Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit

Background Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2022-06, Vol.28 (4), p.777-784
Hauptverfasser: Béchet, Victoire, Benoist, Hubert, Beau, Frédéric, Divanon, Fabienne, Lagadu, Stéphanie, Sichel, F, Delépée, Raphael, Saint-Lorant, Guillaume
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 4
container_start_page 777
container_title Journal of oncology pharmacy practice
container_volume 28
creator Béchet, Victoire
Benoist, Hubert
Beau, Frédéric
Divanon, Fabienne
Lagadu, Stéphanie
Sichel, F
Delépée, Raphael
Saint-Lorant, Guillaume
description Background Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit. Methods The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test. Results A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it (P = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the “outside” group had a significantly higher number of positive assays (P = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found (P = 0.309). Conclusions This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10781552211012059
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03593465v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10781552211012059</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2516222622</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e42a6c2f1361ea7a44b5b1a14aa4a8909941e0cd8c13174f0703378f68be39f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxSNERUvhA3BBlrjQQ4rHf2LnWCpKkVbiAhK3aOLYXa8Se4mdoh755nibUiQQB8uj8W_eG-tV1Sug5wBKvQOqNEjJGAAFRmX7pDoBoVRNW_btaanLe30AjqvnKe0opVox_aw65lwr3Sp5Uv18P8Y4EBNDxskHzD4GEh3JW0v2W5wnNHbJ3uBIUkbnSH9H_OxDzNZgIBgG4nMi-UckE-7iTCabsY-jzzYRH5If7D0Ul7zWxWraxyUMPtyQJfj8ojpyOCb78uE-rb5effhyeV1vPn_8dHmxqQ3nLNdWMGwMc8AbsKhQiF72gCAQBeqWtq0AS82gDXBQwlFFOVfaNbq3vHUNP63OVt0tjt1-9hPOd11E311fbLpDj3LZctHIWyjs25Xdz_H7YlPuJp-MHUcMNi6pYxIaxlg5BX3zF7qLyxzKTzrWyIa2nApVKFgpM8eUZuseNwDaHbLs_smyzLx-UF76yQ6PE7_DK8D5CiS8sX9s_6_4C4jGplA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2656093047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Béchet, Victoire ; Benoist, Hubert ; Beau, Frédéric ; Divanon, Fabienne ; Lagadu, Stéphanie ; Sichel, F ; Delépée, Raphael ; Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</creator><creatorcontrib>Béchet, Victoire ; Benoist, Hubert ; Beau, Frédéric ; Divanon, Fabienne ; Lagadu, Stéphanie ; Sichel, F ; Delépée, Raphael ; Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><description>Background Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit. Methods The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test. Results A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it (P = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the “outside” group had a significantly higher number of positive assays (P = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found (P = 0.309). Conclusions This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-092X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10781552211012059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33878975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adenomatous polyposis coli ; Antineoplastic Agents ; Blood ; Caregivers ; Contamination ; Drug Compounding ; Drug Contamination ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Erythrocytes ; Health care ; Humans ; Irinotecan ; Irinotecan - analysis ; Life Sciences ; Metabolites ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational Exposure - analysis ; Pharmaceutical Preparations ; Pharmaceuticals ; Pharmacy ; Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2022-06, Vol.28 (4), p.777-784</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e42a6c2f1361ea7a44b5b1a14aa4a8909941e0cd8c13174f0703378f68be39f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e42a6c2f1361ea7a44b5b1a14aa4a8909941e0cd8c13174f0703378f68be39f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9894-1268 ; 0000-0003-1295-2191 ; 0000-0001-8429-6539</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/10781552211012059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10781552211012059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33878975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-03593465$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Béchet, Victoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beau, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divanon, Fabienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagadu, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sichel, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delépée, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><title>Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit</title><title>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Background Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit. Methods The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test. Results A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it (P = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the “outside” group had a significantly higher number of positive assays (P = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found (P = 0.309). Conclusions This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.