Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups

Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific rese...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human factors 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553
Hauptverfasser: Michinov, Nicolas, Jeanson, Sophie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1553
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1542
container_title Human factors
container_volume 65
creator Michinov, Nicolas
Jeanson, Sophie
description Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation. Method Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application. Results A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition. Conclusion The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory. Application This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00187208211048301
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03368824v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00187208211048301</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2886248268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EEkPhAdhZYgOLtD5x4jjshqE3aRASl7XlOPaMq4wdbKeou676FO3L9UnqaApIIFaW7O__zvE5CL0GcgjQNEeEAG9KwksAUnFK4AlaQF01BQcOT9Fifi9m4Dl6EeMFIYS1tF6gm1XQMtlLm66wdfirstola6zCX3TUMqjte_xpGpLtbVR2HKyTYWZPfEw6RPxRj2mLvcHnvZYRL3febX5ZYoqz83jQKgXvsvP--vZDkNb9zA7rNvfXd_g0-GmML9EzI4eoXz2eB-j7yfG31Vmx_nx6vlquC0UppKJjimlamprTpqmJJh03UBsmgWqax8B72fcVNVVjaNVS3nZdRUF2yvStaYHTA_Ru793KQYzB7mS4El5acbZci_mOUMo4L6tLyOzbPTsG_2PSMYldnoEeBum0n6Io6yaXgJqxjL75C73wU3D5J6LknJUVL9lcHPaUCj7GoM3vDoCIeYviny3mzOE-E-VG_7H-P_AAzYeemg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886248268</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</creator><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation. Method Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application. Results A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition. Conclusion The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory. Application This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00187208211048301</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural production ; Cognitive science ; Cross cutting ; Food ; Innovations ; Laboratories ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/00187208211048301$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00187208211048301$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://univ-rennes2.hal.science/hal-03368824$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><title>Human factors</title><description>Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation. Method Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application. Results A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition. Conclusion The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory. Application This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Cross cutting</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kctu1DAUhi0EEkPhAdhZYgOLtD5x4jjshqE3aRASl7XlOPaMq4wdbKeou676FO3L9UnqaApIIFaW7O__zvE5CL0GcgjQNEeEAG9KwksAUnFK4AlaQF01BQcOT9Fifi9m4Dl6EeMFIYS1tF6gm1XQMtlLm66wdfirstola6zCX3TUMqjte_xpGpLtbVR2HKyTYWZPfEw6RPxRj2mLvcHnvZYRL3febX5ZYoqz83jQKgXvsvP--vZDkNb9zA7rNvfXd_g0-GmML9EzI4eoXz2eB-j7yfG31Vmx_nx6vlquC0UppKJjimlamprTpqmJJh03UBsmgWqax8B72fcVNVVjaNVS3nZdRUF2yvStaYHTA_Ru793KQYzB7mS4El5acbZci_mOUMo4L6tLyOzbPTsG_2PSMYldnoEeBum0n6Io6yaXgJqxjL75C73wU3D5J6LknJUVL9lcHPaUCj7GoM3vDoCIeYviny3mzOE-E-VG_7H-P_AAzYeemg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Michinov, Nicolas</creator><creator>Jeanson, Sophie</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</title><author>Michinov, Nicolas ; Jeanson, Sophie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-b6c6e32f5837750e0b8f15f6a13e31778dadd43f47f349389bb431abcfd9f9183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Cross cutting</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michinov, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeanson, Sophie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michinov, Nicolas</au><au>Jeanson, Sophie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1542</spage><epage>1553</epage><pages>1542-1553</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><abstract>Objective The aim of this study was to examine the potential benefits of multidisciplinarity among agri-food researchers working in small groups to generate ideas to stimulate innovation in the context of a laboratory project. Background Research on the role of multidisciplinarity in scientific research teams remains limited, particularly regarding the generation of ideas to innovate in a real laboratory project, and on a task with a real challenge for innovation. Method Researchers and agri-food research staff were assigned to small groups of either multidisciplinary or unidisciplinary composition to produce ideas on a cross-cutting theme for an innovative laboratory project using an electronic “brainwriting” application. Results A greater depth in idea generation (number of ideas per category) was observed in the multidisciplinary condition than in the unidisciplinary condition. Conclusion The main benefits of this study were to experimentally examine the effects of multidisciplinarity in small scientific research groups on the production of ideas in a field study conducted on the premises of an agri-food laboratory. Application This study provides advice on how to promote innovative projects by stimulating ideation processes, which includes constructing small multidisciplinary groups and using an electronic “brainwriting” technique.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00187208211048301</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-8061</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-7208
ispartof Human factors, 2023-11, Vol.65 (7), p.1542-1553
issn 0018-7208
1547-8181
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03368824v1
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Agribusiness
Agricultural production
Cognitive science
Cross cutting
Food
Innovations
Laboratories
Psychology
title Creativity in Scientific Research: Multidisciplinarity Fosters Depth of Ideas Among Scientists in Electronic “Brainwriting” Groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A26%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creativity%20in%20Scientific%20Research:%20Multidisciplinarity%20Fosters%20Depth%20of%20Ideas%20Among%20Scientists%20in%20Electronic%20%E2%80%9CBrainwriting%E2%80%9D%20Groups&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=Michinov,%20Nicolas&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1542&rft.epage=1553&rft.pages=1542-1553&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00187208211048301&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2886248268%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886248268&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00187208211048301&rfr_iscdi=true