Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women

Few data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy. This is a retrospective comparative single-cen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical oncology 2020-06, Vol.33, p.24-29
Hauptverfasser: Hotton, Judicael, Koual, Meriem, Gosset, Marie, Rossi, Lea, Delomenie, Myriam, Ngo, Charlotte, Lecuru, Fabrice, Bats, Anne-Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 29
container_issue
container_start_page 24
container_title Surgical oncology
container_volume 33
creator Hotton, Judicael
Koual, Meriem
Gosset, Marie
Rossi, Lea
Delomenie, Myriam
Ngo, Charlotte
Lecuru, Fabrice
Bats, Anne-Sophie
description Few data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy. This is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up. 148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03489896v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960740419303858</els_id><sourcerecordid>2415293248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e591b15163c07c191f6f76630dfd632e61dd9900a47be9a8dae867abc4709ec93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EapfSf4BQJC7tIWHGTpz4glStWoq0Ui9wthx7Al5l42InRfvv8SqlBw6cRvJ882b8HmPvESoElJ_2VVpimGzFAVWFvAKEV2yDXatKITi8ZhtQEsq2hvqcvU1pDwCy5XjGzgVvJELXbdj2YZltOFAqwlDE0IfZ2yIL_6B4LIYQC5pcbs_Rm7GwZrIUCz8VNDqK47H4nXvTO_ZmMGOiy-d6wb7f3X7b3pe7hy9ftze70jZCziU1CntsUAoLrUWFgxxaKQW4wUnBSaJzSgGYuu1Jmc4Z6mRrelu3oMgqccGuV92fZtSP0R9MPOpgvL6_2enTG4i6U52ST5jZq5V9jOHXQmnWB58sjaOZKCxJ8xobrgSvu4x-_AfdhyVO-SeZykapk42ZqlfKxpBSpOHlAgR9CkTv9RqIPgWikescSB778Cy-9AdyL0N_E8jA5xWg7NyTp6iT9ZR9dj6SnbUL_v8b_gCVDZxV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425690960</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hotton, Judicael ; Koual, Meriem ; Gosset, Marie ; Rossi, Lea ; Delomenie, Myriam ; Ngo, Charlotte ; Lecuru, Fabrice ; Bats, Anne-Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hotton, Judicael ; Koual, Meriem ; Gosset, Marie ; Rossi, Lea ; Delomenie, Myriam ; Ngo, Charlotte ; Lecuru, Fabrice ; Bats, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Few data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy. This is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up. 148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p &lt; .01); the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection rates were not different between both groups (p = .2 and p = .9). The operating times were significantly longer in group B (220.1 vs. 234.4 min, p = .02). The conversion rate was similar between the 2 groups (p = .7). The tumors were endometrioid adenocarcinomas for 77.9 and 66.7% respectively (p = .2), with grade 3 tumors more represented in older patients (24.4% vs. 48.4%, p &lt; .01). There were more tumors at high risk of recurrence after 70 years (33.7 vs. 45.2%, p = .04). No significant difference was found for postoperative complications. There was no difference in overall survival (p = .7) or progression-free survival (p = .2). Undertreated women rate was similar in both groups (p = .1). Robotic surgery appears feasible and reproducible and could bring a benefit and allow optimal surgery without increasing the morbidity in the management of endometrial cancers whatever the age is. •We compared the robotic management of endometrial cancer in patients ≥ 70 years and &lt;70 years.•Elderly patients have more advanced and aggressive cancers.•They benefit from as much lymph node dissections despite more advanced stages.•Robot-assisted laparoscopy is feasible in elderly with similar complications rates.•There is no difference in survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32561088</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Abdominal surgery ; Age ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aorta ; Body mass index ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery ; Chemotherapy ; Complications ; Conversion ; Dissection ; Elderly ; Endometrial cancer ; Endometrial neoplasm ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Endometrium ; Feasibility ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Histology ; Hormone replacement therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Hysterectomy ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Life Sciences ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Medical prognosis ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Older people ; Oophorectomy ; Operative Time ; Progression-Free Survival ; Pulmonary embolisms ; Radiation therapy ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotic-assisted laparoscopy ; Robots ; Salpingo-oophorectomy - methods ; Sepsis ; Surgical outcomes ; Survival ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Surgical oncology, 