Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies
The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the who...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology letters 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1916 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1905 |
container_title | Ecology letters |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Facon, Benoit Hafsi, Abir Charlery de la Masselière, Maud Robin, Stéphane Massol, François Dubart, Maxime Chiquet, Julien Frago, Enric Chiroleu, Frédéric Duyck, Pierre‐François Ravigné, Virginie Coulson, Tim |
description | The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use.
The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ele.13825 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03287942v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549207307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbF298A0C3ih02_ydmVyWsm2VBW8UvAuZzAmbMpuMSWZLn8ZXbbarKwgNgXwkv_Odk3MQ-kDJBa3rEka4oLxj8hU6o6KhS8JE9_qo-c9T9Dbne0IoUy19g065YLzq5gz9_hp9KDhPYD1kPPhcku_n4mPIOMEOzIjLBrCN294HGDA4B7ZkHB3exFzwNJpQ8jk2vY_FW-yMLTFlbMJwdK3BExS_N8WmJkl-B-nZ4i9h-jkMJtgqfcAuzb5gN9aXd-jEmTHD-z_nAv24WX2_vluuv91-ub5aLy1XSi6psEJwJYW1g1SNcdT0VLSCywaIYYYOUjpniJWdVLxxg2gt4dB1TAlBa4sW6PPBd2NGPSW_NelRR-P13dVa7-8IZ12rBNvRyn46sFOKv2bIRW99tjDWTkCcs2ZSKEZaXvcCffwPvY9zCvUnlaqFdo2i_F9ym2LOCdyxAkr0fsK6Tlg_T7iylwf2wY_w-DKoV-vVIeIJ2JWmsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559686913</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim</creator><contributor>Coulson, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim ; Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use.
The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-023X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-0248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ele.13825</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34231296</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Abiotic factors ; Butterflies & moths ; community ecology ; Competition ; Fruit flies ; Fruits ; Geographical distribution ; Herbivores ; Host plants ; Life Sciences ; niche modelling ; Niches ; phytophagous insects ; preference ; specialisation ; Species ; Sympatric populations</subject><ispartof>Ecology letters, 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS</rights><rights>Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4098-955X ; 0000-0001-8970-6840 ; 0000-0001-8817-1303 ; 0000-0001-5484-1970 ; 0000-0003-1045-069X ; 0000-0002-3629-3429 ; 0000-0002-4874-5357 ; 0000-0002-2686-0899 ; 0000-0003-0549-0371 ; 0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fele.13825$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fele.13825$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03287942$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Coulson, Tim</contributor><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafsi, Abir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubart, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravigné, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><title>Ecology letters</title><description>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use.
The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</description><subject>Abiotic factors</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>community ecology</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Fruit flies</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>niche modelling</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>phytophagous insects</subject><subject>preference</subject><subject>specialisation</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Sympatric populations</subject><issn>1461-023X</issn><issn>1461-0248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kd9qFDEUxoNYbF298A0C3ih02_ydmVyWsm2VBW8UvAuZzAmbMpuMSWZLn8ZXbbarKwgNgXwkv_Odk3MQ-kDJBa3rEka4oLxj8hU6o6KhS8JE9_qo-c9T9Dbne0IoUy19g065YLzq5gz9_hp9KDhPYD1kPPhcku_n4mPIOMEOzIjLBrCN294HGDA4B7ZkHB3exFzwNJpQ8jk2vY_FW-yMLTFlbMJwdK3BExS_N8WmJkl-B-nZ4i9h-jkMJtgqfcAuzb5gN9aXd-jEmTHD-z_nAv24WX2_vluuv91-ub5aLy1XSi6psEJwJYW1g1SNcdT0VLSCywaIYYYOUjpniJWdVLxxg2gt4dB1TAlBa4sW6PPBd2NGPSW_NelRR-P13dVa7-8IZ12rBNvRyn46sFOKv2bIRW99tjDWTkCcs2ZSKEZaXvcCffwPvY9zCvUnlaqFdo2i_F9ym2LOCdyxAkr0fsK6Tlg_T7iylwf2wY_w-DKoV-vVIeIJ2JWmsA</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Facon, Benoit</creator><creator>Hafsi, Abir</creator><creator>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creator><creator>Robin, Stéphane</creator><creator>Massol, François</creator><creator>Dubart, Maxime</creator><creator>Chiquet, Julien</creator><creator>Frago, Enric</creator><creator>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creator><creator>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creator><creator>Ravigné, Virginie</creator><creator>Coulson, Tim</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-1970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4874-5357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-0899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</title><author>Facon, Benoit ; Hafsi, Abir ; Charlery de la Masselière, Maud ; Robin, Stéphane ; Massol, François ; Dubart, Maxime ; Chiquet, Julien ; Frago, Enric ; Chiroleu, Frédéric ; Duyck, Pierre‐François ; Ravigné, Virginie ; Coulson, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3995-14c443954ccd596af1ab1474356e0a2a1d55ffa0c585936fd47c03e8829441023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abiotic factors</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>community ecology</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Fruit flies</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>niche modelling</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>phytophagous insects</topic><topic>preference</topic><topic>specialisation</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Sympatric populations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Facon, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hafsi, Abir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massol, François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubart, Maxime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiquet, Julien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, Enric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiroleu, Frédéric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duyck, Pierre‐François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravigné, Virginie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coulson, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Facon, Benoit</au><au>Hafsi, Abir</au><au>Charlery de la Masselière, Maud</au><au>Robin, Stéphane</au><au>Massol, François</au><au>Dubart, Maxime</au><au>Chiquet, Julien</au><au>Frago, Enric</au><au>Chiroleu, Frédéric</au><au>Duyck, Pierre‐François</au><au>Ravigné, Virginie</au><au>Coulson, Tim</au><au>Coulson, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies</atitle><jtitle>Ecology letters</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1905</spage><epage>1916</epage><pages>1905-1916</pages><issn>1461-023X</issn><eissn>1461-0248</eissn><abstract>The relative importance of ecological factors and species interactions for shaping species distributions is still debated. The realised niches of eight sympatric tephritid fruit flies were inferred from field abundance data using joint species distribution modelling and network inference, on the whole community and separately on three host plant groups. These estimates were then confronted the fundamental niches of seven fly species estimated through laboratory‐measured fitnesses on host plants. Species abundances depended on host plants, followed by climatic factors, with a dose of competition between species sharing host plants. The relative importance of these factors mildly changed among the three host plant groups. Despite overlapping fundamental niches, specialists and generalists had almost distinct realised niches, with possible competitive exclusion of generalists by specialists on Cucurbitaceae. They had different assembly rules: Specialists were mainly influenced by their adaptation to host plants, while generalist abundances varied regardless of their fundamental host use.
The importance of interspecific competition for a community of eight tropical fruit flies is estimated by comparing the realised niches, measured with joint species distribution models on field abundance data, and the fundamental niches, measured in laboratory conditions.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>34231296</pmid><doi>10.1111/ele.13825</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4098-955X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8970-6840</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8817-1303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5484-1970</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1045-069X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3629-3429</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4874-5357</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2686-0899</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0549-0371</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-2574</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1461-023X |
ispartof | Ecology letters, 2021-09, Vol.24 (9), p.1905-1916 |
issn | 1461-023X 1461-0248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03287942v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Abiotic factors Butterflies & moths community ecology Competition Fruit flies Fruits Geographical distribution Herbivores Host plants Life Sciences niche modelling Niches phytophagous insects preference specialisation Species Sympatric populations |
title | Joint species distributions reveal the combined effects of host plants, abiotic factors and species competition as drivers of species abundances in fruit flies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20species%20distributions%20reveal%20the%20combined%20effects%20of%20host%20plants,%20abiotic%20factors%20and%20species%20competition%20as%20drivers%20of%20species%20abundances%20in%20fruit%20flies&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20letters&rft.au=Facon,%20Benoit&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1905&rft.epage=1916&rft.pages=1905-1916&rft.issn=1461-023X&rft.eissn=1461-0248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ele.13825&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2549207307%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559686913&rft_id=info:pmid/34231296&rfr_iscdi=true |