The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)
Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of philosophical economics 2021-11, Vol.XIV Issue 1-2 (Articles), p.136-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | Articles |
container_start_page | 136 |
container_title | The journal of philosophical economics |
container_volume | XIV Issue 1-2 |
creator | Petre Comşa, Fr Munteanu, Costea |
description | Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.46298/jpe.8665 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03414808v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2937269313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-941a303922befc44520b4c645b0fa7aad3023768a5cea3b3b67966cfa03b2ec53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNQe_AcBL_aQut_ZHEuxtlDwUs_L7GZiU9pszKZK_71pK-pphnceXoaHkHtGJ1Lz3DxtG5wYrdUVGTAjZWo4Ndf_9lsyinFLKWU040zpAZmvN5hAE4rKd5VP9thtQpFAXSRdfygq2IX3AyYOuy_E-hSGPjmeiegrrD0mj8vxHbkpYRdx9DOH5G3-vJ4t0tXry3I2XaVeKNOluWQgqMg5d1h6KRWnTnotlaMlZACFoFxk2oDyCMIJp7Nca18CFY6jV2JIxpfeDexs01Z7aI82QGUX05U9ZVRIJg01n6xnHy5s04aPA8bObsOhrfv3LM9FxnUumPhr9G2IscXyt5ZRe7Zqe6v2ZFV8AxpWZ6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937269313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Petre Comşa, Fr ; Munteanu, Costea</creator><creatorcontrib>Petre Comşa, Fr ; Munteanu, Costea</creatorcontrib><description>Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-8208</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1843-2298</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1844-8208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.46298/jpe.8665</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bucharest: Journal of Philosophical Economics</publisher><subject>Discontinuity ; Divorce ; Epistemology ; God ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Knowledge ; Logic ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Religion ; Religions ; Religious beliefs ; Science ; Scientific reasoning ; Secularization ; Theologians ; Theology</subject><ispartof>The journal of philosophical economics, 2021-11, Vol.XIV Issue 1-2 (Articles), p.136-176</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under http://www.jpe.ro/?id=revista&p=494&cuprins=ascuns (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03414808$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Petre Comşa, Fr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Costea</creatorcontrib><title>The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)</title><title>The journal of philosophical economics</title><description>Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue.</description><subject>Discontinuity</subject><subject>Divorce</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Religions</subject><subject>Religious beliefs</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientific reasoning</subject><subject>Secularization</subject><subject>Theologians</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>1844-8208</issn><issn>1843-2298</issn><issn>1844-8208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNQe_AcBL_aQut_ZHEuxtlDwUs_L7GZiU9pszKZK_71pK-pphnceXoaHkHtGJ1Lz3DxtG5wYrdUVGTAjZWo4Ndf_9lsyinFLKWU040zpAZmvN5hAE4rKd5VP9thtQpFAXSRdfygq2IX3AyYOuy_E-hSGPjmeiegrrD0mj8vxHbkpYRdx9DOH5G3-vJ4t0tXry3I2XaVeKNOluWQgqMg5d1h6KRWnTnotlaMlZACFoFxk2oDyCMIJp7Nca18CFY6jV2JIxpfeDexs01Z7aI82QGUX05U9ZVRIJg01n6xnHy5s04aPA8bObsOhrfv3LM9FxnUumPhr9G2IscXyt5ZRe7Zqe6v2ZFV8AxpWZ6s</recordid><startdate>20211120</startdate><enddate>20211120</enddate><creator>Petre Comşa, Fr</creator><creator>Munteanu, Costea</creator><general>Journal of Philosophical Economics</general><general>Rosetti Educational</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211120</creationdate><title>The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)</title><author>Petre Comşa, Fr ; Munteanu, Costea</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-941a303922befc44520b4c645b0fa7aad3023768a5cea3b3b67966cfa03b2ec53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Discontinuity</topic><topic>Divorce</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Religions</topic><topic>Religious beliefs</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientific reasoning</topic><topic>Secularization</topic><topic>Theologians</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Petre Comşa, Fr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munteanu, Costea</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>The journal of philosophical economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Petre Comşa, Fr</au><au>Munteanu, Costea</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)</atitle><jtitle>The journal of philosophical economics</jtitle><date>2021-11-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>XIV Issue 1-2</volume><issue>Articles</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>136-176</pages><issn>1844-8208</issn><issn>1843-2298</issn><eissn>1844-8208</eissn><abstract>Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Journal of Philosophical Economics</pub><doi>10.46298/jpe.8665</doi><tpages>41</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1844-8208 |
ispartof | The journal of philosophical economics, 2021-11, Vol.XIV Issue 1-2 (Articles), p.136-176 |
issn | 1844-8208 1843-2298 1844-8208 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03414808v1 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Discontinuity Divorce Epistemology God Humanities and Social Sciences Knowledge Logic Ontology Philosophy Religion Religions Religious beliefs Science Scientific reasoning Secularization Theologians Theology |
title | The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A32%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20apodictic%20method%20and%20the%20dialogue%20between%20theology%20and%20science%20(I)&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20philosophical%20economics&rft.au=Petre%20Com%C5%9Fa,%20Fr&rft.date=2021-11-20&rft.volume=XIV%20Issue%201-2&rft.issue=Articles&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=136-176&rft.issn=1844-8208&rft.eissn=1844-8208&rft_id=info:doi/10.46298/jpe.8665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2937269313%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937269313&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |