Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks
Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cognition 2021-07, Vol.212, p.104663-104663, Article 104663 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104663 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104663 |
container_title | Cognition |
container_volume | 212 |
creator | Finisguerra, Alessandra Ticini, Luca F. Kirsch, Louise P. Cross, Emily S. Kotz, Sonja A. Urgesi, Cosimo |
description | Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03394710v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010027721000822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2505359547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-2a73e8d7b9d5f64a0f16e9ef3aa02917e080ad6de3f9ed717419de7899ffcc503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFSASG1hkem0nsb0clZYijdQNXVse-6Z4SOLB9gzq2-MoZRZsWFn-dO6P7iHkA4U1Bdpd7dc2PE4--zCtGTBa0qbr-AuyolLwWkguX5IVAIUamBAX5E1KewBomJCvyQXnoqMNhRW5_-JTCtab7KfHCsddcH7EKVdmcuUb5glmqCIam_3J56fKT1WJQyxZOoQpYapyqEzMv0P8md6SV70ZEr57fi_Jw-3N9-u7env_9dv1ZlvbRrJcMyM4Sid2yrV91xjoaYcKe24MMEUFggTjOoe8V-gEFQ1VDoVUqu-tbYFfks9L3x9m0IfoRxOfdDBe3222es6Ac9UICida2E8Le4jh1xFT1qNPFofBTBiOSbMWWt6qthEF_fgPug_HWC4wUx1TjMtGFkoslI0hpYj9eQMKevaj9_rsR89-9OKnVL5_7n_cjejOdX-FFGCzAFiOd_IYdbIeJ4vOR7RZu-D_O-QP0PSldA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562923848</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Finisguerra, Alessandra ; Ticini, Luca F. ; Kirsch, Louise P. ; Cross, Emily S. ; Kotz, Sonja A. ; Urgesi, Cosimo</creator><creatorcontrib>Finisguerra, Alessandra ; Ticini, Luca F. ; Kirsch, Louise P. ; Cross, Emily S. ; Kotz, Sonja A. ; Urgesi, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><description>Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-0277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33761410</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Appreciation ; Artwork perception ; Cognitive science ; Cortex ; Cortex (motor) ; Covert ; Embodied aesthetics ; Emotions ; Empathy ; Gardens & gardening ; Liking ; Magnetic fields ; Motor evoked potentials ; Motor simulation ; Muscles ; Neural coding ; Perception ; Photography ; Reactivity ; Sensorimotor system ; Simulation ; Stimulus ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Wrist</subject><ispartof>Cognition, 2021-07, Vol.212, p.104663-104663, Article 104663</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-2a73e8d7b9d5f64a0f16e9ef3aa02917e080ad6de3f9ed717419de7899ffcc503</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-2a73e8d7b9d5f64a0f16e9ef3aa02917e080ad6de3f9ed717419de7899ffcc503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8418-776X ; 0000-0002-5894-4624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33761410$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03394710$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finisguerra, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticini, Luca F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Louise P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotz, Sonja A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urgesi, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><title>Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks</title><title>Cognition</title><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><description>Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception.</description><subject>Appreciation</subject><subject>Artwork perception</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cortex</subject><subject>Cortex (motor)</subject><subject>Covert</subject><subject>Embodied aesthetics</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Gardens & gardening</subject><subject>Liking</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Motor evoked potentials</subject><subject>Motor simulation</subject><subject>Muscles</subject><subject>Neural coding</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Reactivity</subject><subject>Sensorimotor system</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Stimulus</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><issn>0010-0277</issn><issn>1873-7838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAURi0EokPhFSASG1hkem0nsb0clZYijdQNXVse-6Z4SOLB9gzq2-MoZRZsWFn-dO6P7iHkA4U1Bdpd7dc2PE4--zCtGTBa0qbr-AuyolLwWkguX5IVAIUamBAX5E1KewBomJCvyQXnoqMNhRW5_-JTCtab7KfHCsddcH7EKVdmcuUb5glmqCIam_3J56fKT1WJQyxZOoQpYapyqEzMv0P8md6SV70ZEr57fi_Jw-3N9-u7env_9dv1ZlvbRrJcMyM4Sid2yrV91xjoaYcKe24MMEUFggTjOoe8V-gEFQ1VDoVUqu-tbYFfks9L3x9m0IfoRxOfdDBe3222es6Ac9UICida2E8Le4jh1xFT1qNPFofBTBiOSbMWWt6qthEF_fgPug_HWC4wUx1TjMtGFkoslI0hpYj9eQMKevaj9_rsR89-9OKnVL5_7n_cjejOdX-FFGCzAFiOd_IYdbIeJ4vOR7RZu-D_O-QP0PSldA</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Finisguerra, Alessandra</creator><creator>Ticini, Luca F.</creator><creator>Kirsch, Louise P.</creator><creator>Cross, Emily S.</creator><creator>Kotz, Sonja A.</creator><creator>Urgesi, Cosimo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-776X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-4624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks</title><author>Finisguerra, Alessandra ; Ticini, Luca F. ; Kirsch, Louise P. ; Cross, Emily S. ; Kotz, Sonja A. ; Urgesi, Cosimo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-2a73e8d7b9d5f64a0f16e9ef3aa02917e080ad6de3f9ed717419de7899ffcc503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Appreciation</topic><topic>Artwork perception</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cortex</topic><topic>Cortex (motor)</topic><topic>Covert</topic><topic>Embodied aesthetics</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Gardens & gardening</topic><topic>Liking</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Motor evoked potentials</topic><topic>Motor simulation</topic><topic>Muscles</topic><topic>Neural coding</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Reactivity</topic><topic>Sensorimotor system</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Stimulus</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finisguerra, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ticini, Luca F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirsch, Louise P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotz, Sonja A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urgesi, Cosimo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finisguerra, Alessandra</au><au>Ticini, Luca F.</au><au>Kirsch, Louise P.</au><au>Cross, Emily S.</au><au>Kotz, Sonja A.</au><au>Urgesi, Cosimo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks</atitle><jtitle>Cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Cognition</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>212</volume><spage>104663</spage><epage>104663</epage><pages>104663-104663</pages><artnum>104663</artnum><issn>0010-0277</issn><eissn>1873-7838</eissn><abstract>Perceiving art is known to elicit motor cortex activation in an observer's brain. This motor activation has often been attributed to a covert approach response associated with the emotional valence of an art piece (emotional reaction hypothesis). However, recent accounts have proposed that aesthetic experiences could be grounded in the motor simulation of actions required to produce an art piece and of the sensorimotor states embedded in its subject (embodied aesthetic hypothesis). Here, we aimed to test these two hypotheses by assessing whether motor facilitation during artwork perception mirrors emotional or motor simulation processes. To this aim, we capitalized on single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation revealing a two-stage motor coding of emotional body postures: an early, non-specific activation related to emotion processing and a later action-specific activation reflecting motor simulation. We asked art-naïve individuals to rate how much they liked a series of pointillist and brushstroke canvases; photographs of artistic gardens served as control natural stimuli. After an early (150 ms) or a later (300 ms) post-stimulus delay, motor evoked potentials were recorded from wrist-extensor and finger muscles that were more involved in brushstroke- and pointillist-like painting, respectively. Results showed that observing the two canvas styles did not elicit differential motor activation in the early time window for either muscle, not supporting the emotional reaction hypothesis. However, in support of the embodied aesthetic hypothesis, we found in the later time window greater motor activation responses to brushstroke than pointillist canvases for the wrist-extensor, but not for the finger muscle. Furthermore, this muscle-selective facilitation was associated with lower liking ratings of brushstroke canvases and with greater empathy dispositions. These findings support the claim that simulation of the painter's movements is crucial for aesthetic experience, by documenting a link between motor simulation, dispositional empathy, and subjective appreciation in artwork perception.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33761410</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8418-776X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5894-4624</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-0277 |
ispartof | Cognition, 2021-07, Vol.212, p.104663-104663, Article 104663 |
issn | 0010-0277 1873-7838 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03394710v1 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Appreciation Artwork perception Cognitive science Cortex Cortex (motor) Covert Embodied aesthetics Emotions Empathy Gardens & gardening Liking Magnetic fields Motor evoked potentials Motor simulation Muscles Neural coding Perception Photography Reactivity Sensorimotor system Simulation Stimulus Transcranial magnetic stimulation Wrist |
title | Dissociating embodiment and emotional reactivity in motor responses to artworks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T13%3A27%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dissociating%20embodiment%20and%20emotional%20reactivity%20in%20motor%20responses%20to%20artworks&rft.jtitle=Cognition&rft.au=Finisguerra,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=212&rft.spage=104663&rft.epage=104663&rft.pages=104663-104663&rft.artnum=104663&rft.issn=0010-0277&rft.eissn=1873-7838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104663&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2505359547%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562923848&rft_id=info:pmid/33761410&rft_els_id=S0010027721000822&rfr_iscdi=true |