Long Island Sound Coastal Observatory: assessment of above-water radiometric measurement uncertainties using collocated multi and hyper-spectral systems: reply to comment

Uncertainties associated with the derivation of the exact normalized water-leaving radiance (Lwn) from an above-water radiometric system were analyzed in Harmel et al. [Appl. Opt. 50, 5842 (2011)] based on collocated hyperspectral (HyperSAS) and multispectral (SeaPRISM) systems installed on the Long...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied optics (2004) 2012-06, Vol.51 (17), p.3893-3899
Hauptverfasser: Harmel, Tristan, Gilerson, Alexander, Hlaing, Soe, Weidemann, Alan, Arnone, Robert, Ahmed, Samir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Uncertainties associated with the derivation of the exact normalized water-leaving radiance (Lwn) from an above-water radiometric system were analyzed in Harmel et al. [Appl. Opt. 50, 5842 (2011)] based on collocated hyperspectral (HyperSAS) and multispectral (SeaPRISM) systems installed on the Long Island Sound Coastal Observational (LISCO) platform. Based on a 1.5 year time series of LISCO data, uncertainty contributors in the derivation of Lwn were quantified in units of unbiased relative percentage differences (URPD) by applying the different steps of the respective data processing incrementally. Results showed that discrepancy between Lwn data of two systems is significantly reduced when the average total sea radiance data of SeaPRISM is used in lieu of the standard one, which utilizes only the lowest total sea radiance measurements to remove the sky glint perturbations. The Zibordi comment [Appl. Opt. 51, 3888 (2012)] rejects the conclusion that attributes the sky glint removal step as the major uncertainty contributor in the SeaPRISM processing. It then states that the observed discrepancy might be due to an increased probability of sun-glint contamination in HyperSAS measurements because of its wider field of view and longer integration time. It was also underlined that observed dispersion between the atmospheric transmittance data derived from HyperSAS and SeaPRISM measurements can be attributed to probable contamination by stray light perturbation or issues with the noncosine response of the HyperSAS irradiance sensor. Finally, it was suggested to thoroughly investigate those instrumental perturbations. In this reply, impacts of nonperfect cosine response of the irradiance sensor are shown to be relatively low (
ISSN:1559-128X
2155-3165
DOI:10.1364/AO.51.003893