Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis

Agricultural practices significantly affect soil biodiversity and functions, altering biogeochemical cycles and potentially compromising food production. Increased employment of sustainable agricultural practices is of growing policy concern and requires a better understanding and quantification of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil biology & biochemistry 2021-10, Vol.161, p.108383, Article 108383
Hauptverfasser: Puissant, Jérémy, Villenave, Cécile, Chauvin, Camille, Plassard, Claude, Blanchart, Eric, Trap, Jean
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 108383
container_title Soil biology & biochemistry
container_volume 161
creator Puissant, Jérémy
Villenave, Cécile
Chauvin, Camille
Plassard, Claude
Blanchart, Eric
Trap, Jean
description Agricultural practices significantly affect soil biodiversity and functions, altering biogeochemical cycles and potentially compromising food production. Increased employment of sustainable agricultural practices is of growing policy concern and requires a better understanding and quantification of how agriculture affects soil functioning. We conducted a worldwide meta-analysis by computing 4855 effect sizes from 103 publications to quantify the effect of agricultural practices on soil nematodes, known to be key biological indicators of soil health. Our meta-analysis summarized the effects of tillage, pesticides use, fertilization, manipulation of above-ground plant including cover crop, rotation and agricultural system shift (the conversion from the conventional to conservation or organic agriculture systems). We quantified how each agricultural practice alters nematode indices of ecological relevance including the absolute abundance of trophic groups, the taxonomic richness and diversity and the food web structure based on functional guilds. At the global level, organo-mineral fertilization, conservation system, cover crop and nematicides exhibited the greatest effect sizes (averaged all nematode indices) while herbicides, plant association, mineral fertilization and tillage had the lowest ones. At the level of trophic groups, the agricultural practices had varying impacts, e.g. crop rotation mainly reduced the abundance of the plant-feeding nematodes (−47%), cover crop mainly increased the abundance of omnivore-predators (+80%) while organic fertilization predominately promoted bacterial (+113%) and fungal feeders (+141%). Crop rotation reduced the absolute abundance of plant feeders by 47% when the rotation is longer than 2 years. At the community level, chemical inputs, monoculture and pesticide application reduced nematode abundance, the food web structure and favoured copiotrophic nematode communities. Biocides and nematicides reduced total abundance, Shannon diversity and the food web complexity of soil nematode (structure index). Using meta-regressions, our meta-analysis revealed that the effect of agricultural practices depends on the time since the last agricultural intervention (e.g. input of fertilizers, pesticide application) and on how long a practice has been adopted. This study will be a useful aid for decision maker to better manage soil nematode community and to identify gaps in current available literature. In providing the direction an
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108383
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03342422v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003807172100256X</els_id><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03342422v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f39cc02a34d12f8ef2525b14615c6cea969291c8d80b365adaec89fcffdb42483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QcitF535aLvUGxlDnTAQQa_jaZpsGW0zkmywf29Kh7deHXg473s4D0L3lMwooeXjbhacbWvrZowwmpjggl-gCRXzKuM5E5doQggXGZnT-TW6CWFHCGEF5RP083mAPlpjFUTreuwMjluNN62rocW224OKA4SNt-rQxoNPeO8TtUoHnBLDbdzrDqJrdHjCC9zpCBn00J6CDbfoykAb9N15TtH368vXcpWtP97el4t1pnhFYmZ4pRRhwPOGMiO0YQUrapqXtFCl0lCVFauoEo0gNS8LaEArURllTFPnLBd8ih7G3i20cu9tB_4kHVi5WqzlwAhPKnLGjjTtFuOu8i4Er81fgBI5KJU7eVYqB6VyVJpyz2NOp0eOVnsZlNW90o31WkXZOPtPwy92jYMv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Puissant, Jérémy ; Villenave, Cécile ; Chauvin, Camille ; Plassard, Claude ; Blanchart, Eric ; Trap, Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Puissant, Jérémy ; Villenave, Cécile ; Chauvin, Camille ; Plassard, Claude ; Blanchart, Eric ; Trap, Jean</creatorcontrib><description>Agricultural practices significantly affect soil biodiversity and functions, altering biogeochemical cycles and potentially compromising food production. Increased employment of sustainable agricultural practices is of growing policy concern and requires a better understanding and quantification of how agriculture affects soil functioning. We conducted a worldwide meta-analysis by computing 4855 effect sizes from 103 publications to quantify the effect of agricultural practices on soil nematodes, known to be key