The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability

Abstract Purpose The “time value of money principle,” a building block of finance theory and practice, states that money today is worth more than money in the future. In this chapter, we argue that this principle is not consistent with intergenerational equity or sustainability. Methodology/approach...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Baur, Dirk, Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 92
container_issue
container_start_page 75
container_title
container_volume 11
creator Baur, Dirk
Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas
description Abstract Purpose The “time value of money principle,” a building block of finance theory and practice, states that money today is worth more than money in the future. In this chapter, we argue that this principle is not consistent with intergenerational equity or sustainability. Methodology/approach We demonstrate that standard capital budgeting negatively affects sustainability by presenting two numerical examples and by discussing the role of financial markets in the time value of money and the discount rate. We then discuss Silvio Gesell’s (1862–1930) concept of Freigeld as a possible alternative framework for a “socially optimal” discount rate. Findings We show that the time value of money principle, as employed in standard capital budgeting techniques, tends to reject sustainable projects (that only break even in the long run) and accept unsustainable projects (that break even in the short term but entail significant long-term negative externalities). We find that fiat currencies offer interesting perspectives in the context of sustainability. Research implications We show that money, interest rates and investment valuation techniques are not merely technical tools, but have important institutional, social, and political attributes. Taken together with current global demands for sustainability, this observation could justify a new research agenda seeking to redefine current capital budgeting techniques. Practical/social implications We stress that the “time value of money principle” should not be viewed as a technical tool, but rather, as a social and political construct. We argue that the principle needs to be reconsidered given the current global sustainability crisis. Originality/value The economics literature considers that externalities indicate a market failure, to which policy makers should respond by introducing optimal tax incentives and regulation. At the same time, the management studies literature has proposed a set of initiatives to align corporate governance with sustainability principles. This chapter examines an issue that concerns both these literatures, that is, the relationship between sustainability and the time value of money.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/S2043-905920160000011004
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03415065v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>CX7313200018</galeid><sourcerecordid>CX7313200018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-89a27af3af125691cdf77c8536167ca6efaa2ee00806167d91f1ed9da905ef193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkM9PwjAUx2vURET-AU-9ekDbde3aI8EfmGA8gB59eWxvUh2b2QaG_94OiImxl6bfHy-vH8a4FNdSCnszi0Sshk5oFwlpRHeCLuIjNnCJlYk1SmvhzDE7PzxC64T1fmtnbNA0H13N6jhytsdu50vi46psa8x82vqq5Atqv4lK3gZn7lfEX7FYE69y_lSVtOVYZny2blr0JS584dvtBTvNsWhocLj77OX-bj6eDKfPD4_j0XSYxta0Q-swSjBXmMtIGyfTLE-S1GplpElSNJQjRkRCWNEpmZO5pMxlGFanXDrVZ1f7uUss4Kv2K6y3UKGHyWgKnSZULLUweiND9nKffceCYFMXkCipot3fg_m2N2lFNRYZLKrqswEpoOMMO87wnzMEWPAHFhxgQYAFHSzYwVI_9JV6ag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability</title><source>Emerald Books Business Management And Economics</source><source>eBooks on EBSCOhost</source><creator>Baur, Dirk ; Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Baur, Dirk ; Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose The “time value of money principle,” a building block of finance theory and practice, states that money today is worth more than money in the future. In this chapter, we argue that this principle is not consistent with intergenerational equity or sustainability. Methodology/approach We demonstrate that standard capital budgeting negatively affects sustainability by presenting two numerical examples and by discussing the role of financial markets in the time value of money and the discount rate. We then discuss Silvio Gesell’s (1862–1930) concept of Freigeld as a possible alternative framework for a “socially optimal” discount rate. Findings We show that the time value of money principle, as employed in standard capital budgeting techniques, tends to reject sustainable projects (that only break even in the long run) and accept unsustainable projects (that break even in the short term but entail significant long-term negative externalities). We find that fiat currencies offer interesting perspectives in the context of sustainability. Research implications We show that money, interest rates and investment valuation techniques are not merely technical tools, but have important institutional, social, and political attributes. Taken together with current global demands for sustainability, this observation could justify