Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system

Flotation tests were performed on a skarn ore to attain the selective separation of scheelite (CaWO4) from fluorite, apatite, and silicates. Fluorite and apatite constitute common gangue minerals in scheelite ores. Due to their similar surface properties and good floatability, the separation of sche...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Powder technology 2019-06, Vol.352, p.501-512
Hauptverfasser: Foucaud, Y., Filippova, I.V., Filippov, L.O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue
container_start_page 501
container_title Powder technology
container_volume 352
creator Foucaud, Y.
Filippova, I.V.
Filippov, L.O.
description Flotation tests were performed on a skarn ore to attain the selective separation of scheelite (CaWO4) from fluorite, apatite, and silicates. Fluorite and apatite constitute common gangue minerals in scheelite ores. Due to their similar surface properties and good floatability, the separation of scheelite from fluorite is particularly difficult. These ores are usually processed at basic pH using sodium silicate as a gangue mineral depressant and a fatty acid as the collector. Sodium silicate was not efficient enough to depress the fluorite in the studied ore. Thus, different depressants were tested in the flotation of scheelite using a commercial mixture of fatty acids. The effect of adding metallic salts [FeSO4, Al(NO3)3, and Zn(SO4)] prior to sodium silicate was therefore investigated. The sole use of organic molecules (starch, lignin sulfonate, tannin, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid), instead of sodium silicate, was also studied. This led to a global depression of the minerals, including scheelite, and did not improve the selectivity of the separation. The addition of metallic cations did not significantly enhance the selectivity of the flotation; however, iron sulphate slightly increased the sodium silicate performance. Overall, among all the studied depressants, the combination of sodium carbonate and sodium silicate presented the best efficiency. This system was then studied through the design of experiments methodology. Strong synergistic effects existed between the two reagents, mainly impacting the scheelite and fluorite recovery as well as the scheelite grade. This was attributed to surface carbonation of the minerals, subsequently leading to a better depression by sodium silicate. The effect of sodium carbonate on the apatite and silicates was small. This was attributed to spontaneous carbonation and the presence of complex crystallographic structures, respectively. The efficiency of the sodium carbonate/sodium silicate combination was limited (maximum WO3 enrichment ratio = 16.48) due to the lack of selectivity of the depressants. The proposed optimization of the flotation separation of scheelite from gangue minerals maximizes both the WO3 grade and recovery. [Display omitted] •Tannin, citric acid, CMC, lignosulfonate, and starch displayed very low selectivity.•Metallic cations (Fe, Zn, Al) did not enhance the sodium silicate depressing effect.•Combination of Na2SiO3 and Na2CO3 exhibited the best selectivity for scheelite.•Na2SiO3/Na2C
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03486969v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032591019303195</els_id><sourcerecordid>2257680906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-28b12a07d8cb2e342bb16c89192aafa1a7c2aadceee3305a9146f1bd7d2533143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uctq3DAUFaWFTKf9gywEXRVqR1fys4tCCE0TGOgmge6ELF13NHgsV5Jd8mH9v2riIXTVlY7ueSDdQ8glsBwYVFeHfHK_I-qcM2hzVuSshldkA00tMsGbH6_JhjHBs7IFdkHehnBgjFUC2Ib8uR8XDNH-VNG6kbqexj1Sg5PHENQYA7Xj4oYFTQLPXMABdbQL0n5w8cUW9B5xsDGNvTtSNSUm4qckmp1_Rmo0VKtB2_lIgx2sVhHDZ3rr9ByoO4c78y99db5r5Ts3pgENTyHi8R1506sh4PvzuSWPt18fbu6y3fdv9zfXu0wXJcSMNx1wxWrT6I6jKHjXQaWbFlquVK9A1ToBoxFRCFaqFoqqh87UhpdCQCG25OOau1eDnLw9Kv8knbLy7nonTzMmiqZqq3aBpP2waifvfs1pp_LgZj-m50nOy7pqWJt2viXFqtLeheCxf4kFJk9lyoNcy5SnMiUrZCoz2b6sNky_XSx6GbTFUaOxPrUhjbP_D_gLIpeumA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2257680906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Foucaud, Y. ; Filippova, I.V. ; Filippov, L.O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Foucaud, Y. ; Filippova, I.V. ; Filippov, L.O.