Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples
An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural se...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2020-05, Vol.154, p.111097-111097, Article 111097 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 111097 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 111097 |
| container_title | Marine pollution bulletin |
| container_volume | 154 |
| creator | Cadiou, J.-F. Gerigny, O. Koren, Š. Zeri, C. Kaberi, H. Alomar, C. Panti, C. Fossi, M.C. Adamopoulou, A. Digka, N. Deudero, S. Concato, M. Carbonell, A. Baini, M. Galli, M. Galgani, F. |
| description | An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural sediment and sea water with microplastics sets made of particles of various polymers, shapes and colours. Overall, the errors on total counts were under 25% in absolute value. The risk of non-detection and loss of particles is greater than the risk of contamination during sample analysis. Significant differences are observed among particle types. It appears difficult to obtain reliable and comparable data on the colour of microplastics. A comparison of the errors with regards to the protocols used led to recommend NaCl [1.2 g/cm3] density separation for sediment and one filtering step (200 μm). The operators' experience appears as a key factor for the quality of the results.
•Underestimation is the most frequent cause of error on the total counts•Recommended protocol: NaCl density separation for sediment, filtering 200 µm. Operators’ experience is a key quality factor•Data on colour is not reliable and comparable•Obtaining clean natural sediment reference material is an issue•FT-IR analysis is useful to remove ambiguities on mineral and biological particles |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111097 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03490467v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X20302150</els_id><sourcerecordid>2441308716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-eb6cf36a1e4cc6b4b977747bf2355921d4e3cf3e8f5b8f7a476fccff9bf851e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAK4AlNrBo8U8SJ8tqBAxSJTYgsbNunGvVlWNn7GSA9-CBccnQBRtWtu_9zrV9DiGvONtxxpt3p90IaYq-X_xOMFGqnLNOPSIb3qpuK2UjH5MNY6LeStF8uyLPcj4xxpRQ_Cm5kkLyrhNyQ34dMOcYMvUIKeBAbYojhUBdmDEZ8K5PMLsYKP4oZ5eRlv18RHq3QJiddWZtQxioOUICU3Qur8Vo6ehMipOHPDtDJ0hl8ZjLeJpxcCOG-Y_0OxQZzTBOpfucPLHgM754WK_J1w_vv9zcbg-fP3662R-2ULN63mLfGCsb4FgZ0_RV3ymlKtVbIeu6E3yoUBYAW1v3rVVQqcYaY23X27bmKOQ1ebvOPYLXU3LF0586gtO3-4M-15isOlY16p4X9s3KTineLZhnPbps0HsIGJeshexk3QpZyYK-_gc9xSWF8hMtqopL1ireFEqtVPEn54T28gLO9DlkfdKXkPU5ZL2GXJQvH-Yv_YjDRfc31QLsVwCLefcOk87GYTDF8IRm1kN0_73kN3wQwA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2441308716</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cadiou, J.-F. ; Gerigny, O. ; Koren, Š. ; Zeri, C. ; Kaberi, H. ; Alomar, C. ; Panti, C. ; Fossi, M.C. ; Adamopoulou, A. ; Digka, N. ; Deudero, S. ; Concato, M. ; Carbonell, A. ; Baini, M. ; Galli, M. ; Galgani, F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadiou, J.-F. ; Gerigny, O. ; Koren, Š. ; Zeri, C. ; Kaberi, H. ; Alomar, C. ; Panti, C. ; Fossi, M.C. ; Adamopoulou, A. ; Digka, N. ; Deudero, S. ; Concato, M. ; Carbonell, A. ; Baini, M. ; Galli, M. ; Galgani, F.</creatorcontrib><description>An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural sediment and sea water with microplastics sets made of particles of various polymers, shapes and colours. Overall, the errors on total counts were under 25% in absolute value. The risk of non-detection and loss of particles is greater than the risk of contamination during sample analysis. Significant differences are observed among particle types. It appears difficult to obtain reliable and comparable data on the colour of microplastics. A comparison of the errors with regards to the protocols used led to recommend NaCl [1.2 g/cm3] density separation for sediment and one filtering step (200 μm). The operators' experience appears as a key factor for the quality of the results.
