On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds
Complete active space self‐consistent field theory (CASSCF) calculations and subsequent second‐order perturbation theory treatment (CASPT2) are discussed in the evaluation of the spin‐states energy difference (ΔHelec) of a series of seven spin crossover (SCO) compounds. The reference values have bee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of computational chemistry 2016-04, Vol.37 (10), p.947-953 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 953 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 947 |
container_title | Journal of computational chemistry |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Vela, Sergi Fumanal, Maria Ribas-Ariño, Jordi Robert, Vincent |
description | Complete active space self‐consistent field theory (CASSCF) calculations and subsequent second‐order perturbation theory treatment (CASPT2) are discussed in the evaluation of the spin‐states energy difference (ΔHelec) of a series of seven spin crossover (SCO) compounds. The reference values have been extracted from a combination of experimental measurements and DFT + U calculations, as discussed in a recent article (Vela et al., Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015, 17, 16306). It is definitely proven that the critical IPEA parameter used in CASPT2 calculations of ΔHelec, a key parameter in the design of SCO compounds, should be modified with respect to its default value of 0.25 a.u. and increased up to 0.50 a.u. The satisfactory agreement observed previously in the literature might result from an error cancellation originated in the default IPEA, which overestimates the stability of the HS state, and the erroneous atomic orbital basis set contraction of carbon atoms, which stabilizes the LS states. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The IPEA parameter used within CASPT2 is benchmarked for its use in the calculation of adiabatic energy gaps of Spin Crossover compounds. The importance of the recently discovered error in the ANO‐RCC basis set contraction for carbon atoms is also unveiled. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcc.24283 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03511540v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1775156170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h4523-124f982915227920fcf717b5b4129eb78a7f019f71833490522eb98ab91ac9903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa3Hju34uIqgBa0o0KIiLpbjdRQvSby1k0L59Xi7ZQ-cZjT-3lhvHkIvgZwAIfR0Y-0JLWnFHqEFECUKVcnvj9GCgKJFJTgcoWcpbQghjIvyKTqiQiiumFigy4sRT53Df1wMU1eEuHYRd2bw_RRGb0bchojr5eXnK4qt6e3cm8mHMeHQ4rT1I7YxpBRus8qGYRvmcZ2eoyet6ZN78VCP0bf3767q82J1cfahXq6KruSUFUDLVlVUAadUKkpa20qQDW9KoMo1sjKyzQ7ysGKsVCRjrlGVaRQYqxRhx-jtfm9ner2NfjDxTgfj9flypXezbBeAl-QWMvtmz25juJldmvTgk3V9b0YX5qRBSg5cgNytff0fuglzHLOTHSWAVJLyTL16oOZmcOvD__9Om4HTPfDL9-7u8A5E7zLTOTN9n5n-WNf3TVYUe4VPk_t9UJj4UwvJJNfXn870j-vyK9DcfGF_AYazlHc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1776108725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vela, Sergi ; Fumanal, Maria ; Ribas-Ariño, Jordi ; Robert, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Vela, Sergi ; Fumanal, Maria ; Ribas-Ariño, Jordi ; Robert, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Complete active space self‐consistent field theory (CASSCF) calculations and subsequent second‐order perturbation theory treatment (CASPT2) are discussed in the evaluation of the spin‐states energy difference (ΔHelec) of a series of seven spin crossover (SCO) compounds. The reference values have been extracted from a combination of experimental measurements and DFT + U calculations, as discussed in a recent article (Vela et al., Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015, 17, 16306). It is definitely proven that the critical IPEA parameter used in CASPT2 calculations of ΔHelec, a key parameter in the design of SCO compounds, should be modified with respect to its default value of 0.25 a.u. and increased up to 0.50 a.u. The satisfactory agreement observed previously in the literature might result from an error cancellation originated in the default IPEA, which overestimates the stability of the HS state, and the erroneous atomic orbital basis set contraction of carbon atoms, which stabilizes the LS states. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The IPEA parameter used within CASPT2 is benchmarked for its use in the calculation of adiabatic energy gaps of Spin Crossover compounds. The importance of the recently discovered error in the ANO‐RCC basis set contraction for carbon atoms is also unveiled.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-8651</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-987X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcc.24283</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26695936</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCCHDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles ; Chemical compounds ; Chemical Sciences ; computational chemistry ; molecular magnetism ; or physical chemistry ; Quantum physics ; spin crossover ; Theoretical and</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational chemistry, 2016-04, Vol.37 (10), p.947-953</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Apr 15, 2016</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-4517-5213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcc.24283$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcc.24283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26695936$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03511540$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vela, Sergi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumanal, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas-Ariño, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds</title><title>Journal of computational chemistry</title><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><description>Complete active space self‐consistent field theory (CASSCF) calculations and subsequent second‐order perturbation theory treatment (CASPT2) are discussed in the evaluation of the spin‐states energy difference (ΔHelec) of a series of seven spin crossover (SCO) compounds. The reference values have been extracted from a combination of experimental measurements and DFT + U calculations, as discussed in a recent article (Vela et al., Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015, 17, 16306). It is definitely proven that the critical IPEA parameter used in CASPT2 calculations of ΔHelec, a key parameter in the design of SCO compounds, should be modified with respect to its default value of 0.25 a.u. and increased up to 0.50 a.u. The satisfactory agreement observed previously in the literature might result from an error cancellation originated in the default IPEA, which overestimates the stability of the HS state, and the erroneous atomic orbital basis set contraction of carbon atoms, which stabilizes the LS states. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The IPEA parameter used within CASPT2 is benchmarked for its use in the calculation of adiabatic energy gaps of Spin Crossover compounds. The importance of the recently discovered error in the ANO‐RCC basis set contraction for carbon atoms is also unveiled.</description><subject>Atoms & subatomic particles</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chemical Sciences</subject><subject>computational chemistry</subject><subject>molecular magnetism</subject><subject>or physical chemistry</subject><subject>Quantum physics</subject><subject>spin crossover</subject><subject>Theoretical and</subject><issn>0192-8651</issn><issn>1096-987X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkUFv1DAQhS0EokvhwB9AlrjAIa3Hju34uIqgBa0o0KIiLpbjdRQvSby1k0L59Xi7ZQ-cZjT-3lhvHkIvgZwAIfR0Y-0JLWnFHqEFECUKVcnvj9GCgKJFJTgcoWcpbQghjIvyKTqiQiiumFigy4sRT53Df1wMU1eEuHYRd2bw_RRGb0bchojr5eXnK4qt6e3cm8mHMeHQ4rT1I7YxpBRus8qGYRvmcZ2eoyet6ZN78VCP0bf3767q82J1cfahXq6KruSUFUDLVlVUAadUKkpa20qQDW9KoMo1sjKyzQ7ysGKsVCRjrlGVaRQYqxRhx-jtfm9ner2NfjDxTgfj9flypXezbBeAl-QWMvtmz25juJldmvTgk3V9b0YX5qRBSg5cgNytff0fuglzHLOTHSWAVJLyTL16oOZmcOvD__9Om4HTPfDL9-7u8A5E7zLTOTN9n5n-WNf3TVYUe4VPk_t9UJj4UwvJJNfXn870j-vyK9DcfGF_AYazlHc</recordid><startdate>20160415</startdate><enddate>20160415</enddate><creator>Vela, Sergi</creator><creator>Fumanal, Maria</creator><creator>Ribas-Ariño, Jordi</creator><creator>Robert, Vincent</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-5213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160415</creationdate><title>On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds</title><author>Vela, Sergi ; Fumanal, Maria ; Ribas-Ariño, Jordi ; Robert, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h4523-124f982915227920fcf717b5b4129eb78a7f019f71833490522eb98ab91ac9903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Atoms & subatomic particles</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chemical Sciences</topic><topic>computational chemistry</topic><topic>molecular magnetism</topic><topic>or physical chemistry</topic><topic>Quantum physics</topic><topic>spin crossover</topic><topic>Theoretical and</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vela, Sergi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fumanal, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribas-Ariño, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vela, Sergi</au><au>Fumanal, Maria</au><au>Ribas-Ariño, Jordi</au><au>Robert, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J. Comput. Chem</addtitle><date>2016-04-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>947</spage><epage>953</epage><pages>947-953</pages><issn>0192-8651</issn><eissn>1096-987X</eissn><coden>JCCHDD</coden><abstract>Complete active space self‐consistent field theory (CASSCF) calculations and subsequent second‐order perturbation theory treatment (CASPT2) are discussed in the evaluation of the spin‐states energy difference (ΔHelec) of a series of seven spin crossover (SCO) compounds. The reference values have been extracted from a combination of experimental measurements and DFT + U calculations, as discussed in a recent article (Vela et al., Phys Chem Chem Phys 2015, 17, 16306). It is definitely proven that the critical IPEA parameter used in CASPT2 calculations of ΔHelec, a key parameter in the design of SCO compounds, should be modified with respect to its default value of 0.25 a.u. and increased up to 0.50 a.u. The satisfactory agreement observed previously in the literature might result from an error cancellation originated in the default IPEA, which overestimates the stability of the HS state, and the erroneous atomic orbital basis set contraction of carbon atoms, which stabilizes the LS states. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
The IPEA parameter used within CASPT2 is benchmarked for its use in the calculation of adiabatic energy gaps of Spin Crossover compounds. The importance of the recently discovered error in the ANO‐RCC basis set contraction for carbon atoms is also unveiled.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26695936</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcc.24283</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4517-5213</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0192-8651 |
ispartof | Journal of computational chemistry, 2016-04, Vol.37 (10), p.947-953 |
issn | 0192-8651 1096-987X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03511540v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Atoms & subatomic particles Chemical compounds Chemical Sciences computational chemistry molecular magnetism or physical chemistry Quantum physics spin crossover Theoretical and |
title | On the zeroth-order hamiltonian for CASPT2 calculations of spin crossover compounds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T17%3A18%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20zeroth-order%20hamiltonian%20for%20CASPT2%20calculations%20of%20spin%20crossover%20compounds&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20chemistry&rft.au=Vela,%20Sergi&rft.date=2016-04-15&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=947&rft.epage=953&rft.pages=947-953&rft.issn=0192-8651&rft.eissn=1096-987X&rft.coden=JCCHDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcc.24283&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1775156170%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1776108725&rft_id=info:pmid/26695936&rfr_iscdi=true |