Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions

Sills, saucer‐shaped sills, and cone sheets are fundamental magma conduits in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Models of their emplacement usually approximate the host rock properties as purely elastic and consider the plastic deformation to be negligible. However, many field observations suggest...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3430-3449
Hauptverfasser: Haug, Ø. T., Galland, O., Souloumiac, P., Souche, A., Guldstrand, F., Schmiedel, T., Maillot, B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3449
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3430
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 123
creator Haug, Ø. T.
Galland, O.
Souloumiac, P.
Souche, A.
Guldstrand, F.
Schmiedel, T.
Maillot, B.
description Sills, saucer‐shaped sills, and cone sheets are fundamental magma conduits in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Models of their emplacement usually approximate the host rock properties as purely elastic and consider the plastic deformation to be negligible. However, many field observations suggest that inelastic damage and shear fracturing play a significant role during sill emplacement. Here we use a rigid plasticity approach, through limit analysis modeling, to study the conditions required for inelastic deformation of sill overburdens. Our models produce distinct shear failure structures that resemble intrusive bodies, such as cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills. This suggests that shear damage greatly controls the transition from flat sill to inclined sheets. We derive an empirical scaling law of the critical overpressure required for shear failure of the sill's overburden. This scaling law allows to predict the critical sill diameter at which shear failure of the overburden occurs, which matches the diameters of natural saucer‐shaped intrusions' inner sills. A quantitative comparison between our shear failure model and the established sill's tensile propagation mechanism suggests that sills initially propagate as tensile fractures, until reaching a critical diameter at which shear failure of the overburden controls the subsequent emplacement of the magma. This comparison also allows us to predict, for the first time, the conditions of emplacement of both conical intrusions, saucer‐shaped intrusions, and large concordant sills. Beyond the application to sills, our study suggests that shear failure significantly controls the emplacement of igneous sheet intrusions in the Earth's brittle crust. Key Points We investigate the conditions for inelastic deformation induced by inflating sills for which we propose an empirical scaling law The damage patterns calculated in our simulations resemble the inclined sheets of cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills Sills propagate laterally by tensile opening at sill tips, but at a given size shear failure may become favored
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2017JB015196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03699332v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2057478709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4263-7bc159667bbb480ee14763b0c62a81ba595ea1a514fee321f15c7841c8ac8333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qGzEUhYeQQEKaXfcVZBWIU11pJM1kl5j8ODgUatOtuCNrsMJYcqWZFu-67irP2CepjPPTVbWR7tHHJ8Epio9AL4BS9plRUA_XFATUcq84YiDrUc2F3H87Az8sTlJ6onlVOYLyqPg9W1qM5JuNaUhkbn1ynSW36LohWvJozRK9S6tEJn4xGLsgzYbMXNfluY9DcsGnSzJZrTtnsN9OpA2R3OQAjV1Z35PQknHw-boj6BdkhlkT__x6ni1xnX3vng_FQYtdsicv-3Exv72Zj-9H0y93k_HVdIQlk3ykGgOillI1TVNW1FooleQNNZJhBQ2KWlgEFFC21nIGLQijqhJMhabinB8XZzvtEju9jm6FcaMDOn1_NdXbjHJZ15yzH5DZTzvWRJd657UPETXQSjCtOKVb4nRHrGP4PtjU66cwRJ__rxkVqlSVonWmzl89IaVo27eHgepte_rf9jLOd_jPXMbmv6x-uPt6LZhknP8Fk7GaZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2057478709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions</title><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Haug, Ø. T. ; Galland, O. ; Souloumiac, P. ; Souche, A. ; Guldstrand, F. ; Schmiedel, T. ; Maillot, B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Haug, Ø. T. ; Galland, O. ; Souloumiac, P. ; Souche, A. ; Guldstrand, F. ; Schmiedel, T. ; Maillot, B.</creatorcontrib><description>Sills, saucer‐shaped sills, and cone sheets are fundamental magma conduits in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Models of their emplacement usually approximate the host rock properties as purely elastic and consider the plastic deformation to be negligible. However, many field observations suggest that inelastic damage and shear fracturing play a significant role during sill emplacement. Here we use a rigid plasticity approach, through limit analysis modeling, to study the conditions required for inelastic deformation of sill overburdens. Our models produce distinct shear failure structures that resemble intrusive bodies, such as cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills. This suggests that shear damage greatly controls the transition from flat sill to inclined sheets. We derive an empirical scaling law of the critical overpressure required for shear failure of the sill's overburden. This scaling law allows to predict the critical sill diameter at which shear failure of the overburden occurs, which matches the diameters of natural saucer‐shaped intrusions' inner sills. A quantitative comparison between our shear failure model and the established sill's tensile propagation mechanism suggests that sills initially propagate as tensile fractures, until reaching a critical diameter at which shear failure of the overburden controls the subsequent emplacement of the magma. This comparison also allows us to predict, for the first time, the conditions of emplacement of both conical intrusions, saucer‐shaped intrusions, and large concordant sills. Beyond the application to sills, our study suggests that shear failure significantly controls the emplacement of igneous sheet intrusions in the Earth's brittle crust. Key Points We investigate the conditions for inelastic deformation induced by inflating sills for which we propose an empirical scaling law The damage patterns calculated in our simulations