a new research agenda seeking to redefine current capital budgeting techniques. Practical/social implications We stress that the “time value of money principle” should not be viewed as a technical tool, but rather, as a social and political construct. We argue that the principle needs to be reconsidered given the current global sustainability crisis. Originality/value The economics literature considers that externalities indicate a market failure, to which policy makers should respond by introducing optimal tax incentives and regulation. At the same time, the management studies literature has proposed a set of initiatives to align corporate governance with sustainability principles. This chapter examines an issue that concerns both these literatures, that is, the relationship between sustainability and the time value of money.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2043-9059</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1786355108</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781786355102</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1786355094</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781786355096</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781786355096</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1786355094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/S2043-905920160000011004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Budgeting ; Business Ethics ; Corporate Governance ; Discount rates ; Equity (Finance) ; Financial markets ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Industrial management ; Interest rates ; Money ; Strategy ; Sustainability ; Sustainable development</subject><ispartof>Finance and Economy for Society : Integrating Sustainability, 2017, Vol.11, p.75-92</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-89a27af3af125691cdf77c8536167ca6efaa2ee00806167d91f1ed9da905ef193</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-0960-9096</orcidid><relation>crgs</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>127,146,230,775,776,780,789,881,25332,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03415065$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baur, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability</title><title>Finance and Economy for Society : Integrating Sustainability</title><description>Abstract Purpose The “time value of money principle,” a building block of finance theory and practice, states that money today is worth more than money in the future. In this chapter, we argue that this principle is not consistent with intergenerational equity or sustainability. Methodology/approach We demonstrate that standard capital budgeting negatively affects sustainability by presenting two numerical examples and by discussing the role of financial markets in the time value of money and the discount rate. We then discuss Silvio Gesell’s (1862–1930) concept of Freigeld as a possible alternative framework for a “socially optimal” discount rate. Findings We show that the time value of money principle, as employed in standard capital budgeting techniques, tends to reject sustainable projects (that only break even in the long run) and accept unsustainable projects (that break even in the short term but entail significant long-term negative externalities). We find that fiat currencies offer interesting perspectives in the context of sustainability. Research implications We show that money, interest rates and investment valuation techniques are not merely technical tools, but have important institutional, social, and political attributes. Taken together with current global demands for sustainability, this observation could justify a new research agenda seeking to redefine current capital budgeting techniques. Practical/social implications We stress that the “time value of money principle” should not be viewed as a technical tool, but rather, as a social and political construct. We argue that the principle needs to be reconsidered given the current global sustainability crisis. Originality/value The economics literature considers that externalities indicate a market failure, to which policy makers should respond by introducing optimal tax incentives and regulation. At the same time, the management studies literature has proposed a set of initiatives to align corporate governance with sustainability principles. This chapter examines an issue that concerns both these literatures, that is, the relationship between sustainability and the time value of money.