Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques

Abstract We compared cardiac output (CO) determined simultaneously by electrical impedance cardiography method (CO ICG ) and by the CO 2 rebreathing technique (CO 2REB ) during three different steady-state exercises (target heart rate of 120, 140, and 160 min -1 ) in 8 healthy fit young men. The mea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of sports medicine 2004-02, Vol.25 (2), p.145-149
Hauptverfasser: Tordi, N., Mourot, L., Matusheski, B., Hughson, R. L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 149
container_issue 2
container_start_page 145
container_title International journal of sports medicine
container_volume 25
creator Tordi, N.
Mourot, L.
Matusheski, B.
Hughson, R. L.
description Abstract We compared cardiac output (CO) determined simultaneously by electrical impedance cardiography method (CO ICG ) and by the CO 2 rebreathing technique (CO 2REB ) during three different steady-state exercises (target heart rate of 120, 140, and 160 min -1 ) in 8 healthy fit young men. The mean difference correlation coefficient obtained between the values of CO ICG and CO 2REB was 0.85 and the mean difference (CO ICG -CO 2REB ) was 0.06 l/min (0.12 %). At 120 min -1 , CO ICG was lower than CO 2REB but the tendency was reversed at 140 and 160 min -1 where CO ICG was higher than CO 2REB . This evolution may be explained by the difficultly of using CO 2 rebreathing technique at the highest steady-state exercises and by the progressive acidemia due to exercise. The present results suggest that electrical impedance cardiography method provides acceptable evaluation of CO and may favourably replace the CO 2 rebreathing technique during mild (or moderate) to high steady-state exercises.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2004-819949
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03559633v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>71680608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-ac46cd162c647c195a28728654ba903ae0ae13a3dc8a5269452ec6570dc785ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotuFI1eUC0hIuPg7cW_VUmilhV6WszV1vKyrxF7sZCn_vo6yak-op5FGzzszmgehd5ScUSLll4wZIQI3VGuhX6AFFVxjrpV4iRaE1gwLxdgJOs35jhAqNOWv0UmpjSqJBbI_HOQxud6FIVdxW60gtR5sdTMO-3Govo7Jh9_VKoY8QBiqy3uXrM8un5dev4fkcwxTbvM3Vj9jwNfhANkfXLVxdhf8n9HlN-jVFrrs3h7rEv36drlZXeH1zffr1cUaW8HogMEKZVuqmFWitlRLYE3NGiXFLWjCwRFwlANvbQOSKS0kc1bJmrS2bqSzfIk-zXN30Jl98j2kfyaCN1cXazP1CJdSK84PtLAfZ3af4nTjYHqfres6CC6O2dRUNUSR5lmQatZISXUB8QzaFHNObvt4AiVmUmWymVSZWVXh3x8Hj7e9a5_oo5sCfDgCkC102wShfP6Jk1IKWXQv0eeZG3a-eDR3cUyh_Pk_ex8AFDOocg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19285519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Tordi, N. ; Mourot, L. ; Matusheski, B. ; Hughson, R. L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tordi, N. ; Mourot, L. ; Matusheski, B. ; Hughson, R. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We compared cardiac output (CO) determined simultaneously by electrical impedance cardiography method (CO ICG ) and by the CO 2 rebreathing technique (CO 2REB ) during three different steady-state exercises (target heart rate of 120, 140, and 160 min -1 ) in 8 healthy fit young men. The mean difference correlation coefficient obtained between the values of CO ICG and CO 2REB was 0.85 and the mean difference (CO ICG -CO 2REB ) was 0.06 l/min (0.12 %). At 120 min -1 , CO ICG was lower than CO 2REB but the tendency was reversed at 140 and 160 min -1 where CO ICG was higher than CO 2REB . This evolution may be explained by the difficultly of using CO 2 rebreathing technique at the highest steady-state exercises and by the progressive acidemia due to exercise. The present results suggest that electrical impedance cardiography method provides acceptable evaluation of CO and may favourably replace the CO 2 rebreathing technique during mild (or moderate) to high steady-state exercises.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0172-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-3964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-819949</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14986199</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJSMDA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Output - physiology ; Cardiography, Impedance - methods ; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac - methods ; Exercise - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Physiology &amp; Biochemistry ; Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><ispartof>International journal of sports medicine, 2004-02, Vol.25 (2), p.145-149</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-ac46cd162c647c195a28728654ba903ae0ae13a3dc8a5269452ec6570dc785ec3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8459-9465</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2004-819949.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-2004-819949$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3003,3004,27903,27904,54537,54538</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15554514$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14986199$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-fcomte.hal.science/hal-03559633$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tordi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourot, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusheski, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughson, R. L.</creatorcontrib><title>Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques</title><title>International journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Abstract We compared cardiac output (CO) determined simultaneously by electrical impedance cardiography method (CO ICG ) and by the CO 2 rebreathing technique (CO 2REB ) during three different steady-state exercises (target heart rate of 120, 140, and 160 min -1 ) in 8 healthy fit young men. The mean difference correlation coefficient obtained between the values of CO ICG and CO 2REB was 0.85 and the mean difference (CO ICG -CO 2REB ) was 0.06 l/min (0.12 %). At 120 min -1 , CO ICG was lower than CO 2REB but the tendency was reversed at 140 and 160 min -1 where CO ICG was higher than CO 2REB . This evolution may be explained by the difficultly of using CO 2 rebreathing technique at the highest steady-state exercises and by the progressive acidemia due to exercise. The present results suggest that electrical impedance cardiography method provides acceptable evaluation of CO and may favourably replace the CO 2 rebreathing technique during mild (or moderate) to high steady-state exercises.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Output - physiology</subject><subject>Cardiography, Impedance - methods</subject><subject>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac - methods</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physiology &amp; Biochemistry</subject><subject>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</subject><issn>0172-4622</issn><issn>1439-3964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1v1DAQhi0EotuFI1eUC0hIuPg7cW_VUmilhV6WszV1vKyrxF7sZCn_vo6yak-op5FGzzszmgehd5ScUSLll4wZIQI3VGuhX6AFFVxjrpV4iRaE1gwLxdgJOs35jhAqNOWv0UmpjSqJBbI_HOQxud6FIVdxW60gtR5sdTMO-3Govo7Jh9_VKoY8QBiqy3uXrM8un5dev4fkcwxTbvM3Vj9jwNfhANkfXLVxdhf8n9HlN-jVFrrs3h7rEv36drlZXeH1zffr1cUaW8HogMEKZVuqmFWitlRLYE3NGiXFLWjCwRFwlANvbQOSKS0kc1bJmrS2bqSzfIk-zXN30Jl98j2kfyaCN1cXazP1CJdSK84PtLAfZ3af4nTjYHqfres6CC6O2dRUNUSR5lmQatZISXUB8QzaFHNObvt4AiVmUmWymVSZWVXh3x8Hj7e9a5_oo5sCfDgCkC102wShfP6Jk1IKWXQv0eeZG3a-eDR3cUyh_Pk_ex8AFDOocg</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Tordi, N.</creator><creator>Mourot, L.</creator><creator>Matusheski, B.</creator><creator>Hughson, R. L.</creator><general>Thieme</general><general>Thieme Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-9465</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques</title><author>Tordi, N. ; Mourot, L. ; Matusheski, B. ; Hughson, R. L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c421t-ac46cd162c647c195a28728654ba903ae0ae13a3dc8a5269452ec6570dc785ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Output - physiology</topic><topic>Cardiography, Impedance - methods</topic><topic>Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac - methods</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physiology &amp; Biochemistry</topic><topic>Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tordi, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mourot, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matusheski, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hughson, R. L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tordi, N.</au><au>Mourot, L.</au><au>Matusheski, B.</au><au>Hughson, R. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>145</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>145-149</pages><issn>0172-4622</issn><eissn>1439-3964</eissn><coden>IJSMDA</coden><abstract>Abstract We compared cardiac output (CO) determined simultaneously by electrical impedance cardiography method (CO ICG ) and by the CO 2 rebreathing technique (CO 2REB ) during three different steady-state exercises (target heart rate of 120, 140, and 160 min -1 ) in 8 healthy fit young men. The mean difference correlation coefficient obtained between the values of CO ICG and CO 2REB was 0.85 and the mean difference (CO ICG -CO 2REB ) was 0.06 l/min (0.12 %). At 120 min -1 , CO ICG was lower than CO 2REB but the tendency was reversed at 140 and 160 min -1 where CO ICG was higher than CO 2REB . This evolution may be explained by the difficultly of using CO 2 rebreathing technique at the highest steady-state exercises and by the progressive acidemia due to exercise. The present results suggest that electrical impedance cardiography method provides acceptable evaluation of CO and may favourably replace the CO 2 rebreathing technique during mild (or moderate) to high steady-state exercises.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>14986199</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2004-819949</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8459-9465</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0172-4622
ispartof International journal of sports medicine, 2004-02, Vol.25 (2), p.145-149
issn 0172-4622
1439-3964
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03559633v1
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Output - physiology
Cardiography, Impedance - methods
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac - methods
Exercise - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Life Sciences
Male
Physiology & Biochemistry
Vertebrates: body movement. Posture. Locomotion. Flight. Swimming. Physical exercise. Rest. Sports
title Measurements of Cardiac Output During Constant Exercises: Comparison of Two Non-Invasive Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T19%3A35%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measurements%20of%20Cardiac%20Output%20During%20Constant%20Exercises:%20Comparison%20of%20Two%20Non-Invasive%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Tordi,%20N.&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=145&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=145-149&rft.issn=0172-4622&rft.eissn=1439-3964&rft.coden=IJSMDA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2004-819949&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E71680608%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19285519&rft_id=info:pmid/14986199&rfr_iscdi=true