</creatorcontrib><description>Flotation tests were performed on a skarn ore to attain the selective separation of scheelite (CaWO4) from fluorite, apatite, and silicates. Fluorite and apatite constitute common gangue minerals in scheelite ores. Due to their similar surface properties and good floatability, the separation of scheelite from fluorite is particularly difficult. These ores are usually processed at basic pH using sodium silicate as a gangue mineral depressant and a fatty acid as the collector. Sodium silicate was not efficient enough to depress the fluorite in the studied ore. Thus, different depressants were tested in the flotation of scheelite using a commercial mixture of fatty acids. The effect of adding metallic salts [FeSO4, Al(NO3)3, and Zn(SO4)] prior to sodium silicate was therefore investigated. The sole use of organic molecules (starch, lignin sulfonate, tannin, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid), instead of sodium silicate, was also studied. This led to a global depression of the minerals, including scheelite, and did not improve the selectivity of the separation. The addition of metallic cations did not significantly enhance the selectivity of the flotation; however, iron sulphate slightly increased the sodium silicate performance. Overall, among all the studied depressants, the combination of sodium carbonate and sodium silicate presented the best efficiency. This system was then studied through the design of experiments methodology. Strong synergistic effects existed between the two reagents, mainly impacting the scheelite and fluorite recovery as well as the scheelite grade. This was attributed to surface carbonation of the minerals, subsequently leading to a better depression by sodium silicate. The effect of sodium carbonate on the apatite and silicates was small. This was attributed to spontaneous carbonation and the presence of complex crystallographic structures, respectively. The efficiency of the sodium carbonate/sodium silicate combination was limited (maximum WO3 enrichment ratio = 16.48) due to the lack of selectivity of the depressants. The proposed optimization of the flotation separation of scheelite from gangue minerals maximizes both the WO3 grade and recovery. [Display omitted] •Tannin, citric acid, CMC, lignosulfonate, and starch displayed very low selectivity.•Metallic cations (Fe, Zn, Al) did not enhance the sodium silicate depressing effect.•Combination of Na2SiO3 and Na2CO3 exhibited the best selectivity for scheelite.•Na2SiO3/Na2CO3 system was optimized through response surface methodology.•Strong positive synergistic effects between the reagents were highlighted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.071</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aluminum ; Apatite ; Calcium ; Calcium silicates ; Calcium tungstates ; Carbonation ; Carboxymethyl cellulose ; Carboxymethylcellulose ; Cations ; Cellulose ; Citric acid ; Crystal structure ; Crystallography ; Depressant ; Depressants ; Design of experiments ; Engineering Sciences ; Fatty acids ; Flotation ; Fluorite ; Gangue ; Iron ; Lignin ; Minerals ; Optimization ; Ores ; Organic chemistry ; Price increases ; Reagents ; Recovery ; Salts ; Scheelite ; Selectivity ; Separation ; Silica ; Silicates ; Sodium ; Sodium carbonate ; Starch ; Surface properties ; Synergistic effect ; Zinc</subject><ispartof>Powder technology, 2019-06, Vol.352, p.501-512</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jun 15, 2019</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-28b12a07d8cb2e342bb16c89192aafa1a7c2aadceee3305a9146f1bd7d2533143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-28b12a07d8cb2e342bb16c89192aafa1a7c2aadceee3305a9146f1bd7d2533143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8846-4218 ; 0000-0003-0047-7506</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.071$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03486969$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Foucaud, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippova, I.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippov, L.O.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system</title><title>Powder technology</title><description>Flotation tests were performed on a skarn ore to attain the selective separation of scheelite (CaWO4) from fluorite, apatite, and silicates. Fluorite and apatite constitute common gangue minerals in scheelite ores. Due to their similar surface properties and good floatability, the separation of scheelite from fluorite is particularly difficult. These ores are usually processed at basic pH using sodium silicate as a gangue mineral depressant and a fatty acid as the collector. Sodium silicate was not efficient enough to depress the fluorite in the studied ore. Thus, different depressants were tested in the flotation of scheelite using a commercial mixture of fatty acids. The effect of adding metallic salts [FeSO4, Al(NO3)3, and Zn(SO4)] prior to sodium silicate was therefore investigated. The sole use of organic molecules (starch, lignin sulfonate, tannin, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid), instead of sodium silicate, was also studied. This led to a global depression of the minerals, including scheelite, and did not improve the selectivity of the separation. The addition of metallic cations did not significantly enhance the selectivity of the flotation; however, iron sulphate slightly increased the sodium silicate performance. Overall, among all the studied depressants, the combination of sodium carbonate and sodium silicate presented the best efficiency. This system was then studied through the design of experiments methodology. Strong synergistic effects existed between the two reagents, mainly impacting the scheelite and fluorite recovery as well as the scheelite grade. This was attributed to surface carbonation of the minerals, subsequently leading to a better depression by sodium silicate. The effect of sodium carbonate on the apatite and silicates was small. This was attributed to spontaneous carbonation and the presence of complex crystallographic structures, respectively. The efficiency of the sodium carbonate/sodium silicate combination was limited (maximum WO3 enrichment ratio = 16.48) due to the lack of selectivity of the depressants. The proposed optimization of the flotation separation of scheelite from gangue minerals maximizes both the WO3 grade and recovery. [Display omitted] •Tannin, citric acid, CMC, lignosulfonate, and starch displayed very low selectivity.•Metallic cations (Fe, Zn, Al) did not enhance the sodium silicate depressing effect.•Combination of Na2SiO3 and Na2CO3 exhibited the best selectivity for scheelite.•Na2SiO3/Na2CO3 system was optimized through response surface methodology.•Strong positive synergistic effects between the reagents were highlighted.</description><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Apatite</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium silicates</subject><subject>Calcium tungstates</subject><subject>Carbonation</subject><subject>Carboxymethyl cellulose</subject><subject>Carboxymethylcellulose</subject><subject>Cations</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Citric acid</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Crystallography</subject><subject>Depressant</subject><subject>Depressants</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Engineering Sciences</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Fluorite</subject><subject>Gangue</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Lignin</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Ores</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Price increases</subject><subject>Reagents</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Salts</subject><subject>Scheelite</subject><subject>Selectivity</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium carbonate</subject><subject>Starch</subject><subject>Surface properties</subject><subject>Synergistic effect</subject><subject>Zinc</subject><issn>0032-5910</issn><issn>1873-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9Uctq3DAUFaWFTKf9gywEXRVqR1fys4tCCE0TGOgmge6ELF13NHgsV5Jd8mH9v2riIXTVlY7ueSDdQ8glsBwYVFeHfHK_I-qcM2hzVuSshldkA00tMsGbH6_JhjHBs7IFdkHehnBgjFUC2Ib8uR8XDNH-VNG6kbqexj1Sg5PHENQYA7Xj4oYFTQLPXMABdbQL0n5w8cUW9B5xsDGNvTtSNSUm4qckmp1_Rmo0VKtB2_lIgx2sVhHDZ3rr9ByoO4c78y99db5r5Ts3pgENTyHi8R1506sh4PvzuSWPt18fbu6y3fdv9zfXu0wXJcSMNx1wxWrT6I6jKHjXQaWbFlquVK9A1ToBoxFRCFaqFoqqh87UhpdCQCG25OOau1eDnLw9Kv8knbLy7nonTzMmiqZqq3aBpP2waifvfs1pp_LgZj-m50nOy7pqWJt2viXFqtLeheCxf4kFJk9lyoNcy5SnMiUrZCoz2b6sNky_XSx6GbTFUaOxPrUhjbP_D_gLIpeumA</recordid><startdate>20190615</startdate><enddate>20190615</enddate><creator>Foucaud, Y.</creator><creator>Filippova, I.V.</creator><creator>Filippov, L.O.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-4218</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-7506</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190615</creationdate><title>Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system</title><author>Foucaud, Y. ; Filippova, I.V. ; Filippov, L.O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-28b12a07d8cb2e342bb16c89192aafa1a7c2aadceee3305a9146f1bd7d2533143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Apatite</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium silicates</topic><topic>Calcium tungstates</topic><topic>Carbonation</topic><topic>Carboxymethyl cellulose</topic><topic>Carboxymethylcellulose</topic><topic>Cations</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Citric acid</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Crystallography</topic><topic>Depressant</topic><topic>Depressants</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Engineering Sciences</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Fluorite</topic><topic>Gangue</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Lignin</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Ores</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Price increases</topic><topic>Reagents</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Salts</topic><topic>Scheelite</topic><topic>Selectivity</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium carbonate</topic><topic>Starch</topic><topic>Surface properties</topic><topic>Synergistic effect</topic><topic>Zinc</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Foucaud, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippova, I.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filippov, L.O.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Foucaud, Y.</au><au>Filippova, I.V.</au><au>Filippov, L.O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system</atitle><jtitle>Powder technology</jtitle><date>2019-06-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>352</volume><spage>501</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>501-512</pages><issn>0032-5910</issn><eissn>1873-328X</eissn><abstract>Flotation tests were performed on a skarn ore to attain the selective separation of scheelite (CaWO4) from fluorite, apatite, and silicates. Fluorite and apatite constitute common gangue minerals in scheelite ores. Due to their similar surface properties and good floatability, the separation of scheelite from fluorite is particularly difficult. These ores are usually processed at basic pH using sodium silicate as a gangue mineral depressant and a fatty acid as the collector. Sodium silicate was not efficient enough to depress the fluorite in the studied ore. Thus, different depressants were tested in the flotation of scheelite using a commercial mixture of fatty acids. The effect of adding metallic salts [FeSO4, Al(NO3)3, and Zn(SO4)] prior to sodium silicate was therefore investigated. The sole use of organic molecules (starch, lignin sulfonate, tannin, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid), instead of sodium silicate, was also studied. This led to a global depression of the minerals, including scheelite, and did not improve the selectivity of the separation. The addition of metallic cations did not significantly enhance the selectivity of the flotation; however, iron sulphate slightly increased the sodium silicate performance. Overall, among all the studied depressants, the combination of sodium carbonate and sodium silicate presented the best efficiency. This system was then studied through the design of experiments methodology. Strong synergistic effects existed between the two reagents, mainly impacting the scheelite and fluorite recovery as well as the scheelite grade. This was attributed to surface carbonation of the minerals, subsequently leading to a better depression by sodium silicate. The effect of sodium carbonate on the apatite and silicates was small. This was attributed to spontaneous carbonation and the presence of complex crystallographic structures, respectively. The efficiency of the sodium carbonate/sodium silicate combination was limited (maximum WO3 enrichment ratio = 16.48) due to the lack of selectivity of the depressants. The proposed optimization of the flotation separation of scheelite from gangue minerals maximizes both the WO3 grade and recovery. [Display omitted] •Tannin, citric acid, CMC, lignosulfonate, and starch displayed very low selectivity.•Metallic cations (Fe, Zn, Al) did not enhance the sodium silicate depressing effect.•Combination of Na2SiO3 and Na2CO3 exhibited the best selectivity for scheelite.•Na2SiO3/Na2CO3 system was optimized through response surface methodology.•Strong positive synergistic effects between the reagents were highlighted.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.071</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-4218</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0047-7506</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5910
ispartof Powder technology, 2019-06, Vol.352, p.501-512
issn 0032-5910
1873-328X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03486969v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aluminum
Apatite
Calcium
Calcium silicates
Calcium tungstates
Carbonation
Carboxymethyl cellulose
Carboxymethylcellulose
Cations
Cellulose
Citric acid
Crystal structure
Crystallography
Depressant
Depressants
Design of experiments
Engineering Sciences
Fatty acids
Flotation
Fluorite
Gangue
Iron
Lignin
Minerals
Optimization
Ores
Organic chemistry
Price increases
Reagents
Recovery
Salts
Scheelite
Selectivity
Separation
Silica
Silicates
Sodium
Sodium carbonate
Starch
Surface properties
Synergistic effect
Zinc
title Investigation of the depressants involved in the selective flotation of scheelite from apatite, fluorite, and calcium silicates: Focus on the sodium silicate/sodium carbonate system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T06%3A02%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20the%20depressants%20involved%20in%20the%20selective%20flotation%20of%20scheelite%20from%20apatite,%20fluorite,%20and%20calcium%20silicates:%20Focus%20on%20the%20sodium%20silicate/sodium%20carbonate%20system&rft.jtitle=Powder%20technology&rft.au=Foucaud,%20Y.&rft.date=2019-06-15&rft.volume=352&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=501-512&rft.issn=0032-5910&rft.eissn=1873-328X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.04.071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2257680906%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2257680906&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0032591019303195&rfr_iscdi=true