biological indicators of soil health. Our meta-analysis summarized the effects of tillage, pesticides use, fertilization, manipulation of above-ground plant including cover crop, rotation and agricultural system shift (the conversion from the conventional to conservation or organic agriculture systems). We quantified how each agricultural practice alters nematode indices of ecological relevance including the absolute abundance of trophic groups, the taxonomic richness and diversity and the food web structure based on functional guilds. At the global level, organo-mineral fertilization, conservation system, cover crop and nematicides exhibited the greatest effect sizes (averaged all nematode indices) while herbicides, plant association, mineral fertilization and tillage had the lowest ones. At the level of trophic groups, the agricultural practices had varying impacts, e.g. crop rotation mainly reduced the abundance of the plant-feeding nematodes (−47%), cover crop mainly increased the abundance of omnivore-predators (+80%) while organic fertilization predominately promoted bacterial (+113%) and fungal feeders (+141%). Crop rotation reduced the absolute abundance of plant feeders by 47% when the rotation is longer than 2 years. At the community level, chemical inputs, monoculture and pesticide application reduced nematode abundance, the food web structure and favoured copiotrophic nematode communities. Biocides and nematicides reduced total abundance, Shannon diversity and the food web complexity of soil nematode (structure index). Using meta-regressions, our meta-analysis revealed that the effect of agricultural practices depends on the time since the last agricultural intervention (e.g. input of fertilizers, pesticide application) and on how long a practice has been adopted. This study will be a useful aid for decision maker to better manage soil nematode community and to identify gaps in current available literature. In providing the direction and magnitude of soil nematode responses to agricultural practices, the effect size produced by this study are critical in facilitating worldwide modelling of soil biodiversity under global change scenarios. [Display omitted] •The worldwide effects of agricultural practices on soil nematodes were quantified.•Rotation, cover crop, organic fertilization and biocides practices had the greatest effects.•Conversion from conventional to conservation agriculture increased nematode abundance and diversity.•Time since the last agricultural intervention and initial nematode abundance were identified as key moderators.•These data could help to model biodiversity under global change scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3428</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108383</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural sciences ; Agroecological practices ; Biocides ; Cover crops ; Life Sciences ; Nematode indices ; Rotation ; Soil biodiversity ; Soil food-web ; Soil functioning ; Soil study ; Tillage ; Trophic group</subject><ispartof>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry, 2021-10, Vol.161, p.108383, Article 108383</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f39cc02a34d12f8ef2525b14615c6cea969291c8d80b365adaec89fcffdb42483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f39cc02a34d12f8ef2525b14615c6cea969291c8d80b365adaec89fcffdb42483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3624-0498 ; 0000-0002-5844-438X ; 0000-0002-9269-1296 ; 0000-0001-5403-8424</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003807172100256X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03342422$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Puissant, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villenave, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauvin, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plassard, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchart, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trap, Jean</creatorcontrib><title>Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis</title><title>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</title><description>Agricultural practices significantly affect soil biodiversity and functions, altering biogeochemical cycles and potentially compromising food production. Increased employment of sustainable agricultural practices is of growing policy concern and requires a better understanding and quantification of how agriculture affects soil functioning. We conducted a worldwide meta-analysis by computing 4855 effect sizes from 103 publications to quantify the effect of agricultural practices on soil nematodes, known to be key biological indicators of soil health. Our meta-analysis summarized the effects of tillage, pesticides use, fertilization, manipulation of above-ground plant including cover crop, rotation and agricultural system shift (the conversion from the conventional to conservation or organic agriculture systems). We quantified how each agricultural practice alters nematode indices of ecological relevance including the absolute abundance of trophic groups, the taxonomic richness and diversity and the food web structure based on functional guilds. At the global level, organo-mineral fertilization, conservation system, cover crop and nematicides exhibited the greatest effect sizes (averaged all nematode indices) while herbicides, plant association, mineral fertilization and tillage had the lowest ones. At the level of trophic groups, the agricultural practices had varying impacts, e.g. crop rotation mainly reduced the abundance of the plant-feeding nematodes (−47%), cover crop mainly increased the abundance of omnivore-predators (+80%) while organic fertilization predominately promoted bacterial (+113%) and fungal feeders (+141%). Crop rotation reduced the absolute abundance of plant feeders by 47% when the rotation is longer than 2 years. At the community level, chemical inputs, monoculture and pesticide application reduced nematode abundance, the food web structure and favoured copiotrophic nematode communities. Biocides and nematicides reduced total abundance, Shannon diversity and the food web complexity of soil nematode (structure index). Using meta-regressions, our meta-analysis revealed that the effect of agricultural practices depends on the time since the last agricultural intervention (e.g. input of fertilizers, pesticide application) and on how long a practice has been adopted. This study will be a useful aid for decision maker to better manage soil nematode community and to identify gaps in current available literature. In providing the direction and magnitude of soil nematode responses to agricultural practices, the effect size produced by this study are critical in facilitating worldwide modelling of soil biodiversity under global change scenarios. [Display omitted] •The worldwide effects of agricultural practices on soil nematodes were quantified.•Rotation, cover crop, organic fertilization and biocides practices had the greatest effects.•Conversion from conventional to conservation agriculture increased nematode abundance and diversity.•Time since the last agricultural intervention and initial nematode abundance were identified as key moderators.•These data could help to model biodiversity under global change scenarios.</description><subject>Agricultural sciences</subject><subject>Agroecological practices</subject><subject>Biocides</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Nematode indices</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Soil biodiversity</subject><subject>Soil food-web</subject><subject>Soil functioning</subject><subject>Soil study</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Trophic group</subject><issn>0038-0717</issn><issn>1879-3428</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKc_QcitF535aLvUGxlDnTAQQa_jaZpsGW0zkmywf29Kh7deHXg473s4D0L3lMwooeXjbhacbWvrZowwmpjggl-gCRXzKuM5E5doQggXGZnT-TW6CWFHCGEF5RP083mAPlpjFUTreuwMjluNN62rocW224OKA4SNt-rQxoNPeO8TtUoHnBLDbdzrDqJrdHjCC9zpCBn00J6CDbfoykAb9N15TtH368vXcpWtP97el4t1pnhFYmZ4pRRhwPOGMiO0YQUrapqXtFCl0lCVFauoEo0gNS8LaEArURllTFPnLBd8ih7G3i20cu9tB_4kHVi5WqzlwAhPKnLGjjTtFuOu8i4Er81fgBI5KJU7eVYqB6VyVJpyz2NOp0eOVnsZlNW90o31WkXZOPtPwy92jYMv</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Puissant, Jérémy</creator><creator>Villenave, Cécile</creator><creator>Chauvin, Camille</creator><creator>Plassard, Claude</creator><creator>Blanchart, Eric</creator><creator>Trap, Jean</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-0498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-438X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-1296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-8424</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis</title><author>Puissant, Jérémy ; Villenave, Cécile ; Chauvin, Camille ; Plassard, Claude ; Blanchart, Eric ; Trap, Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f39cc02a34d12f8ef2525b14615c6cea969291c8d80b365adaec89fcffdb42483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural sciences</topic><topic>Agroecological practices</topic><topic>Biocides</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Nematode indices</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Soil biodiversity</topic><topic>Soil food-web</topic><topic>Soil functioning</topic><topic>Soil study</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Trophic group</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Puissant, Jérémy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Villenave, Cécile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chauvin, Camille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plassard, Claude</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blanchart, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trap, Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Puissant, Jérémy</au><au>Villenave, Cécile</au><au>Chauvin, Camille</au><au>Plassard, Claude</au><au>Blanchart, Eric</au><au>Trap, Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Soil biology &amp; biochemistry</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>161</volume><spage>108383</spage><pages>108383-</pages><artnum>108383</artnum><issn>0038-0717</issn><eissn>1879-3428</eissn><abstract>Agricultural practices significantly affect soil biodiversity and functions, altering biogeochemical cycles and potentially compromising food production. Increased employment of sustainable agricultural practices is of growing policy concern and requires a better understanding and quantification of how agriculture affects soil functioning. We conducted a worldwide meta-analysis by computing 4855 effect sizes from 103 publications to quantify the effect of agricultural practices on soil nematodes, known to be key biological indicators of soil health. Our meta-analysis summarized the effects of tillage, pesticides use, fertilization, manipulation of above-ground plant including cover crop, rotation and agricultural system shift (the conversion from the conventional to conservation or organic agriculture systems). We quantified how each agricultural practice alters nematode indices of ecological relevance including the absolute abundance of trophic groups, the taxonomic richness and diversity and the food web structure based on functional guilds. At the global level, organo-mineral fertilization, conservation system, cover crop and nematicides exhibited the greatest effect sizes (averaged all nematode indices) while herbicides, plant association, mineral fertilization and tillage had the lowest ones. At the level of trophic groups, the agricultural practices had varying impacts, e.g. crop rotation mainly reduced the abundance of the plant-feeding nematodes (−47%), cover crop mainly increased the abundance of omnivore-predators (+80%) while organic fertilization predominately promoted bacterial (+113%) and fungal feeders (+141%). Crop rotation reduced the absolute abundance of plant feeders by 47% when the rotation is longer than 2 years. At the community level, chemical inputs, monoculture and pesticide application reduced nematode abundance, the food web structure and favoured copiotrophic nematode communities. Biocides and nematicides reduced total abundance, Shannon diversity and the food web complexity of soil nematode (structure index). Using meta-regressions, our meta-analysis revealed that the effect of agricultural practices depends on the time since the last agricultural intervention (e.g. input of fertilizers, pesticide application) and on how long a practice has been adopted. This study will be a useful aid for decision maker to better manage soil nematode community and to identify gaps in current available literature. In providing the direction and magnitude of soil nematode responses to agricultural practices, the effect size produced by this study are critical in facilitating worldwide modelling of soil biodiversity under global change scenarios. [Display omitted] •The worldwide effects of agricultural practices on soil nematodes were quantified.•Rotation, cover crop, organic fertilization and biocides practices had the greatest effects.•Conversion from conventional to conservation agriculture increased nematode abundance and diversity.•Time since the last agricultural intervention and initial nematode abundance were identified as key moderators.•These data could help to model biodiversity under global change scenarios.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108383</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-0498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5844-438X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9269-1296</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-8424</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0717
ispartof Soil biology & biochemistry, 2021-10, Vol.161, p.108383, Article 108383
issn 0038-0717
1879-3428
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03342422v1
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural sciences
Agroecological practices
Biocides
Cover crops
Life Sciences
Nematode indices
Rotation
Soil biodiversity
Soil food-web
Soil functioning
Soil study
Tillage
Trophic group
title Quantification of the global impact of agricultural practices on soil nematodes: A meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A13%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantification%20of%20the%20global%20impact%20of%20agricultural%20practices%20on%20soil%20nematodes:%20A%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Soil%20biology%20&%20biochemistry&rft.au=Puissant,%20J%C3%A9r%C3%A9my&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=161&rft.spage=108383&rft.pages=108383-&rft.artnum=108383&rft.issn=0038-0717&rft.eissn=1879-3428&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108383&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03342422v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S003807172100256X&rfr_iscdi=true