA9qINTE2-q726-K4m39Xse55cz5OYvz45DBMPB4OdC2iS6rz7UOMfXbKPfw</recordid><startdate>20210120</startdate><enddate>20210120</enddate><creator>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel</creator><creator>Ilg, Christiane</creator><creator>Demierre, Eliane</creator><creator>Bonnet, Nelly</creator><creator>Wezel, Alexander</creator><creator>Robin, Joël</creator><creator>Vallod, Dominique</creator><creator>Calvo, José Francisco</creator><creator>Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José</creator><creator>Oertli, Beat</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-086X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210120</creationdate><title>Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?</title><author>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel ; Ilg, Christiane ; Demierre, Eliane ; Bonnet, Nelly ; Wezel, Alexander ; Robin, Joël ; Vallod, Dominique ; Calvo, José Francisco ; Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José ; Oertli, Beat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-7d915a174242a7b0967c1510e30266438c00d622c9ff1ed173e6fa8bdff15c063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Freshwater snails</topic><topic>Natural ponds</topic><topic>Pond management</topic><topic>Regional species pools</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Water beetles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilg, Christiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demierre, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, Nelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wezel, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Joël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallod, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, José Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertli, Beat</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zamora-Marín, Jose Manuel</au><au>Ilg, Christiane</au><au>Demierre, Eliane</au><au>Bonnet, Nelly</au><au>Wezel, Alexander</au><au>Robin, Joël</au><au>Vallod, Dominique</au><au>Calvo, José Francisco</au><au>Oliva-Paterna, Francisco José</au><au>Oertli, Beat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><date>2021-01-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>753</volume><spage>141987</spage><epage>141987</epage><pages>141987-141987</pages><artnum>141987</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Artificial ponds are increasingly created for the services they provide to humans. While they have the potential to offer habitats for freshwater biodiversity, their contribution to regional diversity has hardly been quantified. In this study, we assess the relative contribution of five types of artificial ponds to regional biodiversity of five different regions, studying amphibians, water beetles and freshwater snails. This biodiversity is also compared with that observed in natural ponds from three of the investigated regions. Our results indicate that artificial ponds host, on average, about 50% of the regional pool of lentic species. When compared to natural ponds, the artificial ponds always supported a substantially lower alpha richness (54% of the natural pond richness). The invertebrate communities presented high values of beta diversity and were represented by a restricted set of widely distributed species, and by numerous rare species. There were discrepancies among the taxonomic groups: overall, amphibians benefited most from the presence of artificial ponds, since 65% of the regional lentic species pools for this group was found in artificial ponds, whereas 43% and 42% was observed in the case of beetles and snails, respectively. However, each invertebrate group was promptly the most benefited animal group in a single pond type. Therefore, artificial pond types were complementary among them in terms of contribution to regional diversity of the three animal groups. Based on these results, we forecast that future human-dominated landscapes in which most ponds are artificial will be particularly impoverished in terms of freshwater biodiversity, underlining the need to conserve existing natural ponds and to create new “near-natural” ponds. However, if properly designed and managed, artificial ponds could make a substantial contribution to support freshwater biodiversity at a regional scale. Furthermore, the number and diversity of artificial ponds must be high in each considered landscape. [Display omitted] •Artificial ponds will replace natural ponds in our future human-dominated landscapes.•We assess the relative contribution of different types of artificial and natural ponds to regional biodiversity.•Artificial ponds hosted on average about 50% of the regional species pool, then making a moderate contribution.•Natural ponds supported higher alpha richness than artificial ones, especially in the case of freshwater snails.•Conservation strategies should focus on conserving existing natural ponds and creating new “near-natural” ponds.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5088-5087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2981-086X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-9697
ispartof The Science of the total environment, 2021-01, Vol.753, p.141987-141987, Article 141987
issn 0048-9697
1879-1026
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03712752v1
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Amphibians
Biodiversity and Ecology
Environmental Sciences
Freshwater snails
Natural ponds
Pond management
Regional species pools
Species richness
Water beetles
title Contribution of artificial waterbodies to biodiversity: A glass half empty or half full?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T12%3A37%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20artificial%20waterbodies%20to%20biodiversity:%20A%20glass%20half%20empty%20or%20half%20full?&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Zamora-Mar%C3%ADn,%20Jose%20Manuel&rft.date=2021-01-20&rft.volume=753&rft.spage=141987&rft.epage=141987&rft.pages=141987-141987&rft.artnum=141987&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141987&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2441607136%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441607136&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0048969720355169&rfr_iscdi=true