Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies

The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the who...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology letters 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916
Hauptverfasser: Facon, Benoit, Hafsi, Abir, Charlery de la Masselière, Maud, Robin, Stéphane, Massol, François, Dubart, Maxime, Chiquet, Julien, Frago, Enric, Chiroleu, Frédéric, Duyck, Pierre‐François, Ravigné, Virginie, Coulson, Tim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1916
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1905
container_title Ecology letters
container_volume 24
creator Facon, Benoit
Hafsi, Abir
Charlery de la Masselière, Maud
Robin, Stéphane
Massol, François
Dubart, Maxime
Chiquet, Julien
Frago, Enric
Chiroleu, Frédéric
Duyck, Pierre‐François
Ravigné, Virginie
Coulson, Tim
description The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use. The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ele.13825
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03287942v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549207307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbF298A0C3ih02_ydmVyWsm2VBW8UvAuZzAmbMpuMSWZLn8ZXbbarKwgNgXwkv_Odk3MQ-kDJBa3rEka4oLxj8hU6o6KhS8JE9_qo-c9T9Dbne0IoUy19g065YLzq5gz9_hp9KDhPYD1kPPhcku_n4mPIOMEOzIjLBrCN294HGDA4B7ZkHB3exFzwNJpQ8jk2vY_FW-yMLTFlbMJwdK3BExS_N8WmJkl-B-nZ4i9h-jkMJtgqfcAuzb5gN9aXd-jEmTHD-z_nAv24WX2_vluuv91-ub5aLy1XSi6psEJwJYW1g1SNcdT0VLSCywaIYYYOUjpniJWdVLxxg2gt4dB1TAlBa4sW6PPBd2NGPSW_NelRR-P13dVa7-8IZ12rBNvRyn46sFOKv2bIRW99tjDWTkCcs2ZSKEZaXvcCffwPvY9zCvUnlaqFdo2i_F9ym2LOCdyxAkr0fsK6Tlg_T7iylwf2wY_w-DKoV-vVIeIJ2JWmsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559686913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim</creator><contributor>Coulson, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim ; Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use. The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34231296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; community ecology ; Competition ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Geographical distribution ; Herbivores ; Host plants ; Life Sciences ; niche modelling ; Niches ; phytophagous insects ; preference ; specialisation ; Species ; Sympatric populations</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4098-955X ; 0000-0001-8970-6840 ; 0000-0001-8817-1303 ; 0000-0001-5484-1970 ; 0000-0003-1045-069X ; 0000-0002-3629-3429 ; 0000-0002-4874-5357 ; 0000-0002-2686-0899 ; 0000-0003-0549-0371 ; 0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.13825$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.13825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03287942$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Coulson, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafsi, Abir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubart, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravigné, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><title>Ecology letters</title><description>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use. The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>community ecology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>niche modelling</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>phytophagous insects</subject><subject>preference</subject><subject>specialisation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbF298A0C3ih02_ydmVyWsm2VBW8UvAuZzAmbMpuMSWZLn8ZXbbarKwgNgXwkv_Odk3MQ-kDJBa3rEka4oLxj8hU6o6KhS8JE9_qo-c9T9Dbne0IoUy19g065YLzq5gz9_hp9KDhPYD1kPPhcku_n4mPIOMEOzIjLBrCN294HGDA4B7ZkHB3exFzwNJpQ8jk2vY_FW-yMLTFlbMJwdK3BExS_N8WmJkl-B-nZ4i9h-jkMJtgqfcAuzb5gN9aXd-jEmTHD-z_nAv24WX2_vluuv91-ub5aLy1XSi6psEJwJYW1g1SNcdT0VLSCywaIYYYOUjpniJWdVLxxg2gt4dB1TAlBa4sW6PPBd2NGPSW_NelRR-P13dVa7-8IZ12rBNvRyn46sFOKv2bIRW99tjDWTkCcs2ZSKEZaXvcCffwPvY9zCvUnlaqFdo2i_F9ym2LOCdyxAkr0fsK6Tlg_T7iylwf2wY_w-DKoV-vVIeIJ2JWmsA</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Facon, Benoit</creator><creator>Hafsi, Abir</creator><creator>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creator><creator>Robin, Stéphane</creator><creator>Massol, François</creator><creator>Dubart, Maxime</creator><creator>Chiquet, Julien</creator><creator>Frago, Enric</creator><creator>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creator><creator>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creator><creator>Ravigné, Virginie</creator><creator>Coulson, Tim</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-1970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4874-5357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-0899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><author>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>community ecology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>niche modelling</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>phytophagous insects</topic><topic>preference</topic><topic>specialisation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafsi, Abir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubart, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravigné, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Facon, Benoit</au><au>Hafsi, Abir</au><au>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</au><au>Robin, Stéphane</au><au>Massol, François</au><au>Dubart, Maxime</au><au>Chiquet, Julien</au><au>Frago, Enric</au><au>Chiroleu, Frédéric</au><au>Duyck, Pierre‐François</au><au>Ravigné, Virginie</au><au>Coulson, Tim</au><au>Coulson, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1905</spage><epage>1916</epage><pages>1905-1916</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use. The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34231296</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13825</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-1970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4874-5357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-0899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-023X
ispartof Ecology letters, 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916
issn 1461-023X
1461-0248
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03287942v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abiotic factors
Butterflies & moths
community ecology
Competition
Fruit flies
Fruits
Geographical distribution
Herbivores
Host plants
Life Sciences
niche modelling
Niches
phytophagous insects
preference
specialisation
Species
Sympatric populations
title Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20species%20distributions%20reveal%20the%20combined%20effects%20of%20host%20plants,%20abiotic%20factors%20and%20species%20competition%20as%20drivers%20of%20species%20abundances%20in%20fruit%20flies&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Facon,%20Benoit&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1905&rft.epage=1916&rft.pages=1905-1916&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2549207307%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559686913&rft_id=info:pmid/34231296&rfr_iscdi=true