Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques

To compare the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in optic disc images acquired from 60 glaucoma and 60 control subjects using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices, with and without enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and adaptive compensation (AC). A horizontal B-scan was acquired through...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 2015-01, Vol.56 (2), p.865-874
Hauptverfasser: Girard, Michaël J A, Tun, Tin A, Husain, Rahat, Acharyya, Sanchalika, Haaland, Benjamin A, Wei, Xin, Mari, Jean M, Perera, Shamira A, Baskaran, Mani, Aung, Tin, Strouthidis, Nicholas G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 874
container_issue 2
container_start_page 865
container_title Investigative ophthalmology & visual science
container_volume 56
creator Girard, Michaël J A
Tun, Tin A
Husain, Rahat
Acharyya, Sanchalika
Haaland, Benjamin A
Wei, Xin
Mari, Jean M
Perera, Shamira A
Baskaran, Mani
Aung, Tin
Strouthidis, Nicholas G
description To compare the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in optic disc images acquired from 60 glaucoma and 60 control subjects using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices, with and without enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and adaptive compensation (AC). A horizontal B-scan was acquired through the center of the disc using two spectral-domain (Spectralis and Cirrus; with and without EDI) and a swept-source (DRI) OCT. Adaptive compensation was applied post acquisition to improve image quality. To assess LC visibility, four masked observers graded the 1200 images in a randomized sequence. The anterior LC was graded from 0 to 4, the LC insertions from 0 to 2, and the posterior LC either 0 or 1. The effect of EDI, AC, glaucoma severity, and other clinical/demographic factors on LC visibility was assessed using generalized estimating equations. The anterior LC was the most detectable feature, followed by the LC insertions. Adaptive compensation improved anterior LC visibility independent of EDI. Cirrus+EDI+AC generated the greatest anterior LC visibility grades (2.79/4). For LC insertions visibility, DRI+AC was the best method (1.10/2). Visibility of the posterior LC was consistently poor. Neither glaucoma severity nor clinical/demographic factors consistently affected LC visibility. Adaptive compensation is superior to EDI in improving LC visibility. Visibility of the posterior LC remains poor suggesting impracticality in using LC thickness as a glaucoma biomarker.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/iovs.14-14903
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03135375v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1652459923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-17cf24ae4c2cf62c44ca476c048c4950fb9a4b535f4a433a913f8db57216080d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1P3DAQhi3Uqiy0R67Ix3II-DPZcEOofEgrcWnP1sQZb4wSO9jZlfbWn96kC5xGevXMq9E8hFxwds15Wd34uM_XXBVc1UyekBXXWhS6WssvZMW4KgummDolZzm_MiY4F-wbORVa15IJvSJ_NzD4ANQm36SYge599o3v_XSgu-zDlsZx8hZ6amOHCYNFOsUhbhOM3eF2TocRks8x0Ohoi3tvMVMILUXn0E55if0AW6QYOpjXBwwTndB2wb_tMH8nXx30GX-8z3Py5-HX7_unYvPy-Hx_tymsrOVU8Mo6oQCVFdaVwiplQVWlZWptVa2Za2pQjZbaKVBSQs2lW7eNrgQv2Zq18pxcHXs76M2Y5pPSwUTw5uluY5aMSS61rPSez-zPIzumuNw4mcFni30PAeMuG15qoXRdCzmjxRG18_dyQvfZzZlZBJlFkOHK_Bc085fv1btmwPaT_jAi_wGMBo4H</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652459923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Girard, Michaël J A ; Tun, Tin A ; Husain, Rahat ; Acharyya, Sanchalika ; Haaland, Benjamin A ; Wei, Xin ; Mari, Jean M ; Perera, Shamira A ; Baskaran, Mani ; Aung, Tin ; Strouthidis, Nicholas G</creator><creatorcontrib>Girard, Michaël J A ; Tun, Tin A ; Husain, Rahat ; Acharyya, Sanchalika ; Haaland, Benjamin A ; Wei, Xin ; Mari, Jean M ; Perera, Shamira A ; Baskaran, Mani ; Aung, Tin ; Strouthidis, Nicholas G</creatorcontrib><description>To compare the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in optic disc images acquired from 60 glaucoma and 60 control subjects using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices, with and without enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and adaptive compensation (AC). A horizontal B-scan was acquired through the center of the disc using two spectral-domain (Spectralis and Cirrus; with and without EDI) and a swept-source (DRI) OCT. Adaptive compensation was applied post acquisition to improve image quality. To assess LC visibility, four masked observers graded the 1200 images in a randomized sequence. The anterior LC was graded from 0 to 4, the LC insertions from 0 to 2, and the posterior LC either 0 or 1. The effect of EDI, AC, glaucoma severity, and other clinical/demographic factors on LC visibility was assessed using generalized estimating equations. The anterior LC was the most detectable feature, followed by the LC insertions. Adaptive compensation improved anterior LC visibility independent of EDI. Cirrus+EDI+AC generated the greatest anterior LC visibility grades (2.79/4). For LC insertions visibility, DRI+AC was the best method (1.10/2). Visibility of the posterior LC was consistently poor. Neither glaucoma severity nor clinical/demographic factors consistently affected LC visibility. Adaptive compensation is superior to EDI in improving LC visibility. Visibility of the posterior LC remains poor suggesting impracticality in using LC thickness as a glaucoma biomarker.