resemble the inclined sheets of cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills Sills propagate laterally by tensile opening at sill tips, but at a given size shear failure may become favored</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2017JB015196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cone sheets ; Crack propagation ; Damage ; Deformation ; Deformation mechanisms ; Earth ; Earth crust ; Earth Sciences ; Elastic deformation ; Elastic properties ; Empirical analysis ; Failure mechanisms ; Fractures ; Geophysics ; Landslides &amp; mudslides ; Lava ; Limit analysis ; Magma ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Overburden ; Overpressure ; Plastic deformation ; Plasticity ; Rock properties ; saucer‐shaped sills ; Scaling ; Scaling laws ; Sciences of the Universe ; Sedimentary basins ; Shear ; shear failure ; Sheets ; Sills</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3430-3449</ispartof><rights>2018. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4263-7bc159667bbb480ee14763b0c62a81ba595ea1a514fee321f15c7841c8ac8333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4263-7bc159667bbb480ee14763b0c62a81ba595ea1a514fee321f15c7841c8ac8333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2769-655X ; 0000-0002-3556-1268 ; 0000-0002-8087-428X ; 0000-0001-9368-7494 ; 0000-0002-5370-0954 ; 0000-0002-9378-3985</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2017JB015196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2017JB015196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,26544,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03699332$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Haug, Ø. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galland, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souloumiac, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souche, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guldstrand, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedel, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillot, B.</creatorcontrib><title>Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>Sills, saucer‐shaped sills, and cone sheets are fundamental magma conduits in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Models of their emplacement usually approximate the host rock properties as purely elastic and consider the plastic deformation to be negligible. However, many field observations suggest that inelastic damage and shear fracturing play a significant role during sill emplacement. Here we use a rigid plasticity approach, through limit analysis modeling, to study the conditions required for inelastic deformation of sill overburdens. Our models produce distinct shear failure structures that resemble intrusive bodies, such as cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills. This suggests that shear damage greatly controls the transition from flat sill to inclined sheets. We derive an empirical scaling law of the critical overpressure required for shear failure of the sill's overburden. This scaling law allows to predict the critical sill diameter at which shear failure of the overburden occurs, which matches the diameters of natural saucer‐shaped intrusions' inner sills. A quantitative comparison between our shear failure model and the established sill's tensile propagation mechanism suggests that sills initially propagate as tensile fractures, until reaching a critical diameter at which shear failure of the overburden controls the subsequent emplacement of the magma. This comparison also allows us to predict, for the first time, the conditions of emplacement of both conical intrusions, saucer‐shaped intrusions, and large concordant sills. Beyond the application to sills, our study suggests that shear failure significantly controls the emplacement of igneous sheet intrusions in the Earth's brittle crust. Key Points We investigate the conditions for inelastic deformation induced by inflating sills for which we propose an empirical scaling law The damage patterns calculated in our simulations resemble the inclined sheets of cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills Sills propagate laterally by tensile opening at sill tips, but at a given size shear failure may become favored</description><subject>cone sheets</subject><subject>Crack propagation</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Deformation mechanisms</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth crust</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Elastic deformation</subject><subject>Elastic properties</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Landslides &amp; mudslides</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Limit analysis</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Overburden</subject><subject>Overpressure</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>Plasticity</subject><subject>Rock properties</subject><subject>saucer‐shaped sills</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Scaling laws</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Sedimentary basins</subject><subject>Shear</subject><subject>shear failure</subject><subject>Sheets</subject><subject>Sills</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1qGzEUhYeQQEKaXfcVZBWIU11pJM1kl5j8ODgUatOtuCNrsMJYcqWZFu-67irP2CepjPPTVbWR7tHHJ8Epio9AL4BS9plRUA_XFATUcq84YiDrUc2F3H87Az8sTlJ6onlVOYLyqPg9W1qM5JuNaUhkbn1ynSW36LohWvJozRK9S6tEJn4xGLsgzYbMXNfluY9DcsGnSzJZrTtnsN9OpA2R3OQAjV1Z35PQknHw-boj6BdkhlkT__x6ni1xnX3vng_FQYtdsicv-3Exv72Zj-9H0y93k_HVdIQlk3ykGgOillI1TVNW1FooleQNNZJhBQ2KWlgEFFC21nIGLQijqhJMhabinB8XZzvtEju9jm6FcaMDOn1_NdXbjHJZ15yzH5DZTzvWRJd657UPETXQSjCtOKVb4nRHrGP4PtjU66cwRJ__rxkVqlSVonWmzl89IaVo27eHgepte_rf9jLOd_jPXMbmv6x-uPt6LZhknP8Fk7GaZw</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Haug, Ø. T.</creator><creator>Galland, O.</creator><creator>Souloumiac, P.</creator><creator>Souche, A.</creator><creator>Guldstrand, F.</creator><creator>Schmiedel, T.</creator><creator>Maillot, B.