Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat
Microphytobenthos (MPB) are a key primary producer of intertidal mudflats. MPB face strong variability in incident irradiance during low tides. Despite photoprotection and photoacclimation, such variations can translate into the photoinhibition of MPB cells. This study explores the effect of photoin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2021-09, Vol.126 (9), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Savelli, Raphaël Serôdio, João Cugier, Philippe Méléder, Vona Polsenaere, Pierre Dupuy, Christine Le Fouest, Vincent |
description | Microphytobenthos (MPB) are a key primary producer of intertidal mudflats. MPB face strong variability in incident irradiance during low tides. Despite photoprotection and photoacclimation, such variations can translate into the photoinhibition of MPB cells. This study explores the effect of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and productive temperate mudflat (Brouage mudflat, NW France). We used a regional and high‐resolution tri‐dimensional hydrodynamic model coupled to an MPB model with or without photoinhibition. Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79 × 103 t C) decrease of the simulated MPB PP over the entire mudflat. As the upper shore is exposed to light more frequently and longer than the lower shore, the decrease of MPB PP is higher on the upper shore (−29%) than on the lower shore (−5%). With the highest photosynthetically active radiation cumulated over the mudflat, the decrease of MPB PP due to photoinhibition is the highest during spring and spring tides (−22% and −23%, respectively). The model suggests MPB photoinhibition is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells through the light saturation parameter. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP. As such, assessing the MPB photosynthetic response to the highly variable environmental conditions that prevail in large and productive intertidal mudflats is a real challenge for quantifying MPB PP from a synoptic to inter‐annual time scale.
Plain Language Summary
Benthic micro‐algae or microphytobenthos (MPB) inhabiting the surficial sediment sustain the high biological production of intertidal mudflats. MPB achieve photosynthesis by aggregating into a dense biofilm at the mud surface during daytime low tides. As MPB can be exposed to short‐term variations and high light levels, they change their short‐term physiology and position within the sediment to protect themselves. However, such strategies can be outbalanced by a too long stressful light exposure. In this study, we explore with a numerical model the impact of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and very productive mudflat (NW France). The model suggests that photoinhibition can strongly impact MPB PP. With photoinhibition, the yearly PP decreases by 20% over the whole mudflat. The |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2021JG006443 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03346122v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2576697227</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3366-c041608728bbd8a25d5d26f97bd71fcd2513ec2e6efc3d4af047c0ce081ce3163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOObe_AAFnwSr-dOm7eMY2m10OESfQ5qkNqNrapoq-_ZmVIdPXi7cy-XH4dwDwDWC9wji7AFDjNY5hDSKyBmYYESzMM0oOj_tMbkEs77fQV-pPyE0AXprnGqd5k2w2ndcuMBUwbY2zui21qV22rSB740W1nT1wZnS47UWwdbqPbcHP40cxC_Hg4LbdxWsWqes09LrbgZZNdxdgYuKN72a_cwpeHt6fF0sw-I5Xy3mRSgIoTQUMEIUpglOy1KmHMcylphWWVLKBFVC4hgRJbCiqhJERryCUSKgUP4joQiiZApuR92aN6wbTTLDNVvOC3a8QUIiijD-RJ69GdnOmo9B9Y7tzGBbb4_hOKE0SzBOPHU3Uj6CvreqOskiyI7Zs7_Ze5yM-Jdu1OFflq3zlxyjLKPkG5dPhSc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2576697227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Savelli, Raphaël ; Serôdio, João ; Cugier, Philippe ; Méléder, Vona ; Polsenaere, Pierre ; Dupuy, Christine ; Le Fouest, Vincent</creator><creatorcontrib>Savelli, Raphaël ; Serôdio, João ; Cugier, Philippe ; Méléder, Vona ; Polsenaere, Pierre ; Dupuy, Christine ; Le Fouest, Vincent</creatorcontrib><description>Microphytobenthos (MPB) are a key primary producer of intertidal mudflats. MPB face strong variability in incident irradiance during low tides. Despite photoprotection and photoacclimation, such variations can translate into the photoinhibition of MPB cells. This study explores the effect of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and productive temperate mudflat (Brouage mudflat, NW France). We used a regional and high‐resolution tri‐dimensional hydrodynamic model coupled to an MPB model with or without photoinhibition. Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79 × 103 t C) decrease of the simulated MPB PP over the entire mudflat. As the upper shore is exposed to light more frequently and longer than the lower shore, the decrease of MPB PP is higher on the upper shore (−29%) than on the lower shore (−5%). With the highest photosynthetically active radiation cumulated over the mudflat, the decrease of MPB PP due to photoinhibition is the highest during spring and spring tides (−22% and −23%, respectively). The model suggests MPB photoinhibition is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells through the light saturation parameter. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP. As such, assessing the MPB photosynthetic response to the highly variable environmental conditions that prevail in large and productive intertidal mudflats is a real challenge for quantifying MPB PP from a synoptic to inter‐annual time scale.
Plain Language Summary
Benthic micro‐algae or microphytobenthos (MPB) inhabiting the surficial sediment sustain the high biological production of intertidal mudflats. MPB achieve photosynthesis by aggregating into a dense biofilm at the mud surface during daytime low tides. As MPB can be exposed to short‐term variations and high light levels, they change their short‐term physiology and position within the sediment to protect themselves. However, such strategies can be outbalanced by a too long stressful light exposure. In this study, we explore with a numerical model the impact of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and very productive mudflat (NW France). The model suggests that photoinhibition can strongly impact MPB PP. With photoinhibition, the yearly PP decreases by 20% over the whole mudflat. The model suggests MPB PP is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells, that is, their light use efficiency at a given light level. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP.
Key Points
With or without photoinhibition, simulated yearly MPB PP is higher on the upper and middle shores than on the lower shore
Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79×103 t C yr−1) decrease of MPB PP over the entire mudflat
The photoinhibition process in the model is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JG006443</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acclimation ; Algae ; Benthos ; Biofilms ; Biological production ; Cells ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental Sciences ; Exposure ; intertidal mudflat ; Irradiance ; Light ; Light effects ; Light levels ; Mathematical models ; microphytobenthos ; Modelling ; Mud flats ; Numerical models ; Photoinhibition ; Photosynthesis ; Photosynthetically active radiation ; physical‐biological coupled model ; Physiology ; Phytobenthos ; Primary production ; Saturation ; Sediment ; Spring tides ; Tides</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-09, Vol.126 (9), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3366-c041608728bbd8a25d5d26f97bd71fcd2513ec2e6efc3d4af047c0ce081ce3163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1874-1929 ; 0000-0002-2454-485X ; 0000-0002-4503-8243 ; 0000-0003-4295-9714</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2021JG006443$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2021JG006443$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03346122$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savelli, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serôdio, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugier, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méléder, Vona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polsenaere, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuy, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Fouest, Vincent</creatorcontrib><title>Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>Microphytobenthos (MPB) are a key primary producer of intertidal mudflats. MPB face strong variability in incident irradiance during low tides. Despite photoprotection and photoacclimation, such variations can translate into the photoinhibition of MPB cells. This study explores the effect of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and productive temperate mudflat (Brouage mudflat, NW France). We used a regional and high‐resolution tri‐dimensional hydrodynamic model coupled to an MPB model with or without photoinhibition. Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79 × 103 t C) decrease of the simulated MPB PP over the entire mudflat. As the upper shore is exposed to light more frequently and longer than the lower shore, the decrease of MPB PP is higher on the upper shore (−29%) than on the lower shore (−5%). With the highest photosynthetically active radiation cumulated over the mudflat, the decrease of MPB PP due to photoinhibition is the highest during spring and spring tides (−22% and −23%, respectively). The model suggests MPB photoinhibition is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells through the light saturation parameter. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP. As such, assessing the MPB photosynthetic response to the highly variable environmental conditions that prevail in large and productive intertidal mudflats is a real challenge for quantifying MPB PP from a synoptic to inter‐annual time scale.
Plain Language Summary
Benthic micro‐algae or microphytobenthos (MPB) inhabiting the surficial sediment sustain the high biological production of intertidal mudflats. MPB achieve photosynthesis by aggregating into a dense biofilm at the mud surface during daytime low tides. As MPB can be exposed to short‐term variations and high light levels, they change their short‐term physiology and position within the sediment to protect themselves. However, such strategies can be outbalanced by a too long stressful light exposure. In this study, we explore with a numerical model the impact of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and very productive mudflat (NW France). The model suggests that photoinhibition can strongly impact MPB PP. With photoinhibition, the yearly PP decreases by 20% over the whole mudflat. The model suggests MPB PP is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells, that is, their light use efficiency at a given light level. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP.
Key Points
With or without photoinhibition, simulated yearly MPB PP is higher on the upper and middle shores than on the lower shore
Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79×103 t C yr−1) decrease of MPB PP over the entire mudflat
The photoinhibition process in the model is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells</description><subject>Acclimation</subject><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biological production</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>intertidal mudflat</subject><subject>Irradiance</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light effects</subject><subject>Light levels</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>microphytobenthos</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Mud flats</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Photoinhibition</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Photosynthetically active radiation</subject><subject>physical‐biological coupled model</subject><subject>Physiology</subject><subject>Phytobenthos</subject><subject>Primary production</subject><subject>Saturation</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Spring tides</subject><subject>Tides</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOObe_AAFnwSr-dOm7eMY2m10OESfQ5qkNqNrapoq-_ZmVIdPXi7cy-XH4dwDwDWC9wji7AFDjNY5hDSKyBmYYESzMM0oOj_tMbkEs77fQV-pPyE0AXprnGqd5k2w2ndcuMBUwbY2zui21qV22rSB740W1nT1wZnS47UWwdbqPbcHP40cxC_Hg4LbdxWsWqes09LrbgZZNdxdgYuKN72a_cwpeHt6fF0sw-I5Xy3mRSgIoTQUMEIUpglOy1KmHMcylphWWVLKBFVC4hgRJbCiqhJERryCUSKgUP4joQiiZApuR92aN6wbTTLDNVvOC3a8QUIiijD-RJ69GdnOmo9B9Y7tzGBbb4_hOKE0SzBOPHU3Uj6CvreqOskiyI7Zs7_Ze5yM-Jdu1OFflq3zlxyjLKPkG5dPhSc</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Savelli, Raphaël</creator><creator>Serôdio, João</creator><creator>Cugier, Philippe</creator><creator>Méléder, Vona</creator><creator>Polsenaere, Pierre</creator><creator>Dupuy, Christine</creator><creator>Le Fouest, Vincent</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-1929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-485X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-8243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-9714</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat</title><author>Savelli, Raphaël ; Serôdio, João ; Cugier, Philippe ; Méléder, Vona ; Polsenaere, Pierre ; Dupuy, Christine ; Le Fouest, Vincent</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3366-c041608728bbd8a25d5d26f97bd71fcd2513ec2e6efc3d4af047c0ce081ce3163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acclimation</topic><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biological production</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>intertidal mudflat</topic><topic>Irradiance</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light effects</topic><topic>Light levels</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>microphytobenthos</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Mud flats</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Photoinhibition</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Photosynthetically active radiation</topic><topic>physical‐biological coupled model</topic><topic>Physiology</topic><topic>Phytobenthos</topic><topic>Primary production</topic><topic>Saturation</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Spring tides</topic><topic>Tides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savelli, Raphaël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serôdio, João</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cugier, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Méléder, Vona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polsenaere, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dupuy, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Fouest, Vincent</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savelli, Raphaël</au><au>Serôdio, João</au><au>Cugier, Philippe</au><au>Méléder, Vona</au><au>Polsenaere, Pierre</au><au>Dupuy, Christine</au><au>Le Fouest, Vincent</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>9</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>Microphytobenthos (MPB) are a key primary producer of intertidal mudflats. MPB face strong variability in incident irradiance during low tides. Despite photoprotection and photoacclimation, such variations can translate into the photoinhibition of MPB cells. This study explores the effect of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and productive temperate mudflat (Brouage mudflat, NW France). We used a regional and high‐resolution tri‐dimensional hydrodynamic model coupled to an MPB model with or without photoinhibition. Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79 × 103 t C) decrease of the simulated MPB PP over the entire mudflat. As the upper shore is exposed to light more frequently and longer than the lower shore, the decrease of MPB PP is higher on the upper shore (−29%) than on the lower shore (−5%). With the highest photosynthetically active radiation cumulated over the mudflat, the decrease of MPB PP due to photoinhibition is the highest during spring and spring tides (−22% and −23%, respectively). The model suggests MPB photoinhibition is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells through the light saturation parameter. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP. As such, assessing the MPB photosynthetic response to the highly variable environmental conditions that prevail in large and productive intertidal mudflats is a real challenge for quantifying MPB PP from a synoptic to inter‐annual time scale.
Plain Language Summary
Benthic micro‐algae or microphytobenthos (MPB) inhabiting the surficial sediment sustain the high biological production of intertidal mudflats. MPB achieve photosynthesis by aggregating into a dense biofilm at the mud surface during daytime low tides. As MPB can be exposed to short‐term variations and high light levels, they change their short‐term physiology and position within the sediment to protect themselves. However, such strategies can be outbalanced by a too long stressful light exposure. In this study, we explore with a numerical model the impact of photoinhibition on MPB primary production (PP) over a large and very productive mudflat (NW France). The model suggests that photoinhibition can strongly impact MPB PP. With photoinhibition, the yearly PP decreases by 20% over the whole mudflat. The model suggests MPB PP is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells, that is, their light use efficiency at a given light level. This first modeling attempt to account for MPB photoinhibition is highly constrained by our current theoretical knowledge and limitations on the MPB growth physiology, but it suggests that this process can have a substantial impact on the MPB PP.
Key Points
With or without photoinhibition, simulated yearly MPB PP is higher on the upper and middle shores than on the lower shore
Photoinhibition leads to a 20% (−0.79×103 t C yr−1) decrease of MPB PP over the entire mudflat
The photoinhibition process in the model is sensitive to the photoacclimation status of MPB cells</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JG006443</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-1929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2454-485X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-8243</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4295-9714</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-8953 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-09, Vol.126 (9), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-8953 2169-8961 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03346122v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acclimation Algae Benthos Biofilms Biological production Cells Environmental conditions Environmental Sciences Exposure intertidal mudflat Irradiance Light Light effects Light levels Mathematical models microphytobenthos Modelling Mud flats Numerical models Photoinhibition Photosynthesis Photosynthetically active radiation physical‐biological coupled model Physiology Phytobenthos Primary production Saturation Sediment Spring tides Tides |
title | Potential Impact of Photoinhibition on Microphytobenthic Primary Production on a Large Intertidal Mudflat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A25%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potential%20Impact%20of%20Photoinhibition%20on%20Microphytobenthic%20Primary%20Production%20on%20a%20Large%20Intertidal%20Mudflat&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Savelli,%20Rapha%C3%ABl&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=9&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JG006443&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2576697227%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2576697227&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |