Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup

Makeup is a form of body art which has been used for more than 7,000 years and is present in the great majority of human cultures, often used to enhance facial attractiveness and to accentuate features that represent femininity. This study examines how cumulative levels of facial makeup influenced a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2023-02, Vol.17 (1), p.29-42
Hauptverfasser: Comfort, William Edgar, de Andrade, Bianca Nunes, Wingenbach, Tanja S. H., Causeur, David, Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 42
container_issue 1
container_start_page 29
container_title Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts
container_volume 17
creator Comfort, William Edgar
de Andrade, Bianca Nunes
Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.
Causeur, David
Boggio, Paulo Sérgio
description Makeup is a form of body art which has been used for more than 7,000 years and is present in the great majority of human cultures, often used to enhance facial attractiveness and to accentuate features that represent femininity. This study examines how cumulative levels of facial makeup influenced approach and avoidance tendencies and on facial muscle responses associated with emotional response obtained through facial electromyography (EMG) in a passive viewing task. Experiment 1 used the joystick variant of the approach-avoidance task, where 30 subjects categorized female faces by visual orientation (portrait/landscape) in seven cumulatively added makeup levels. In Experiment 2, facial EMG was recorded from 40 subjects in the passive viewing of the same images. The present study shows that makeup application modulates implicit responses and reveals two distinct implicit preferences, behavioral and affective, with a male behavioral preference for heavy eye cosmetics, a female behavioral preference for light makeup, and an overall affective preference in both men and women for makeup accentuating visual contrast in the eye and mouth regions. These results are consistent with the conception that perceptual cues underlying cosmetic enhancement are key determinants in aesthetic facial preferences.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/aca0000408
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03403732v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802524604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-331f97f91460edce7b5416aba40fdee7af90f37e8faee1ac8355254d838358a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAiCs6PF_-Cgk8K06RJm_Rx-C0TQRR9kXBmly2za2uSDvzvTZ26N_NyR_hdctwlyQElJ5QwcQoaSDycyI1kQEtGh6wkL5u_uSyL7WTH-3kkgmXFIHm9WbSV1TakD-jbpvboU1unYYbpbTeZLrAOaWPSUQgOdLBLrNF_i0vQkT7bMEvPrTHobD1Nx7jEyvcFd_COXbuXbBmoPO7_xN3k6fLi8ex6OL6_ujkbjYfAeRGGjFFTClNSXhCcaBRvOacFvAEnZoIowJTEMIHSACIFLVmeZzmfSBYzCQXbTY5W786gUq2zC3CfqgGrrkdj1d8RxuN4WLak0R6ubOuajw59UPOmc3VsT2WSZHkWm-D_qlzQUjApe3W8Uto13js0f59TovqFqPVC1hhaUK3_1OCC1RV63TkX59xbRYWiKivZF67Liz0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2571973884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><creator>Comfort, William Edgar ; de Andrade, Bianca Nunes ; Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. ; Causeur, David ; Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</creator><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Comfort, William Edgar ; de Andrade, Bianca Nunes ; Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. ; Causeur, David ; Boggio, Paulo Sérgio ; Goldstein, Thalia ; Vartanian, Oshin</creatorcontrib><description>Makeup is a form of body art which has been used for more than 7,000 years and is present in the great majority of human cultures, often used to enhance facial attractiveness and to accentuate features that represent femininity. This study examines how cumulative levels of facial makeup influenced approach and avoidance tendencies and on facial muscle responses associated with emotional response obtained through facial electromyography (EMG) in a passive viewing task. Experiment 1 used the joystick variant of the approach-avoidance task, where 30 subjects categorized female faces by visual orientation (portrait/landscape) in seven cumulatively added makeup levels. In Experiment 2, facial EMG was recorded from 40 subjects in the passive viewing of the same images. The present study shows that makeup application modulates implicit responses and reveals two distinct implicit preferences, behavioral and affective, with a male behavioral preference for heavy eye cosmetics, a female behavioral preference for light makeup, and an overall affective preference in both men and women for makeup accentuating visual contrast in the eye and mouth regions. These results are consistent with the conception that perceptual cues underlying cosmetic enhancement are key determinants in aesthetic facial preferences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1931-3896</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-390X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/aca0000408</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Preferences ; Aesthetics ; Approach Avoidance ; Body art ; Cosmetic Techniques ; Cosmetics ; Electromyography ; Face ; Female ; Human ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Judgment ; Male ; Mathematics ; Methods and statistics ; Personal appearance ; Physical Attractiveness ; Preferences ; Psychology ; Responses ; Statistics ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2023-02, Vol.17 (1), p.29-42</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2023</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-331f97f91460edce7b5416aba40fdee7af90f37e8faee1ac8355254d838358a63</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9335-960X ; 0000-0002-1727-2374 ; 0000-0003-3739-2768 ; 0000-0001-6910-9440</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,30972</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03403732$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Goldstein, Thalia</contributor><contributor>Vartanian, Oshin</contributor><creatorcontrib>Comfort, William Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Bianca Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causeur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><title>Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup</title><title>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</title><description>Makeup is a form of body art which has been used for more than 7,000 years and is present in the great majority of human cultures, often used to enhance facial attractiveness and to accentuate features that represent femininity. This study examines how cumulative levels of facial makeup influenced approach and avoidance tendencies and on facial muscle responses associated with emotional response obtained through facial electromyography (EMG) in a passive viewing task. Experiment 1 used the joystick variant of the approach-avoidance task, where 30 subjects categorized female faces by visual orientation (portrait/landscape) in seven cumulatively added makeup levels. In Experiment 2, facial EMG was recorded from 40 subjects in the passive viewing of the same images. The present study shows that makeup application modulates implicit responses and reveals two distinct implicit preferences, behavioral and affective, with a male behavioral preference for heavy eye cosmetics, a female behavioral preference for light makeup, and an overall affective preference in both men and women for makeup accentuating visual contrast in the eye and mouth regions. These results are consistent with the conception that perceptual cues underlying cosmetic enhancement are key determinants in aesthetic facial preferences.</description><subject>Aesthetic Preferences</subject><subject>Aesthetics</subject><subject>Approach Avoidance</subject><subject>Body art</subject><subject>Cosmetic Techniques</subject><subject>Cosmetics</subject><subject>Electromyography</subject><subject>Face</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Methods and statistics</subject><subject>Personal appearance</subject><subject>Physical Attractiveness</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>1931-3896</issn><issn>1931-390X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNp90d1LwzAQAPAiCs6PF_-Cgk8K06RJm_Rx-C0TQRR9kXBmly2za2uSDvzvTZ26N_NyR_hdctwlyQElJ5QwcQoaSDycyI1kQEtGh6wkL5u_uSyL7WTH-3kkgmXFIHm9WbSV1TakD-jbpvboU1unYYbpbTeZLrAOaWPSUQgOdLBLrNF_i0vQkT7bMEvPrTHobD1Nx7jEyvcFd_COXbuXbBmoPO7_xN3k6fLi8ex6OL6_ujkbjYfAeRGGjFFTClNSXhCcaBRvOacFvAEnZoIowJTEMIHSACIFLVmeZzmfSBYzCQXbTY5W786gUq2zC3CfqgGrrkdj1d8RxuN4WLak0R6ubOuajw59UPOmc3VsT2WSZHkWm-D_qlzQUjApe3W8Uto13js0f59TovqFqPVC1hhaUK3_1OCC1RV63TkX59xbRYWiKivZF67Liz0</recordid><startdate>20230201</startdate><enddate>20230201</enddate><creator>Comfort, William Edgar</creator><creator>de Andrade, Bianca Nunes</creator><creator>Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.</creator><creator>Causeur, David</creator><creator>Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QI</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-960X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-2374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-2768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-9440</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230201</creationdate><title>Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup</title><author>Comfort, William Edgar ; de Andrade, Bianca Nunes ; Wingenbach, Tanja S. H. ; Causeur, David ; Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-331f97f91460edce7b5416aba40fdee7af90f37e8faee1ac8355254d838358a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Preferences</topic><topic>Aesthetics</topic><topic>Approach Avoidance</topic><topic>Body art</topic><topic>Cosmetic Techniques</topic><topic>Cosmetics</topic><topic>Electromyography</topic><topic>Face</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Methods and statistics</topic><topic>Personal appearance</topic><topic>Physical Attractiveness</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Comfort, William Edgar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Andrade, Bianca Nunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Causeur, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Comfort, William Edgar</au><au>de Andrade, Bianca Nunes</au><au>Wingenbach, Tanja S. H.</au><au>Causeur, David</au><au>Boggio, Paulo Sérgio</au><au>Goldstein, Thalia</au><au>Vartanian, Oshin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup</atitle><jtitle>Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts</jtitle><date>2023-02-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>29</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>29-42</pages><issn>1931-3896</issn><eissn>1931-390X</eissn><abstract>Makeup is a form of body art which has been used for more than 7,000 years and is present in the great majority of human cultures, often used to enhance facial attractiveness and to accentuate features that represent femininity. This study examines how cumulative levels of facial makeup influenced approach and avoidance tendencies and on facial muscle responses associated with emotional response obtained through facial electromyography (EMG) in a passive viewing task. Experiment 1 used the joystick variant of the approach-avoidance task, where 30 subjects categorized female faces by visual orientation (portrait/landscape) in seven cumulatively added makeup levels. In Experiment 2, facial EMG was recorded from 40 subjects in the passive viewing of the same images. The present study shows that makeup application modulates implicit responses and reveals two distinct implicit preferences, behavioral and affective, with a male behavioral preference for heavy eye cosmetics, a female behavioral preference for light makeup, and an overall affective preference in both men and women for makeup accentuating visual contrast in the eye and mouth regions. These results are consistent with the conception that perceptual cues underlying cosmetic enhancement are key determinants in aesthetic facial preferences.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/aca0000408</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9335-960X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1727-2374</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-2768</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6910-9440</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1931-3896
ispartof Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts, 2023-02, Vol.17 (1), p.29-42
issn 1931-3896
1931-390X
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03403732v1
source APA PsycARTICLES; ARTbibliographies Modern
subjects Aesthetic Preferences
Aesthetics
Approach Avoidance
Body art
Cosmetic Techniques
Cosmetics
Electromyography
Face
Female
Human
Humanities and Social Sciences
Judgment
Male
Mathematics
Methods and statistics
Personal appearance
Physical Attractiveness
Preferences
Psychology
Responses
Statistics
Visual Perception
title Implicit Responses in the Judgment of Attractiveness in Faces With Differing Levels of Makeup
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A35%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implicit%20Responses%20in%20the%20Judgment%20of%20Attractiveness%20in%20Faces%20With%20Differing%20Levels%20of%20Makeup&rft.jtitle=Psychology%20of%20aesthetics,%20creativity,%20and%20the%20arts&rft.au=Comfort,%20William%20Edgar&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=29&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=29-42&rft.issn=1931-3896&rft.eissn=1931-390X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/aca0000408&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2802524604%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2571973884&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true