Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture
Mixing different herbivore species is assumed to increase vegetation use because of the complementarity of their feeding choices and to reduce animal parasite burden through the dilution effect. Here, we compare the effects of mixed horse‐cattle grazing and monospecific horse grazing (1.4 LU/ha) on...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Grass and forage science 2022-09, Vol.77 (3), p.175-188 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 188 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | Grass and forage science |
container_volume | 77 |
creator | Fleurance, Géraldine Sallé, Guillaume Lansade, Léa Wimel, Laurence Dumont, Bertrand |
description | Mixing different herbivore species is assumed to increase vegetation use because of the complementarity of their feeding choices and to reduce animal parasite burden through the dilution effect. Here, we compare the effects of mixed horse‐cattle grazing and monospecific horse grazing (1.4 LU/ha) on animal foraging behaviour, sward characteristics and horse parasitism in a mesophile grassland of central France. In both treatments, animals were stocked alternately on two subplots with rotation lengths between 15 and 21 days according to season. The horses quickly acclimated to the cattle, and very few agonistic interactions were observed between them. All the horses selected short (≤4 cm) and intermediate (5–8 cm) high‐quality regrowths and avoided reproductive and dead herbage areas contaminated by their faeces as a consequence of their latrine behaviour. Cattle, which are more constrained by plant height, selected intermediate and tall vegetative swards. However, the alternate stocking of animals also provided them with high‐quality regrowth on the shortest patches. Consequently, the cattle used these short patches proportionally to their availability while avoiding reproductive and dead herbage areas. We assume this limited their consumption of infective cyathostome larvae, which are concentrated close to horse dung. Moreover, co‐grazing horses and cattle did not reduce sward structural heterogeneity and thus did not enhance overall herbage quality. We conclude that rather than considering mixed grazing as a turn‐key solution, its management needs to be adapted to support the complementarity of horse and cattle dietary choices and thus provide the expected benefits of multi‐species grazing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/gfs.12564 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03663805v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2707698915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3664-aaaa8cf81b338c2af15679281dd580407e166f5b788a5f05f3784c50f5814d9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFPwyAUxonRxDk9-B-QePLQDQq09LgsbjNZ4kE9E9ZCy9KVCWzL_Oul1ujJd3mB78f3ePkAuMdogmNNa-0nOGUZvQAjTDKWpLSgl2CEME0TltL0Gtx4v0UI5QUhI3Ce291eOtPVMDQKKq1VGTy0GjbWeQVrJz97Uba2U9A6eDKhgaUMoY3H7oeKDtKbYPwOyq6CR1WrIIOJ-iGqpoMS7pS3-8a0PezDwalbcKVl69XdTx-D98XT23yVrF-Wz_PZOilJltFExuKl5nhDCC9TqTHL8iLluKoYRxTlCmeZZpucc8k0YprknJYMacYxrYqKjMHj4NvIVuyd2Ul3FlYasZqtRX-H4hzCETviyD4M7N7Zj4PyQWztwXXxeyLNUZ4VvMDsz7F01nun9K8tRqJPQcQUxHcKkZ0O7Cmufv4fFMvF6_DiC4e0iPY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2707698915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Fleurance, Géraldine ; Sallé, Guillaume ; Lansade, Léa ; Wimel, Laurence ; Dumont, Bertrand</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleurance, Géraldine ; Sallé, Guillaume ; Lansade, Léa ; Wimel, Laurence ; Dumont, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><description>Mixing different herbivore species is assumed to increase vegetation use because of the complementarity of their feeding choices and to reduce animal parasite burden through the dilution effect. Here, we compare the effects of mixed horse‐cattle grazing and monospecific horse grazing (1.4 LU/ha) on animal foraging behaviour, sward characteristics and horse parasitism in a mesophile grassland of central France. In both treatments, animals were stocked alternately on two subplots with rotation lengths between 15 and 21 days according to season. The horses quickly acclimated to the cattle, and very few agonistic interactions were observed between them. All the horses selected short (≤4 cm) and intermediate (5–8 cm) high‐quality regrowths and avoided reproductive and dead herbage areas contaminated by their faeces as a consequence of their latrine behaviour. Cattle, which are more constrained by plant height, selected intermediate and tall vegetative swards. However, the alternate stocking of animals also provided them with high‐quality regrowth on the shortest patches. Consequently, the cattle used these short patches proportionally to their availability while avoiding reproductive and dead herbage areas. We assume this limited their consumption of infective cyathostome larvae, which are concentrated close to horse dung. Moreover, co‐grazing horses and cattle did not reduce sward structural heterogeneity and thus did not enhance overall herbage quality. We conclude that rather than considering mixed grazing