Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control
Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1685 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1660 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Gonthier, Corentin Ambrosi, Solène Blaye, Agnès |
description | Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0001005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03183308v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1322202</ericid><sourcerecordid>2621184082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0-RJelF-6gSL0AUsBj58Pm1m4XumglLnCOHGdSXCV2ameX9s4Pr0OWReKAL_Z4nnln7JeQl0DfA-Xlh7uup5QCpfkjsgDJZQpM5I_JqSwFZJwLmWcgnpAFZaVISy75CXkewg2dFhfPyAnnZZEByxbk1xaVt8ZepxcqYJNcYOs8Jhs7oh2Ns6pLVu7amtHsMZ7s6F33MbnEPXZu6CMTgfXeNGg1JrE0UcmlCcFpo6byqDf-RLTJph86o82YKNsk67tDcBB8QZ62qgt4etiX5Pun9bfVVbr9-nmzOt-mKudyTFuZyaKlmNXx6S3ooi7qEljTImpAjSXjjIoGoEbZKFDY1hSkKDi2TS4g50vydtb9obpq8KZX_r5yylRX59tquqMcBOdU7CGyb2Z28O52h2GsehM0dp2y6HahYjnNecEgNl2Ss3_QG7fz8esiFQkQGRX_p3KaiZJN3i3Ju5nS3oXgsT3OCbSa3K_-uh_h1wfJXd1jc0T_2BuBVzOA3uhjev0FOGOMTjOlc14NqhrCvVZ-NLrDoHfeR3OnZlVW_u5dFJQ_ALrSwJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504872143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès</creator><contributor>Bugg, Julie M ; Benjamin, Aaron S ; Egner, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès ; Bugg, Julie M ; Benjamin, Aaron S ; Egner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433895418</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433895412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33764124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Age Differences ; Child ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Control ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive science ; Congruence (Psychology) ; Cues ; Dissociation ; Elementary School Students ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit Learning ; Learning ; Male ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Students ; Proactive Inhibition ; Psychology ; Test Construction</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-4514-6519 ; 0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1322202$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03183308$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bugg, Julie M</contributor><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><contributor>Egner, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosi, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaye, Agnès</creatorcontrib><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Congruence (Psychology)</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dissociation</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit Learning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Students</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><isbn>9781433895418</isbn><isbn>1433895412</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0-RJelF-6gSL0AUsBj58Pm1m4XumglLnCOHGdSXCV2ameX9s4Pr0OWReKAL_Z4nnln7JeQl0DfA-Xlh7uup5QCpfkjsgDJZQpM5I_JqSwFZJwLmWcgnpAFZaVISy75CXkewg2dFhfPyAnnZZEByxbk1xaVt8ZepxcqYJNcYOs8Jhs7oh2Ns6pLVu7amtHsMZ7s6F33MbnEPXZu6CMTgfXeNGg1JrE0UcmlCcFpo6byqDf-RLTJph86o82YKNsk67tDcBB8QZ62qgt4etiX5Pun9bfVVbr9-nmzOt-mKudyTFuZyaKlmNXx6S3ooi7qEljTImpAjSXjjIoGoEbZKFDY1hSkKDi2TS4g50vydtb9obpq8KZX_r5yylRX59tquqMcBOdU7CGyb2Z28O52h2GsehM0dp2y6HahYjnNecEgNl2Ss3_QG7fz8esiFQkQGRX_p3KaiZJN3i3Ju5nS3oXgsT3OCbSa3K_-uh_h1wfJXd1jc0T_2BuBVzOA3uhjev0FOGOMTjOlc14NqhrCvVZ-NLrDoHfeR3OnZlVW_u5dFJQ_ALrSwJs</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Gonthier, Corentin</creator><creator>Ambrosi, Solène</creator><creator>Blaye, Agnès</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-6519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><author>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Congruence (Psychology)</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dissociation</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit Learning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Students</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosi, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaye, Agnès</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonthier, Corentin</au><au>Ambrosi, Solène</au><au>Blaye, Agnès</au><au>Bugg, Julie M</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><au>Egner, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1322202</ericid><atitle>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1660</spage><epage>1685</epage><pages>1660-1685</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><isbn>9781433895418</isbn><isbn>1433895412</isbn><abstract>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>33764124</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0001005</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-6519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03183308v1 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Adjustment Age Differences Child Child Development Child, Preschool Cognition Cognition & reasoning Cognitive ability Cognitive Control Cognitive Development Cognitive Processes Cognitive science Congruence (Psychology) Cues Dissociation Elementary School Students Experimental psychology Female Foreign Countries Human Humans Implicit Learning Learning Male Preschool Children Preschool Students Proactive Inhibition Psychology Test Construction |
title | Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A21%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning-Based%20Before%20Intentional%20Cognitive%20Control:%20Developmental%20Evidence%20for%20a%20Dissociation%20Between%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Gonthier,%20Corentin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1660&rft.epage=1685&rft.pages=1660-1685&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.isbn=9781433895418&rft.isbn_list=1433895412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0001005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2621184082%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504872143&rft_id=info:pmid/33764124&rft_ericid=EJ1322202&rfr_iscdi=true |