</description><subject>Budgeting</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Corporate Governance</subject><subject>Discount rates</subject><subject>Equity (Finance)</subject><subject>Financial markets</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Industrial management</subject><subject>Interest rates</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><issn>2043-9059</issn><isbn>1786355108</isbn><isbn>9781786355102</isbn><isbn>1786355094</isbn><isbn>9781786355096</isbn><isbn>9781786355096</isbn><isbn>1786355094</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNplkM9PwjAUx2vURET-AU-9ekDbde3aI8EfmGA8gB59eWxvUh2b2QaG_94OiImxl6bfHy-vH8a4FNdSCnszi0Sshk5oFwlpRHeCLuIjNnCJlYk1SmvhzDE7PzxC64T1fmtnbNA0H13N6jhytsdu50vi46psa8x82vqq5Atqv4lK3gZn7lfEX7FYE69y_lSVtOVYZny2blr0JS584dvtBTvNsWhocLj77OX-bj6eDKfPD4_j0XSYxta0Q-swSjBXmMtIGyfTLE-S1GplpElSNJQjRkRCWNEpmZO5pMxlGFanXDrVZ1f7uUss4Kv2K6y3UKGHyWgKnSZULLUweiND9nKffceCYFMXkCipot3fg_m2N2lFNRYZLKrqswEpoOMMO87wnzMEWPAHFhxgQYAFHSzYwVI_9JV6ag</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Baur, Dirk</creator><creator>Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-9096</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability</title><author>Baur, Dirk ; Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-89a27af3af125691cdf77c8536167ca6efaa2ee00806167d91f1ed9da905ef193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Budgeting</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Corporate Governance</topic><topic>Discount rates</topic><topic>Equity (Finance)</topic><topic>Financial markets</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Industrial management</topic><topic>Interest rates</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baur, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baur, Dirk</au><au>Lagoarde-Segot, Thomas</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability</atitle><btitle>Finance and Economy for Society : Integrating Sustainability</btitle><seriestitle>crgs</seriestitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>75</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>75-92</pages><issn>2043-9059</issn><isbn>1786355108</isbn><isbn>9781786355102</isbn><isbn>1786355094</isbn><isbn>9781786355096</isbn><eisbn>9781786355096</eisbn><eisbn>1786355094</eisbn><abstract>Abstract Purpose The “time value of money principle,” a building block of finance theory and practice, states that money today is worth more than money in the future. In this chapter, we argue that this principle is not consistent with intergenerational equity or sustainability. Methodology/approach We demonstrate that standard capital budgeting negatively affects sustainability by presenting two numerical examples and by discussing the role of financial markets in the time value of money and the discount rate. We then discuss Silvio Gesell’s (1862–1930) concept of Freigeld as a possible alternative framework for a “socially optimal” discount rate. Findings We show that the time value of money principle, as employed in standard capital budgeting techniques, tends to reject sustainable projects (that only break even in the long run) and accept unsustainable projects (that break even in the short term but entail significant long-term negative externalities). We find that fiat currencies offer interesting perspectives in the context of sustainability. Research implications We show that money, interest rates and investment valuation techniques are not merely technical tools, but have important institutional, social, and political attributes. Taken together with current global demands for sustainability, this observation could justify a new research agenda seeking to redefine current capital budgeting techniques. Practical/social implications We stress that the “time value of money principle” should not be viewed as a technical tool, but rather, as a social and political construct. We argue that the principle needs to be reconsidered given the current global sustainability crisis. Originality/value The economics literature considers that externalities indicate a market failure, to which policy makers should respond by introducing optimal tax incentives and regulation. At the same time, the management studies literature has proposed a set of initiatives to align corporate governance with sustainability principles. This chapter examines an issue that concerns both these literatures, that is, the relationship between sustainability and the time value of money.</abstract><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/S2043-905920160000011004</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0960-9096</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2043-9059
ispartof Finance and Economy for Society : Integrating Sustainability, 2017, Vol.11, p.75-92
issn 2043-9059
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03415065v1
source Emerald Books Business Management And Economics; eBooks on EBSCOhost
subjects Budgeting
Business Ethics
Corporate Governance
Discount rates
Equity (Finance)
Financial markets
Humanities and Social Sciences
Industrial management
Interest rates
Money
Strategy
Sustainability
Sustainable development
title The Contradiction between the Time Value of Money and Sustainability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T04%3A37%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=The%20Contradiction%20between%20the%20Time%20Value%20of%20Money%20and%20Sustainability&rft.btitle=Finance%20and%20Economy%20for%20Society%20:%20Integrating%20Sustainability&rft.au=Baur,%20Dirk&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=75-92&rft.issn=2043-9059&rft.isbn=1786355108&rft.isbn_list=9781786355102&rft.isbn_list=1786355094&rft.isbn_list=9781786355096&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/S2043-905920160000011004&rft_dat=%3Cgale_hal_p%3ECX7313200018%3C/gale_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9781786355096&rft.eisbn_list=1786355094&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=CX7313200018&rfr_iscdi=true