2020-06, Vol.33, p.24-29</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e591b15163c07c191f6f76630dfd632e61dd9900a47be9a8dae867abc4709ec93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e591b15163c07c191f6f76630dfd632e61dd9900a47be9a8dae867abc4709ec93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740419303858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32561088$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03489896$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hotton, Judicael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koual, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosset, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delomenie, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecuru, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bats, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women</title><title>Surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Few data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy. This is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up. 148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p &lt; .01); the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection rates were not different between both groups (p = .2 and p = .9). The operating times were significantly longer in group B (220.1 vs. 234.4 min, p = .02). The conversion rate was similar between the 2 groups (p = .7). The tumors were endometrioid adenocarcinomas for 77.9 and 66.7% respectively (p = .2), with grade 3 tumors more represented in older patients (24.4% vs. 48.4%, p &lt; .01). There were more tumors at high risk of recurrence after 70 years (33.7 vs. 45.2%, p = .04). No significant difference was found for postoperative complications. There was no difference in overall survival (p = .7) or progression-free survival (p = .2). Undertreated women rate was similar in both groups (p = .1). Robotic surgery appears feasible and reproducible and could bring a benefit and allow optimal surgery without increasing the morbidity in the management of endometrial cancers whatever the age is. •We compared the robotic management of endometrial cancer in patients ≥ 70 years and &lt;70 years.•Elderly patients have more advanced and aggressive cancers.•They benefit from as much lymph node dissections despite more advanced stages.•Robot-assisted laparoscopy is feasible in elderly with similar complications rates.•There is no difference in survival.</description><subject>Abdominal surgery</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Conversion</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>Endometrial neoplasm</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Hormone replacement therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Oophorectomy</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Progression-Free Survival</subject><subject>Pulmonary embolisms</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotic-assisted laparoscopy</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Salpingo-oophorectomy - methods</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0960-7404</issn><issn>1879-3320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EapfSf4BQJC7tIWHGTpz4glStWoq0Ui9wthx7Al5l42InRfvv8SqlBw6cRvJ882b8HmPvESoElJ_2VVpimGzFAVWFvAKEV2yDXatKITi8ZhtQEsq2hvqcvU1pDwCy5XjGzgVvJELXbdj2YZltOFAqwlDE0IfZ2yIL_6B4LIYQC5pcbs_Rm7GwZrIUCz8VNDqK47H4nXvTO_ZmMGOiy-d6wb7f3X7b3pe7hy9ftze70jZCziU1CntsUAoLrUWFgxxaKQW4wUnBSaJzSgGYuu1Jmc4Z6mRrelu3oMgqccGuV92fZtSP0R9MPOpgvL6_2enTG4i6U52ST5jZq5V9jOHXQmnWB58sjaOZKCxJ8xobrgSvu4x-_AfdhyVO-SeZykapk42ZqlfKxpBSpOHlAgR9CkTv9RqIPgWikescSB778Cy-9AdyL0N_E8jA5xWg7NyTp6iT9ZR9dj6SnbUL_v8b_gCVDZxV</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Hotton, Judicael</creator><creator>Koual, Meriem</creator><creator>Gosset, Marie</creator><creator>Rossi, Lea</creator><creator>Delomenie, Myriam</creator><creator>Ngo, Charlotte</creator><creator>Lecuru, Fabrice</creator><creator>Bats, Anne-Sophie</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women</title><author>Hotton, Judicael ; Koual, Meriem ; Gosset, Marie ; Rossi, Lea ; Delomenie, Myriam ; Ngo, Charlotte ; Lecuru, Fabrice ; Bats, Anne-Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-e591b15163c07c191f6f76630dfd632e61dd9900a47be9a8dae867abc4709ec93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abdominal surgery</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Conversion</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>Endometrial neoplasm</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Hormone replacement therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Oophorectomy</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Progression-Free Survival</topic><topic>Pulmonary embolisms</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotic-assisted laparoscopy</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Salpingo-oophorectomy - methods</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hotton, Judicael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koual, Meriem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gosset, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossi, Lea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delomenie, Myriam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lecuru, Fabrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bats, Anne-Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hotton, Judicael</au><au>Koual, Meriem</au><au>Gosset, Marie</au><au>Rossi, Lea</au><au>Delomenie, Myriam</au><au>Ngo, Charlotte</au><au>Lecuru, Fabrice</au><au>Bats, Anne-Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women</atitle><jtitle>Surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>24</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>24-29</pages><issn>0960-7404</issn><eissn>1879-3320</eissn><abstract>Few data have been reported on robot-assisted surgery in elderly. The objectives were to compare feasibility, complication data, and survival of patients under and upper the age of 70 who are managed for endometrial cancer by robot-assisted laparoscopy. This is a retrospective comparative single-center study including patients treated between January 2007 and December 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: less than 70 years and greater than or equal to 70 years. The primary endpoint was the rate of complications. The secondary endpoints were conversion rate and follow-up. 148 patients were included: 86 under 70 (group A) and 62 aged 70 and over (group B). More adhesiolysis was performed in group B (p &lt; .01); the pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection rates were not different between both groups (p = .2 and p = .9). The operating times were significantly longer in group B (220.1 vs. 234.4 min, p = .02). The conversion rate was similar between the 2 groups (p = .7). The tumors were endometrioid adenocarcinomas for 77.9 and 66.7% respectively (p = .2), with grade 3 tumors more represented in older patients (24.4% vs. 48.4%, p &lt; .01). There were more tumors at high risk of recurrence after 70 years (33.7 vs. 45.2%, p = .04). No significant difference was found for postoperative complications. There was no difference in overall survival (p = .7) or progression-free survival (p = .2). Undertreated women rate was similar in both groups (p = .1). Robotic surgery appears feasible and reproducible and could bring a benefit and allow optimal surgery without increasing the morbidity in the management of endometrial cancers whatever the age is. •We compared the robotic management of endometrial cancer in patients ≥ 70 years and &lt;70 years.•Elderly patients have more advanced and aggressive cancers.•They benefit from as much lymph node dissections despite more advanced stages.•Robot-assisted laparoscopy is feasible in elderly with similar complications rates.•There is no difference in survival.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>32561088</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.010</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7404
ispartof Surgical oncology, 2020-06, Vol.33, p.24-29
issn 0960-7404
1879-3320
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03489896v1
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abdominal surgery
Age
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aorta
Body mass index
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Carcinoma, Endometrioid - surgery
Chemotherapy
Complications
Conversion
Dissection
Elderly
Endometrial cancer
Endometrial neoplasm
Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery
Endometrium
Feasibility
Feasibility Studies
Female
Histology
Hormone replacement therapy
Humans
Hypertension
Hysterectomy
Hysterectomy - methods
Laparoscopy
Laparotomy
Life Sciences
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Medical prognosis
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Older people
Oophorectomy
Operative Time
Progression-Free Survival
Pulmonary embolisms
Radiation therapy
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Robotic-assisted laparoscopy
Robots
Salpingo-oophorectomy - methods
Sepsis
Surgical outcomes
Survival
Treatment Outcome
Tumors
title Outcomes of robotic surgery for endometrial cancer in elderly women
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T17%3A08%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20of%20robotic%20surgery%20for%20endometrial%20cancer%20in%20elderly%20women&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Hotton,%20Judicael&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=24-29&rft.issn=0960-7404&rft.eissn=1879-3320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2415293248%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425690960&rft_id=info:pmid/32561088&rft_els_id=S0960740419303858&rfr_iscdi=true