•Underestimation is the most frequent cause of error on the total counts•Recommended protocol: NaCl density separation for sediment, filtering 200 µm. Operators’ experience is a key quality factor•Data on colour is not reliable and comparable•Obtaining clean natural sediment reference material is an issue•FT-IR analysis is useful to remove ambiguities on mineral and biological particles</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32319923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemical analysis ; Colour ; Contamination ; Environmental Sciences ; Errors ; Intercalibration ; Marine sediments ; Microplastics ; Polymers ; Protocols ; Seawater ; Sediment ; Sediment samples ; Sediments ; Sodium chloride ; Soil density ; Water analysis ; Water sampling</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2020-05, Vol.154, p.111097-111097, Article 111097</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV May 2020</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-eb6cf36a1e4cc6b4b977747bf2355921d4e3cf3e8f5b8f7a476fccff9bf851e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-eb6cf36a1e4cc6b4b977747bf2355921d4e3cf3e8f5b8f7a476fccff9bf851e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X20302150$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32319923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03490467$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadiou, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerigny, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Š.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeri, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaberi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alomar, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panti, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossi, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamopoulou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digka, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deudero, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concato, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baini, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galgani, F.</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><description>An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural sediment and sea water with microplastics sets made of particles of various polymers, shapes and colours. Overall, the errors on total counts were under 25% in absolute value. The risk of non-detection and loss of particles is greater than the risk of contamination during sample analysis. Significant differences are observed among particle types. It appears difficult to obtain reliable and comparable data on the colour of microplastics. A comparison of the errors with regards to the protocols used led to recommend NaCl [1.2 g/cm3] density separation for sediment and one filtering step (200 μm). The operators' experience appears as a key factor for the quality of the results.
•Underestimation is the most frequent cause of error on the total counts•Recommended protocol: NaCl density separation for sediment, filtering 200 µm. Operators’ experience is a key quality factor•Data on colour is not reliable and comparable•Obtaining clean natural sediment reference material is an issue•FT-IR analysis is useful to remove ambiguities on mineral and biological particles</description><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Colour</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Intercalibration</subject><subject>Marine sediments</subject><subject>Microplastics</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Protocols</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment samples</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Sodium chloride</subject><subject>Soil density</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2O0zAUhS0EYsrAK4AlNrBo8U8SJ8tqBAxSJTYgsbNunGvVlWNn7GSA9-CBccnQBRtWtu_9zrV9DiGvONtxxpt3p90IaYq-X_xOMFGqnLNOPSIb3qpuK2UjH5MNY6LeStF8uyLPcj4xxpRQ_Cm5kkLyrhNyQ34dMOcYMvUIKeBAbYojhUBdmDEZ8K5PMLsYKP4oZ5eRlv18RHq3QJiddWZtQxioOUICU3Qur8Vo6ehMipOHPDtDJ0hl8ZjLeJpxcCOG-Y_0OxQZzTBOpfucPLHgM754WK_J1w_vv9zcbg-fP3662R-2ULN63mLfGCsb4FgZ0_RV3ymlKtVbIeu6E3yoUBYAW1v3rVVQqcYaY23X27bmKOQ1ebvOPYLXU3LF0586gtO3-4M-15isOlY16p4X9s3KTineLZhnPbps0HsIGJeshexk3QpZyYK-_gc9xSWF8hMtqopL1ireFEqtVPEn54T28gLO9DlkfdKXkPU5ZL2GXJQvH-Yv_YjDRfc31QLsVwCLefcOk87GYTDF8IRm1kN0_73kN3wQwA4</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Cadiou, J.-F.</creator><creator>Gerigny, O.</creator><creator>Koren, Š.</creator><creator>Zeri, C.</creator><creator>Kaberi, H.</creator><creator>Alomar, C.</creator><creator>Panti, C.</creator><creator>Fossi, M.C.</creator><creator>Adamopoulou, A.</creator><creator>Digka, N.</creator><creator>Deudero, S.</creator><creator>Concato, M.</creator><creator>Carbonell, A.</creator><creator>Baini, M.</creator><creator>Galli, M.</creator><creator>Galgani, F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples</title><author>Cadiou, J.