Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose

X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005
Hauptverfasser: Rouge-Labriet, Helene, Quenot, Laurene, Bohic, Sylvain, Fayard, Barbara, Paganin, David M, Brun, Emmanuel, Berujon, Sebastien
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 065005
container_issue 6
container_start_page 065005
container_title Physics in medicine & biology
container_volume 66
creator Rouge-Labriet, Helene
Quenot, Laurene
Bohic, Sylvain
Fayard, Barbara
Paganin, David M
Brun, Emmanuel
Berujon, Sebastien
description X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03600465v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388000340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUFv2zAMRoWhw5pmu-9U6NgdvJCWLcvHIujaAgF22YDdBNmiEq125EpOgO7Xz6nbnAgSjx9APsa-InxHUGqFQmImSwkr06jKVR_Y4jy6YAsAgVmNZXnJrlL6C4Co8uITuxR5LpXAfMGGdegHE30Kex4c_5NF88LTQO1TR1ljElnue7P1-y235DpqRz-Rkcbo6Wg6brptiH7c9Ym7EPm4Ix6G0ff-n3klp8xorJ8bGxJ9Zh-d6RJ9eatL9vvH3a_1Q7b5ef-4vt1krRBizIRDlFjVJRbUKCVBirKGVtRUCnR1oRS2eQ5ONJVsG2utQkuFtGWVN01dGbFk3-bcnen0EKcj4osOxuuH240-zUBIgEKWR5zYm5kdYng-UBp171NLXWf2FA5J50IpmJ5ZwITCjLYxpBTJnbMR9MmJPgnQJwF6djKtXL-lH5qe7HnhXYL4D0wsh6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388000340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><description>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32268312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bioengineering ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Imaging ; Life Sciences ; Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods ; Observer Variation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Quality Control ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography - methods ; Radiometry - methods ; Synchrotrons ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine &amp; biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6355-7592 ; 0000-0002-7869-4319 ; 0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03600465$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Laurene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohic, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayard, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><title>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Synchrotrons</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUFv2zAMRoWhw5pmu-9U6NgdvJCWLcvHIujaAgF22YDdBNmiEq125EpOgO7Xz6nbnAgSjx9APsa-InxHUGqFQmImSwkr06jKVR_Y4jy6YAsAgVmNZXnJrlL6C4Co8uITuxR5LpXAfMGGdegHE30Kex4c_5NF88LTQO1TR1ljElnue7P1-y235DpqRz-Rkcbo6Wg6brptiH7c9Ym7EPm4Ix6G0ff-n3klp8xorJ8bGxJ9Zh-d6RJ9eatL9vvH3a_1Q7b5ef-4vt1krRBizIRDlFjVJRbUKCVBirKGVtRUCnR1oRS2eQ5ONJVsG2utQkuFtGWVN01dGbFk3-bcnen0EKcj4osOxuuH240-zUBIgEKWR5zYm5kdYng-UBp171NLXWf2FA5J50IpmJ5ZwITCjLYxpBTJnbMR9MmJPgnQJwF6djKtXL-lH5qe7HnhXYL4D0wsh6s</recordid><startdate>20210321</startdate><enddate>20210321</enddate><creator>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creator><creator>Quenot, Laurene</creator><creator>Bohic, Sylvain</creator><creator>Fayard, Barbara</creator><creator>Paganin, David M</creator><creator>Brun, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Berujon, Sebastien</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210321</creationdate><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><author>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Synchrotrons</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Laurene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohic, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayard, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</au><au>Quenot, Laurene</au><au>Bohic, Sylvain</au><au>Fayard, Barbara</au><au>Paganin, David M</au><au>Brun, Emmanuel</au><au>Berujon, Sebastien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2021-03-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>065005</spage><epage>065005</epage><pages>065005-065005</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>32268312</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-9155
ispartof Physics in medicine & biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005
issn 0031-9155
1361-6560
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03600465v1
source MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Algorithms
Bioengineering
Equipment Design
Humans
Imaging
Life Sciences
Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods
Observer Variation
Phantoms, Imaging
Quality Control
Radiation Dosage
Radiography - methods
Radiometry - methods
Synchrotrons
X-Rays
title Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20X-ray%20speckle-based%20imaging%20deflection%20retrieval%20algorithms%20for%20the%20optimization%20of%20radiation%20dose&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Rouge-Labriet,%20Helene&rft.date=2021-03-21&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=065005&rft.epage=065005&rft.pages=065005-065005&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2388000340%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388000340&rft_id=info:pmid/32268312&rfr_iscdi=true