A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience

The neural correlates supporting our perceptual experience of the world remain largely unknown. Recent studies have shown how stimulus detection and related confidence involve evidence accumulation (EA) processes similar to those involved in perceptual decision-making. Here, we propose that independ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trends in cognitive sciences 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.451-461
Hauptverfasser: Pereira, Michael, Perrin, Denis, Faivre, Nathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 461
container_issue 6
container_start_page 451
container_title Trends in cognitive sciences
container_volume 26
creator Pereira, Michael
Perrin, Denis
Faivre, Nathan
description The neural correlates supporting our perceptual experience of the world remain largely unknown. Recent studies have shown how stimulus detection and related confidence involve evidence accumulation (EA) processes similar to those involved in perceptual decision-making. Here, we propose that independently from any tasks, percepts are not static but fade in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of a leaky evidence accumulation process (LEAP), and that confidence corresponds to the maximal evidence accumulated by this process. We discuss the implications and limitations of our proposal, assess how it may qualify as a neural correlate of consciousness, and illustrate how it brings us closer to a mechanistic understanding of phenomenal aspects of perceptual experience like intensity and duration, beyond mere detection. Evidence accumulation enables accurate perceptual decisions based on noisy sensory evidence. Here, we explore how leaky evidence accumulation processes (LEAPs) could determine perceptual consciousness.We propose that a stimulus fades in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of the corresponding accumulated evidence. A percept is held to become conscious when accumulated evidence exceeds a threshold, increases in intensity until maximal evidence is reached, and ceases to be conscious when accumulated evidence drops below threshold due to a leaky accumulation regime.We account for perceptual monitoring by proposing a proxy for perceptual reliability: confidence in having perceived or not a stimulus is defined as the distance between the maximum of accumulated evidence and the detection threshold, thereby enabling metacognition for conscious and unconscious percepts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03629021v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364661322000614</els_id><sourcerecordid>2647656402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b5cb23a15f4f41dc56e27c7cb6d8b155c9caa88b5956f52a0fe254762379e5313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUQIMovn_AhXSpi9Y8mrQFQYZBHWHAjYK7kN7eYsbOdEzawfl7U6uzdJUH556EQ8gFowmjTN0sks6CTzjlPKEioVTskWOWZ0UsaPa2H_ZCpbFSTByRE-8XlDKZZeqQHAkpcl4U4pjcTaIGzcc2wo2tcAUYGYB-2Tems-0qWrsW0Puobl20Rge47nrTRPgVDnbAz8hBbRqP57_rKXl9uH-ZzuL58-PTdDKPIRVpF5cSSi4Mk3Vap6wCqZBnkEGpqrxkUkIBxuR5KQupaskNrZHLNFNcZAVKwcQpuR6976bRa2eXxm11a6yeTeZ6uKNC8YJythnYq5ENv__s0Xd6aT1g05gVtr3XXAWzVCnlAeUjCq713mG9czOqh8h6oYfIeogc3tAhchi6_PX35RKr3chf1QDcjgCGIhuLTnv4qVVZh9DpqrX_-b8BOwOMog</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2647656402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pereira, Michael ; Perrin, Denis ; Faivre, Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Michael ; Perrin, Denis ; Faivre, Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>The neural correlates supporting our perceptual experience of the world remain largely unknown. Recent studies have shown how stimulus detection and related confidence involve evidence accumulation (EA) processes similar to those involved in perceptual decision-making. Here, we propose that independently from any tasks, percepts are not static but fade in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of a leaky evidence accumulation process (LEAP), and that confidence corresponds to the maximal evidence accumulated by this process. We discuss the implications and limitations of our proposal, assess how it may qualify as a neural correlate of consciousness, and illustrate how it brings us closer to a mechanistic understanding of phenomenal aspects of perceptual experience like intensity and duration, beyond mere detection. Evidence accumulation enables accurate perceptual decisions based on noisy sensory evidence. Here, we explore how leaky evidence accumulation processes (LEAPs) could determine perceptual consciousness.We propose that a stimulus fades in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of the corresponding accumulated evidence. A percept is held to become conscious when accumulated evidence exceeds a threshold, increases in intensity until maximal evidence is reached, and ceases to be conscious when accumulated evidence drops below threshold due to a leaky accumulation regime.We account for perceptual monitoring by proposing a proxy for perceptual reliability: confidence in having perceived or not a stimulus is defined as the distance between the maximum of accumulated evidence and the detection threshold, thereby enabling metacognition for conscious and unconscious percepts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-6613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-307X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35382993</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cognitive science ; decision-making ; electrophysiology ; evidence accumulation ; neural correlates of consciousness ; perceptual consciousness ; perceptual monitoring</subject><ispartof>Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.451-461</ispartof><rights>2022 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b5cb23a15f4f41dc56e27c7cb6d8b155c9caa88b5956f52a0fe254762379e5313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b5cb23a15f4f41dc56e27c7cb6d8b155c9caa88b5956f52a0fe254762379e5313</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6011-4921</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364661322000614$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35382993$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03629021$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faivre, Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience</title><title>Trends in cognitive sciences</title><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><description>The neural correlates supporting our perceptual experience of the world remain largely unknown. Recent studies have shown how stimulus detection and related confidence involve evidence accumulation (EA) processes similar to those involved in perceptual decision-making. Here, we propose that independently from any tasks, percepts are not static but fade in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of a leaky evidence accumulation process (LEAP), and that confidence corresponds to the maximal evidence accumulated by this process. We discuss the implications and limitations of our proposal, assess how it may qualify as a neural correlate of consciousness, and illustrate how it brings us closer to a mechanistic understanding of phenomenal aspects of perceptual experience like intensity and duration, beyond mere detection. Evidence accumulation enables accurate perceptual decisions based on noisy sensory evidence. Here, we explore how leaky evidence accumulation processes (LEAPs) could determine perceptual consciousness.We propose that a stimulus fades in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of the corresponding accumulated evidence. A percept is held to become conscious when accumulated evidence exceeds a threshold, increases in intensity until maximal evidence is reached, and ceases to be conscious when accumulated evidence drops below threshold due to a leaky accumulation regime.We account for perceptual monitoring by proposing a proxy for perceptual reliability: confidence in having perceived or not a stimulus is defined as the distance between the maximum of accumulated evidence and the detection threshold, thereby enabling metacognition for conscious and unconscious percepts.</description><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>decision-making</subject><subject>electrophysiology</subject><subject>evidence accumulation</subject><subject>neural correlates of consciousness</subject><subject>perceptual consciousness</subject><subject>perceptual monitoring</subject><issn>1364-6613</issn><issn>1879-307X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUQIMovn_AhXSpi9Y8mrQFQYZBHWHAjYK7kN7eYsbOdEzawfl7U6uzdJUH556EQ8gFowmjTN0sks6CTzjlPKEioVTskWOWZ0UsaPa2H_ZCpbFSTByRE-8XlDKZZeqQHAkpcl4U4pjcTaIGzcc2wo2tcAUYGYB-2Tems-0qWrsW0Puobl20Rge47nrTRPgVDnbAz8hBbRqP57_rKXl9uH-ZzuL58-PTdDKPIRVpF5cSSi4Mk3Vap6wCqZBnkEGpqrxkUkIBxuR5KQupaskNrZHLNFNcZAVKwcQpuR6976bRa2eXxm11a6yeTeZ6uKNC8YJythnYq5ENv__s0Xd6aT1g05gVtr3XXAWzVCnlAeUjCq713mG9czOqh8h6oYfIeogc3tAhchi6_PX35RKr3chf1QDcjgCGIhuLTnv4qVVZh9DpqrX_-b8BOwOMog</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Pereira, Michael</creator><creator>Perrin, Denis</creator><creator>Faivre, Nathan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-4921</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience</title><author>Pereira, Michael ; Perrin, Denis ; Faivre, Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-b5cb23a15f4f41dc56e27c7cb6d8b155c9caa88b5956f52a0fe254762379e5313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>electrophysiology</topic><topic>evidence accumulation</topic><topic>neural correlates of consciousness</topic><topic>perceptual consciousness</topic><topic>perceptual monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pereira, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrin, Denis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faivre, Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pereira, Michael</au><au>Perrin, Denis</au><au>Faivre, Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience</atitle><jtitle>Trends in cognitive sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Trends Cogn Sci</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>461</epage><pages>451-461</pages><issn>1364-6613</issn><eissn>1879-307X</eissn><abstract>The neural correlates supporting our perceptual experience of the world remain largely unknown. Recent studies have shown how stimulus detection and related confidence involve evidence accumulation (EA) processes similar to those involved in perceptual decision-making. Here, we propose that independently from any tasks, percepts are not static but fade in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of a leaky evidence accumulation process (LEAP), and that confidence corresponds to the maximal evidence accumulated by this process. We discuss the implications and limitations of our proposal, assess how it may qualify as a neural correlate of consciousness, and illustrate how it brings us closer to a mechanistic understanding of phenomenal aspects of perceptual experience like intensity and duration, beyond mere detection. Evidence accumulation enables accurate perceptual decisions based on noisy sensory evidence. Here, we explore how leaky evidence accumulation processes (LEAPs) could determine perceptual consciousness.We propose that a stimulus fades in and out of consciousness according to the dynamics of the corresponding accumulated evidence. A percept is held to become conscious when accumulated evidence exceeds a threshold, increases in intensity until maximal evidence is reached, and ceases to be conscious when accumulated evidence drops below threshold due to a leaky accumulation regime.We account for perceptual monitoring by proposing a proxy for perceptual reliability: confidence in having perceived or not a stimulus is defined as the distance between the maximum of accumulated evidence and the detection threshold, thereby enabling metacognition for conscious and unconscious percepts.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>35382993</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.003</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6011-4921</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-6613
ispartof Trends in cognitive sciences, 2022-06, Vol.26 (6), p.451-461
issn 1364-6613
1879-307X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03629021v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cognitive science
decision-making
electrophysiology
evidence accumulation
neural correlates of consciousness
perceptual consciousness
perceptual monitoring
title A leaky evidence accumulation process for perceptual experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T19%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20leaky%20evidence%20accumulation%20process%20for%20perceptual%20experience&rft.jtitle=Trends%20in%20cognitive%20sciences&rft.au=Pereira,%20Michael&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=461&rft.pages=451-461&rft.issn=1364-6613&rft.eissn=1879-307X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tics.2022.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2647656402%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2647656402&rft_id=info:pmid/35382993&rft_els_id=S1364661322000614&rfr_iscdi=true