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geopgysical Union (AGU)</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>3HK</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-655X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-1268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-428X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-3985</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions</title><author>Haug, Ø. T. ; Galland, O. ; Souloumiac, P. ; Souche, A. ; Guldstrand, F. ; Schmiedel, T. ; Maillot, B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4263-7bc159667bbb480ee14763b0c62a81ba595ea1a514fee321f15c7841c8ac8333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>cone sheets</topic><topic>Crack propagation</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Deformation mechanisms</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth crust</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Elastic deformation</topic><topic>Elastic properties</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Landslides &amp; mudslides</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Limit analysis</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Overburden</topic><topic>Overpressure</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>Plasticity</topic><topic>Rock properties</topic><topic>saucer‐shaped sills</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Scaling laws</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Sedimentary basins</topic><topic>Shear</topic><topic>shear failure</topic><topic>Sheets</topic><topic>Sills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Haug, Ø. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galland, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souloumiac, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souche, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guldstrand, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmiedel, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maillot, B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Haug, Ø. T.</au><au>Galland, O.</au><au>Souloumiac, P.</au><au>Souche, A.</au><au>Guldstrand, F.</au><au>Schmiedel, T.</au><au>Maillot, B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3430</spage><epage>3449</epage><pages>3430-3449</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>Sills, saucer‐shaped sills, and cone sheets are fundamental magma conduits in many sedimentary basins worldwide. Models of their emplacement usually approximate the host rock properties as purely elastic and consider the plastic deformation to be negligible. However, many field observations suggest that inelastic damage and shear fracturing play a significant role during sill emplacement. Here we use a rigid plasticity approach, through limit analysis modeling, to study the conditions required for inelastic deformation of sill overburdens. Our models produce distinct shear failure structures that resemble intrusive bodies, such as cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills. This suggests that shear damage greatly controls the transition from flat sill to inclined sheets. We derive an empirical scaling law of the critical overpressure required for shear failure of the sill's overburden. This scaling law allows to predict the critical sill diameter at which shear failure of the overburden occurs, which matches the diameters of natural saucer‐shaped intrusions' inner sills. A quantitative comparison between our shear failure model and the established sill's tensile propagation mechanism suggests that sills initially propagate as tensile fractures, until reaching a critical diameter at which shear failure of the overburden controls the subsequent emplacement of the magma. This comparison also allows us to predict, for the first time, the conditions of emplacement of both conical intrusions, saucer‐shaped intrusions, and large concordant sills. Beyond the application to sills, our study suggests that shear failure significantly controls the emplacement of igneous sheet intrusions in the Earth's brittle crust. Key Points We investigate the conditions for inelastic deformation induced by inflating sills for which we propose an empirical scaling law The damage patterns calculated in our simulations resemble the inclined sheets of cone sheets and saucer‐shaped sills Sills propagate laterally by tensile opening at sill tips, but at a given size shear failure may become favored</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2017JB015196</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-655X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3556-1268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-428X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9368-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-0954</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9378-3985</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2018-05, Vol.123 (5), p.3430-3449
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03699332v1
source Wiley Free Content; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects cone sheets
Crack propagation
Damage
Deformation
Deformation mechanisms
Earth
Earth crust
Earth Sciences
Elastic deformation
Elastic properties
Empirical analysis
Failure mechanisms
Fractures
Geophysics
Landslides & mudslides
Lava
Limit analysis
Magma
Mathematical models
Modelling
Overburden
Overpressure
Plastic deformation
Plasticity
Rock properties
saucer‐shaped sills
Scaling
Scaling laws
Sciences of the Universe
Sedimentary basins
Shear
shear failure
Sheets
Sills
title Shear Versus Tensile Failure Mechanisms Induced by Sill Intrusions: Implications for Emplacement of Conical and Saucer‐Shaped Intrusions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T09%3A02%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shear%20Versus%20Tensile%20Failure%20Mechanisms%20Induced%20by%20Sill%20Intrusions:%20Implications%20for%20Emplacement%20of%20Conical%20and%20Saucer%E2%80%90Shaped%20Intrusions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Haug,%20%C3%98.%20T.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3430&rft.epage=3449&rft.pages=3430-3449&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2017JB015196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2057478709%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2057478709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true