as a turn‐key solution, its management needs to be adapted to support the complementarity of horse and cattle dietary choices and thus provide the expected benefits of multi‐species grazing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0142-5242</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2494</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12564</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; agroecology ; Animal behavior ; Animal parasites ; Animals ; Cattle ; Complementarity ; Diet ; diet selection ; Dilution ; dilution effect ; Dung ; Foraging behavior ; Grasslands ; Grazing ; herbage quality ; Heterogeneity ; Horse manure ; Horses ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Mixed grazing ; Parasitism ; Pasture ; Regrowth ; strongyle ; Vegetal Biology ; Vegetation ; Zootechny</subject><ispartof>Grass and forage science, 2022-09, Vol.77 (3), p.175-188</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3664-aaaa8cf81b338c2af15679281dd580407e166f5b788a5f05f3784c50f5814d9d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3664-aaaa8cf81b338c2af15679281dd580407e166f5b788a5f05f3784c50f5814d9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3221-9026 ; 0000-0002-4185-9714 ; 0000-0001-8376-4417 ; 0000-0002-4032-139X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fgfs.12564$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fgfs.12564$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03663805$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleurance, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallé, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansade, Léa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimel, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture</title><title>Grass and forage science</title><description>Mixing different herbivore species is assumed to increase vegetation use because of the complementarity of their feeding choices and to reduce animal parasite burden through the dilution effect. Here, we compare the effects of mixed horse‐cattle grazing and monospecific horse grazing (1.4 LU/ha) on animal foraging behaviour, sward characteristics and horse parasitism in a mesophile grassland of central France. In both treatments, animals were stocked alternately on two subplots with rotation lengths between 15 and 21 days according to season. The horses quickly acclimated to the cattle, and very few agonistic interactions were observed between them. All the horses selected short (≤4 cm) and intermediate (5–8 cm) high‐quality regrowths and avoided reproductive and dead herbage areas contaminated by their faeces as a consequence of their latrine behaviour. Cattle, which are more constrained by plant height, selected intermediate and tall vegetative swards. However, the alternate stocking of animals also provided them with high‐quality regrowth on the shortest patches. Consequently, the cattle used these short patches proportionally to their availability while avoiding reproductive and dead herbage areas. We assume this limited their consumption of infective cyathostome larvae, which are concentrated close to horse dung. Moreover, co‐grazing horses and cattle did not reduce sward structural heterogeneity and thus did not enhance overall herbage quality. We conclude that rather than considering mixed grazing as a turn‐key solution, its management needs to be adapted to support the complementarity of horse and cattle dietary choices and thus provide the expected benefits of multi‐species grazing.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>agroecology</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal parasites</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Complementarity</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>diet selection</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>dilution effect</subject><subject>Dung</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>herbage quality</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Horse manure</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mixed grazing</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>Regrowth</subject><subject>strongyle</subject><subject>Vegetal Biology</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Zootechny</subject><issn>0142-5242</issn><issn>1365-2494</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFPwyAUxonRxDk9-B-QePLQDQq09LgsbjNZ4kE9E9ZCy9KVCWzL_Oul1ujJd3mB78f3ePkAuMdogmNNa-0nOGUZvQAjTDKWpLSgl2CEME0TltL0Gtx4v0UI5QUhI3Ce291eOtPVMDQKKq1VGTy0GjbWeQVrJz97Uba2U9A6eDKhgaUMoY3H7oeKDtKbYPwOyq6CR1WrIIOJ-iGqpoMS7pS3-8a0PezDwalbcKVl69XdTx-D98XT23yVrF-Wz_PZOilJltFExuKl5nhDCC9TqTHL8iLluKoYRxTlCmeZZpucc8k0YprknJYMacYxrYqKjMHj4NvIVuyd2Ul3FlYasZqtRX-H4hzCETviyD4M7N7Zj4PyQWztwXXxeyLNUZ4VvMDsz7F01nun9K8tRqJPQcQUxHcKkZ0O7Cmufv4fFMvF6_DiC4e0iPY</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Fleurance, Géraldine</creator><creator>Sallé, Guillaume</creator><creator>Lansade, Léa</creator><creator>Wimel, Laurence</creator><creator>Dumont, Bertrand</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-9026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-9714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-139X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture</title><author>Fleurance, Géraldine ; Sallé, Guillaume ; Lansade, Léa ; Wimel, Laurence ; Dumont, Bertrand</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3664-aaaa8cf81b338c2af15679281dd580407e166f5b788a5f05f3784c50f5814d9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>agroecology</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal parasites</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Complementarity</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>diet selection</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>dilution effect</topic><topic>Dung</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>herbage quality</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Horse manure</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mixed grazing</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>Regrowth</topic><topic>strongyle</topic><topic>Vegetal Biology</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Zootechny</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleurance, Géraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sallé, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lansade, Léa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimel, Laurence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dumont, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleurance, Géraldine</au><au>Sallé, Guillaume</au><au>Lansade, Léa</au><au>Wimel, Laurence</au><au>Dumont, Bertrand</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture</atitle><jtitle>Grass and forage science</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>175-188</pages><issn>0142-5242</issn><eissn>1365-2494</eissn><abstract>Mixing different herbivore species is assumed to increase vegetation use because of the complementarity of their feeding choices and to reduce animal parasite burden through the dilution effect. Here, we compare the effects of mixed horse‐cattle grazing and monospecific horse grazing (1.4 LU/ha) on animal foraging behaviour, sward characteristics and horse parasitism in a mesophile grassland of central France. In both treatments, animals were stocked alternately on two subplots with rotation lengths between 15 and 21 days according to season. The horses quickly acclimated to the cattle, and very few agonistic interactions were observed between them. All the horses selected short (≤4 cm) and intermediate (5–8 cm) high‐quality regrowths and avoided reproductive and dead herbage areas contaminated by their faeces as a consequence of their latrine behaviour. Cattle, which are more constrained by plant height, selected intermediate and tall vegetative swards. However, the alternate stocking of animals also provided them with high‐quality regrowth on the shortest patches. Consequently, the cattle used these short patches proportionally to their availability while avoiding reproductive and dead herbage areas. We assume this limited their consumption of infective cyathostome larvae, which are concentrated close to horse dung. Moreover, co‐grazing horses and cattle did not reduce sward structural heterogeneity and thus did not enhance overall herbage quality. We conclude that rather than considering mixed grazing as a turn‐key solution, its management needs to be adapted to support the complementarity of horse and cattle dietary choices and thus provide the expected benefits of multi‐species grazing.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/gfs.12564</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-9026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4185-9714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8376-4417</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-139X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0142-5242 |
ispartof | Grass and forage science, 2022-09, Vol.77 (3), p.175-188 |
issn | 0142-5242 1365-2494 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03663805v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural sciences agroecology Animal behavior Animal parasites Animals Cattle Complementarity Diet diet selection Dilution dilution effect Dung Foraging behavior Grasslands Grazing herbage quality Heterogeneity Horse manure Horses Larvae Life Sciences Mixed grazing Parasitism Pasture Regrowth strongyle Vegetal Biology Vegetation Zootechny |
title | Comparing the effects of horse grazing alone or with cattle on horse parasitism and vegetation use in a mesophile pasture |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A08%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20effects%20of%20horse%20grazing%20alone%20or%20with%20cattle%20on%20horse%20parasitism%20and%20vegetation%20use%20in%20a%20mesophile%20pasture&rft.jtitle=Grass%20and%20forage%20science&rft.au=Fleurance,%20G%C3%A9raldine&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=175-188&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gfs.12564&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2707698915%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2707698915&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |