Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching
COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Medical education online 2021-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1919042-1919042 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1919042 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1919042 |
| container_title | Medical education online |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle Labbé, Antoine Benoist, Grégoire Linglart, Agnès Gajdos, Vincent Lapillonne, Alexandre |
| description | COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to adapt curricula in the next few years. An anonymous cross-sectional survey of medical students, pediatric residents, neonatal fellows, and their respective teachers was conducted between June and August 2020 to assess feelings about quality, attendance, equivalence, and sustainability of online teaching programs. 146 Students and 26 teachers completed the survey. 89% of students agreed that the offered online teaching was an appropriate way of teaching during the pandemic. Less than half of learners and teachers felt they have received or provided a training of an equivalent level and quality as in usual courses. About one-third thought that this online teaching should continue after the crisis ends. Medical school students had significantly more mixed opinions on online teaching than residents and fellows did. Attendance of learners significantly improved with synchronous online classes (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03329784v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_90313fc3544f4082befd5f15c2657913</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2609933849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-6644d6c275b6af3f86085d03511b72230159dc0a93d9945f2884e3426208ebf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstuEzEUhkcIREvhEUAjsYHFBF9nbBaIKlwaKVJZAFvL40viaGKn9kxQtjw5nkxatV2w8eX4P9-xj_-ieA3BDAIGPuShQZzBGQIIziCHHBD0pDgf49V48PTe-qx4kdIGANQAWj8vzjBmDcSAnRd_f5iozK53wZfBllujnZJdafSg5DHYHsrOyOhNTKX0uuyNVOtxo4fo_Krs16acX_9efKkgL3dZYbZOfSxlqWJIqUpGjZiMTEPcm8NYJPjOeTORMuJl8czKLplXp_mi-PXt68_5VbW8_r6YXy4rRXndV3VNiK4VamhbS4stqwGjGmAKYdsghAGkXCsgOdacE2oRY8RggmoEmGktxxfFYuLqIDdiF91WxoMI0oljIMSVkLF3qjOCAwyxVZgSYglgqDVWUwupQjVtOMSZ9Wli7YY290wZ30fZPYA-PPFuLVZhLxhoOEB1BryfAOtHaVeXSzHGAMaIN4zsYda-OxWL4WYwqRdbl5TpOulNGJJAFFLQUNKgLH37SLoJQ8ztz6oacJ4_noydoJPq-EfR2LsbQCBGd4lbd4nRXeLkrpz35v6r77Ju7ZQFnyeB8zbErfwTYqdFLw9diDZKr1wS-P81_gHvldyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2609933849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Co-Action Open Access Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle ; Labbé, Antoine ; Benoist, Grégoire ; Linglart, Agnès ; Gajdos, Vincent ; Lapillonne, Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle ; Labbé, Antoine ; Benoist, Grégoire ; Linglart, Agnès ; Gajdos, Vincent ; Lapillonne, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to adapt curricula in the next few years. An anonymous cross-sectional survey of medical students, pediatric residents, neonatal fellows, and their respective teachers was conducted between June and August 2020 to assess feelings about quality, attendance, equivalence, and sustainability of online teaching programs. 146 Students and 26 teachers completed the survey. 89% of students agreed that the offered online teaching was an appropriate way of teaching during the pandemic. Less than half of learners and teachers felt they have received or provided a training of an equivalent level and quality as in usual courses. About one-third thought that this online teaching should continue after the crisis ends. Medical school students had significantly more mixed opinions on online teaching than residents and fellows did. Attendance of learners significantly improved with synchronous online classes (p < 0.001), and among more advanced learners (p < 0.002). Our study is the first of this kind to assess simultaneously the feelings of learners at different levels (medical students, residents, and fellows) and their respective teachers of pediatric on programs taught online. It showed that online programs were perceived as appropriate ways of teaching during the COVID pandemic. Further studies are, however, needed to assess the efficacy of such teaching methods on medical skills and communication capabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-2981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1087-2981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33871308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Attendance ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Cross-sectional studies ; Curricula ; Education ; Efficacy ; health crisis ; Humanities and Social Sciences ; Medical education ; Medical schools ; Medical students ; Online instruction ; Online teaching ; Pandemics ; Pediatrics ; Polls & surveys ; students' opinion ; Teachers ; teachers' opinion ; Teaching ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Medical education online, 2021-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1919042-1919042</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2021</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial</rights><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2021 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-6644d6c275b6af3f86085d03511b72230159dc0a93d9945f2884e3426208ebf93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-6644d6c275b6af3f86085d03511b72230159dc0a93d9945f2884e3426208ebf93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0514-4420 ; 0000-0003-3455-002X ; 0000-0003-3057-3558</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079026/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8079026/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,12846,27502,27924,27925,30999,53791,53793,59143,59144</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33871308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03329784$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labbé, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linglart, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajdos, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapillonne, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching</title><title>Medical education online</title><addtitle>Med Educ Online</addtitle><description>COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to adapt curricula in the next few years. An anonymous cross-sectional survey of medical students, pediatric residents, neonatal fellows, and their respective teachers was conducted between June and August 2020 to assess feelings about quality, attendance, equivalence, and sustainability of online teaching programs. 146 Students and 26 teachers completed the survey. 89% of students agreed that the offered online teaching was an appropriate way of teaching during the pandemic. Less than half of learners and teachers felt they have received or provided a training of an equivalent level and quality as in usual courses. About one-third thought that this online teaching should continue after the crisis ends. Medical school students had significantly more mixed opinions on online teaching than residents and fellows did. Attendance of learners significantly improved with synchronous online classes (p < 0.001), and among more advanced learners (p < 0.002). Our study is the first of this kind to assess simultaneously the feelings of learners at different levels (medical students, residents, and fellows) and their respective teachers of pediatric on programs taught online. It showed that online programs were perceived as appropriate ways of teaching during the COVID pandemic. Further studies are, however, needed to assess the efficacy of such teaching methods on medical skills and communication capabilities.</description><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>health crisis</subject><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Online teaching</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>students' opinion</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>teachers' opinion</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>1087-2981</issn><issn>1087-2981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstuEzEUhkcIREvhEUAjsYHFBF9nbBaIKlwaKVJZAFvL40viaGKn9kxQtjw5nkxatV2w8eX4P9-xj_-ieA3BDAIGPuShQZzBGQIIziCHHBD0pDgf49V48PTe-qx4kdIGANQAWj8vzjBmDcSAnRd_f5iozK53wZfBllujnZJdafSg5DHYHsrOyOhNTKX0uuyNVOtxo4fo_Krs16acX_9efKkgL3dZYbZOfSxlqWJIqUpGjZiMTEPcm8NYJPjOeTORMuJl8czKLplXp_mi-PXt68_5VbW8_r6YXy4rRXndV3VNiK4VamhbS4stqwGjGmAKYdsghAGkXCsgOdacE2oRY8RggmoEmGktxxfFYuLqIDdiF91WxoMI0oljIMSVkLF3qjOCAwyxVZgSYglgqDVWUwupQjVtOMSZ9Wli7YY290wZ30fZPYA-PPFuLVZhLxhoOEB1BryfAOtHaVeXSzHGAMaIN4zsYda-OxWL4WYwqRdbl5TpOulNGJJAFFLQUNKgLH37SLoJQ8ztz6oacJ4_noydoJPq-EfR2LsbQCBGd4lbd4nRXeLkrpz35v6r77Ju7ZQFnyeB8zbErfwTYqdFLw9diDZKr1wS-P81_gHvldyU</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle</creator><creator>Labbé, Antoine</creator><creator>Benoist, Grégoire</creator><creator>Linglart, Agnès</creator><creator>Gajdos, Vincent</creator><creator>Lapillonne, Alexandre</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Co-Action Publishing</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope><scope>IHQJB</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-4420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-002X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-3558</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching</title><author>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle ; Labbé, Antoine ; Benoist, Grégoire ; Linglart, Agnès ; Gajdos, Vincent ; Lapillonne, Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c596t-6644d6c275b6af3f86085d03511b72230159dc0a93d9945f2884e3426208ebf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>health crisis</topic><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Online teaching</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>students' opinion</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>teachers' opinion</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Labbé, Antoine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benoist, Grégoire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linglart, Agnès</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gajdos, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapillonne, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société (Open Access)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Medical education online</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motte-Signoret, Emmanuelle</au><au>Labbé, Antoine</au><au>Benoist, Grégoire</au><au>Linglart, Agnès</au><au>Gajdos, Vincent</au><au>Lapillonne, Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching</atitle><jtitle>Medical education online</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ Online</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1919042</spage><epage>1919042</epage><pages>1919042-1919042</pages><issn>1087-2981</issn><eissn>1087-2981</eissn><abstract>COVID-19 lockdowns have deeply impacted teaching programs. Online teaching has suddenly become the main form of medical education, a form that may be used as long as the pandemic continues. We aimed at analyzing how online teaching was perceived by both teachers and learners to help determine how to adapt curricula in the next few years. An anonymous cross-sectional survey of medical students, pediatric residents, neonatal fellows, and their respective teachers was conducted between June and August 2020 to assess feelings about quality, attendance, equivalence, and sustainability of online teaching programs. 146 Students and 26 teachers completed the survey. 89% of students agreed that the offered online teaching was an appropriate way of teaching during the pandemic. Less than half of learners and teachers felt they have received or provided a training of an equivalent level and quality as in usual courses. About one-third thought that this online teaching should continue after the crisis ends. Medical school students had significantly more mixed opinions on online teaching than residents and fellows did. Attendance of learners significantly improved with synchronous online classes (p < 0.001), and among more advanced learners (p < 0.002). Our study is the first of this kind to assess simultaneously the feelings of learners at different levels (medical students, residents, and fellows) and their respective teachers of pediatric on programs taught online. It showed that online programs were perceived as appropriate ways of teaching during the COVID pandemic. Further studies are, however, needed to assess the efficacy of such teaching methods on medical skills and communication capabilities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>33871308</pmid><doi>10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-4420</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-002X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3057-3558</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1087-2981 |
| ispartof | Medical education online, 2021-01, Vol.26 (1), p.1919042-1919042 |
| issn | 1087-2981 1087-2981 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03329784v1 |
| source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Co-Action Open Access Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Attendance Coronaviruses COVID-19 Cross-sectional studies Curricula Education Efficacy health crisis Humanities and Social Sciences Medical education Medical schools Medical students Online instruction Online teaching Pandemics Pediatrics Polls & surveys students' opinion Teachers teachers' opinion Teaching Teaching methods |
| title | Perception of medical education by learners and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of online teaching |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A44%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perception%20of%20medical%20education%20by%20learners%20and%20teachers%20during%20the%20COVID-19%20pandemic:%20a%20cross-sectional%20survey%20of%20online%20teaching&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education%20online&rft.au=Motte-Signoret,%20Emmanuelle&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1919042&rft.epage=1919042&rft.pages=1919042-1919042&rft.issn=1087-2981&rft.eissn=1087-2981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10872981.2021.1919042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2609933849%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2609933849&rft_id=info:pmid/33871308&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_90313fc3544f4082befd5f15c2657913&rfr_iscdi=true |