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-0404</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-14903</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25593025</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Computer Science ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Glaucoma - diagnosis ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation ; Male ; Medical Imaging ; Middle Aged ; Optic Disk - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Signal and Image Processing ; Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science, 2015-01, Vol.56 (2), p.865-874</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2015 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-17cf24ae4c2cf62c44ca476c048c4950fb9a4b535f4a433a913f8db57216080d3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-1169-6547</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25593025$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-03135375$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Girard, Michaël J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tun, Tin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Rahat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharyya, Sanchalika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaland, Benjamin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Jean M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Shamira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskaran, Mani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Tin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strouthidis, Nicholas G</creatorcontrib><title>Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques</title><title>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</title><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><description>To compare the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in optic disc images acquired from 60 glaucoma and 60 control subjects using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices, with and without enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and adaptive compensation (AC). A horizontal B-scan was acquired through the center of the disc using two spectral-domain (Spectralis and Cirrus; with and without EDI) and a swept-source (DRI) OCT. Adaptive compensation was applied post acquisition to improve image quality. To assess LC visibility, four masked observers graded the 1200 images in a randomized sequence. The anterior LC was graded from 0 to 4, the LC insertions from 0 to 2, and the posterior LC either 0 or 1. The effect of EDI, AC, glaucoma severity, and other clinical/demographic factors on LC visibility was assessed using generalized estimating equations. The anterior LC was the most detectable feature, followed by the LC insertions. Adaptive compensation improved anterior LC visibility independent of EDI. Cirrus+EDI+AC generated the greatest anterior LC visibility grades (2.79/4). For LC insertions visibility, DRI+AC was the best method (1.10/2). Visibility of the posterior LC was consistently poor. Neither glaucoma severity nor clinical/demographic factors consistently affected LC visibility. Adaptive compensation is superior to EDI in improving LC visibility. Visibility of the posterior LC remains poor suggesting impracticality in using LC thickness as a glaucoma biomarker.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Glaucoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Optic Disk - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Signal and Image Processing</subject><subject>Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation</subject><issn>0146-0404</issn><issn>1552-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1P3DAQhi3Uqiy0R67Ix3II-DPZcEOofEgrcWnP1sQZb4wSO9jZlfbWn96kC5xGevXMq9E8hFxwds15Wd34uM_XXBVc1UyekBXXWhS6WssvZMW4KgummDolZzm_MiY4F-wbORVa15IJvSJ_NzD4ANQm36SYge599o3v_XSgu-zDlsZx8hZ6amOHCYNFOsUhbhOM3eF2TocRks8x0Ohoi3tvMVMILUXn0E55if0AW6QYOpjXBwwTndB2wb_tMH8nXx30GX-8z3Py5-HX7_unYvPy-Hx_tymsrOVU8Mo6oQCVFdaVwiplQVWlZWptVa2Za2pQjZbaKVBSQs2lW7eNrgQv2Zq18pxcHXs76M2Y5pPSwUTw5uluY5aMSS61rPSez-zPIzumuNw4mcFni30PAeMuG15qoXRdCzmjxRG18_dyQvfZzZlZBJlFkOHK_Bc085fv1btmwPaT_jAi_wGMBo4H</recordid><startdate>20150115</startdate><enddate>20150115</enddate><creator>Girard, Michaël J A</creator><creator>Tun, Tin A</creator><creator>Husain, Rahat</creator><creator>Acharyya, Sanchalika</creator><creator>Haaland, Benjamin A</creator><creator>Wei, Xin</creator><creator>Mari, Jean M</creator><creator>Perera, Shamira A</creator><creator>Baskaran, Mani</creator><creator>Aung, Tin</creator><creator>Strouthidis, Nicholas G</creator><general>Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1169-6547</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150115</creationdate><title>Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques</title><author>Girard, Michaël J A ; Tun, Tin A ; Husain, Rahat ; Acharyya, Sanchalika ; Haaland, Benjamin A ; Wei, Xin ; Mari, Jean M ; Perera, Shamira A ; Baskaran, Mani ; Aung, Tin ; Strouthidis, Nicholas G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-17cf24ae4c2cf62c44ca476c048c4950fb9a4b535f4a433a913f8db57216080d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Glaucoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Optic Disk - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Signal and Image Processing</topic><topic>Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Girard, Michaël J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tun, Tin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Husain, Rahat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acharyya, Sanchalika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haaland, Benjamin A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mari, Jean M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perera, Shamira A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskaran, Mani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aung, Tin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strouthidis, Nicholas G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Girard, Michaël J A</au><au>Tun, Tin A</au><au>Husain, Rahat</au><au>Acharyya, Sanchalika</au><au>Haaland, Benjamin A</au><au>Wei, Xin</au><au>Mari, Jean M</au><au>Perera, Shamira A</au><au>Baskaran, Mani</au><au>Aung, Tin</au><au>Strouthidis, Nicholas G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques</atitle><jtitle>Investigative ophthalmology &amp; visual science</jtitle><addtitle>Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci</addtitle><date>2015-01-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>865</spage><epage>874</epage><pages>865-874</pages><issn>0146-0404</issn><eissn>1552-5783</eissn><abstract>To compare the visibility of the lamina cribrosa (LC) in optic disc images acquired from 60 glaucoma and 60 control subjects using three optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices, with and without enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and adaptive compensation (AC). A horizontal B-scan was acquired through the center of the disc using two spectral-domain (Spectralis and Cirrus; with and without EDI) and a swept-source (DRI) OCT. Adaptive compensation was applied post acquisition to improve image quality. To assess LC visibility, four masked observers graded the 1200 images in a randomized sequence. The anterior LC was graded from 0 to 4, the LC insertions from 0 to 2, and the posterior LC either 0 or 1. The effect of EDI, AC, glaucoma severity, and other clinical/demographic factors on LC visibility was assessed using generalized estimating equations. The anterior LC was the most detectable feature, followed by the LC insertions. Adaptive compensation improved anterior LC visibility independent of EDI. Cirrus+EDI+AC generated the greatest anterior LC visibility grades (2.79/4). For LC insertions visibility, DRI+AC was the best method (1.10/2). Visibility of the posterior LC was consistently poor. Neither glaucoma severity nor clinical/demographic factors consistently affected LC visibility. Adaptive compensation is superior to EDI in improving LC visibility. Visibility of the posterior LC remains poor suggesting impracticality in using LC thickness as a glaucoma biomarker.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology</pub><pmid>25593025</pmid><doi>10.1167/iovs.14-14903</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1169-6547</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-0404
ispartof Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2015-01, Vol.56 (2), p.865-874
issn 0146-0404
1552-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03135375v1
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Computer Science
Cross-Sectional Studies
Equipment Design
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glaucoma - diagnosis
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - instrumentation
Male
Medical Imaging
Middle Aged
Optic Disk - pathology
Reproducibility of Results
Signal and Image Processing
Tomography, Optical Coherence - instrumentation
title Lamina cribrosa visibility using optical coherence tomography: comparison of devices and effects of image enhancement techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A00%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lamina%20cribrosa%20visibility%20using%20optical%20coherence%20tomography:%20comparison%20of%20devices%20and%20effects%20of%20image%20enhancement%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Investigative%20ophthalmology%20&%20visual%20science&rft.au=Girard,%20Micha%C3%ABl%20J%20A&rft.date=2015-01-15&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=865&rft.epage=874&rft.pages=865-874&rft.issn=0146-0404&rft.eissn=1552-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/iovs.14-14903&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E1652459923%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652459923&rft_id=info:pmid/25593025&rfr_iscdi=true