Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation

Understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence is a key task for ecology. Recent theory predicts that both competition and predation (which causes apparent competition among prey) can either promote or limit species coexistence. Both mechanisms cause negative interactions between individuals, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2017-02, Vol.126 (2), p.276-284
Hauptverfasser: Nottebrock, Henning, Schmid, Baptiste, Treurnicht, Martina, Pagel, Jörn, Esler, Karen J., Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin, Schleuning, Matthias, Schurr, Frank M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 284
container_issue 2
container_start_page 276
container_title Oikos
container_volume 126
creator Nottebrock, Henning
Schmid, Baptiste
Treurnicht, Martina
Pagel, Jörn
Esler, Karen J.
Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin
Schleuning, Matthias
Schurr, Frank M.
description Understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence is a key task for ecology. Recent theory predicts that both competition and predation (which causes apparent competition among prey) can either promote or limit species coexistence. Both mechanisms cause negative interactions between individuals, and each mechanism promotes stable coexistence if it causes negative interactions to be stronger between conspecifics than between heterospecifics. However, the relative importance of competition and predation for coexistence in natural communities is poorly known. Here, we study how competition and apparent competition via pre-dispersal seed predators affect the long-term fecundity of Protea shrubs in the fire-prone Fynbos biome (South Africa). These shrubs store all viable seeds produced since the last fire in fire-proof cones. Competitive effects on cone number and pre-dispersal seed predation reduce their fecundity and can thus limit recruitment after the next fire. In 27 communities comprising 49 990 shrubs of 22 Protea species, we measured cone number and percone seed predation rate of 2154 and 1755 focal individuals, respectively. Neighbourhood analyses related these measures to individual-based community maps. We found that conspecific neighbours had stronger competitive effects on cone number than heterospecific neighbours. In contrast, apparent competition via seed predators was comparable between conspecifics and heterospecifics. This indicates that competition stabilizes coexistence of Protea species, whereas predispersal seed predation does not. Larger neighbours had stronger competitive effects and neighbours with large seed crops exerted stronger apparent competition. For 97% of the focal plants, competition reduced fecundity more than apparent competition. Our results show that even in communities of closely related and ecologically similar species, intraspecific competition can be stronger than interspecific competition. On the other hand, apparent competition through seed predators need not have such a stabilizing effect. These findings illustrate the potential of ‘community demography’, the demographic study of multiple interacting species, for understanding plant coexistence.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/oik.03438
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03137921v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>90000458</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>90000458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-acc3d9c6fa795087d088a7bcf448ba3c38946ae33da5c6e7b8d8ca80c6fa07363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUFvEzEQha0KpIbCgR-AZIkLHDaM483aPlYR0IpIvbRny-udVR0268XjtIRfj5dURULCF0vzvjcz9mPsrYClKOdTDN-XIGupz9hCNAAVKGhesAWAhEqsjDlnr4h2AKCUqhdsv4n4M1DG0SOPPZ8GN2ZOE_qAxMPIHW9D7MIDJgr5yO9jpilmHohTdm0Ywi_seHvkPu4nzCGHOPL2kPlYoFImLPKUsHOz8pq97N1A-ObpvmB3Xz7fbq6q7c3X683ltvL1CnTlvJed8U3vlFmDVh1o7VTr-7rWrZNealM3DqXs3No3qFrdae80zA5QspEX7OOp770b7JTC3qWjjS7Yq8utnWsghVRmJR5EYT-c2CnFHwekbPeBPA7lIzAeyArdaCmNaGb0_T_oLh7SWF4yU6WlUUr_He5TJErYP28gwM4h2RKS_RNSYZcn9jEMePw_aG-uvz0Z3p0MO8oxPRtMCRTqtZa_ARx9nRo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1863139778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nottebrock, Henning ; Schmid, Baptiste ; Treurnicht, Martina ; Pagel, Jörn ; Esler, Karen J. ; Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin ; Schleuning, Matthias ; Schurr, Frank M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nottebrock, Henning ; Schmid, Baptiste ; Treurnicht, Martina ; Pagel, Jörn ; Esler, Karen J. ; Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin ; Schleuning, Matthias ; Schurr, Frank M.