-F. ; Gerigny, O. ; Koren, Š. ; Zeri, C. ; Kaberi, H. ; Alomar, C. ; Panti, C. ; Fossi, M.C. ; Adamopoulou, A. ; Digka, N. ; Deudero, S. ; Concato, M. ; Carbonell, A. ; Baini, M. ; Galli, M. ; Galgani, F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a505t-eb6cf36a1e4cc6b4b977747bf2355921d4e3cf3e8f5b8f7a476fccff9bf851e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Colour</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Intercalibration</topic><topic>Marine sediments</topic><topic>Microplastics</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Protocols</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment samples</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Sodium chloride</topic><topic>Soil density</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadiou, J.-F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerigny, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koren, Š.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeri, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaberi, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alomar, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panti, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fossi, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamopoulou, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digka, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deudero, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Concato, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carbonell, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baini, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galgani, F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadiou, J.-F.</au><au>Gerigny, O.</au><au>Koren, Š.</au><au>Zeri, C.</au><au>Kaberi, H.</au><au>Alomar, C.</au><au>Panti, C.</au><au>Fossi, M.C.</au><au>Adamopoulou, A.</au><au>Digka, N.</au><au>Deudero, S.</au><au>Concato, M.</au><au>Carbonell, A.</au><au>Baini, M.</au><au>Galli, M.</au><au>Galgani, F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>154</volume><spage>111097</spage><epage>111097</epage><pages>111097-111097</pages><artnum>111097</artnum><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><abstract>An intercalibration exercise on the characterisation of microplastics in marine sediment and water samples was carried out among five laboratories involved in the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) in their country. The samples were prepared by mixing cleaned natural sediment and sea water with microplastics sets made of particles of various polymers, shapes and colours. Overall, the errors on total counts were under 25% in absolute value. The risk of non-detection and loss of particles is greater than the risk of contamination during sample analysis. Significant differences are observed among particle types. It appears difficult to obtain reliable and comparable data on the colour of microplastics. A comparison of the errors with regards to the protocols used led to recommend NaCl [1.2 g/cm3] density separation for sediment and one filtering step (200 μm). The operators' experience appears as a key factor for the quality of the results.
•Underestimation is the most frequent cause of error on the total counts•Recommended protocol: NaCl density separation for sediment, filtering 200 µm. Operators’ experience is a key quality factor•Data on colour is not reliable and comparable•Obtaining clean natural sediment reference material is an issue•FT-IR analysis is useful to remove ambiguities on mineral and biological particles</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32319923</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111097</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-326X |
| ispartof | Marine pollution bulletin, 2020-05, Vol.154, p.111097-111097, Article 111097 |
| issn | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03490467v1 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Chemical analysis Colour Contamination Environmental Sciences Errors Intercalibration Marine sediments Microplastics Polymers Protocols Seawater Sediment Sediment samples Sediments Sodium chloride Soil density Water analysis Water sampling |
| title | Lessons learned from an intercalibration exercise on the quantification and characterisation of microplastic particles in sediment and water samples |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A35%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20learned%20from%20an%20intercalibration%20exercise%20on%20the%20quantification%20and%20characterisation%20of%20microplastic%20particles%20in%20sediment%20and%20water%20samples&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Cadiou,%20J.-F.&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=154&rft.spage=111097&rft.epage=111097&rft.pages=111097-111097&rft.artnum=111097&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2441308716%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2441308716&rft_id=info:pmid/32319923&rft_els_id=S0025326X20302150&rfr_iscdi=true |