Comparison of epicardial vs. endocardial reimplantation in pacemaker-dependent patients with device infection

Reimplantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) after extraction due to device infection is a major issue in pacemaker-dependent patients. We compared in-hospital and long-term outcomes with two techniques: epicardial reimplantation (EPI) before CIED extraction and temporary pacing...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Europace (London, England) England), 2018-04, Vol.20 (4), p.e42-e50
Hauptverfasser:	Perrin, Tilman, Maille, Baptiste, Lemoine, Coralie, Resseguier, Noémie, Franceschi, Frédéric, Koutbi, Linda, Hourdain, Jérôme, Deharo, Jean-Claude
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects Device Removal Endocardium - physiopathology Endocardium - surgery Hospitalization Humans Life Sciences Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects Pericardium - physiopathology Pericardium - surgery Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation Prosthesis Implantation - methods Prosthesis-Related Infections - diagnosis Prosthesis-Related Infections - microbiology Prosthesis-Related Infections - surgery Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Time Factors Treatment Outcome
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!