Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus
Background Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of pain 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.7-17 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 17 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 7 |
| container_title | European journal of pain |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Levesque, Amélie Bautrant, Eric Quistrebert, Virginie Valancogne, Guy Riant, Thibault Beer Gabel, Marc Leroi, Anne‐Marie Jottard, Katleen Bruyninx, Luc Amarenco, Gerard Quintas, Lara Picard, Pascale Vancaillie, Thierry Leveque, Christine Mohy, Frédérique Rioult, Bruno Ploteau, Stéphane Labat, Jean‐Jacques Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine Quinio, Bertrand Cosson, Michel Haddad, Rebecca Deffieux, Xavier Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée Garreau, Claire Robert, Roger |
| description | Background
Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE.
Methods
The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid.
Results
The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri‐tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow‐up to be currently proposed in this indication.
Conclusion
These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care.
Significance
Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ejp.1861 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03431160v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2581815124</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-20f2ff34c51e399bdfa2e078bd21c8e062e7c5cef0fd04fa822b3f82591b31c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO5DAQRS0E4i3xBchLWASq7CSdsGu1YGDUEgjB2nKcMgQlcbAToP9-EhqYFasq3To6i7qMHSGcIYA4p5fuDLMUN9guJlJEAuN8c9whh0hmgDtsL4QXAIhnILfZjozTWOap3GX2noxrGmpL3VeuDdy1vH8m3uhWP9GY99xZ3g3lRNS8Jf9GfEy97j6PYdWW3jV0wefcOt_ougpUcvroyPfcjEZqwxAO2JbVdaDDr7nPHq8uHxbX0fL2z81ivoyMTBKMBFhhrYxNgiTzvCitFgSzrCgFmowgFTQziSELtoTY6kyIQtpMJDkWEg3KfXa69j7rWnW-arRfKacrdT1fqikDGUvEFN4m9mTNdt69DhR61VTBUF3rltwQlEgyzDBBEf9HjXcheLI_bgQ1NaDGBtTUwIgef1mHoqHyB_x--QhEa-C9qmn1q0hd_r37FP4DUO6QEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2581815124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Levesque, Amélie ; Bautrant, Eric ; Quistrebert, Virginie ; Valancogne, Guy ; Riant, Thibault ; Beer Gabel, Marc ; Leroi, Anne‐Marie ; Jottard, Katleen ; Bruyninx, Luc ; Amarenco, Gerard ; Quintas, Lara ; Picard, Pascale ; Vancaillie, Thierry ; Leveque, Christine ; Mohy, Frédérique ; Rioult, Bruno ; Ploteau, Stéphane ; Labat, Jean‐Jacques ; Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine ; Quinio, Bertrand ; Cosson, Michel ; Haddad, Rebecca ; Deffieux, Xavier ; Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée ; Garreau, Claire ; Robert, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Amélie ; Bautrant, Eric ; Quistrebert, Virginie ; Valancogne, Guy ; Riant, Thibault ; Beer Gabel, Marc ; Leroi, Anne‐Marie ; Jottard, Katleen ; Bruyninx, Luc ; Amarenco, Gerard ; Quintas, Lara ; Picard, Pascale ; Vancaillie, Thierry ; Leveque, Christine ; Mohy, Frédérique ; Rioult, Bruno ; Ploteau, Stéphane ; Labat, Jean‐Jacques ; Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine ; Quinio, Bertrand ; Cosson, Michel ; Haddad, Rebecca ; Deffieux, Xavier ; Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée ; Garreau, Claire ; Robert, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE.
Methods
The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid.
Results
The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri‐tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow‐up to be currently proposed in this indication.
Conclusion
These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care.
Significance
Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1090-3801</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2149</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34643963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Consensus ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Life Sciences ; Pain Measurement ; Pudendal Neuralgia - diagnosis ; Pudendal Neuralgia - therapy ; Tissues and Organs ; United States</subject><ispartof>European journal of pain, 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.7-17</ispartof><rights>2021 European Pain Federation - EFIC</rights><rights>2021 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-20f2ff34c51e399bdfa2e078bd21c8e062e7c5cef0fd04fa822b3f82591b31c13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-20f2ff34c51e399bdfa2e078bd21c8e062e7c5cef0fd04fa822b3f82591b31c13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5080-3931 ; 0000-0002-6266-4203 ; 0000-0002-1528-5569 ; 0000-0001-7856-2853</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fejp.1861$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fejp.1861$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643963$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-03431160$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautrant, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quistrebert, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valancogne, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riant, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beer Gabel, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroi, Anne‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jottard, Katleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyninx, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarenco, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintas, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picard, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vancaillie, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohy, Frédérique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rioult, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploteau, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labat, Jean‐Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinio, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deffieux, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garreau, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus</title><title>European journal of pain</title><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><description>Background
Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE.
Methods
The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid.
Results
The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri‐tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow‐up to be currently proposed in this indication.
Conclusion
These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care.
Significance
Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE.</description><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pudendal Neuralgia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pudendal Neuralgia - therapy</subject><subject>Tissues and Organs</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1090-3801</issn><issn>1532-2149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO5DAQRS0E4i3xBchLWASq7CSdsGu1YGDUEgjB2nKcMgQlcbAToP9-EhqYFasq3To6i7qMHSGcIYA4p5fuDLMUN9guJlJEAuN8c9whh0hmgDtsL4QXAIhnILfZjozTWOap3GX2noxrGmpL3VeuDdy1vH8m3uhWP9GY99xZ3g3lRNS8Jf9GfEy97j6PYdWW3jV0wefcOt_ougpUcvroyPfcjEZqwxAO2JbVdaDDr7nPHq8uHxbX0fL2z81ivoyMTBKMBFhhrYxNgiTzvCitFgSzrCgFmowgFTQziSELtoTY6kyIQtpMJDkWEg3KfXa69j7rWnW-arRfKacrdT1fqikDGUvEFN4m9mTNdt69DhR61VTBUF3rltwQlEgyzDBBEf9HjXcheLI_bgQ1NaDGBtTUwIgef1mHoqHyB_x--QhEa-C9qmn1q0hd_r37FP4DUO6QEQ</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Levesque, Amélie</creator><creator>Bautrant, Eric</creator><creator>Quistrebert, Virginie</creator><creator>Valancogne, Guy</creator><creator>Riant, Thibault</creator><creator>Beer Gabel, Marc</creator><creator>Leroi, Anne‐Marie</creator><creator>Jottard, Katleen</creator><creator>Bruyninx, Luc</creator><creator>Amarenco, Gerard</creator><creator>Quintas, Lara</creator><creator>Picard, Pascale</creator><creator>Vancaillie, Thierry</creator><creator>Leveque, Christine</creator><creator>Mohy, Frédérique</creator><creator>Rioult, Bruno</creator><creator>Ploteau, Stéphane</creator><creator>Labat, Jean‐Jacques</creator><creator>Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine</creator><creator>Quinio, Bertrand</creator><creator>Cosson, Michel</creator><creator>Haddad, Rebecca</creator><creator>Deffieux, Xavier</creator><creator>Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée</creator><creator>Garreau, Claire</creator><creator>Robert, Roger</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5080-3931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-5569</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-2853</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus</title><author>Levesque, Amélie ; Bautrant, Eric ; Quistrebert, Virginie ; Valancogne, Guy ; Riant, Thibault ; Beer Gabel, Marc ; Leroi, Anne‐Marie ; Jottard, Katleen ; Bruyninx, Luc ; Amarenco, Gerard ; Quintas, Lara ; Picard, Pascale ; Vancaillie, Thierry ; Leveque, Christine ; Mohy, Frédérique ; Rioult, Bruno ; Ploteau, Stéphane ; Labat, Jean‐Jacques ; Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine ; Quinio, Bertrand ; Cosson, Michel ; Haddad, Rebecca ; Deffieux, Xavier ; Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée ; Garreau, Claire ; Robert, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3551-20f2ff34c51e399bdfa2e078bd21c8e062e7c5cef0fd04fa822b3f82591b31c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pudendal Neuralgia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pudendal Neuralgia - therapy</topic><topic>Tissues and