</description><subject>Adenomatous polyposis coli</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Drug Compounding</subject><subject>Drug Contamination</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Irinotecan</subject><subject>Irinotecan - analysis</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - analysis</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Preparations</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</subject><issn>1078-1552</issn><issn>1477-092X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxSNERUvhA3BBlrjQQ4rHf2LnWCpKkVbiAhK3aOLYXa8Se4mdoh755nibUiQQB8uj8W_eG-tV1Sug5wBKvQOqNEjJGAAFRmX7pDoBoVRNW_btaanLe30AjqvnKe0opVox_aw65lwr3Sp5Uv18P8Y4EBNDxskHzD4GEh3JW0v2W5wnNHbJ3uBIUkbnSH9H_OxDzNZgIBgG4nMi-UckE-7iTCabsY-jzzYRH5If7D0Ul7zWxWraxyUMPtyQJfj8ojpyOCb78uE-rb5effhyeV1vPn_8dHmxqQ3nLNdWMGwMc8AbsKhQiF72gCAQBeqWtq0AS82gDXBQwlFFOVfaNbq3vHUNP63OVt0tjt1-9hPOd11E311fbLpDj3LZctHIWyjs25Xdz_H7YlPuJp-MHUcMNi6pYxIaxlg5BX3zF7qLyxzKTzrWyIa2nApVKFgpM8eUZuseNwDaHbLs_smyzLx-UF76yQ6PE7_DK8D5CiS8sX9s_6_4C4jGplA</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Béchet, Victoire</creator><creator>Benoist, Hubert</creator><creator>Beau, Frédéric</creator><creator>Divanon, Fabienne</creator><creator>Lagadu, Stéphanie</creator><creator>Sichel, F</creator><creator>Delépée, Raphael</creator><creator>Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-1268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-2191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-6539</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit</title><author>Béchet, Victoire ; Benoist, Hubert ; Beau, Frédéric ; Divanon, Fabienne ; Lagadu, Stéphanie ; Sichel, F ; Delépée, Raphael ; Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-e42a6c2f1361ea7a44b5b1a14aa4a8909941e0cd8c13174f0703378f68be39f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adenomatous polyposis coli</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Drug Compounding</topic><topic>Drug Contamination</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Irinotecan</topic><topic>Irinotecan - analysis</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - analysis</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Preparations</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Tandem Mass Spectrometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Béchet, Victoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beau, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divanon, Fabienne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagadu, Stéphanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sichel, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delépée, Raphael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Béchet, Victoire</au><au>Benoist, Hubert</au><au>Beau, Frédéric</au><au>Divanon, Fabienne</au><au>Lagadu, Stéphanie</au><au>Sichel, F</au><au>Delépée, Raphael</au><au>Saint-Lorant, Guillaume</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>777</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>777-784</pages><issn>1078-1552</issn><eissn>1477-092X</eissn><abstract>Background Caregivers in healthcare settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination which can lead to adverse health effects. Biological monitoring is necessary to estimate the actual level of exposure of these workers. This study was conducted with the aim of assessing blood contamination levels by irinotecan and its metabolites of pharmaceutical staff operating inside and outside a compounding unit. Methods The study took place within the pharmaceutical unit of a French comprehensive cancer centre. Blood samples were collected from the pharmacy workers operating inside and outside the compounding unit, and analysed by UHPLC-MS/MS. Plasma and red blood cell irinotecan and its metabolites (SN-38; APC) were determined with a validated analytical method detection test. Results A total of 17/78 (21.8%) plasma and red blood cell-based assays were found to be contaminated among staff. Overall, the total number of positive assays was significantly higher for staff members working outside the compounding unit than for workers working inside it (P = 0.022), with respectively 5/42 (11.9%) and 12/36 (33.3%) positive assays. For plasma dosages, the “outside” group had a significantly higher number of positive assays (P = 0.014). For red blood cell-based assays, no significant difference was found (P = 0.309). Conclusions This study reveals that pharmaceutical staff serving in health care settings are exposed to a risk of antineoplastic drug contamination, not only inside the compounding room but also in adjacent rooms. The results would help to raise awareness and potentially establish protective measures for caregivers working in areas close to the compounding room as well.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>33878975</pmid><doi>10.1177/10781552211012059</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-1268</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-2191</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8429-6539</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1552
ispartof Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2022-06, Vol.28 (4), p.777-784
issn 1078-1552
1477-092X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03593465v1
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Adenomatous polyposis coli
Antineoplastic Agents
Blood
Caregivers
Contamination
Drug Compounding
Drug Contamination
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Erythrocytes
Health care
Humans
Irinotecan
Irinotecan - analysis
Life Sciences
Metabolites
Occupational exposure
Occupational Exposure - analysis
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmacy
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title Blood contamination of the pharmaceutical staff by irinotecan and its two major metabolites inside and outside a compounding unit
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A22%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20contamination%20of%20the%20pharmaceutical%20staff%20by%20irinotecan%20and%20its%20two%20major%20metabolites%20inside%20and%20outside%20a%20compounding%20unit&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=B%C3%A9chet,%20Victoire&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=777&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=777-784&rft.issn=1078-1552&rft.eissn=1477-092X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10781552211012059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2516222622%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2656093047&rft_id=info:pmid/33878975&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10781552211012059&rfr_iscdi=true