Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits
Multi‐infections may result in either competitive exclusion or coexistence on the same host of pathogen genotypes belonging to the same or different species. Epidemiological consequences of multiple infections, particularly how the development and transmission of a pathogen can be modified by the pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oikos 2021-04, Vol.130 (4), p.652-667 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 667 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 652 |
container_title | Oikos |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Dutt, Agathe Anthony, Rault Andrivon, Didier Jumel, Stéphane Le Roy, Gwenola Baranger, Alain Leclerc, Melen Le May, Christophe |
description | Multi‐infections may result in either competitive exclusion or coexistence on the same host of pathogen genotypes belonging to the same or different species. Epidemiological consequences of multiple infections, particularly how the development and transmission of a pathogen can be modified by the presence of another pathogen, are well documented. However, understanding how life history strategies of each pathogen modulate co‐infection outcomes remains quite elusive. To analyze how co‐infection drives changes in life history traits and affects co‐existence in epidemic pathogens, we infected detached pea stipules with two fungal species, Peyronellaea pinodes and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella (considering two strains per species), part of the ascochyta blight complex but presenting different life history strategies. All pairwise combinations (including self‐pairs) between two strains of each species were tested. Strains were inoculated simultaneously, but apart from one another on the stipule. For each strain, four life history traits were measured: incubation period, necrosis area six days after inoculation, latent period and offspring production. Results show that, in co‐infection, when resources are highly allocated to lesion development, the time between inoculation and the appearance of reproduction structures (latent period) and offspring production decreased, and vice‐versa relative to single infections. The direction and/or magnitude of these responses to co‐infection depend on the co‐infecting strains. Moreover, these changes were always higher in self‐pairs than in mixed co‐infections. These results suggest facilitation between co‐infecting strains, resulting in the selection of an intermediate level of virulence (here measured as the lesion development) at the expense of pathogen offspring production. This strategy allows the development and reproduction of each co‐infecting strain when sharing limited resources. However, the direction and strength of these life history traits variations in co‐infection depend on the life history strategy of the co‐infecting strains, with a clear difference between ‘opportunists', ‘scavengers' and ‘pioneer colonisers'. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/oik.07747 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03227966v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2509225590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3317-90109ac2458c1f8b66800341dc47af77ec7f4023a8e4ba299da5a8787f767cf73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOP4sfIOAKxcdb5q2t13K4B8OuNGdEK6ZxIl2mppklNn5CD6jT2J1RFfezYHDx-Hcw9iBgLEY7ti7pzEgFrjBRqICyACh2mQjAAmZyJtmm-3E-AgwQFiM2N3EL3qTXHK-49TNuCXtWpdobSx898DtsnuglvctdYn3FCi6ZCIna41OPM2NC7x11ny8vc9dTD6seArkUtxjW5baaPZ_dJfdnp3eTC6y6fX55eRkmmkpBWYNCGhI50VZa2Hr-6qqh7qFmOkCySIajbaAXFJtinsafphRSTXWaLFCbVHusqN17pxa1Qe3oLBSnpy6OJmqLw9knmNTVS9iYA_XbB_889LEpB79MnRDPZWX0OR5WTbwl6iDjzEY-xsrQH0NrYah1ffQA3u8Zl9da1b_g-r68kpIIVF-AvN9f_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2509225590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Dutt, Agathe ; Anthony, Rault ; Andrivon, Didier ; Jumel, Stéphane ; Le Roy, Gwenola ; Baranger, Alain ; Leclerc, Melen ; Le May, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Dutt, Agathe ; Anthony, Rault ; Andrivon, Didier ; Jumel, Stéphane ; Le Roy, Gwenola ; Baranger, Alain ; Leclerc, Melen ; Le May, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>Multi‐infections may result in either competitive exclusion or coexistence on the same host of pathogen genotypes belonging to the same or different species. Epidemiological consequences of multiple infections, particularly how the development and transmission of a pathogen can be modified by the presence of another pathogen, are well documented. However, understanding how life history strategies of each pathogen modulate co‐infection outcomes remains quite elusive. To analyze how co‐infection drives changes in life history traits and affects co‐existence in epidemic pathogens, we infected detached pea stipules with two fungal species, Peyronellaea pinodes and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella (considering two strains per species), part of the ascochyta blight complex but presenting different life history strategies. All pairwise combinations (including self‐pairs) between two strains of each species were tested. Strains were inoculated simultaneously, but apart from one another on the stipule. For each strain, four life history traits were measured: incubation period, necrosis area six days after inoculation, latent period and offspring production. Results show that, in co‐infection, when resources are highly allocated to lesion development, the time between inoculation and the appearance of reproduction structures (latent period) and offspring production decreased, and vice‐versa relative to single infections. The direction and/or magnitude of these responses to co‐infection depend on the co‐infecting strains. Moreover, these changes were always higher in self‐pairs than in mixed co‐infections. These results suggest facilitation between co‐infecting strains, resulting in the selection of an intermediate level of virulence (here measured as the lesion development) at the expense of pathogen offspring production. This strategy allows the development and reproduction of each co‐infecting strain when sharing limited resources. However, the direction and strength of these life history traits variations in co‐infection depend on the life history strategy of the co‐infecting strains, with a clear difference between ‘opportunists', ‘scavengers' and ‘pioneer colonisers'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.07747</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>ascochyta blight ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Blight ; Coexistence ; Direction ; disease complex ; Environmental Sciences ; Epidemiology ; Fungi ; Genotypes ; Incubation period ; Infections ; Inoculation ; Latent period ; Lesions ; Life history ; life history traits ; multiple infections ; Necrosis ; Offspring ; Parasites ; Parasitic plants ; Pathogens ; pea ; Peyronellaea pinodes ; Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella ; Reproduction ; Resources ; Species ; Strains (organisms) ; Strategy ; tradeoff ; Virulence</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2021-04, Vol.130 (4), p.652-667</ispartof><rights>2021 Nordic Society Oikos. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Oikos © 2021 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3317-90109ac2458c1f8b66800341dc47af77ec7f4023a8e4ba299da5a8787f767cf73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3317-90109ac2458c1f8b66800341dc47af77ec7f4023a8e4ba299da5a8787f767cf73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4339-8568 ; 0000-0002-2421-7875 ; 0000-0002-8603-5487 ; 0000-0002-5314-461X ; 0000-0002-0060-1231</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Foik.07747$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Foik.07747$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03227966$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dutt, Agathe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Rault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrivon, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumel, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Roy, Gwenola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranger, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Melen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le May, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits</title><title>Oikos</title><description>Multi‐infections may result in either competitive exclusion or coexistence on the same host of pathogen genotypes belonging to the same or different species. Epidemiological consequences of multiple infections, particularly how the development and transmission of a pathogen can be modified by the presence of another pathogen, are well documented. However, understanding how life history strategies of each pathogen modulate co‐infection outcomes remains quite elusive. To analyze how co‐infection drives changes in life history traits and affects co‐existence in epidemic pathogens, we infected detached pea stipules with two fungal species, Peyronellaea pinodes and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella (considering two strains per species), part of the ascochyta blight complex but presenting different life history strategies. All pairwise combinations (including self‐pairs) between two strains of each species were tested. Strains were inoculated simultaneously, but apart from one another on the stipule. For each strain, four life history traits were measured: incubation period, necrosis area six days after inoculation, latent period and offspring production. Results show that, in co‐infection, when resources are highly allocated to lesion development, the time between inoculation and the appearance of reproduction structures (latent period) and offspring production decreased, and vice‐versa relative to single infections. The direction and/or magnitude of these responses to co‐infection depend on the co‐infecting strains. Moreover, these changes were always higher in self‐pairs than in mixed co‐infections. These results suggest facilitation between co‐infecting strains, resulting in the selection of an intermediate level of virulence (here measured as the lesion development) at the expense of pathogen offspring production. This strategy allows the development and reproduction of each co‐infecting strain when sharing limited resources. However, the direction and strength of these life history traits variations in co‐infection depend on the life history strategy of the co‐infecting strains, with a clear difference between ‘opportunists', ‘scavengers' and ‘pioneer colonisers'.</description><subject>ascochyta blight</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Blight</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Direction</subject><subject>disease complex</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Incubation period</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Inoculation</subject><subject>Latent period</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Life history</subject><subject>life history traits</subject><subject>multiple infections</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Parasites</subject><subject>Parasitic plants</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>pea</subject><subject>Peyronellaea pinodes</subject><subject>Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Resources</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Strains (organisms)</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>tradeoff</subject><subject>Virulence</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1KxDAUhYMoOP4sfIOAKxcdb5q2t13K4B8OuNGdEK6ZxIl2mppklNn5CD6jT2J1RFfezYHDx-Hcw9iBgLEY7ti7pzEgFrjBRqICyACh2mQjAAmZyJtmm-3E-AgwQFiM2N3EL3qTXHK-49TNuCXtWpdobSx898DtsnuglvctdYn3FCi6ZCIna41OPM2NC7x11ny8vc9dTD6seArkUtxjW5baaPZ_dJfdnp3eTC6y6fX55eRkmmkpBWYNCGhI50VZa2Hr-6qqh7qFmOkCySIajbaAXFJtinsafphRSTXWaLFCbVHusqN17pxa1Qe3oLBSnpy6OJmqLw9knmNTVS9iYA_XbB_889LEpB79MnRDPZWX0OR5WTbwl6iDjzEY-xsrQH0NrYah1ffQA3u8Zl9da1b_g-r68kpIIVF-AvN9f_A</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Dutt, Agathe</creator><creator>Anthony, Rault</creator><creator>Andrivon, Didier</creator><creator>Jumel, Stéphane</creator><creator>Le Roy, Gwenola</creator><creator>Baranger, Alain</creator><creator>Leclerc, Melen</creator><creator>Le May, Christophe</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Nordic