Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene

The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, that is the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back‐arc regions. A compressional‐to‐transpressional regime occurred in the nor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tectonics (Washington, D.C.) D.C.), 2021-11, Vol.40 (11), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Cerpa, N. G., Hassani, R., Arcay, D., Lallemand, S., Garrocq, C., Philippon, M., Cornée, J.‐J., Münch, P., Garel, F., Marcaillou, B., Mercier de Lépinay, B., Lebrun, J.‐F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page
container_title Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)
container_volume 40
creator Cerpa, N. G.
Hassani, R.
Arcay, D.
Lallemand, S.
Garrocq, C.
Philippon, M.
Cornée, J.‐J.
Münch, P.
Garel, F.
Marcaillou, B.
Mercier de Lépinay, B.
Lebrun, J.‐F.
description The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, that is the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back‐arc regions. A compressional‐to‐transpressional regime occurred in the north, while rifting and seafloor spreading occurred in Grenada basin to the south. The mechanism for this strong spatial variation and its evolution through time has yet to be established. Here, using 3‐D subduction mechanical models, we evaluate whether the change in the trench‐curvature radius at the northeast corner of the CP could have modulated the duality. We assume asymmetrical CP boundaries at the north (from east to west: oblique subduction to strike‐slip) and at the south (subduction‐transform edge propagator‐like behavior). Regardless of the imposed trench curvature, the southern half of our modeled CP undergoes a NW‐to‐W‐oriented extension due to the tendency of the southernmost part of the South‐America oceanic slab to rollback. In contrast, the tectonic regime in the northeast corner of the CP depends on the trench‐curvature radius. A low radius promotes transtension‐to‐transpression, with a NE‐oriented compressive component of the principal stress. A high radius largely reduces the compressive component and promotes an extensional regime similar to that in the south. We thus propose that an initially low‐curvature radius of the NE‐LASZ triggered the tectonic N‐S duality in the Eocene and led to an ephemeral period of transpression/compression at the north. However, an additional mechanism might have been required to locally enhance compression. Key Points The trench curvature at the northeast Caribbean plate affects the back‐arc tectonic regime in models of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone A low‐radius of curvature induces a strong north‐south variation in the stress field, and may have favored a transpressive regime at north A high‐radius of curvature reduces the spatial variation in the tectonic regime and induces NW‐to‐E‐oriented extension from north to south
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021TC006885
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03360128v2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2600839966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4027-505f816c2c09d0f6da994998f86263f72bdca4a4ed26b805e8321ccc1a1805f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVooNuktz6AoKdAnI4kW5aOG2eTFBZaqHvpRciynCh1pFSyU_bWS-59xjxJlbiUnHqZYX4-PmYYhN4ROCFA5QcKlLQNABei2kMrIsuykLm-QiugtSjqEurX6E1KNwCkrDhfoYdGR9d1Vnv8edSTxadh9n3ObMJN8FMMIw4eT9cWt9ZMwTuDz2Y9ummH3ZKfavP98dfvdTQ4DM_J1qZkI177yY1jFn2Zu342k8uib8HbLIjOXz2jm2Cst4dof9Bjsm__9gP09XzTNpfF9tPFx2a9LXSZDygqqAZBuKEGZA8D77WUpZRiEJxyNtS0640udWl7yjsBlRWMEmMM0SRPA2EH6GjxXutR3UV3q-NOBe3U5XqrnjJgjAOh4p5m9v3C3sXwY7ZpUjdhjj6vpygHEExKzjN1vFAmhpSiHf5pCainp6iXT8k4W_CfbrS7_7Kq3TQtJZzV7A-E7o18</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2600839966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Cerpa, N. G. ; Hassani, R. ; Arcay, D. ; Lallemand, S. ; Garrocq, C. ; Philippon, M. ; Cornée, J.‐J. ; Münch, P. ; Garel, F. ; Marcaillou, B. ; Mercier de Lépinay, B. ; Lebrun, J.‐F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerpa, N. G. ; Hassani, R. ; Arcay, D. ; Lallemand, S. ; Garrocq, C. ; Philippon, M. ; Cornée, J.‐J. ; Münch, P. ; Garel, F. ; Marcaillou, B. ; Mercier de Lépinay, B. ; Lebrun, J.‐F.</creatorcontrib><description>The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, that is the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back‐arc regions. A compressional‐to‐transpressional regime occurred in the north, while rifting and seafloor spreading occurred in Grenada basin to the south. The mechanism for this strong spatial variation and its evolution through time has yet to be established. Here, using 3‐D subduction mechanical models, we evaluate whether the change in the trench‐curvature radius at the northeast corner of the CP could have modulated the duality. We assume asymmetrical CP boundaries at the north (from east to west: oblique subduction to strike‐slip) and at the south (subduction‐transform edge propagator‐like behavior). Regardless of the imposed trench curvature, the southern half of our modeled CP undergoes a NW‐to‐W‐oriented extension due to the tendency of the southernmost part of the South‐America oceanic slab to rollback. In contrast, the tectonic regime in the northeast corner of the CP depends on the trench‐curvature radius. A low radius promotes transtension‐to‐transpression, with a NE‐oriented compressive component of the principal stress. A high radius largely reduces the compressive component and promotes an extensional regime similar to that in the south. We thus propose that an initially low‐curvature radius of the NE‐LASZ triggered the tectonic N‐S duality in the Eocene and led to an ephemeral period of transpression/compression at the north. However, an additional mechanism might have been required to locally enhance compression. Key Points The trench curvature at the northeast Caribbean plate affects the back‐arc tectonic regime in models of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone A low‐radius of curvature induces a strong north‐south variation in the stress field, and may have favored a transpressive regime at north A high‐radius of curvature reduces the spatial variation in the tectonic regime and induces NW‐to‐E‐oriented extension from north to south</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7407</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9194</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021TC006885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>back‐arc tectonic regime ; Boundaries ; Caribbean plate ; Compression ; Earth Sciences ; Eocene ; Evolution ; lesser antilles subduction zone ; numerical modeling ; Ocean floor ; Plate boundaries ; Plates ; Rifting ; Sciences of the Universe ; Seafloor spreading ; Spatial variations ; Subduction ; Subduction zones ; Tectonics ; trench curvature</subject><ispartof>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2021-11, Vol.40 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4027-505f816c2c09d0f6da994998f86263f72bdca4a4ed26b805e8321ccc1a1805f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4027-505f816c2c09d0f6da994998f86263f72bdca4a4ed26b805e8321ccc1a1805f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8609-9704 ; 0000-0002-9804-943X ; 0000-0003-4616-8039 ; 0000-0001-6773-0807 ; 0000-0002-0494-9550 ; 0000-0003-1924-9423 ; 0000-0003-2619-3341 ; 0000-0003-0112-0138 ; 0000-0002-8359-358X ; 0000-0002-0823-8545 ; 0000-0001-5727-2531 ; 0000-0003-0542-098X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021TC006885$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021TC006885$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46387,46446,46811,46870</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03360128$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerpa, N. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcay, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lallemand, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrocq, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornée, J.‐J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcaillou, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier de Lépinay, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebrun, J.‐F.</creatorcontrib><title>Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene</title><title>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</title><description>The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, that is the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back‐arc regions. A compressional‐to‐transpressional regime occurred in the north, while rifting and seafloor spreading occurred in Grenada basin to the south. The mechanism for this strong spatial variation and its evolution through time has yet to be established. Here, using 3‐D subduction mechanical models, we evaluate whether the change in the trench‐curvature radius at the northeast corner of the CP could have modulated the duality. We assume asymmetrical CP boundaries at the north (from east to west: oblique subduction to strike‐slip) and at the south (subduction‐transform edge propagator‐like behavior). Regardless of the imposed trench curvature, the southern half of our modeled CP undergoes a NW‐to‐W‐oriented extension due to the tendency of the southernmost part of the South‐America oceanic slab to rollback. In contrast, the tectonic regime in the northeast corner of the CP depends on the trench‐curvature radius. A low radius promotes transtension‐to‐transpression, with a NE‐oriented compressive component of the principal stress. A high radius largely reduces the compressive component and promotes an extensional regime similar to that in the south. We thus propose that an initially low‐curvature radius of the NE‐LASZ triggered the tectonic N‐S duality in the Eocene and led to an ephemeral period of transpression/compression at the north. However, an additional mechanism might have been required to locally enhance compression. Key Points The trench curvature at the northeast Caribbean plate affects the back‐arc tectonic regime in models of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone A low‐radius of curvature induces a strong north‐south variation in the stress field, and may have favored a transpressive regime at north A high‐radius of curvature reduces the spatial variation in the tectonic regime and induces NW‐to‐E‐oriented extension from north to south</description><subject>back‐arc tectonic regime</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Caribbean plate</subject><subject>Compression</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Eocene</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>lesser antilles subduction zone</subject><subject>numerical modeling</subject><subject>Ocean floor</subject><subject>Plate boundaries</subject><subject>Plates</subject><subject>Rifting</subject><subject>Sciences of the Universe</subject><subject>Seafloor spreading</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction zones</subject><subject>Tectonics</subject><subject>trench curvature</subject><issn>0278-7407</issn><issn>1944-9194</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVooNuktz6AoKdAnI4kW5aOG2eTFBZaqHvpRciynCh1pFSyU_bWS-59xjxJlbiUnHqZYX4-PmYYhN4ROCFA5QcKlLQNABei2kMrIsuykLm-QiugtSjqEurX6E1KNwCkrDhfoYdGR9d1Vnv8edSTxadh9n3ObMJN8FMMIw4eT9cWt9ZMwTuDz2Y9ummH3ZKfavP98dfvdTQ4DM_J1qZkI177yY1jFn2Zu342k8uib8HbLIjOXz2jm2Cst4dof9Bjsm__9gP09XzTNpfF9tPFx2a9LXSZDygqqAZBuKEGZA8D77WUpZRiEJxyNtS0640udWl7yjsBlRWMEmMM0SRPA2EH6GjxXutR3UV3q-NOBe3U5XqrnjJgjAOh4p5m9v3C3sXwY7ZpUjdhjj6vpygHEExKzjN1vFAmhpSiHf5pCainp6iXT8k4W_CfbrS7_7Kq3TQtJZzV7A-E7o18</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Cerpa, N. G.</creator><creator>Hassani, R.</creator><creator>Arcay, D.</creator><creator>Lallemand, S.</creator><creator>Garrocq, C.</creator><creator>Philippon, M.</creator><creator>Cornée, J.‐J.</creator><creator>Münch, P.</creator><creator>Garel, F.</creator><creator>Marcaillou, B.</creator><creator>Mercier de Lépinay, B.</creator><creator>Lebrun, J.‐F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union (AGU)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-9704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-943X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-8039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-0807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-9550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-9423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-3341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-0138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-8545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-2531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0542-098X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene</title><author>Cerpa, N. G. ; Hassani, R. ; Arcay, D. ; Lallemand, S. ; Garrocq, C. ; Philippon, M. ; Cornée, J.‐J. ; Münch, P. ; Garel, F. ; Marcaillou, B. ; Mercier de Lépinay, B. ; Lebrun, J.‐F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4027-505f816c2c09d0f6da994998f86263f72bdca4a4ed26b805e8321ccc1a1805f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>back‐arc tectonic regime</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Caribbean plate</topic><topic>Compression</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Eocene</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>lesser antilles subduction zone</topic><topic>numerical modeling</topic><topic>Ocean floor</topic><topic>Plate boundaries</topic><topic>Plates</topic><topic>Rifting</topic><topic>Sciences of the Universe</topic><topic>Seafloor spreading</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction zones</topic><topic>Tectonics</topic><topic>trench curvature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerpa, N. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassani, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arcay, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lallemand, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrocq, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philippon, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cornée, J.‐J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Münch, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcaillou, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercier de Lépinay, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebrun, J.‐F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerpa, N. G.</au><au>Hassani, R.</au><au>Arcay, D.</au><au>Lallemand, S.</au><au>Garrocq, C.</au><au>Philippon, M.</au><au>Cornée, J.‐J.</au><au>Münch, P.</au><au>Garel, F.</au><au>Marcaillou, B.</au><au>Mercier de Lépinay, B.</au><au>Lebrun, J.‐F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene</atitle><jtitle>Tectonics (Washington, D.C.)</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0278-7407</issn><eissn>1944-9194</eissn><abstract>The Eocene tectonic evolution of the easternmost Caribbean Plate (CP) boundary, that is the Lesser Antilles subduction zone (LASZ), is debated. Recents works shed light on a peculiar period of tectonic duality in the arc/back‐arc regions. A compressional‐to‐transpressional regime occurred in the north, while rifting and seafloor spreading occurred in Grenada basin to the south. The mechanism for this strong spatial variation and its evolution through time has yet to be established. Here, using 3‐D subduction mechanical models, we evaluate whether the change in the trench‐curvature radius at the northeast corner of the CP could have modulated the duality. We assume asymmetrical CP boundaries at the north (from east to west: oblique subduction to strike‐slip) and at the south (subduction‐transform edge propagator‐like behavior). Regardless of the imposed trench curvature, the southern half of our modeled CP undergoes a NW‐to‐W‐oriented extension due to the tendency of the southernmost part of the South‐America oceanic slab to rollback. In contrast, the tectonic regime in the northeast corner of the CP depends on the trench‐curvature radius. A low radius promotes transtension‐to‐transpression, with a NE‐oriented compressive component of the principal stress. A high radius largely reduces the compressive component and promotes an extensional regime similar to that in the south. We thus propose that an initially low‐curvature radius of the NE‐LASZ triggered the tectonic N‐S duality in the Eocene and led to an ephemeral period of transpression/compression at the north. However, an additional mechanism might have been required to locally enhance compression. Key Points The trench curvature at the northeast Caribbean plate affects the back‐arc tectonic regime in models of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone A low‐radius of curvature induces a strong north‐south variation in the stress field, and may have favored a transpressive regime at north A high‐radius of curvature reduces the spatial variation in the tectonic regime and induces NW‐to‐E‐oriented extension from north to south</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021TC006885</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8609-9704</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9804-943X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4616-8039</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6773-0807</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0494-9550</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-9423</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2619-3341</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0112-0138</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8359-358X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0823-8545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-2531</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0542-098X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7407
ispartof Tectonics (Washington, D.C.), 2021-11, Vol.40 (11), p.n/a
issn 0278-7407
1944-9194
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03360128v2
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects back‐arc tectonic regime
Boundaries
Caribbean plate
Compression
Earth Sciences
Eocene
Evolution
lesser antilles subduction zone
numerical modeling
Ocean floor
Plate boundaries
Plates
Rifting
Sciences of the Universe
Seafloor spreading
Spatial variations
Subduction
Subduction zones
Tectonics
trench curvature
title Caribbean Plate Boundaries Control on the Tectonic Duality in the Back‐Arc of the Lesser Antilles Subduction Zone During the Eocene
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A01%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Caribbean%20Plate%20Boundaries%20Control%20on%20the%20Tectonic%20Duality%20in%20the%20Back%E2%80%90Arc%20of%20the%20Lesser%20Antilles%20Subduction%20Zone%20During%20the%20Eocene&rft.jtitle=Tectonics%20(Washington,%20D.C.)&rft.au=Cerpa,%20N.%20G.&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0278-7407&rft.eissn=1944-9194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021TC006885&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2600839966%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2600839966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true