Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups
Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific rese...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human factors 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1553 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1542 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Michinov, Nicolas Jeanson, Sophie |
description | Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project.
Background
Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation.
Method
Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application.
Results
A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition.
Conclusion
The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory.
Application
This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00187208211048301 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03368824v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00187208211048301</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2886248268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EEkPhAdhZYgOLtD5x4jjshqE3aRASl7XlOPaMq4wdbKeou676FO3L9UnqaApIIFaW7O__zvE5CL0GcgjQNEeEAG9KwksAUnFK4AlaQF01BQcOT9Fifi9m4Dl6EeMFIYS1tF6gm1XQMtlLm66wdfirstola6zCX3TUMqjte_xpGpLtbVR2HKyTYWZPfEw6RPxRj2mLvcHnvZYRL3febX5ZYoqz83jQKgXvsvP--vZDkNb9zA7rNvfXd_g0-GmML9EzI4eoXz2eB-j7yfG31Vmx_nx6vlquC0UppKJjimlamprTpqmJJh03UBsmgWqax8B72fcVNVVjaNVS3nZdRUF2yvStaYHTA_Ru793KQYzB7mS4El5acbZci_mOUMo4L6tLyOzbPTsG_2PSMYldnoEeBum0n6Io6yaXgJqxjL75C73wU3D5J6LknJUVL9lcHPaUCj7GoM3vDoCIeYviny3mzOE-E-VG_7H-P_AAzYeemg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886248268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project.
Background
Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation.
Method
Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application.
Results
A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition.
Conclusion
The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory.
Application
This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00187208211048301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural production ; Cognitive science ; Cross cutting ; Food ; Innovations ; Laboratories ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00187208211048301$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00187208211048301$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-rennes2.hal.science/hal-03368824$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><title>Human factors</title><description>Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project.
Background
Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation.
Method
Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application.
Results
A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition.
Conclusion
The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory.
Application
This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cross cutting</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EEkPhAdhZYgOLtD5x4jjshqE3aRASl7XlOPaMq4wdbKeou676FO3L9UnqaApIIFaW7O__zvE5CL0GcgjQNEeEAG9KwksAUnFK4AlaQF01BQcOT9Fifi9m4Dl6EeMFIYS1tF6gm1XQMtlLm66wdfirstola6zCX3TUMqjte_xpGpLtbVR2HKyTYWZPfEw6RPxRj2mLvcHnvZYRL3febX5ZYoqz83jQKgXvsvP--vZDkNb9zA7rNvfXd_g0-GmML9EzI4eoXz2eB-j7yfG31Vmx_nx6vlquC0UppKJjimlamprTpqmJJh03UBsmgWqax8B72fcVNVVjaNVS3nZdRUF2yvStaYHTA_Ru793KQYzB7mS4El5acbZci_mOUMo4L6tLyOzbPTsG_2PSMYldnoEeBum0n6Io6yaXgJqxjL75C73wU3D5J6LknJUVL9lcHPaUCj7GoM3vDoCIeYviny3mzOE-E-VG_7H-P_AAzYeemg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Michinov, Nicolas</creator><creator>Jeanson, Sophie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><author>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cross cutting</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michinov, Nicolas</au><au>Jeanson, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1542</spage><epage>1553</epage><pages>1542-1553</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective
The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project.
Background
Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation.
Method
Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application.
Results
A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition.
Conclusion
The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory.
Application
This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00187208211048301</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03368824v1 |
source | SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Agribusiness Agricultural production Cognitive science Cross cutting Food Innovations Laboratories Psychology |
title | Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A26%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creativity%20in%20Scientific%20Research:%20Multidisciplinarity%20Fosters%20Depth%20of%20Ideas%20Among%20Scientists%20in%20Electronic%20%E2%80%9CBrainwriting%E2%80%9D%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Michinov,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1542&rft.epage=1553&rft.pages=1542-1553&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00187208211048301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2886248268%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886248268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00187208211048301&rfr_iscdi=true |