Ecological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-8568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-7875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8603-5487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-461X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-1231</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits</title><author>Dutt, Agathe ; Anthony, Rault ; Andrivon, Didier ; Jumel, Stéphane ; Le Roy, Gwenola ; Baranger, Alain ; Leclerc, Melen ; Le May, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3317-90109ac2458c1f8b66800341dc47af77ec7f4023a8e4ba299da5a8787f767cf73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>ascochyta blight</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Blight</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Direction</topic><topic>disease complex</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Incubation period</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Inoculation</topic><topic>Latent period</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Life history</topic><topic>life history traits</topic><topic>multiple infections</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Parasites</topic><topic>Parasitic plants</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>pea</topic><topic>Peyronellaea pinodes</topic><topic>Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Resources</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Strains (organisms)</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>tradeoff</topic><topic>Virulence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dutt, Agathe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anthony, Rault</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrivon, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jumel, Stéphane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Roy, Gwenola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranger, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, Melen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le May, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dutt, Agathe</au><au>Anthony, Rault</au><au>Andrivon, Didier</au><au>Jumel, Stéphane</au><au>Le Roy, Gwenola</au><au>Baranger, Alain</au><au>Leclerc, Melen</au><au>Le May, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>652</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>652-667</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Multi‐infections may result in either competitive exclusion or coexistence on the same host of pathogen genotypes belonging to the same or different species. Epidemiological consequences of multiple infections, particularly how the development and transmission of a pathogen can be modified by the presence of another pathogen, are well documented. However, understanding how life history strategies of each pathogen modulate co‐infection outcomes remains quite elusive. To analyze how co‐infection drives changes in life history traits and affects co‐existence in epidemic pathogens, we infected detached pea stipules with two fungal species, Peyronellaea pinodes and Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella (considering two strains per species), part of the ascochyta blight complex but presenting different life history strategies. All pairwise combinations (including self‐pairs) between two strains of each species were tested. Strains were inoculated simultaneously, but apart from one another on the stipule. For each strain, four life history traits were measured: incubation period, necrosis area six days after inoculation, latent period and offspring production. Results show that, in co‐infection, when resources are highly allocated to lesion development, the time between inoculation and the appearance of reproduction structures (latent period) and offspring production decreased, and vice‐versa relative to single infections. The direction and/or magnitude of these responses to co‐infection depend on the co‐infecting strains. Moreover, these changes were always higher in self‐pairs than in mixed co‐infections. These results suggest facilitation between co‐infecting strains, resulting in the selection of an intermediate level of virulence (here measured as the lesion development) at the expense of pathogen offspring production. This strategy allows the development and reproduction of each co‐infecting strain when sharing limited resources. However, the direction and strength of these life history traits variations in co‐infection depend on the life history strategy of the co‐infecting strains, with a clear difference between ‘opportunists', ‘scavengers' and ‘pioneer colonisers'.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.07747</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4339-8568</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-7875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8603-5487</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5314-461X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0060-1231</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-1299 |
ispartof | Oikos, 2021-04, Vol.130 (4), p.652-667 |
issn | 0030-1299 1600-0706 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03227966v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | ascochyta blight Biodiversity and Ecology Blight Coexistence Direction disease complex Environmental Sciences Epidemiology Fungi Genotypes Incubation period Infections Inoculation Latent period Lesions Life history life history traits multiple infections Necrosis Offspring Parasites Parasitic plants Pathogens pea Peyronellaea pinodes Phoma medicaginis var. pinodella Reproduction Resources Species Strains (organisms) Strategy tradeoff Virulence |
title | Competition and facilitation among fungal plant parasites affect their life‐history traits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T02%3A03%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competition%20and%20facilitation%20among%20fungal%20plant%20parasites%20affect%20their%20life%E2%80%90history%20traits&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Dutt,%20Agathe&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=652&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=652-667&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.07747&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2509225590%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2509225590&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |