Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose
X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physics in medicine & biology 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 065005 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 065005 |
container_title | Physics in medicine & biology |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Rouge-Labriet, Helene Quenot, Laurene Bohic, Sylvain Fayard, Barbara Paganin, David M Brun, Emmanuel Berujon, Sebastien |
description | X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03600465v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2388000340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kUFv2zAMRoWhw5pmu-9U6NgdvJCWLcvHIujaAgF22YDdBNmiEq125EpOgO7Xz6nbnAgSjx9APsa-InxHUGqFQmImSwkr06jKVR_Y4jy6YAsAgVmNZXnJrlL6C4Co8uITuxR5LpXAfMGGdegHE30Kex4c_5NF88LTQO1TR1ljElnue7P1-y235DpqRz-Rkcbo6Wg6brptiH7c9Ym7EPm4Ix6G0ff-n3klp8xorJ8bGxJ9Zh-d6RJ9eatL9vvH3a_1Q7b5ef-4vt1krRBizIRDlFjVJRbUKCVBirKGVtRUCnR1oRS2eQ5ONJVsG2utQkuFtGWVN01dGbFk3-bcnen0EKcj4osOxuuH240-zUBIgEKWR5zYm5kdYng-UBp171NLXWf2FA5J50IpmJ5ZwITCjLYxpBTJnbMR9MmJPgnQJwF6djKtXL-lH5qe7HnhXYL4D0wsh6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2388000340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</creator><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><description>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-9155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32268312</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Bioengineering ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Imaging ; Life Sciences ; Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods ; Observer Variation ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Quality Control ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography - methods ; Radiometry - methods ; Synchrotrons ; X-Rays</subject><ispartof>Physics in medicine & biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6355-7592 ; 0000-0002-7869-4319 ; 0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32268312$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03600465$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Laurene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohic, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayard, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><title>Physics in medicine & biology</title><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><description>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Synchrotrons</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><issn>0031-9155</issn><issn>1361-6560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kUFv2zAMRoWhw5pmu-9U6NgdvJCWLcvHIujaAgF22YDdBNmiEq125EpOgO7Xz6nbnAgSjx9APsa-InxHUGqFQmImSwkr06jKVR_Y4jy6YAsAgVmNZXnJrlL6C4Co8uITuxR5LpXAfMGGdegHE30Kex4c_5NF88LTQO1TR1ljElnue7P1-y235DpqRz-Rkcbo6Wg6brptiH7c9Ym7EPm4Ix6G0ff-n3klp8xorJ8bGxJ9Zh-d6RJ9eatL9vvH3a_1Q7b5ef-4vt1krRBizIRDlFjVJRbUKCVBirKGVtRUCnR1oRS2eQ5ONJVsG2utQkuFtGWVN01dGbFk3-bcnen0EKcj4osOxuuH240-zUBIgEKWR5zYm5kdYng-UBp171NLXWf2FA5J50IpmJ5ZwITCjLYxpBTJnbMR9MmJPgnQJwF6djKtXL-lH5qe7HnhXYL4D0wsh6s</recordid><startdate>20210321</startdate><enddate>20210321</enddate><creator>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creator><creator>Quenot, Laurene</creator><creator>Bohic, Sylvain</creator><creator>Fayard, Barbara</creator><creator>Paganin, David M</creator><creator>Brun, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Berujon, Sebastien</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210321</creationdate><title>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</title><author>Rouge-Labriet, Helene ; Quenot, Laurene ; Bohic, Sylvain ; Fayard, Barbara ; Paganin, David M ; Brun, Emmanuel ; Berujon, Sebastien</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-3f116179514eb886063590c39e531f94881c220f3b76cbddd81de46d572bb97a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Synchrotrons</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quenot, Laurene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohic, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fayard, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paganin, David M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berujon, Sebastien</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rouge-Labriet, Helene</au><au>Quenot, Laurene</au><au>Bohic, Sylvain</au><au>Fayard, Barbara</au><au>Paganin, David M</au><au>Brun, Emmanuel</au><au>Berujon, Sebastien</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose</atitle><jtitle>Physics in medicine & biology</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med Biol</addtitle><date>2021-03-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>065005</spage><epage>065005</epage><pages>065005-065005</pages><issn>0031-9155</issn><eissn>1361-6560</eissn><abstract>X-ray phase contrast imaging can provide improved or complementary information to traditional attenuation-based X-ray imaging, making the field a vast and rapidly evolving research subject. X-ray speckle-based imaging (SBI) is one phase-contrast imaging approach that has shown significant potential in providing both high sensitivity and high resolution while using a very simple experimental setup. With the aim of transferring such phase-contrast-based imaging techniques from synchrotron to laboratory X-ray sources, the issue of the deposited radiation dose still remains to be addressed. In this work, we experimentally and quantitatively compare the results from three different SBI phase retrieval algorithms using both phantoms and biological samples in order to infer the optimal configuration. The results obtained using a synchrotron beam suggest that the technique based on optical flow conservation achieves the most accurate retrieval from the lowest number of sample exposures. This constitutes an important step toward the possibility of transferring SBI into the clinic.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><pmid>32268312</pmid><doi>10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-7592</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7869-4319</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0332-4903</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-9155 |
ispartof | Physics in medicine & biology, 2021-03, Vol.66 (6), p.065005-065005 |
issn | 0031-9155 1361-6560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03600465v1 |
source | MEDLINE; IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | Algorithms Bioengineering Equipment Design Humans Imaging Life Sciences Microscopy, Phase-Contrast - methods Observer Variation Phantoms, Imaging Quality Control Radiation Dosage Radiography - methods Radiometry - methods Synchrotrons X-Rays |
title | Comparison of X-ray speckle-based imaging deflection retrieval algorithms for the optimization of radiation dose |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A40%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20X-ray%20speckle-based%20imaging%20deflection%20retrieval%20algorithms%20for%20the%20optimization%20of%20radiation%20dose&rft.jtitle=Physics%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Rouge-Labriet,%20Helene&rft.date=2021-03-21&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=065005&rft.epage=065005&rft.pages=065005-065005&rft.issn=0031-9155&rft.eissn=1361-6560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1361-6560/ab87f7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2388000340%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2388000340&rft_id=info:pmid/32268312&rfr_iscdi=true |