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence is a key task for ecology. Recent theory predicts that both competition and predation (which causes apparent competition among prey) can either promote or limit species coexistence. Both mechanisms cause negative interactions between individuals, and each mechanism promotes stable coexistence if it causes negative interactions to be stronger between conspecifics than between heterospecifics. However, the relative importance of competition and predation for coexistence in natural communities is poorly known. Here, we study how competition and apparent competition via pre-dispersal seed predators affect the long-term fecundity of Protea shrubs in the fire-prone Fynbos biome (South Africa). These shrubs store all viable seeds produced since the last fire in fire-proof cones. Competitive effects on cone number and pre-dispersal seed predation reduce their fecundity and can thus limit recruitment after the next fire. In 27 communities comprising 49 990 shrubs of 22 Protea species, we measured cone number and percone seed predation rate of 2154 and 1755 focal individuals, respectively. Neighbourhood analyses related these measures to individual-based community maps. We found that conspecific neighbours had stronger competitive effects on cone number than heterospecific neighbours. In contrast, apparent competition via seed predators was comparable between conspecifics and heterospecifics. This indicates that competition stabilizes coexistence of Protea species, whereas predispersal seed predation does not. Larger neighbours had stronger competitive effects and neighbours with large seed crops exerted stronger apparent competition. For 97% of the focal plants, competition reduced fecundity more than apparent competition. Our results show that even in communities of closely related and ecologically similar species, intraspecific competition can be stronger than interspecific competition. On the other hand, apparent competition through seed predators need not have such a stabilizing effect. These findings illustrate the potential of ‘community demography’, the demographic study of multiple interacting species, for understanding plant coexistence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.03438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Nordic Society Oikos</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Competition ; Environmental Sciences ; Plant ecology ; Predation ; Protea ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2017-02, Vol.126 (2), p.276-284</ispartof><rights>2016 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><rights>Oikos © 2016 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-acc3d9c6fa795087d088a7bcf448ba3c38946ae33da5c6e7b8d8ca80c6fa07363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-acc3d9c6fa795087d088a7bcf448ba3c38946ae33da5c6e7b8d8ca80c6fa07363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Foik.03438$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Foik.03438$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03137921$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nottebrock, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treurnicht, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Jörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esler, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleuning, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Frank M.</creatorcontrib><title>Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation</title><title>Oikos</title><description>Understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence is a key task for ecology. Recent theory predicts that both competition and predation (which causes apparent competition among prey) can either promote or limit species coexistence. Both mechanisms cause negative interactions between individuals, and each mechanism promotes stable coexistence if it causes negative interactions to be stronger between conspecifics than between heterospecifics. However, the relative importance of competition and predation for coexistence in natural communities is poorly known. Here, we study how competition and apparent competition via pre-dispersal seed predators affect the long-term fecundity of Protea shrubs in the fire-prone Fynbos biome (South Africa). These shrubs store all viable seeds produced since the last fire in fire-proof cones. Competitive effects on cone number and pre-dispersal seed predation reduce their fecundity and can thus limit recruitment after the next fire. In 27 communities comprising 49 990 shrubs of 22 Protea species, we measured cone number and percone seed predation rate of 2154 and 1755 focal individuals, respectively. Neighbourhood analyses related these measures to individual-based community maps. We found that conspecific neighbours had stronger competitive effects on cone number than heterospecific neighbours. In contrast, apparent competition via seed predators was comparable between conspecifics and heterospecifics. This indicates that competition stabilizes coexistence of Protea species, whereas predispersal seed predation does not. Larger neighbours had stronger competitive effects and neighbours with large seed crops exerted stronger apparent competition. For 97% of the focal plants, competition reduced fecundity more than apparent competition. Our results show that even in communities of closely related and ecologically similar species, intraspecific competition can be stronger than interspecific competition. On the other hand, apparent competition through seed predators need not have such a stabilizing effect. These findings illustrate the potential of ‘community demography’, the demographic study of multiple interacting species, for understanding plant coexistence.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Plant ecology</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Protea</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kUFvEzEQha0KpIbCgR-AZIkLHDaM483aPlYR0IpIvbRny-udVR0268XjtIRfj5dURULCF0vzvjcz9mPsrYClKOdTDN-XIGupz9hCNAAVKGhesAWAhEqsjDlnr4h2AKCUqhdsv4n4M1DG0SOPPZ8GN2ZOE_qAxMPIHW9D7MIDJgr5yO9jpilmHohTdm0Ywi_seHvkPu4nzCGHOPL2kPlYoFImLPKUsHOz8pq97N1A-ObpvmB3Xz7fbq6q7c3X683ltvL1CnTlvJed8U3vlFmDVh1o7VTr-7rWrZNealM3DqXs3No3qFrdae80zA5QspEX7OOp770b7JTC3qWjjS7Yq8utnWsghVRmJR5EYT-c2CnFHwekbPeBPA7lIzAeyArdaCmNaGb0_T_oLh7SWF4yU6WlUUr_He5TJErYP28gwM4h2RKS_RNSYZcn9jEMePw_aG-uvz0Z3p0MO8oxPRtMCRTqtZa_ARx9nRo</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Nottebrock, Henning</creator><creator>Schmid, Baptiste</creator><creator>Treurnicht, Martina</creator><creator>Pagel, Jörn</creator><creator>Esler, Karen J.