Organs</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levesque, Amélie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bautrant, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quistrebert, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valancogne, Guy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riant, Thibault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beer Gabel, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroi, Anne‐Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jottard, Katleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruyninx, Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amarenco, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintas, Lara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Picard, Pascale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vancaillie, Thierry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohy, Frédérique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rioult, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploteau, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labat, Jean‐Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinio, Bertrand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosson, Michel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deffieux, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garreau, Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robert, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levesque, Amélie</au><au>Bautrant, Eric</au><au>Quistrebert, Virginie</au><au>Valancogne, Guy</au><au>Riant, Thibault</au><au>Beer Gabel, Marc</au><au>Leroi, Anne‐Marie</au><au>Jottard, Katleen</au><au>Bruyninx, Luc</au><au>Amarenco, Gerard</au><au>Quintas, Lara</au><au>Picard, Pascale</au><au>Vancaillie, Thierry</au><au>Leveque, Christine</au><au>Mohy, Frédérique</au><au>Rioult, Bruno</au><au>Ploteau, Stéphane</au><au>Labat, Jean‐Jacques</au><au>Guinet‐Lacoste, Amandine</au><au>Quinio, Bertrand</au><au>Cosson, Michel</au><au>Haddad, Rebecca</au><au>Deffieux, Xavier</au><au>Perrouin‐Verbe, Marie‐Aimée</au><au>Garreau, Claire</au><au>Robert, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pain</addtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>7</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>7-17</pages><issn>1090-3801</issn><eissn>1532-2149</eissn><abstract>Background
Since the development and publication of diagnostic criteria for pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) syndrome in 2008, no comprehensive work has been published on the clinical knowledge in the management of this condition. The aim of this work was to develop recommendations on the diagnosis and the management of PNE.
Methods
The methodology of this study was based on French High Authority for Health Method for the development of good practice and the literature review was based on the PRISMA method. The selected articles have all been evaluated according to the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians assessment grid.
Results
The results of the literature review and expert consensus are incorporated into 10 sections to describe diagnosis and management of PNE: (1) diagnosis of PNE, (2) patients advice and precautions, (3) drugs treatments, (4) physiotherapy, (5) transcutaneous electrostimulations (TENS), (6) psychotherapy, (7) injections, (8) surgery, (9) pulsed radiofrequency, and (10) Neuromodulation. The following major points should be noted: (i) the relevance of 4+1 Nantes criteria for diagnosis; (ii) the preference for initial monotherapy with tri‐tetracyclics or gabapentinoids; (iii) the lack of effect of opiates, (iv) the likely relevance (pending more controlled studies) of physiotherapy, TENS and cognitive behavioural therapy; (v) the incertitudes (lack of data) regarding corticoid injections, (vi) surgery is a long term effective treatment and (vii) radiofrequency needs a longer follow‐up to be currently proposed in this indication.
Conclusion
These recommendations should allow rational and homogeneous management of patients suffering from PNE. They should also allow to shorten the delays of management by directing the primary care.
Significance
Pudendal nerve entrapment (PNE) has only been known for about 20 years and its management is heterogeneous from one practitioner to another. This work offers a synthesis of the literature and international experts' opinions on the diagnosis and management of PNE.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>34643963</pmid><doi>10.1002/ejp.1861</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5080-3931</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6266-4203</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-5569</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7856-2853</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1090-3801 |
| ispartof | European journal of pain, 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.7-17 |
| issn | 1090-3801 1532-2149 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03431160v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Consensus Human health and pathology Humans Life Sciences Pain Measurement Pudendal Neuralgia - diagnosis Pudendal Neuralgia - therapy Tissues and Organs United States |
| title | Recommendations on the management of pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: A formalised expert consensus |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A44%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recommendations%20on%20the%20management%20of%20pudendal%20nerve%20entrapment%20syndrome:%20A%20formalised%20expert%20consensus&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Levesque,%20Am%C3%A9lie&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=7&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=7-17&rft.issn=1090-3801&rft.eissn=1532-2149&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ejp.1861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2581815124%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2581815124&rft_id=info:pmid/34643963&rfr_iscdi=true |