Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?

Worldwide dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings. However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteral...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hospital infection 2020-07, Vol.105 (3), p.534-545
Hauptverfasser: Hilliquin, D., Lomont, A., Zahar, J-R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 545
container_issue 3
container_start_page 534
container_title The Journal of hospital infection
container_volume 105
creator Hilliquin, D.
Lomont, A.
Zahar, J-R.
description Worldwide dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings. However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, the usefulness of this measure in non-outbreak settings is questionable; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination. A narrative review of the literature was conducted and the role of cohorting discussed. CPE are responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, fewer therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been reported as contaminated with CPE and may be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies to demonstrate that this measure should be mandatory. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all healthcare settings, requiring human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance with hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship, and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors for acquisition should also be evaluated. In conclusion, local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03490512v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195670120301973</els_id><sourcerecordid>S0195670120301973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-afa3bb2b31a73fc5a034392a1ed0950ae990445757d240a1ccade3d6f7545ef43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpoNskf6AnXXuwO5KsdV0KJSxpU1jopTmLsTSutdiSkZyF_If-6Mjd0mNPj5l534N5jL0TUAsQ-w-n-jT6UEuQUENTg5Sv2E5oJSvZqe4124HodLVvQbxhb3M-AUDZ6x37fYhjTKsPv_gQE18SnSn8GdeReIg52jh7nHguJ3Q8Dtxi6nGhQDNmqpYU3ZPdgPuwUoo92iI4UeY-lIBQ0eIdzd7yTOuWnD_xPManyXG_8p74jMHhGtPzlxt2NeCU6favXrPHr_c_Dw_V8ce374e7Y2VV-3GtcEDV97JXAls1WI2gGtVJFOSg04DUddA0utWtkw2gsBYdKbcfWt1oGhp1zd5fckeczJL8jOnZRPTm4e5otl0J7EALeRbFKy9em2LOiYZ_gACzdW9OZuvebN0baEzpvkCfLxCVL86eksnWU7DkfCK7Ghf9__AXFW6Qlw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hilliquin, D. ; Lomont, A. ; Zahar, J-R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilliquin, D. ; Lomont, A. ; Zahar, J-R.</creatorcontrib><description>Worldwide dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings. However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, the usefulness of this measure in non-outbreak settings is questionable; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination. A narrative review of the literature was conducted and the role of cohorting discussed. CPE are responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, fewer therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been reported as contaminated with CPE and may be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies to demonstrate that this measure should be mandatory. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all healthcare settings, requiring human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance with hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship, and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors for acquisition should also be evaluated. In conclusion, local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antibiotic stewardship ; Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales ; Cohorting ; Environment ; Hand hygiene ; Life Sciences ; Recommendations</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-07, Vol.105 (3), p.534-545</ispartof><rights>2020 The Healthcare Infection Society</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-afa3bb2b31a73fc5a034392a1ed0950ae990445757d240a1ccade3d6f7545ef43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-afa3bb2b31a73fc5a034392a1ed0950ae990445757d240a1ccade3d6f7545ef43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670120301973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03490512$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilliquin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomont, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahar, J-R.</creatorcontrib><title>Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?</title><title>The Journal of hospital infection</title><description>Worldwide dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings. However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, the usefulness of this measure in non-outbreak settings is questionable; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination. A narrative review of the literature was conducted and the role of cohorting discussed. CPE are responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, fewer therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been reported as contaminated with CPE and may be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies to demonstrate that this measure should be mandatory. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all healthcare settings, requiring human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance with hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship, and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors for acquisition should also be evaluated. In conclusion, local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.</description><subject>Antibiotic stewardship</subject><subject>Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales</subject><subject>Cohorting</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Hand hygiene</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Recommendations</subject><issn>0195-6701</issn><issn>1532-2939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFr3DAQhUVpoNskf6AnXXuwO5KsdV0KJSxpU1jopTmLsTSutdiSkZyF_If-6Mjd0mNPj5l534N5jL0TUAsQ-w-n-jT6UEuQUENTg5Sv2E5oJSvZqe4124HodLVvQbxhb3M-AUDZ6x37fYhjTKsPv_gQE18SnSn8GdeReIg52jh7nHguJ3Q8Dtxi6nGhQDNmqpYU3ZPdgPuwUoo92iI4UeY-lIBQ0eIdzd7yTOuWnD_xPManyXG_8p74jMHhGtPzlxt2NeCU6favXrPHr_c_Dw_V8ce374e7Y2VV-3GtcEDV97JXAls1WI2gGtVJFOSg04DUddA0utWtkw2gsBYdKbcfWt1oGhp1zd5fckeczJL8jOnZRPTm4e5otl0J7EALeRbFKy9em2LOiYZ_gACzdW9OZuvebN0baEzpvkCfLxCVL86eksnWU7DkfCK7Ghf9__AXFW6Qlw</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Hilliquin, D.</creator><creator>Lomont, A.</creator><creator>Zahar, J-R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>WB Saunders</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?</title><author>Hilliquin, D. ; Lomont, A. ; Zahar, J-R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-afa3bb2b31a73fc5a034392a1ed0950ae990445757d240a1ccade3d6f7545ef43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antibiotic stewardship</topic><topic>Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales</topic><topic>Cohorting</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Hand hygiene</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Recommendations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilliquin, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomont, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahar, J-R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilliquin, D.</au><au>Lomont, A.</au><au>Zahar, J-R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hospital infection</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>545</epage><pages>534-545</pages><issn>0195-6701</issn><eissn>1532-2939</eissn><abstract>Worldwide dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings. However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, the usefulness of this measure in non-outbreak settings is questionable; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination. A narrative review of the literature was conducted and the role of cohorting discussed. CPE are responsible for outbreaks in healthcare settings, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, fewer therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been reported as contaminated with CPE and may be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies to demonstrate that this measure should be mandatory. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all healthcare settings, requiring human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance with hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship, and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors for acquisition should also be evaluated. In conclusion, local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.022</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0195-6701
ispartof The Journal of hospital infection, 2020-07, Vol.105 (3), p.534-545
issn 0195-6701
1532-2939
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03490512v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Antibiotic stewardship
Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales
Cohorting
Environment
Hand hygiene
Life Sciences
Recommendations
title Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in non-epidemic settings: should it be mandatory?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T14%3A36%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cohorting%20for%20preventing%20the%20nosocomial%20spread%20of%20carbapenemase-producing%20Enterobacterales%20in%20non-epidemic%20settings:%20should%20it%20be%20mandatory?&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hospital%20infection&rft.au=Hilliquin,%20D.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=545&rft.pages=534-545&rft.issn=0195-6701&rft.eissn=1532-2939&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.022&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_hal_p%3ES0195670120301973%3C/elsevier_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0195670120301973&rfr_iscdi=true