</creator><creator>Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin</creator><creator>Schleuning, Matthias</creator><creator>Schurr, Frank M.</creator><general>Nordic Society Oikos</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Nordic Ecological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation</title><author>Nottebrock, Henning ; Schmid, Baptiste ; Treurnicht, Martina ; Pagel, Jörn ; Esler, Karen J. ; Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin ; Schleuning, Matthias ; Schurr, Frank M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4208-acc3d9c6fa795087d088a7bcf448ba3c38946ae33da5c6e7b8d8ca80c6fa07363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Plant ecology</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Protea</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nottebrock, Henning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Baptiste</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Treurnicht, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagel, Jörn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esler, Karen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleuning, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schurr, Frank M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nottebrock, Henning</au><au>Schmid, Baptiste</au><au>Treurnicht, Martina</au><au>Pagel, Jörn</au><au>Esler, Karen J.</au><au>Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin</au><au>Schleuning, Matthias</au><au>Schurr, Frank M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>284</epage><pages>276-284</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Understanding the mechanisms of species coexistence is a key task for ecology. Recent theory predicts that both competition and predation (which causes apparent competition among prey) can either promote or limit species coexistence. Both mechanisms cause negative interactions between individuals, and each mechanism promotes stable coexistence if it causes negative interactions to be stronger between conspecifics than between heterospecifics. However, the relative importance of competition and predation for coexistence in natural communities is poorly known. Here, we study how competition and apparent competition via pre-dispersal seed predators affect the long-term fecundity of Protea shrubs in the fire-prone Fynbos biome (South Africa). These shrubs store all viable seeds produced since the last fire in fire-proof cones. Competitive effects on cone number and pre-dispersal seed predation reduce their fecundity and can thus limit recruitment after the next fire. In 27 communities comprising 49 990 shrubs of 22 Protea species, we measured cone number and percone seed predation rate of 2154 and 1755 focal individuals, respectively. Neighbourhood analyses related these measures to individual-based community maps. We found that conspecific neighbours had stronger competitive effects on cone number than heterospecific neighbours. In contrast, apparent competition via seed predators was comparable between conspecifics and heterospecifics. This indicates that competition stabilizes coexistence of Protea species, whereas predispersal seed predation does not. Larger neighbours had stronger competitive effects and neighbours with large seed crops exerted stronger apparent competition. For 97% of the focal plants, competition reduced fecundity more than apparent competition. Our results show that even in communities of closely related and ecologically similar species, intraspecific competition can be stronger than interspecific competition. On the other hand, apparent competition through seed predators need not have such a stabilizing effect. These findings illustrate the potential of ‘community demography’, the demographic study of multiple interacting species, for understanding plant coexistence.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Nordic Society Oikos</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.03438</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2017-02, Vol.126 (2), p.276-284
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03137921v1
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Biodiversity
Competition
Environmental Sciences
Plant ecology
Predation
Protea
Seeds
title Coexistence of plant species in a biodiversity hotspot is stabilized by competition but not by seed predation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T16%3A19%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coexistence%20of%20plant%20species%20in%20a%20biodiversity%20hotspot%20is%20stabilized%20by%20competition%20but%20not%20by%20seed%20predation&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Nottebrock,%20Henning&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=284&rft.pages=276-284&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.03438&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E90000458%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1863139778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=90000458&rfr_iscdi=true