Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control

Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685
Hauptverfasser: Gonthier, Corentin, Ambrosi, Solène, Blaye, Agnès
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1685
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1660
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 47
creator Gonthier, Corentin
Ambrosi, Solène
Blaye, Agnès
description Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0001005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03183308v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1322202</ericid><sourcerecordid>2621184082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0-RJelF-6gSL0AUsBj58Pm1m4XumglLnCOHGdSXCV2ameX9s4Pr0OWReKAL_Z4nnln7JeQl0DfA-Xlh7uup5QCpfkjsgDJZQpM5I_JqSwFZJwLmWcgnpAFZaVISy75CXkewg2dFhfPyAnnZZEByxbk1xaVt8ZepxcqYJNcYOs8Jhs7oh2Ns6pLVu7amtHsMZ7s6F33MbnEPXZu6CMTgfXeNGg1JrE0UcmlCcFpo6byqDf-RLTJph86o82YKNsk67tDcBB8QZ62qgt4etiX5Pun9bfVVbr9-nmzOt-mKudyTFuZyaKlmNXx6S3ooi7qEljTImpAjSXjjIoGoEbZKFDY1hSkKDi2TS4g50vydtb9obpq8KZX_r5yylRX59tquqMcBOdU7CGyb2Z28O52h2GsehM0dp2y6HahYjnNecEgNl2Ss3_QG7fz8esiFQkQGRX_p3KaiZJN3i3Ju5nS3oXgsT3OCbSa3K_-uh_h1wfJXd1jc0T_2BuBVzOA3uhjev0FOGOMTjOlc14NqhrCvVZ-NLrDoHfeR3OnZlVW_u5dFJQ_ALrSwJs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504872143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès</creator><contributor>Bugg, Julie M ; Benjamin, Aaron S ; Egner, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès ; Bugg, Julie M ; Benjamin, Aaron S ; Egner, Tobias</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433895418</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433895412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33764124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Age Differences ; Child ; Child Development ; Child, Preschool ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Control ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Processes ; Cognitive science ; Congruence (Psychology) ; Cues ; Dissociation ; Elementary School Students ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Foreign Countries ; Human ; Humans ; Implicit Learning ; Learning ; Male ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Students ; Proactive Inhibition ; Psychology ; Test Construction</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685</ispartof><rights>2021 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2021, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2021</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-4514-6519 ; 0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1322202$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33764124$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03183308$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bugg, Julie M</contributor><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><contributor>Egner, Tobias</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosi, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaye, Agnès</creatorcontrib><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Age Differences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Control</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Cognitive science</subject><subject>Congruence (Psychology)</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dissociation</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implicit Learning</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Students</subject><subject>Proactive Inhibition</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><isbn>9781433895418</isbn><isbn>1433895412</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0-RJelF-6gSL0AUsBj58Pm1m4XumglLnCOHGdSXCV2ameX9s4Pr0OWReKAL_Z4nnln7JeQl0DfA-Xlh7uup5QCpfkjsgDJZQpM5I_JqSwFZJwLmWcgnpAFZaVISy75CXkewg2dFhfPyAnnZZEByxbk1xaVt8ZepxcqYJNcYOs8Jhs7oh2Ns6pLVu7amtHsMZ7s6F33MbnEPXZu6CMTgfXeNGg1JrE0UcmlCcFpo6byqDf-RLTJph86o82YKNsk67tDcBB8QZ62qgt4etiX5Pun9bfVVbr9-nmzOt-mKudyTFuZyaKlmNXx6S3ooi7qEljTImpAjSXjjIoGoEbZKFDY1hSkKDi2TS4g50vydtb9obpq8KZX_r5yylRX59tquqMcBOdU7CGyb2Z28O52h2GsehM0dp2y6HahYjnNecEgNl2Ss3_QG7fz8esiFQkQGRX_p3KaiZJN3i3Ju5nS3oXgsT3OCbSa3K_-uh_h1wfJXd1jc0T_2BuBVzOA3uhjev0FOGOMTjOlc14NqhrCvVZ-NLrDoHfeR3OnZlVW_u5dFJQ_ALrSwJs</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Gonthier, Corentin</creator><creator>Ambrosi, Solène</creator><creator>Blaye, Agnès</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-6519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</title><author>Gonthier, Corentin ; Ambrosi, Solène ; Blaye, Agnès</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a539t-f9496f0e4b005f1c6b6b712dfeec1ece723208d11be9da1aefb019863efd58153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Age Differences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Control</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Cognitive science</topic><topic>Congruence (Psychology)</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dissociation</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implicit Learning</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Students</topic><topic>Proactive Inhibition</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonthier, Corentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrosi, Solène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blaye, Agnès</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonthier, Corentin</au><au>Ambrosi, Solène</au><au>Blaye, Agnès</au><au>Bugg, Julie M</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><au>Egner, Tobias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1322202</ericid><atitle>Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1660</spage><epage>1685</epage><pages>1660-1685</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><isbn>9781433895418</isbn><isbn>1433895412</isbn><abstract>Cognitive control can be triggered by explicit or implicit events; it has been proposed that these two possibilities tap into dissociable mechanisms. In this study, we investigate this idea by testing whether young children, who struggle with explicitly triggered control, can demonstrate proportion congruency effects-which are based on implicit learning of task regularities and thus indicative of implicitly triggered control. In a series of five experiments, preschoolers indeed demonstrated significant proportion congruency effects, including both list-wide proportion congruency (LWPC) and item-specific proportion congruency (ISPC) effects, in a Stroop-like task and in a flanker task. These effects did not increase with age, contrary to what is typically observed for explicit control. These results demonstrate that young children show early evidence of cognitive control-including proactive control-when it is triggered by implicit events, at an age where explicit control, and particularly proactive control, is not yet functional. By showing evidence of an early ability for fine-grained adjustments of cognitive control when control cues are learned implicitly, these results support the proposed functional dissociation between explicit and implicit cognitive control.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>33764124</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0001005</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4514-6519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-0413</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2021-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1660-1685
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03183308v1
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adjustment
Age Differences
Child
Child Development
Child, Preschool
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Cognitive Control
Cognitive Development
Cognitive Processes
Cognitive science
Congruence (Psychology)
Cues
Dissociation
Elementary School Students
Experimental psychology
Female
Foreign Countries
Human
Humans
Implicit Learning
Learning
Male
Preschool Children
Preschool Students
Proactive Inhibition
Psychology
Test Construction
title Learning-Based Before Intentional Cognitive Control: Developmental Evidence for a Dissociation Between Implicit and Explicit Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A21%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning-Based%20Before%20Intentional%20Cognitive%20Control:%20Developmental%20Evidence%20for%20a%20Dissociation%20Between%20Implicit%20and%20Explicit%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Gonthier,%20Corentin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1660&rft.epage=1685&rft.pages=1660-1685&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft.isbn=9781433895418&rft.isbn_list=1433895412&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0001005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2621184082%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504872143&rft_id=info:pmid/33764124&rft_ericid=EJ1322202&rfr_iscdi=true